Carneros closure tops list of concerns at school meeting
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
November 20th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
November 9th, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 11th, 2009
November 9th, 2009
Don’t close Carneros Elementary School. That was the message from many of the 100 or so residents who came out to a special Napa Valley Unified School District meeting Wednesday night at Harvest Middle School.
School officials called the meeting to draw public input about the district’s Program and Facilities Master Plan. If the plan is approved by the school board, the district could close and consolidate schools and make changes in elementary school attendance boundaries. It could also convert a handful of the district’s existing campuses to magnet schools, which are known for attracting students with specialized courses or curriculum.
The long-term plan would unfold in phases, between 2010 and 2020.
Meanwhile, the district is considering adding campuses in areas expected to grow, including southeast and northeast Napa.
Superintendent John Glaser told the audience that in light of ongoing cuts to public education, there is a “huge financial interest driving (the) master plan.”
Breaking into five discussion groups Wednesday, parents voiced concerns and questions about the master plan. English- and Spanish-speakers asked how students will be bussed to another school if their campus closes, what would happen to any closed school buildings and whether the district can close Carneros, given that Measure M dollars paid for its construction.
Parents also asked why the school district did not consider making Carneros Elementary School a magnet campus, instead putting the school on the list of possible campus closures. Although the school board has not finalized any decision, Capell Valley, Carneros and Wooden Valley elementary schools may be shuttered at the end of this academic year.
Rigo Ortega said his daughter thrives at Carneros and that the campus is “like a private school without the cost.” Ortega said Carneros “builds a good foundation for the kids.”
Glaser said many factors go into deciding which campuses will make the best magnet schools, including school location, where students live, how they will get to school and other components.
Sally Jensen Dutcher, the school district’s attorney, said the district considered all elementary schools with fewer than 350 students for closure. In addition to Carneros, she said, the district is also looking at closing Yountville and Mt. George elementary schools over time.
Carneros was not a magnet school candidate because of its remote location and because very few students attending the school live near the campus, she added.
Conversely, some parents argued that Carneros is a good candidate for a magnet school because many of its students come from elsewhere. “There are a lot of us — both Anglos and Hispanics — who are out of Carneros’ district” but prefer the campus, one woman said.
“The idea that people wouldn’t make the drive out there is ludicrous,” said Curtis Smith, a Napa man with three grandchildren attending Carneros. Smith said Carneros’ staff has a history of working on a technology magnet plan, but has been “ignored” by the district.
Ernesto Castillo said he has three children attending Carneros and understands the district’s fiscal limitations in light of budget cuts. But he disagrees with the idea of closing Carneros. He said because the school’s teachers work together so effectively, they should be transferred collectively to another campus if Carneros closes.
Pending necessary funding, the district will likely make Bel Aire Elementary and Alternative School, Pueblo Vista Elementary and Alternative School and McPherson and Salvador elementary schools pilot magnet campuses.
Overall, parent groups requested more fiscal details from the district about how the master plan’s various scenarios would save money. One group requested that the district send master plan update information to Spanish-speaking households by U.S. mail. Many asked how school closures — and resulting changes in student transportation — might influence traffic.
Glaser and Dutcher said they would post answers to the questions raised at the meeting on the school district’s Web site.
District officials will hold another master plan meeting on Nov. 18 at 6:30 p.m. at Redwood Middle School, and will also discuss the plan at the regularly scheduled Dec. 10 board meeting.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
noblindershere wrote on Nov 6, 2009 7:22 AM:
Cadence wrote on Nov 6, 2009 8:43 AM:
There certainly is a cost.
Btw, there are private schools available for those who want them. "
pharper wrote on Nov 6, 2009 10:10 AM:
Carneros is AMAZING because its teachers know each other so well - have known each other since I went to school there a long time ago. The campus itself is beautiful and beautifully maintained and the kids are happy there. They learn more since they are a smaller community and the teachers have time for real one-on-one help. The playground is new and gorgeous (my parents helped build it when I was in fifth or sixth grade) and the brand-new cafeteria/auditorium has been a huge asset.
Don't close Carneros! "
Cadence wrote on Nov 6, 2009 10:48 AM:
The beauty of equal protection is that we are all supposed to be treated equally. "
NapaMom wrote on Nov 6, 2009 12:37 PM:
The parent would need to transport their student I would guess. The district took the Carneros bus route away from the Carneros area students for all grade levels. The district still continues to run a bus from NVLA to Carneros and that is not even the local school area for Carneros elementary. "
enufisenuf wrote on Nov 6, 2009 12:40 PM:
noblindershere wrote on Nov 6, 2009 1:26 PM:
What about the students that already attend other NVUSD through Open Enrollment that come from Cappell and Wooden...hopefully they will be able to stay in the NVUSD with an interdistrict agreement.
The closures have a great number of complex situations. "
montana wrote on Nov 6, 2009 1:35 PM:
Let’s clarify a couple of things. The district installed a new restroom because the existing one was determined to be unfit for use. Would you rather have had the kids not have this? Oh, and it is portable. And your comment “now they want to close us” is not true. They have wanted to close you for a long time. The district gave you all a year to figure out another option to keep it open that did not involve them loosing money year after year. It was the district that came up with the idea of going to Pope Valley, and has facilitated the discussions around it, so yes, they will GLADLY let it happen. "
pharper wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:03 PM:
And what about bussing? The demographics at Carneros show that most parents are working parents who do not have time or means to take their kids to and from school every day, aprticularly outside of their area.
Cadence, I don't think the intention of the man's statement was to say that people who can't afford it should have private education funded by the public His point was that at Carneros, students are getting education that is the quality of a private education at a private school. That's a GOOD thing. That means Carneros is doing its job and MORE. "
montana wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:28 PM:
Why do you think the kids bussed into Carneros each day deserve that campus more than a charter school? Last I checked, charter school partents pay the same Measure M taxes as everyone else. "
enufisenuf wrote on Nov 6, 2009 2:39 PM:
pharper wrote on Nov 6, 2009 3:01 PM:
And consider this: if it were to become a charter school, it would not have bus service. This means that 200-300 kids would be driven by their parents 2 times a day (there and back in the morning, there and back at the end of the day). Think how much traffic that puts on our quiet, already damaged country roads.Think how many more people that is driving every single day out in a part of Napa that is known for being quiet and beautiful and traffic-free.
And what about the relationship with the community there? At the Family Fun Day this past year, we had people showing off dancing horses, homemade food, jumpy houses donated by parents, teacher- and parent-run booths, and lots more. It is a COMMUNITY, and its location makes it even more of one.
I have every confidence that the district can find another way to save money WITHOUT closing the elementary school I went to. "
srsly wrote on Nov 6, 2009 3:44 PM:
If the District needs to close schools to save money, then close the darn school. Of course, this was the recommendation years ago from a Task Force that the Board ignored. Maybe the District wouldn't be in this predicament if they had listened. "
alucawanza wrote on Nov 6, 2009 4:52 PM:
350 school population is probably an ideal number for an elementary school.
That's two classes of each grade and possibly a small special ed. class. No one is lost in, as someone else said, a warehoused learning environment.
Portable classrooms are awful. They smell, the carpets get nasty, and they feel like you're in a cave all day.
Neighborhood schools are ideal. Too bad that's gone. "
noblindershere wrote on Nov 6, 2009 6:53 PM:
Napagrrl wrote on Nov 6, 2009 11:27 PM:
pharper wrote on Nov 7, 2009 1:49 AM:
Napagrrl is right. For a lot of kids, Carneros is the only family they have - there are a lot of kids there from broken homes, a few from abusive families or families where there are so many children that they just don't get the attention from their parents that children deserve (and in that case, I'm talking about WHITE kids). Carneros is small enough that every kid can feel special and necessary, and know that their teachers understand their situation and want to help. "
Cadence wrote on Nov 7, 2009 7:32 AM:
I think it's called putting your money where your mouth is. If you won't pay the tax, then it's putting someone else's money where your mouth is... "
pharper wrote on Nov 7, 2009 7:18 PM:
Carneros ISN'T inefficient. Kids start that school speaking little to no English. By third trimester of kindergarten, they speak it fluently - without ESL programs. If that's not success, I don't know what is. It may not show on the test scores but those who work there see it happening every single day. "