NVR Logo
Big choices for Napa schools
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Save and Share Share
Significant changes are coming to Napa schools, and tonight marks the first of two public meetings on topics important to parents, students and future generations of Napans.

The Napa Valley Unified School District board will take up potential school closures driven by statewide budget cuts, as well as a move toward magnet schools — programs that encourage campuses to highlight specific areas of learning, such as technology, math or the arts.
Last week, the Register editorial board met with school Superintendent John Glaser and General Counsel Sally Jensen Dutcher. Most of the conversation focused on magnet schools, though the subject of school closures came up.

The potential closures are foremost on many minds because families and teachers are loyal to the vulnerable elementary campuses — Carneros, Capell Valley, Wooden Valley, Mount George — and do not want to see them close. Glaser was careful to say that the board has not yet decided how to handle closures and he does not speak for the board.
Yet he and Dutcher acknowledged that the statewide cuts to schools are forcing hard choices, and that the budget outlook for the next few years is sufficiently grim that it would be hard to stave off closures.

However, some creative solutions could help the schools. For example, Glaser said rural Capell Valley and Wooden Valley schools could be placed in the Pope Valley Unified School District or could create a tiny district of their own.
Magnet schools, Dutcher explained, were created in the 1970s to combat segregation in urban school districts.

In Napa, the district allows parents to send children to schools outside their neighborhoods if they choose. This program has opened up existing magnet schools — such as New Tech High School and Napa Valley Language Academy — to students from around the district. At the same time, Glaser acknowledged, parent choice has led to “unintended consequences” regarding the ethnic makeup at some elementary schools.

Glaser emphasized that creating magnet schools at existing campuses will serve several purposes. Parents will have curriculum-based reasons — in addition to family convenience or where the highest test scores are — to choose one school over another.

Glaser said “one of the reasons we are ready” to move toward magnets is the general academic improvement on Napa campuses, including some that were underperforming previously. “We have viable programs everywhere now,” he said.

So what will it take to bring more magnets here? The district is vying for a key federal magnet-school grant. It should know by the end of the year or early next whether it won.

If not, implementing the programs — including training faculty and obtaining specific equipment — will be a tall order in these austere times. But the district is still planning for the day it can go forward with magnet schools.

“If we do it right at the elementary level, it will lead to big ripples in middle and high school,” Glaser said. “Research tells us that powerful teaching and learning is served by a good, diverse student body at every school.”

Tonight’s meeting takes place at Harvest Middle School at

7 p.m. A second meeting will be at Redwood Middle School on Nov. 18 at 6:30 p.m. At these meetings, the public can help shape the future of public education in Napa.
9 comment(s)

noblindershere wrote on Nov 4, 2009 7:56 AM:

" once again, a lot of weight being put on the Magnet option. I would like the NVR to do some real journalism and see how many other schools are applying and how many grants were awarded to schools that are not in a truly "urban" setting three years ago. We already have "magnet" schools, but they are not diverse like a true magnet would require. "

alucawanza wrote on Nov 4, 2009 2:14 PM:

" "unintended consequences?" no they weren't... Now they must be dealt with because what used to be an unspoken agenda is now the elephant in the room that is being noticed and pointed out. "

BrownsValley wrote on Nov 4, 2009 3:56 PM:

" If you did not allow open enrollment and elementary school students could only enroll in their local school which of the campuses would be closed.? On the face of it there are elementary schools that are in essence "private schools" using public resources to segregate their students from ethnic minorities. I didn't know that was still legal. What happened to Brown V Board and "All deliberate Speed"? What's appears deliberate is likely to result in legal action. The facilities solution needs to understand the risks of favoring one ethnic group or income level over another. They are "public schools". "

noblindershere wrote on Nov 4, 2009 5:21 PM:

" Brownsvalley- I have said this all along, MT George is a publically subsidized private school. Who is paying for their IB program that cost more, I would hope parents, but ofcourse they can afford it becaue they are not paying private school dues. Close Mt. George first it is a perfect example of separate and unequal "

steph wrote on Nov 4, 2009 6:49 PM:

" BrownsValley and noblinders, you are wrong.
The public schools you allude to are educating children who have a right to be there and have a right to a free public education. Enrollment is open to children from any race, social background, parental education level, and physical/intellectual ability. The same is not true of private schools.

Do you have some evidence that children of certain backgrounds are willfullly being kept out of certain schools? Or, is it possible that ethnic "minorities" are not clamoring to go to Mt. George?

Work to improve education for all children where they or their parents choose to send them. "

winemd wrote on Nov 4, 2009 7:54 PM:

" OK, I am confused. NVLA is a charter school. It certainly offers a specialized curriculum. But is it officially a magnet school? Is it both a charter AND a magnet school? And it is more diverse than many other schools. Can somebody please explain the difference? "

BrownsValley wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:01 PM:

" If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, I suspect it's a duck. It is most commonly referred to as defacto segregation. If you are asking for someone to prove it, then that would of course require a legal action entailing discovery, depositions, and millions of dollars in legal fees, which is what I would hope the district will avoid. NVUSD is a remarkably segregated district, and the segregation has been aided and abetted (most likely un intentional) by district policy which is of course now a big problem. Obama in his speech today addressed the problem of the highest paid most experienced teachers going to the wealthier schools within districts away from those schools most in need of their experience, causing more money to be spent educating the easiest to educate. The West ed study indicates this is the case with NVUSD. This doesn't include the money parents of means spend on after school fee for service programs which increase the API of the schools full of mostly Anglo wealthy students. This situation requires leadership to solve and I hope we have it now otherwise the courts will be forced to act. "

alucawanza wrote on Nov 5, 2009 2:07 PM:

" Steph
I have the evidence. I llived it in the schools in which I taught. Just look at test scores and come to your conclusions.
It is de facto segregation.
If the alternative class had an opening and the regular class was overloaded..which child was picked to go to the alternative class?That's just one example.
Do you want more? "

noblindershere wrote on Nov 5, 2009 2:10 PM:

" brownsvalley- key phrase, "this situation requires leadership to solve" that would be what the problem is in the district. OUr leadership wants to plug along addressing the needs of the 21st Century when we still have a problem dealing with issues that were suppose to be dealt with in the 20th Century, segregation. However, this is Napa and I'm sure we think that "parent choice" is what is most important. Well, "steph" when you have secretaries at schools that don't raise their heads to Spanish speakers because this is not a population they regularly serve, then ofcourse they are not going to feel welcome enough to apply for open enrollment into that community. I have seen it happen and was stopped in my tracks and followed the parent out to her car to try to help address her concerns, I was so embarrassed for the school, but not surprised. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy