Cash-strapped Napa schools OK tax survey
Poll will test voters' outlook on parcel levy
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
November 20th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
November 9th, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 26th, 2009
November 25th, 2009
November 24th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
Napa Valley Unified School District is going ahead with a poll to find out how amenable district residents would be to a new school parcel tax.
Unlike most school bond measures, in which the amount of a tax is dependent on the value of the home, a parcel tax is a flat fee.
Implementing the tax requires approval from two-thirds of voters in the district, which includes Yountville, Napa and American Canyon.
The telephone poll comes with a $16,250 price tag for the school district. The contract with Goodwin Simon Strategic Research — which has offices on the east coast, in the Bay Area and in Southern California — includes an option to do an American Canyon survey for an additional $1,500.
The district received seven contract proposals, according to Superintendent John Glaser.
Pollsters will make between 1,000 and 2,000 calls, coming up with complete data from 400 Napa registered voters planning on voting in the June election.
Forty additional qualified responses from American Canyon could be added to the poll sample.
The 15-minute survey calls will go out before Dec. 21, the beginning of the school district’s winter break.
School officials have not detailed what programs would receive parcel tax funds, should such a tax go to a ballot and be approved by voters.
Nearby school districts have successfully passed parcel taxes of about $150 per property in recent elections, district board Vice President Robb Felder said at a school board meeting Thursday. Parcel taxes tailored to districts’ needs are generally “more palatable” to voters, he said.
Poll results will determine whether the district goes ahead with putting a parcel tax on the ballot. The poll will also yield information about how much voters might be willing to tax themselves and for how long.
The district must decide by January or February whether to go ahead with a parcel tax if it is going to be placed on the June ballot, he said.
Trustee Jackie Dickson said that while the district doesn’t have an exact dollar figure in mind, it should analyze the poll results carefully to gain a “set expectation” from the public regarding the minimum amount they might be willing to tax themselves.
The district also needs to gain a sense of what dollar figure it needs for the tax effort to be worthwhile, as well as what figure is most likely to gain the two-thirds approval necessary.
The district has plans to use school board and public input to generate about 30 percent of the polling questions, while leaving the rest to the polling company, Glaser said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Steelhead wrote on Nov 8, 2009 7:01 AM:
4real wrote on Nov 8, 2009 9:49 AM:
John Richards wrote on Nov 8, 2009 10:11 AM:
Rocketman wrote on Nov 8, 2009 11:06 AM:
larrysbird wrote on Nov 8, 2009 11:18 AM:
suma1971 wrote on Nov 8, 2009 12:01 PM:
Cadence wrote on Nov 8, 2009 12:41 PM:
I will vote no. "
fourmaplesoutback wrote on Nov 8, 2009 1:59 PM:
greenridgedoug wrote on Nov 8, 2009 4:57 PM:
you must rent "
4real wrote on Nov 8, 2009 6:40 PM:
I just like Napa's children to be well educated. "
gicastanon wrote on Nov 8, 2009 7:26 PM:
John Richards wrote on Nov 8, 2009 8:13 PM:
Private elementary schools spend less per pupil, yet achieve higher academic scores than equivalent public schools. "
zamersmith wrote on Nov 9, 2009 2:11 PM:
This School Board is inept and wasteful at best, and is dancing closely with out right fraudulent behavior.
This is just another example of the current School Board lacking initative and foresight. It truly is a pity our school age children have to suffer at the hands of these people.
Napa residents it is seriously time to start thinking about the replacement of all member on the School Board, including Superintendant John Glaser. "