Judge grants change of venue in BART shooting case
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
October 26th, 2009
October 21st, 2009
October 20th, 2009
October 17th, 2009
October 16th, 2009
October 14th, 2009
October 9th, 2009
OAKLAND, Calif. -- The trial of a white former BART Police officer accused of fatally shooting an unarmed black man will be moved out of Alameda County, a judge ruled Friday.
Superior Court Judge Morris Jacobson said in his 28-page ruling the circumstances of the New Year's Day slaying, the violent protests that erupted in Oakland afterwards, intense media scrutiny and fears of shielding jurors and witnesses from any possible civil unrest, justified granting a change of venue.
Former Bay Area Rapid Transit District officer, Johannes Mehserle, 27, has been charged with killing Oscar Grant, 22, who had been pulled off a train for allegedly fighting when he was shot on an Oakland station platform. Mehserle has pleaded not guilty.
"The nature of this crime has an implied racial aspect to it in that the defendant is Caucasian and the victim was African American," Jacobson wrote.
"This case may well be a close one and difficult for some or all of the jurors to decide. Under these circumstances, there is a reasonable probability that (Mehserle) cannot get a fair trial," he said.
A new location for the trial, still scheduled to begin Nov. 2, will be decided over the next few weeks.
Mehserle's attorney, Michael Rains, had argued for a change of venue citing a survey of nearly 400 potential jurors said nearly 97 percent of them knew details about the case and nearly half believe he is guilty or probably guilty. Prosecutor David Stein argued that the survey was not credible.
Neither Stein nor Rains were available for comment Friday because of a gag order.
The Jan. 1 shooting was video-recorded by several bystanders, shown across the Internet and subsequently used as evidence in a preliminary hearing last spring.
Rains argues that Mehserle meant to use his Taser to restrain Grant, but accidentally pulled his pistol while Grant was lying face down on the station platform.
Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums said that he understood many may disagree with the judge's ruling.
"Whether we agree or disagree withthe ruling, let us go forward in a civil manner and treat one another with respect," Dellums said. "My fervent plea is that this decision does not cause chaos and upheaval in our city."
Grant's mother, Wanda Johnson, said she was stunned by the decision, which came a week after a change of venue hearing concluded. Her family had been encouraged by previous court rulings - including that Mehserle stand trial for murder.
She was adamant that the trial should be held in the city where her son died.
"It shows we still live in a black and white world. Nothing changes. " Johnson said. "We will go wherever the trial goes. Justice will be served."
Michael Cardoza, a veteran defense lawyer who has closely watched the proceedings, said the new venue makes "imminent sense."
Even if enough unbiased jurors could be found, "they might fear retaliation should they not bring back a favorable verdict," Cardoza said.
Venue changes are rare because of the extra cost and logistical obstacles. The California Judicial Council reports that scores of requests have been made in the last two years, but only four granted.
To win a venue change, defense attorneys must prove that their clients cannot get justice in the county where the crime occurred.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 16, 2009 8:38 PM:
napasfinest wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:14 PM:
Baraki wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:37 PM:
apartmentguy wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:52 PM:
Cowboy wrote on Oct 16, 2009 10:37 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 16, 2009 10:37 PM:
It was a prudent move. It eliminates yet another basis that may be claimed for mistrial, or appeal (regardless of the outcome) after trial. "
jmo wrote on Oct 16, 2009 11:19 PM:
Let's move onto the trial and see what justice brings!!!!
Right! "
Raven wrote on Oct 17, 2009 12:10 AM:
Blackbeard wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:39 AM:
Baraki wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:57 AM:
samaker wrote on Oct 17, 2009 12:02 PM:
suze wrote on Oct 17, 2009 2:32 PM:
I am going to be interested to see how the law deals with it.
As I understand it, if you kill someone it is called murder, if you kill them 'accidently' it is called manslaughter. I know hairs do get split on it, but those are the basics.
However, it does seem that once you put on a law enforcement uniform, you can truly sidestep any kind of murder charges while on duty, no matter what the circumstances, or serious consequences for any fault in professional judgement. This is not in line with other professions where you are held accountable for truly bad decisions or actions.
I know it will be said that a law officer should not have to hesitate and think in a 'dangerous or threatening' moment, but maybe they should stop and think for a moment. I do feel they kill too many people. Trigger happy does come to mind.
I am convinced that without the phone camera evidence, Mehserle would simply be on paid administrative leave while it all got 'sorted out.'
It's gonna be interesting. "
Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 17, 2009 7:25 PM:
But - as stated in the article - venue changes are rare. It's a pretty high burden. So there are many instances where a venue change may appear obvious, but it's not granted.
In the end, though, this is a reasonable ruling. "