Crash injures two on Jamieson Canyon
A truck that was involved in a three-vehicle accident on Jamieson Canyon Road on Monday afternoon, awaits towing as motorists crawl past the accident scene. The driver of one of the cars was taken by helicopter to an area hospital. J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
Man flown to hospital after head-on crash
By ALISHA WYMAN
Register Staff Writer
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
A head-on collision on Jamieson Canyon Road prompted authorities to fly an injured man to a hospital and snarled traffic Monday afternoon.
At about 2:30 p.m., Vacaville resident Kurt Bennink, 50, was driving a white Infiniti sedan west on Jamieson Canyon Road at Kirkland Ranch Winery, according to the California Highway Patrol.
For unknown reasons, Bennink veered into oncoming traffic where Lou Scalzo, 64, was driving a Lexus, CHP Sgt. Joe McDermott said. Scalzo swerved to avoid the oncoming car, but it still struck the left back side of the Lexus.
The impact caused the Lexus to spin around.
Meanwhile the Infiniti continued west and hit a JR Concrete trailer-truck head-on, McDermott said. The truck went off the road and down a steep embankment, spilling a load of two-by-fours and other materials.
The driver of the Infiniti suffered moderate to major injuries and was flown by CHP helicopter to John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek, the CHP said.
The driver of the truck, Jose Zepeda, 26, of Sacramento, suffered minor injuries but declined medical treatment. Scalzo, his wife Claire Scalzo, 64, and his son Arthur Wren, 21, were uninjured.
Three dogs and a cat in their car also weren’t hurt, he said.
“Everybody seems to be OK,” he said.
The family was headed to their beach house in the Aptos area when the accident occurred.
Airbags in all three vehicles deployed during the wreck. All the passengers in all vehicles were wearing seat belts.
Alcohol is not suspected as a cause to the accident at this time, said CHP Officer Bob Kays.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
ysoserious wrote on Nov 3, 2009 1:07 AM:
dclerici wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:26 AM:
norcalgal wrote on Nov 3, 2009 8:19 AM:
napa1968 wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:09 AM:
anothervoice wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:16 AM:
4466 wrote on Nov 3, 2009 11:05 AM:
4466 wrote on Nov 3, 2009 11:07 AM:
reason-ator wrote on Nov 3, 2009 12:41 PM:
This article was more informative than most of the NVR-style articles. There were actually a 'who', a 'what', a 'where', a 'when', and even some information about a beach house that may have figured into the 'why'.
If you were to look at many of the typical NVR articles with a neutral perception, you will often see many of the articles lack many of the components of basic journalism. I understand some of the obstacles that they may face, but there usually is no attempt to follow up the vague initial reports.
It's too bad. I wish they'd be as good as I remember that they used to be. "
anothervoice wrote on Nov 3, 2009 1:09 PM:
Malo wrote on Nov 3, 2009 3:35 PM:
The one thing that as I see as a missing item in this article is the names of the dogs and cat in the accident. If all of the people names are included, why not the animals? They were just as much a part of this story as the rest!
Unless the animals are juvenile, then I see no reason why their names should not be in print. Aside from that, this article is just fine.
Poor kitty must have really been scared. Welp, 8 lives left! "
informedmom wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:35 PM:
Carrillo wrote on Nov 5, 2009 9:18 AM: