The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 16, 2009 8:38 PM:
napasfinest wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:14 PM:
Baraki wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:37 PM:
apartmentguy wrote on Oct 16, 2009 9:52 PM:
Cowboy wrote on Oct 16, 2009 10:37 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 16, 2009 10:37 PM:
It was a prudent move. It eliminates yet another basis that may be claimed for mistrial, or appeal (regardless of the outcome) after trial. "
jmo wrote on Oct 16, 2009 11:19 PM:
Let's move onto the trial and see what justice brings!!!!
Right! "
Raven wrote on Oct 17, 2009 12:10 AM:
Blackbeard wrote on Oct 17, 2009 5:39 AM:
Baraki wrote on Oct 17, 2009 8:57 AM:
samaker wrote on Oct 17, 2009 12:02 PM:
suze wrote on Oct 17, 2009 2:32 PM:
I am going to be interested to see how the law deals with it.
As I understand it, if you kill someone it is called murder, if you kill them 'accidently' it is called manslaughter. I know hairs do get split on it, but those are the basics.
However, it does seem that once you put on a law enforcement uniform, you can truly sidestep any kind of murder charges while on duty, no matter what the circumstances, or serious consequences for any fault in professional judgement. This is not in line with other professions where you are held accountable for truly bad decisions or actions.
I know it will be said that a law officer should not have to hesitate and think in a 'dangerous or threatening' moment, but maybe they should stop and think for a moment. I do feel they kill too many people. Trigger happy does come to mind.
I am convinced that without the phone camera evidence, Mehserle would simply be on paid administrative leave while it all got 'sorted out.'
It's gonna be interesting. "
Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 17, 2009 7:25 PM:
But - as stated in the article - venue changes are rare. It's a pretty high burden. So there are many instances where a venue change may appear obvious, but it's not granted.
In the end, though, this is a reasonable ruling. "