Grant boosts chances for water in Coombsville
By KERANA TODOROV
Register Staff Writer
November 19th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
A proposed recycled water system for the North Bay got a $200,000 boost this week. The federal grant money is a step towards solving groundwater problems in places like Coombsville, where wells have been running dry.
The $200,000 for the North Bay Water Reuse Authority will allow the agency to apply up to $25 million in federal funds toward the construction of recycled water projects in Marin, Sonoma and Napa counties. The Napa Sanitation District is one member of the authority and is working to bring recycled water to the Milliken-Sarco-Tulocay watershed in thirsty Coombsville.
“This little bit of funding is what starts the process,” explained Ginger Bryant, a consultant with Bryant and Associates of Sacramento, a lobbyist for the authority. “Without that, we couldn’t get the (larger sum of) money.”
“I think it shows their commitment to the project,” said Napa County Supervisor Keith Caldwell, referring to federal officials. Caldwell’s district includes Coombsville, which has a groundwater problem forcing some residents to dig deeper wells and others to buy potable water and have it trucked to their homes.
The authority is also seeking state and local funding.
Napa County first proposed a reclaimed water pipeline through Coombsville, to be paid for by property owners. But opposition from residents, including many long-time owners and retirees on limited incomes, prompted the county and Napa Sanitation District to consider a scaled-down project.
The $13 million project being studied now would create about 5.5 miles of recycled water pipes, running from the Napa Sanitation District plant near Napa Valley College to the Napa Valley Country Club on Hagen Road. The 8-to-24 inch pipe would also carry recycled water to a yet-to-be determined number of major water users, including vineyard properties along the way.
Scott Zion, president of the Napa Valley Country Club, said the club wants a more reliable source of water. The club relies on one well to irrigate its older, original front nine holes, and on rainfall stored in ponds to water the newest nine holes.
“We have always said that we would be willing to pay” a fair share for the pipeline, Zion said. “The country club wouldn’t be viable without the golf course.”
Suzanne von Rosenberg, acting president of Groundwater Under Local Protection, or GULP, a group of residents in Coombsville, said Coombsville cannot solve its water shortage problem — which includes availability of potable water — without recycled water for irrigation and landscaping, she said. “Recycled water is an absolute must,” she said.
The authority’s members — the Napa Sanitation District, the Sonoma County Water Agency, Las Gallinas Valley Sanitary District, Novato Sanitary District, and the Sonoma Valley County Sanitation District — are considering a second series of projects which would cost as much as $200 million. One such project includes installing pipes in Carneros, which also has groundwater supply problems.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
whyn? wrote on Nov 4, 2009 9:39 AM:
korikill wrote on Nov 4, 2009 11:20 AM:
When will they understand that?
And their 'willingness to pay their fair share'? HA!
Is that like the plan last year where they wanted each 'acre' owned to get a vote, but each 'parcel' would split the cost equally?
That would mean NVCC gets 50 votes, yet only pays 1 share. As for me and my one acre, I would pay the EXACT SAME AMOUNT as NVCC, yet only get one vote???
And what about the fact that my well is filled with ammonia and other chemicals that come from massive amounts of fertilizer from NVCC, which just happens to be on higher ground so that all their runoff leaches into and poisons the existing water? "
jefferson wrote on Nov 4, 2009 12:26 PM:
They have more lush green grass that any golf course around. You can drive by and the sprinklers are going in the heat of the sun and the water is running down the sidewalks into the gutters. "
kbf wrote on Nov 4, 2009 5:05 PM: