NVR Logo
Cash-strapped Napa schools OK tax survey
Poll will test voters' outlook on parcel levy
Sunday, November 08, 2009
Save and Share Share
Napa Valley Unified School District is going ahead with a poll to find out how amenable district residents would be to a new school parcel tax.

Unlike most school bond measures, in which the amount of a tax is dependent on the value of the home, a parcel tax is a flat fee.
Implementing the tax requires approval from two-thirds of voters in the district, which includes Yountville, Napa and American Canyon.

The telephone poll comes with a $16,250 price tag for the school district. The contract with Goodwin Simon Strategic Research — which has offices on the east coast, in the Bay Area and in Southern California — includes an option to do an American Canyon survey for an additional $1,500.
The district received seven contract proposals, according to Superintendent John Glaser.

Pollsters will make between 1,000 and 2,000 calls, coming up with complete data from 400 Napa registered voters planning on voting in the June election.
Forty additional qualified responses from American Canyon could be added to the poll sample.

The 15-minute survey calls will go out before Dec. 21, the beginning of the school district’s winter break.

School officials have not detailed what programs would receive parcel tax funds, should such a tax go to a ballot and be approved by voters.

Nearby school districts have successfully passed parcel taxes of about $150 per property in recent elections, district board Vice President Robb Felder said at a school board meeting Thursday. Parcel taxes tailored to districts’ needs are generally “more palatable” to voters, he said.

Poll results will determine whether the district goes ahead with putting a parcel tax on the ballot. The poll will also yield information about how much voters might be willing to tax themselves and for how long.

The district must decide by January or February whether to go ahead with a parcel tax if it is going to be placed on the June ballot, he said.

Trustee Jackie Dickson said that while the district doesn’t have an exact dollar figure in mind, it should analyze the poll results carefully to gain a “set expectation” from the public regarding the minimum amount they might be willing to tax themselves.

The district also needs to gain a sense of what dollar figure it needs for the tax effort to be worthwhile, as well as what figure is most likely to gain the two-thirds approval necessary.

The district has plans to use school board and public input to generate about 30 percent of the polling questions, while leaving the rest to the polling company, Glaser said.
13 comment(s)

Steelhead wrote on Nov 8, 2009 7:01 AM:

" one word. No! "

4real wrote on Nov 8, 2009 9:49 AM:

" I am all for it. "

John Richards wrote on Nov 8, 2009 10:11 AM:

" A waste of time and taxpayer money. "

Rocketman wrote on Nov 8, 2009 11:06 AM:

" So let me get this straight.....the California politicians overspend and can't balance the budget. Schools take a huge hit and then "we" are supposed to make up for the politicians ineptness?? Anyone see a problem here?? "

larrysbird wrote on Nov 8, 2009 11:18 AM:

" If they are so strapped for cash why are they paying for this expensive survey. There isnt any other way to get the answers needed? Why doesnt each district have a conference with the parents and have them mark a scantron or something of that nature? Why cant we use voluteers for this? I am sure a lot of parents would rather help make this happen than hear about the big bucks being shelled out for a survey. They can keep talking about closing schools like Mt. George, but the argument becomes pretty redundant when you look at the monetary implications of doing a survey like this one. "

suma1971 wrote on Nov 8, 2009 12:01 PM:

" Tell the District to save their money - set up a web site or just have people write or call in with their opinions! The Register is already taking a poll - use that! My answer is a big fat NO. No more taxes!! The money the school district already gets seems to be mismanaged and ill spent. "

Cadence wrote on Nov 8, 2009 12:41 PM:

" The district must be heartened by other districts' successes in this past Tuesday's election.
I will vote no. "

fourmaplesoutback wrote on Nov 8, 2009 1:59 PM:

" I've had it with more taxes. "

greenridgedoug wrote on Nov 8, 2009 4:57 PM:

" 4REAL
you must rent "

4real wrote on Nov 8, 2009 6:40 PM:

" Greenridgedoug, no, I don't rent. I have owned a house in Napa for more than 2 decades.

I just like Napa's children to be well educated. "

gicastanon wrote on Nov 8, 2009 7:26 PM:

" I would support the tax. We're always talking about how important education is for the future of our country yet so many are unwilling to pay the price. And yes, I am a homeowner. "

John Richards wrote on Nov 8, 2009 8:13 PM:

" The fact is that there is no correlation between the amount of money spent per pupil and academic achievement level.
Private elementary schools spend less per pupil, yet achieve higher academic scores than equivalent public schools. "

zamersmith wrote on Nov 9, 2009 2:11 PM:

" You have to be kidding me. $16,250 to fund a poll for only 400 Napa residents. What a waste of time and money. The Napa Register already has over 500 people responding to the same questions with 73% as of 1:30 pmon 11/9/09 voting no and can vote on the matter.

This School Board is inept and wasteful at best, and is dancing closely with out right fraudulent behavior.

This is just another example of the current School Board lacking initative and foresight. It truly is a pity our school age children have to suffer at the hands of these people.

Napa residents it is seriously time to start thinking about the replacement of all member on the School Board, including Superintendant John Glaser. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy