City funds dip; cuts may be coming
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
With Napa’s major sources of revenues dropping at an accelerating rate in the first half of 2009, new cost-cutting may be necessary this winter, Napa City Manager Mike Parness told the City Council Tuesday.
“What’s alarming is the trend. In the fourth quarter (April-June 2009) we saw a rather alarming decrease in revenues,” Parness said.
In that period, taxes on merchant sales plummeted 15.7 percent from a year earlier. New vehicle sales were off 26 percent, furniture and appliance sales down 28 percent. Restaurant sales dropped 4 percent.
The tax on hotel and B&B beds, in recent years one of the city’s best performers, dropped 6 percent.
When revenues for July-September are totaled in December, the city should have a clearer picture of which way the local economy is going, Parness said.
“That will be key,” Parness said. If revenues continue to perform worse than predicted, Parness said he would propose spending cuts for council consideration.
The city’s general fund income for the 2008-09 fiscal year, which ended June 30, was $61.1 million — $3.1 million less than the year before. City spending was $63.6 million, $4.4 million more than the year before.
The difference between spending and revenue — $2.5 million — was covered by dipping into reserve accounts.
“Over time you can’t continue to do that,” Parness said about the use of reserves for routine spending.
The financial situation at the end of the 2008-09 fiscal year could have been worse, Roberta Meyer, a city finance analyst, said. City departments spent $3.2 million less than anticipated.
The city’s largest source of revenue, the property tax, totaled $22.8 million, or 1 percent less than the year before.
The sales tax, the second-largest revenue stream, brought in $12.7 million, down 6 percent. The transient occupancy tax netted $8.2 million, down 6 percent. This was the largest hotel tax decline in 12 years.
The city’s major revenues are likely to be down in 2009-10 as well, Parness said.
Despite the city’s financial troubles, the city is committed to installing a boat dock on the river at Fourth Street and paving East Avenue next year, Parness said.
Both projects will occur even if the city isn’t awarded a state grant for the dock and the state holds up road funds because of its own financial problems, he said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
DannyK wrote on Oct 22, 2009 7:45 AM:
I have total respect for our Napa city officicials. If only our state and federal officials had the same insight. "
larrysbird wrote on Oct 22, 2009 7:57 AM:
native74 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 8:51 AM:
Kathy Concened wrote on Oct 22, 2009 8:56 AM:
ambonizay wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:05 AM:
REGISTERNAME wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:12 AM:
firststreetmayor wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:37 AM:
how about we reduce the Attorney DA staff, sheriff patrols and a couple city police, most of the victims and perpetrators are homeless and if their arrested their a strain on our city funds, our economy is hit with taking care of lower middle class with no return on our city revenue.
Look at it this way, when our own city's DA can't charge a wealthy man with arrest and "FINES" that broke the jaw of
another man our city's revenue is the only victim, at the tax payer expense of-course . "
reason-ator wrote on Oct 22, 2009 10:02 AM:
native74 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 10:43 AM:
It's supposed to be a public dock and was used by all. It took the support of many citizens to finally get it installed (I want to say at least 10 years of promoting the great project in downtown). It then lasted about 10 years before they took it out for the Flood Project.
The original dock was in great shape as were the pilings (there's another story there) so I'm mystified on why there's a lot of money needed to put it back in. Not really...supposedly the flood wall designer forgot to design the ramp back into the new flood wall configuration (ADA compliant) and well, here we are with no dock. Or maybe it was City/County oversight (non-boating enthusiasts in charge that forgot common sense?) and that's why they need more money instead of going after the original designer.
P.S. - I got my info from another engineering firm working with the Flood Project so I'd like to think some of the engineering City/County part is the truth. I will admit I added the biased non-river loving part. "
ambonizay wrote on Oct 22, 2009 11:03 AM:
REGISTERNAME wrote on Oct 22, 2009 11:11 AM:
As for larrysbird, the boat dock NEEDS to be replaced back to where it used to be for transportation, shipping, and recreational purposes regardless of what you think. And by the way, it is not a beautification project. "
yessam99 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 12:15 PM:
larrysbird wrote on Oct 22, 2009 12:50 PM:
crooked6pence wrote on Oct 22, 2009 5:32 PM:
"Unlike cities that are facing severe financial hardship, Napa has not depended on residential development to balance its budget, Parness said. Construction has plunged over the past year, hurting fast-growth cities. Eroding property values are also a bigger issue in newer cities, he said." NVR, 11-25-08
"While other cities are slashing programs and employees, Napa plans to ride out the recession by relying on reserve funds." NVR, 1-31-09
"Parness predicted no major disruptions in city operations for the next year or two. No layoffs or service cutbacks are envisioned, assuming the economy begins to improve next year, he said." NVR, 3-19-09
Napa is fortunate that its major revenue sources — property tax, sales tax and hotel tax — have dipped only slightly or continue to grow, albeit slowly, Parness said. NVR, 6-4-09
“Over time you can’t continue to do that,” Parness said about the use of reserves for routine spending. NVR , 10-22-09 "
Old Time Napkin wrote on Oct 22, 2009 7:52 PM:
Piquemyinterest wrote on Nov 18, 2009 9:08 PM: