NVR Logo
Extension or extinction?
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
Save and Share Share
November 21st, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
October 31st, 2009
October 24th, 2009
Is it jobs, then spending, or spending, then jobs? The nation looks for each newsflash or business report indicating an end to economic decline and a return to prosperity.

References are made to a jobless recovery where businesses become more profitable and stock values rise, but not from an increase in production or sale of more products.
In a jobless recovery, the profit source is more likely to be greater efficiency in operations and employee cost reduction, resulting in both higher profits and higher unemployment.

An increase in the stock market of almost
50 percent since March has created much wealth for those holding stocks and may add to additional disposable income. However, increased wealth alone creates no jobs unless the disposable money is spent, profits are made and jobs are created. Thus, the stock market may give the appearance of returning health to the economy, but only when that wealth is used for expansion in production and employment.

There is one economic indicator and proven success of the stimulus program that as of this writing is on the verge of extinction or extension. As a key element in the $787 billion stimulus program, first-time homebuyers were able to claim a credit of up to $8,000 on a purchase made between Jan. 1 and Nov. 30, 2009.
Reflecting on the success of the credit program, Leslie Appleton Young, economist for the California Association of Realtors, said earlier this week: “Efforts by the government to stimulate housing and the economy clearly are impacting the market. Sales have exceeded 500,000 homes for 13 consecutive months, and now are

33.1 percent higher on a year-to-date basis compared to 2008.

“September also marked the seventh consecutive month of month-to-month increases in the statewide median price and the first single-digit decline in the year-to-year median price since October 2007, after 22 consecutive months of double-digit decreases.”

Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody’s, has reported expectation that more than 400,000 additional homes will have been sold by the end of the program term this coming month. In addition, home sales activity and the dollar value of sales does not include the consumer dollars used for home furnishings, improvements, and services related to the sale.

Home sales create a stimulus success that can be witnessed in our cities right here in Napa County.

Just this week, the Obama administration called upon Congress to extend the deadline for this home purchase incentive. In the words of Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner, “We welcome the efforts taken by Congress to extend the first-time home buyers tax credit for a limited period. This credit has brought new families into the housing market and contributed to three consecutive months of rising prices nationwide.”

It appears that the credit will be extended until April 2010, and expanded to include current homeowners. Overcoming testimony regarding fraudulent use of the program, the Senate has reached agreement including greater oversight and administration of the program.

The passage of this extension will aid the recovery of the housing industry and the economy as a whole. As an economic indicator and success of the stimulus program, housing is not hidden in graphs and statistics; you will see it just down the street.

Charles Bogue is a real estate broker in Napa. He can be reached at 486-5511 or e-mail: cbnapa@napanet.net.
1 comment(s)

nuttinpersonal wrote on Nov 6, 2009 10:01 PM:

" Can we be any more self-serving?

As has been repeatedly reported, this is a gross mis-use of taxpayer money. The first housing tax credit is estimated to cost the taxpayer $15B. Even by the National Association of Realtors' likely overzealous estimate, there were 350K houses sold that were due mostly to the housing credit. That puts the cost at about $43K per incremental house sold for the taxpayer.

Why is it so expensive?
1) Most of the houses that were sold during that time period were going to sell anyway. So, for many purchases, the $8K basically went from the taxpayer to the seller, the broker, the homebuilder, loan originator, etc. Nice.

2) The rampant fraud that's going as crooks rip off the government. Simply google up "housing tax credit fraud." But that's ok because the taxpayer is footing the bill so nobody has any incentive to stop it.

Instead of letting housing prices fall to a market clearing price, the government is trying to artificially support housing with a blank check from the taxpayer. Fannie and Freddie (bankrupt and basically nationalized), FHA (the new Fannie with its skyrocketing default rates), and now this idiotic subsidy which is actually being *expanded*. Never mind that that the taxpayer already subsidizes housing heavily with the mortgage interest rate deduction and a massive capital gains exclusion.

At what point does the taxpayer decide that enough is enough? The housing industry is like a 42 year old still living with his parents playing Nintendo in the basement instead of getting a job and living in the real world.

If high housing prices are so useful to the US, why doesn't the government just give you $3M if you buy a new house? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy