Ag officials draft plan for new pest
By MIKE TRELEVEN
Register Staff Writer
November 22nd, 2009
November 14th, 2009
Napa County agricultural officials met with counterparts from the United States Department of Agriculture and California Department of Food and Agriculture Thursday, offering an update on the European grapevine moth discovered last week near Oakville.
“We are still gathering information and traps have been placed to try and identify where the insect might be,” Greg Clark, assistant agricultural commission for Napa County, said. “We are still trying to determine the extent of the infestation.”
The European grapevine moth goes dormant in winter, while another pest in local vineyards — the Australian light-brown apple moth — can be trapped throughout the year.
“We do not expect to have a clear understanding of where this new pest is until the spring,” Clark said. “In some ways, that is good because there is no rush to do something right away.”
“In the spring, we need to have enough traps out to get the first flight of the moth and find out where exactly it is,” Dave Whitmer, agricultural commissioner for Napa County said.
The European moth caterpillars larvae feed on fruit as it ripens, ruining grape clusters and increasing the risk of mold affecting vineyards. Last week’s discovery was the first sighting of the European moth here.
Most Napa Valley vineyards are already under quarantine for the light brown apple moth, which is widespread in California but has done little damage. The quarantine requires growers, truckers and wineries to agree to inspections and seek certification from agricultural officials to harvest, deliver and crush the grapes.
The fact that the county already is dealing with one moth will make it easier for the industry to respond to the new one.
“We already have the safeguards in place with this new pest,” Clark said.
So far, there are still only the two confirmed identifications of the European moth.
“Nobody is rushing into anything. We care concerned and following up on every lead and busy submitting samples and checking traps,” Whitmer said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
reason-ator wrote on Oct 16, 2009 11:27 PM:
And I know we've been told by a poster that we are not qualified to proofread NVR articles ( by what I assumed was an NVR employee's mom ), but what does the last sentence ("We care concerned and following up on every lead and busy submitting samples and checking traps") attributed to Mr. Whitmer mean ? I don't think he would have said something like that, and someday I hope to be qualified to show that it should have been "We are concerned..." and not "We care concerned....". "