NVR Logo
St. Helena tasting rooms for Napa Valley wines only
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Save and Share Share
The St. Helena City Council endorsed new regulations late last month defining wine shops and tasting rooms in town —and requiring them to pour only Napa Valley wines.

The new zoning ordinance language, crafted by the planning commission, prohibits tasting rooms from pouring or selling wines that are not made from at least 75 percent Napa Valley grapes.
Wines poured must be labeled Napa Valley or a sub-appellation of the Napa Valley.

St. helena Planning Director Carol Poole said the planning commission put together the regulations because several recent applications made it clear that the existing zoning ordinance “doesn’t really have uses and definitions that reflect how people currently view tasting rooms and wine shops.”
Under the new rules, tasting rooms are defined as “establishments that sell wines on behalf of one or more wineries and enable consumers to taste wine (with and without charge) as a regular part of the sales process.”

The ordinance defines “wine shops” as non-winery-owned establishments “that purchase and sell wines from multiple wineries and distributors.” Incidental wine tastings are allowed.
Wine shops and winery tasting rooms will be a conditional use (requiring a use permit) in the Central Business and Service Commercial districts.

Currently, the city has approved five tasting rooms within the city limits, but they have not opened.

Clarification: The original article failed to clarify some details about proposed tasting room regulations. The ordinance pertains to tasting rooms that are owned by wineries and located in the city’s Central Business and Service Commercial districts. It does not pertain to the tasting rooms at wineries. Within St. Helena’s downtown commercial district, wineries may have off-premises tasting rooms (meaning tasting rooms that are not at the winery), but may only pour wines made from 75-percent Napa Valley grapes. Wineries (facilities where the wine is made) are allowed in the city’s agricultural districts and the definition of tasting room (as an accessory use to the winery facility) has not changed there.
13 comment(s)

arttow wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:12 AM:

" Enough of the regulation. Where does Carol Poole get off dictating which wines people can pour? "

KAS wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:52 AM:

" This is a ridiculous ordinance. Amazing Napa Valley grown wines are made, sold and tasted in Sonoma and they aren't limiting their marketing and available. Why should we limit what wines can be promoted as long as it's supporting a local business? "

Grommitt wrote on Nov 4, 2009 10:36 AM:

" arttow: Poole didn't dictate anything. The planning commission did. READ what's written! "

notanapanative wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:12 AM:

" I agree that this ordinance is a waste of time!

Either the wines measure up on their own or they don't.

I must say from a business perspective I would think that selling/tasting non Napa/Sonoma wines would be at best a secondary interest in a tasting room in Napa.

However I oppose government trying to micromanage any business.

All this may do is reduce the revenue possibilities for the tasting rooms and make them less viable, maybe that was the point.

Napa is saying it owns the sandbox and these are the rules.

Unfortunately it may drive out otherwise tax paying, employee hiring businesses.

A bad idea to let government dictate business policy. "

fedupinnapa wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:55 AM:

" Can someone explain how this regulation would in any way benefit the community? I doubt wines from Spain is going to take over the valley anytime soon with the greatly popular tasting room they open. "

Malo wrote on Nov 4, 2009 1:20 PM:

" Tasting Rooms and Wine Shops only? Does this mean if I open a "Wine Bar" I can pour whatever I want? ...or maybe they'll have an addendum later for this!

Wine Bar = only drink wine, no tastings, no to go bags just a straight up bar for drinking wine. Much like a beer pub or whiskey bar. Would this fall under this category or?

Toooooo much politics, leave it alone people. Please get a real job and stop making up sooooo much nonsense! "

reason-ator wrote on Nov 4, 2009 2:01 PM:

" I would have hoped that Napa Valley wines are good enough that they can stand up to comparison with wines from elsewhere.

But it seems like St. Helena isn't so sure. If I was a Sonoma, Livermore, Temecula, or Anywhere-ville winery, I would be pleased to point that out in their tasting rooms. It wouldn't be hard to make the Napa Valley wines taste not-so-good in another region. "

bdnf wrote on Nov 4, 2009 2:51 PM:

" Terroir is power. Protect the Napa Valley hegemony. Look at France. I like it, St. Helena! "

shadowynewcomer wrote on Nov 4, 2009 2:54 PM:

" Are we so insecure about how our wines compare to others that we have to have this codified? "

napawiner wrote on Nov 4, 2009 3:41 PM:

" Isn't this ordinance a Commerce Clause violation? How can you exclude the sale/tasting of wines from outside Napa, while protecting wines in Napa. Isn't this economic protectionism? "

cheezcakemaker wrote on Nov 4, 2009 4:44 PM:

" Kinda like not letting the Wine Train stop in town for 15 years. Not so smart. "

napahystorian wrote on Nov 4, 2009 5:03 PM:

" I am surprised they did limit the wines to the St. Helena appellation. Wine snobbery to this extent is bad for business. "

sharonden wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:26 PM:

" Simply ridiculous. As well as being another infringement on the free enterprise system, which is supposed to be the backbone of America. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy