County wants to buy local
Supervisors look for ways to keep government money here
By JILLIAN JONES, Register Staff Writer
November 18th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 10th, 2009
November 9th, 2009
October 30th, 2009
October 22nd, 2009
October 12th, 2009
October 11th, 2009
October 4th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
With the rocky economy pushing the county unemployment rate past 9 percent, the Napa County Board of Supervisors is considering a local hiring and purchase preference aimed at pumping money into the economy and stimulating local job growth.
“As we spend dollars on our community, we’d like to see those dollars circulate back through our community,” Supervisor Mark Luce said.
Particularly in this economic climate, Supervisor Brad Wagenknecht said that Napa County should look out for its own. “Right now, our unemployment rate is over 9 percent, and that’s the highest it’s been in my memory,” Wagenknecht said.
Exactly how the county will drive more of its dollars into local hands remains unclear. State laws governing so-called general law counties such as Napa restrict certain preference programs and often require local governments to work with the lowest bidder no matter where they are based.
“There are some limits,” Luce said. “There’re certain things that we have to go to the lowest price by law.”
But if there is a viable way to make sure that county’s expenditures stay in the community, supervisors say they want to do it.
One idea is a local vendor preference program, which would provide a preference credit to local businesses when the county is evaluating bids for goods, supplies and possibly services. Of California’s 58 counties, 33 have local vendor preferences.
Any such measure would have limitations. For example, because it is a general law county, Napa is unable to award construction and road repair projects to anyone but the lowest bidder.
Another idea is a rule that requires general contractors on government construction projects to sign an agreement with affected local unions covering the terms and conditions of work. The agreements might give preference to local workers, for example, and unions might agree not to strike during the construction project.
County officials are also looking at expanding a local vendor preference that currently applies only to the purchase of cars. In July of 2006, the board approved a 5 percent local vendor preference for its fleet of vehicles, but other goods are still acquired based on cost alone.
Today, that issue is back up for debate.
Wagenknecht acknowledges that all of these ideas, if implemented, could cost Napa County in the short term. But it would be repaid with a more vibrant local economy.
“Local people spend taxes,” Wagenknecht said. “We may lose in the short term, but we gain in the long term.”
Tony Grillo, Napa County’s purchasing manager, said county staff will meet this week to consider local hiring and purchase preferences. The county will also form a steering committee made up of members of both the public and private sectors, he said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
kbf wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:00 AM:
rpcv wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:10 AM:
Not so common sense wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:39 AM:
Cadence wrote on Oct 12, 2009 6:50 AM:
Doesn't the county have any local consulting firms? "
Mr4 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 8:51 AM:
BilLy wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:08 AM:
cheezcakemaker wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:25 AM:
How can this be the first time that consideration is being made to buy local?
Elected representatives at their finest! "
glenroy wrote on Oct 12, 2009 10:12 AM:
LMW wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:18 AM:
LMW wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:20 AM:
danmonez wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:37 AM:
Isn't it wonderful how a contested Board of Supervisors race can inspire incumbents to do things they had no intererest in doing before? "
xmrs09 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 12:36 PM:
funnyme wrote on Oct 12, 2009 1:46 PM:
It would seem absolutely absurd to 'force' a government agency to spend a lot more than it should just by obeying 'keep it local'. Recently, we were in the process of purchasing a new fireplace and we went to a local 'dealer' in Napa and then checked the same item at a store in Santa Rosa and Fairfield and the difference was in the THOUSANDS of dollars.
I understand the cost of living is higher in Napa, but WE certainly considered the amount we are saving by just driving 'around the corner' instead. "
crooked6pence wrote on Oct 12, 2009 3:45 PM:
The headline could have read, "County should buy local!"
A little investigative reporting might have brought this story to the front page years ago and motivated a little change - before the situation became critical and necessary.
Instead of being reactive, NVR, try being proactive - this may take a little more investment time wise, but you will be rewarded by having a stronger and more satisfied readership.
I have always advocated that money should be spent within the circle of people you know.
Who knows, maybe with this "new" philosophy, Napa County might just be able to overcome being the poorest county in the Bay Area. "
Raven wrote on Oct 12, 2009 3:58 PM:
larrysbird wrote on Oct 12, 2009 8:57 PM:
Thanks NVR, I needed a laugh today. "
dommale wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:20 PM: