Transit agency finds missing millions
NCTPA uncovers mistakes, sets course for accountability
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
The financial wheels nearly came off the Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency in recent years, with the public and, for a time, agency directors, none the wiser.
The magnitude of the agency’s financial problems surfaced two weeks ago when new managers reported tracking down $2.6 million in federal grants that had been lost or ignored for up to two years.
In 2007, the agency, which runs Napa County’s transit and paratransit services, failed to claim $2 million in federal funds needed to buy new buses for the VINE.
“How can you miss $2 million? I can’t tell you. I wasn’t here,” Tom Roberts, NCTPA’s new manager of planning and programming, said in an interview last week.
The agency expects to regain the entire $2.6 million, enabling it to buy three or more new buses, improve bus stops and upgrade maintenance. Despite past oversights, no money will be lost, Roberts said.
“It’s kind of like a windfall now, isn’t it?” Roberts said. Because of Roberts’ sleuthing, one official at the Metropolitan Transportation Commission dubbed him “the Sherlock Holmes of transit.”
Recent years were hard ones for the agency, which lost senior managers and for two years had an executive director with no transportation background.
“We got a sense a year or two ago that things weren’t what they should have been,” said Jim Krider, the Napa city councilman who chairs the agency’s board of directors.
When Jim Leddy, a former legislative aide, resigned as executive director in September 2008, the board hired Paul Price, a career transportation manager, who took charge in January.
Price was hired with the mission of making the agency fire on all cylinders, Krider said. The agency pulled back from becoming a countywide environmental and growth management agency, deciding that transportation had to be its first priority, he said.
Pam Kindig, the county auditor/controller who retired earlier this year, said NCTPA’s financial disarray was confirmed when her agency was invited to conduct several audits.
“We were trying to take care of it before it became a huge problem,” Kindig said. “I was trying to avoid a situation that could have been a crisis ... in the media.”
At her recommendation, the agency hired a full-time finance manager, a position that Antonio Onorato assumed only a couple of months ago. Roberts, who ran transportation systems in Santa Barbara for 20 years, became the agency’s first full-time planning manager. Price charged Diana Vargas, his deputy director, with holding managers accountable.
The agency had lost much of its institutional memory when several key managers and the executive director departed, Roberts said. The agency has fewer than a dozen employees.
The combination of staff turnover and possible “mission creep” resulted in basic financial accounting and planning not getting done, he said.
It was with trepidation that staff told the board last month of the federal grant monies that had been lying fallow or unclaimed.
“Obviously taking this to the board was sensitive. The board needed to know that the staff and the agency are getting it done, yet making it public shows there was a weak spot somewhere,” Roberts said.
Board members, who had been briefed earlier on the findings, voiced appreciation that the new regime was bringing financial order. “History is history,” American Canyon Mayor Leon Garcia said.
“We’re going to see accountability now,” St. Helena Mayor Del Britton said later.
“Transportation financing is very complicated,” Krider said in an interview. “I think the previous executive director did not have the technical skills that Paul does.”
Price said the board was clear about his mission when he was hired last winter. “They said they wanted me to focus on transportation issues. Something isn’t working right.”
Management jobs were reorganized for clearer lines of responsibility and vacancies were filled with people with needed expertise, he said.
Price said he pledged to board members that he would be forthcoming about any shortcomings he discovered. “You have to be transparent. If you hide, you will be pilloried at some point,” he said. “If we have something that needs to be said, let’s get it out and move on.”
Jacques LaRochelle, the city of Napa’s public works director, said he was impressed by Price and his new management team. “The new guys, they really cranked it up,” he said.
Even during the years of disorganization, the agency was run “conservatively” with “decent” financial reserves, Roberts said. What lagged were an assortment of projects, including the purchasing of new buses and construction of park-and-ride lots.
The agency was relying more on state transportation funds, which come with fewer restrictions, than federal grants, Roberts said.
Now that staff is on top of federal grants, it is reviewing all sources of state funding for mistakes or oversights. The board will get an accounting of state funds this fall, Roberts said.
For possibly the first time, the board is now getting financial reports every month, Onorato said. “You’ll see where the money is coming from and where it’s going,” he said.
At the October meeting, Onorato presented the board with a revised budget for 2009-10, updating numbers adopted four months ago. Expenses and revenues were each adjusted by several million dollars.
While these revisions won’t have an impact on transit operations, they capture the agency’s real financial situation, Onorato said.
Professionally speaking, getting the agency squared away has been an exciting time, Onorato said. The future may be less exhilarating.
“We’re going from an agency kind of all over the place to one that is predictable and boring,” he said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
freeport56 wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:06 AM:
notanapanative wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:48 AM:
"For possibly the first time, the board is now getting financial reports every month, Onorato said. “You’ll see where the money is coming from and where it’s going,” he said."
Where was the oversight before this from the Board?
Is this "normal" oversight from the government?
Kudo's to the new managers, but please make sure to clean house and get anyone who was responsible for Agency decision making in the past OUT! No matter what lame excuse they offer.
It is the only way this Agency will have credibility again!
And the Board overseeing this atrocity needs to be replaced!
They were clearly not doing their job if they are just now getting monthly financial reports!
“We were trying to take care of it before it became a huge problem,” Kindig said. “I was trying to avoid a situation that could have been a crisis ... in the media.”
Clearly the Board was more concerned about "optics" than effectively managing the tax monies of it's citizens!
I am outraged at the amateurish way my tax money was being (mis) managed!
How much were we paying these so called managers?
I bet we are even paying them some sort of pension for being incompetent!
I cannot express my anger and outrage enough!
Quite simply I and the taxpayers demand and deserve better! "
firststreetmayor wrote on Nov 3, 2009 7:57 AM:
to bad we couldn't have Roberts’ sleuthing run the DA's office. Sounds like this man can get to the bottom of any case that the district attorney has no time for. "
jfz wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:35 AM:
Shareathought wrote on Nov 3, 2009 9:48 AM:
commenter wrote on Nov 3, 2009 1:15 PM:
Not having regular financials is no explanation as they should have demanded financials. Amy board member who went more than one month without seeing a financial statement should resign. "
gladtobgone wrote on Nov 3, 2009 1:30 PM:
Raven wrote on Nov 3, 2009 3:47 PM:
http://www.nctpa.net/board.cfm... "
cheezcakemaker wrote on Nov 3, 2009 5:45 PM:
Missing millions is probably the norm, not the exception. "
shareathought wrote on Nov 3, 2009 6:04 PM:
So most are elected members from our Napa City Councils or Supervisors, except two.
One paid employee.
And... a rep from PCC (Is anyone familiar with the Paratransit Coordinating Council?)
Do or have, any of these members use/d local public transportation? "