NVR Logo
City funds dip; cuts may be coming
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Save and Share Share
With Napa’s major sources of revenues dropping at an accelerating rate in the first half of 2009, new cost-cutting may be necessary this winter, Napa City Manager Mike Parness told the City Council Tuesday.

“What’s alarming is the trend. In the fourth quarter (April-June 2009) we saw a rather alarming decrease in revenues,” Parness said.
In that period, taxes on merchant sales plummeted 15.7 percent from a year earlier. New vehicle sales were off 26 percent, furniture and appliance sales down 28 percent. Restaurant sales dropped 4 percent.

The tax on hotel and B&B beds, in recent years one of the city’s best performers, dropped 6 percent.
When revenues for July-September are totaled in December, the city should have a clearer picture of which way the local economy is going, Parness said.

“That will be key,” Parness said. If revenues continue to perform worse than predicted, Parness said he would propose spending cuts for council consideration.
The city’s general fund income for the 2008-09 fiscal year, which ended June 30, was $61.1 million — $3.1 million less than the year before. City spending was $63.6 million, $4.4 million more than the year before.

The difference between spending and revenue  — $2.5 million — was covered by dipping into reserve accounts.

“Over time you can’t continue to do that,” Parness said about the use of reserves for routine spending.

The financial situation at the end of the 2008-09 fiscal year could have been worse, Roberta Meyer, a city finance analyst, said. City departments spent $3.2 million less than anticipated.

The city’s largest source of revenue, the property tax, totaled $22.8 million, or 1 percent less than the year before.

The sales tax, the second-largest revenue stream, brought in $12.7 million, down 6 percent. The transient occupancy tax netted $8.2 million, down 6 percent. This was the largest hotel tax decline in 12 years.

The city’s major revenues are likely to be down in 2009-10 as well, Parness said.

Despite the city’s financial troubles, the city is committed to installing a boat dock on the river at Fourth Street and paving East Avenue next year, Parness said.

Both projects will occur even if the city isn’t awarded a state grant for the dock and the state holds up road funds because of its own financial problems, he said.
16 comment(s)

DannyK wrote on Oct 22, 2009 7:45 AM:

" "Over time you can't continue to do that (over spending)"
I have total respect for our Napa city officicials. If only our state and federal officials had the same insight. "

larrysbird wrote on Oct 22, 2009 7:57 AM:

" We dont need the boat dock. Save the money please. I dont know how everyone else feels, but spending a lot of money on beautification projects is a waste. I love living here, and dont notice if power lines are under ground etc. etc. . I just want our local community to be able to thrive, and for our city to be ours again. Save the money, rather than spending it on projects that can wait. "

native74 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 8:51 AM:

" Yeah...the dock that was taken out for the Flood Wall in front of the new development, right? It's been two years since it was supposed to be installed...can't wait for it to be done! I'll definitely be in town more because of it! "

Kathy Concened wrote on Oct 22, 2009 8:56 AM:

" Strange. In the past articles by city leaders said we were in good financial shape. Now this. Its appears they really don't know. Hope their accounting methods are better now since we spent a million on that new accounting software. "

ambonizay wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:05 AM:

" There is something I just don't understand. How can the City budget be is such a sad state of affairs? With the red light cameras spewing out tickets faster the Postal Service can deliver them, what gives? Napa is in the process of installing a dozen more cameras with mega bucks of revenue coming in. Perhaps we should use our vote in the next election to put the elected officals who are suppose to respresent us out. The City has more than enough revenue without crying to the public with threats about cutting our services. This is getting, rather is, very very old. "

REGISTERNAME wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:12 AM:

" Re boat dock at 4th Street - does anybody know if regular citizens like me will be able to use it, or is it only for specific people? "

firststreetmayor wrote on Oct 22, 2009 9:37 AM:

" Seeing that crime is down, except for the occasional violent crime of broken jaws, which I might add brings nothing to the city's revenue,
how about we reduce the Attorney DA staff, sheriff patrols and a couple city police, most of the victims and perpetrators are homeless and if their arrested their a strain on our city funds, our economy is hit with taking care of lower middle class with no return on our city revenue.
Look at it this way, when our own city's DA can't charge a wealthy man with arrest and "FINES" that broke the jaw of
another man our city's revenue is the only victim, at the tax payer expense of-course . "

reason-ator wrote on Oct 22, 2009 10:02 AM:

" Sure would be nice to have that extra $6,000,000 right now. "

native74 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 10:43 AM:

" REGISTERNAME

It's supposed to be a public dock and was used by all. It took the support of many citizens to finally get it installed (I want to say at least 10 years of promoting the great project in downtown). It then lasted about 10 years before they took it out for the Flood Project.

The original dock was in great shape as were the pilings (there's another story there) so I'm mystified on why there's a lot of money needed to put it back in. Not really...supposedly the flood wall designer forgot to design the ramp back into the new flood wall configuration (ADA compliant) and well, here we are with no dock. Or maybe it was City/County oversight (non-boating enthusiasts in charge that forgot common sense?) and that's why they need more money instead of going after the original designer.

P.S. - I got my info from another engineering firm working with the Flood Project so I'd like to think some of the engineering City/County part is the truth. I will admit I added the biased non-river loving part. "

ambonizay wrote on Oct 22, 2009 11:03 AM:

" Cuts may be coming? Fine, then look at cutting bloated City wages first. "

REGISTERNAME wrote on Oct 22, 2009 11:11 AM:

" native74 - Thanks for the insight surrounding the boad dock issue.

As for larrysbird, the boat dock NEEDS to be replaced back to where it used to be for transportation, shipping, and recreational purposes regardless of what you think. And by the way, it is not a beautification project. "

yessam99 wrote on Oct 22, 2009 12:15 PM:

" What, the City of Napa can't afford 2 Asst City Managers that make $130,000+ each, and a City Clerk that make $120,000+? "

larrysbird wrote on Oct 22, 2009 12:50 PM:

" How much was the old dock used for shipping and transportation purposes? What about the boat launch at the yacht club on Brown St.? The old dock doesnt NEED to be replaced, and that IS what I think. Do you think the new, mega expensive dock coincides nicely with the fancy shopping and dining area that just went in there? If we are in difficult financial straits, I doubt spending all that money is going to help. We have done ok without the new dock so far. "

crooked6pence wrote on Oct 22, 2009 5:32 PM:

" What's is even more alarming is that the City officials somehow thought that Napa was immune to this economic downturn. Genius at work...

"Unlike cities that are facing severe financial hardship, Napa has not depended on residential development to balance its budget, Parness said. Construction has plunged over the past year, hurting fast-growth cities. Eroding property values are also a bigger issue in newer cities, he said." NVR, 11-25-08

"While other cities are slashing programs and employees, Napa plans to ride out the recession by relying on reserve funds." NVR, 1-31-09

"Parness predicted no major disruptions in city operations for the next year or two. No layoffs or service cutbacks are envisioned, assuming the economy begins to improve next year, he said." NVR, 3-19-09

Napa is fortunate that its major revenue sources — property tax, sales tax and hotel tax — have dipped only slightly or continue to grow, albeit slowly, Parness said. NVR, 6-4-09

“Over time you can’t continue to do that,” Parness said about the use of reserves for routine spending. NVR , 10-22-09 "

Old Time Napkin wrote on Oct 22, 2009 7:52 PM:

" Looks like the tourist industry is not keeping Napa in the black. We've become totally dependent on tourists and the wine industry and it looks like the golden goose may not be so golden anymore. "

Piquemyinterest wrote on Nov 18, 2009 9:08 PM:

" Yes, I agree once again with Kathy Concerned. The City of Napa did state they had surplus and would be about to whether this storm. Now they are saying just the opposite. Internal auditors are definitely needed as everyone is on the take here. I'm tired of paying for these swindlers and you can't keep taxing the residents of Napa either! Property owners shouldn't be penalized because they own. If your going to tax people do it fairly across the board and tax everyone ...even the renters! The College even wants to push a parcel tax! I can't afford my living expenses and they already have two bond measures on my property tax bill I'm presently paying for. Enough is enough! "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy