NVR Logo
Cyclists and motorists on collision course
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Save and Share Share
Dr. Christopher Thompson, a driver who abruptly stopped his car in front of two cyclists in Los Angeles last summer, was found guilty of six felonies and a misdemeanor last week.

The trial, which lasted three weeks and captivated the cycling community, revealed a particularly virulent form of road rage. Christian Stoehr suffered a separated shoulder and Ron Peterson shattered several teeth and broke and nearly severed his nose when the two hit the back of Thompson’s Infiniti sedan on Mandeville Canyon Road in the upscale Los Angeles suburb of Brentwood.
Thompson, a former emergency-room physician who lives along the winding five-mile road, claimed that he was merely trying to take a photograph of Stoehr and Peterson, evidence of the way cyclists flout the law in the canyon and flip off residents. A Los Angeles Police Department traffic investigator who arrived on the scene shortly after the incident testified that Thompson told him he “stopped in front to teach them a lesson.”

Suffice it to say that Thompson shouldn’t be driving a support vehicle in the Tour de France. Two other cyclists testified that in March 2008, a motorist they believed to be Thompson made a similar maneuver, speeding ahead, then slamming on his brakes. One of these cyclists told the court that the driver tried to hit them again and then sped off, noting that the car was an Infiniti sedan and the license plates — spelling out an abbreviated form of the medical software company Thompson owns — matched those of Thompson’s car.
Obscene gestures, vanity plates — it’s all part of the romance of Southern California driving.

But anyone who’s been paying attention to the road lately probably has noticed a marked, even dizzying, increase in the number of bikes on U.S. streets. Suddenly, they’re in bike lanes and traffic lanes, zipping through stoplights, careening around mountain passes and weaving along sidewalks. Census data show that between 2000 and 2008, the number of bicycle commuters increased by 43 percent. And membership in competitive cycling clubs is on the rise, with USA Cycling reporting the number of licensed U.S. racers up 48 percent since 2002.
Despite the community spirit this trend might evoke, the reality is more sobering. Cycling-related accident rates are decreasing, but cycling injuries are getting worse. That suggests that riders may be tangling with something more than a mere fall, like a car door or fender. Although most drivers, mercifully, don’t harbor as much animosity as Thompson, there may be more of him out there than we might like to think.

Why? For starters, many people don’t know what rights cyclists do and do not have, which pretty much makes them assume they have none. I was in this category myself until I consulted the bicycle laws in the California Vehicle Code and learned that a cyclist has “all the rights and is subject to all the provisions applicable to the driver of a vehicle.” In other words, you’re not supposed to dart through red lights on a bike (shame on you, 80 percent of Lycra wearers in my neighborhood).

But guess what: It’s perfectly legal to occupy the entire lane, not just hang on the side, if you’re going the same speed as traffic. The speed limit on Mandeville Canyon Road is 30 mph, which, according to the injured cyclists’ GPS data, was about the speed they were traveling when Thompson stopped in front of them. In other words, if you’re getting impatient with a “slow” cyclist in front of you, it’s probably because you’re speeding. (It hurts me to say this as much as it hurts you to read it.)

So, are you going to stop swearing at cyclists? My guess is no. Because there’s a larger bone of contention here, which is that cyclists make a lot of us feel like lazy slobs. While drivers sit in an air-conditioned bubble, expending only the energy required to press the gas pedal, tap the brake and change from a ’70s classic-rock radio station to an ’80s classic-rock station, cyclists are out in the actual elements doing actual exercise. While drivers are consuming calories by eating an entire bucket of KFC over 10 blocks, cyclists are burning calories and consuming nothing but seaweed at home.

Of course, moral superiority is insufferable, but you still shouldn’t try to run it off the road or teach it a lesson with your luxury car. You might win on the street, but in court, it’s a different story.

(Daum is an essayist and novelist in Los Angeles. This essay first appeared in the Los Angeles Times.)
13 comment(s)

Sandra wrote on Nov 11, 2009 7:54 AM:

" I am not making an excuse for road rage and the intentional harming of anyone, but the writer is correct, that bicycles have to adhere to the same rules as any vehicle on the road. I have always been told that rear ending any vehicle is the fault of the person who hit the stopped vehicle, as they did not maintain a safe distance to stop. Granted the circumstances here were probably diferent...maybe the car passed and then slammed on the brakes in front of the bikes, causing the accident.
But contrary to what the writer states, most bicycles hogging the middle of the lane do so because it is not safe to hug the side. AND most of them are not going anything near the speed limit. I think they should pull off and let vehicles going the speed limit pass. "

Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote on Nov 11, 2009 8:44 AM:

" There are plenty of people like Thompson here in Napa. If you read the NVR website you know what I am talking about. "

Enlightened Coelacanth wrote on Nov 11, 2009 9:37 AM:

" Only the supposed virtues that bicycle riders assign themselves make it possible for adult aged children to hold major cities hostage with Critical Mass events and assault auto owners with impunity. They've given themselves permission to do as they please because they're "better".
I have been personally victimized by bike riders touring down Hagen Road or Spring Mountain road riding three or four abreast giving the finger and blocking anyone trying to get them to ride so others have the use of the road too. The cry for civility here is somewhat selective. "

amazed wrote on Nov 11, 2009 10:36 AM:

" I have no "rage" against cyclists until they put me at risk. By that, I mean the cyclists who ride in the traffic lane because there is no shoulder (Hagen Road is my favorite example). In my vehicle, traveling within the speed limit, I come around a corner and happen upon a cyclist who is not traveling anywhere near the speed limit. My choices are (1) slam on the brakes and pray I don't hit the cyclist; or (2) slam on the brakes, swerve into the oncoming lane, and pray I don't take out another vehicle. Neither are very appealing.

If you can cycle at or near the speed limit, you can safely share the road (i.e., the traffic lanes). If not, the cyclist belongs on a road with bike lanes. "

JustMyyOpinion wrote on Nov 11, 2009 11:23 AM:

" As I was driving on Dry Creek Road last week I noticed two cyclists riding side by side quite a distance ahead of me. I honked my horn twice to let them know I was approaching and to indicate to the one that was riding in the traffic lane to fall in to single file, as is the law. I got no reaction, so I gently honked again. Still the cyclist in my lane continued on her merry way directly beside her riding companion.

It's actions such as this, that when given plenty of notice that an automobile is approaching and they should move over, but they don't that gives cyclists as a whole a bad name. Would it have been so hard for her to move out of my way rather than forcing me into oncoming traffic?

If we all would follow the laws as they apply to us given our chosen means of transportation, things would be a whole lot better for everyone. "

lberryessa wrote on Nov 11, 2009 12:11 PM:

" I was just wondering why bicycle riders aren't required to carry insurance? What happens if one of them runs a stop sign and hits my car? Seems like a double standard....share the road but not required to carry insurance! "

antipc wrote on Nov 11, 2009 12:42 PM:

" Cyclists that show respect will be treated respectfully, and those that don't, well..................... "

Tim wrote on Nov 11, 2009 2:15 PM:

" Now they have taken to spraying their graffiti all over the mountain roads...go over Mt. Veeder, Dry Creek, Redwood Rd. they spray paint whatever they want on the road : " "ALMOST THERE" "...SLOW CURVES AHEAD" "WICKED HILL AHEAD" and much much more...I have seen the road dept. blacking this out. "

pharper wrote on Nov 11, 2009 2:22 PM:

" Chico is a "bike-friendly" city, but from what I see, all that means is that cyclists will ride the way they want to, and cars be damned. Driving anywhere within a 5-mile radius of the school takes twice as long as it should because bikers ride in the middle of the rode and drivers have no choice but to drive slowly behind them until the lightbulb goes on and they get out of the way, or they turn and get in someone else's way.

I think biking is great; it's a healthy, environmentally-friendly choice, but driving around here is TERRIFYING because at any given time there are 5 or 6 cyclists around me with no regard for the rules or their own personal safety - I like to think I'm a pretty good driver, but there are times when I slam on my brakes and come close to having a heart attack because some biker has swerved in my path and I've nearly hit them. "

bike to work wrote on Nov 11, 2009 2:31 PM:

" I ride to work most days of the week and visit the backroads as much as I am able. In the past few years I have seen a decline in car driver hostility. People really do drive cautiously on the back roads. Is it becasue so many drivers are also cyclists?
Cyclists do need to obey the laws, ride in the lane as far to the right as practible (not on the shoulder) and stop at all stop signs. If not they can die. Many of those that do not are young, many usually drive autos and think that when they on a bike they have immunity, and some are drunk or stoned just like people in cars. Be careful on the roads. "

hawkeye wrote on Nov 11, 2009 3:52 PM:

" It cuts both ways really. Cyclists and drivers must follow the laws alike. That said, there are rude cyclists and rude drivers alike. There are also considerate cyclists and considerate drivers too. I am a cyclist myself, but drive more than I bike. I too get annoyed at cyclists that ride 2,3 or 4 abreast when I'm trying to get by. The law is for slower traffic to get over to the right as far as possible, whether it's cyclists or motorists. Both modes often fail to follow that law. Even being a cyclist myself, I question why anybody would want to ride on curvy roads with no bike lane and no shoulder. Especially in today's traffic. I refuse to ride on those types. Not only is it dangerous to me, but to other motorized traffic and an inconvenience to other motorists. Bottom line is, we all need to be considerate, law abiding and using common sense whether we're biking or driving. If everyone was, bikes and cars could co-exist perfectly and this letter to the editor would never need to have been written. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Nov 11, 2009 11:52 PM:

" I had to deal with two side by side bicyclists who took up the entire lane of a road for a mile and a half. They wouldn't budge after I lightly tapped the horn. I took a deep breath and let them control the situation, which was really what they were after. And then, Once I began driving on Deer Park Road, which is more heavily traveled, I came across more bicyclists. One woman would not pull over, I was not able to pass her safely without risking both of our lives and I ended out with five vehicles coming up behind me, wondering what was going on.

It was clearly a case of "in your face" disrespect. When it gets to this point, it becomes a case of control freaks exerting their love for power and control. When they're not on bicycles, they're probably fairly self righteous. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Nov 14, 2009 12:21 AM:

" Btw, I really meant to say that the types of bicyclists who take up two lanes or create a situation where vehicles cannot pass are self righteous either on or off of their bicycles.

But I also want to point out a very small majority of bicyclists are inconsiderate. Most of the time, it's the driver of a vehicle who rudely passes a bicyclist without slowing down or being conscientious about the risks of colliding with them. From my observation, most bicyclists are very considerate. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy