NVR Logo
County wants to buy local
Supervisors look for ways to keep government money here
Monday, October 12, 2009
Save and Share Share
With the rocky economy pushing the county unemployment rate past 9 percent, the Napa County Board of Supervisors is considering a local hiring and purchase preference aimed at pumping money into the economy and stimulating local job growth.

“As we spend dollars on our community, we’d like to see those dollars circulate back through our community,” Supervisor Mark Luce said.
Particularly in this economic climate, Supervisor Brad Wagenknecht said that Napa County should look out for its own. “Right now, our unemployment rate is over 9 percent, and that’s the highest it’s been in my memory,” Wagenknecht said.

Exactly how the county will drive more of its dollars into local hands remains unclear. State laws governing so-called general law counties such as Napa restrict certain preference programs and often require local governments to work with the lowest bidder no matter where they are based.
“There are some limits,” Luce said. “There’re certain things that we have to go to the lowest price by law.”

But if there is a viable way to make sure that county’s expenditures stay in the community, supervisors say they want to do it.
One idea is a local vendor preference program, which would provide a preference credit to local businesses when the county is evaluating bids for goods, supplies and possibly services. Of California’s 58 counties, 33 have local vendor preferences.

Any such measure would have limitations. For example, because it is a general law county, Napa is unable to award construction and road repair projects to anyone but the lowest bidder.

Another idea is a rule that requires general contractors on government construction projects to sign an agreement with affected local unions covering the terms and conditions of work. The agreements might give preference to local workers, for example, and unions might agree not to strike during the construction project.

County officials are also looking at expanding a local vendor preference that currently applies only to the purchase of cars. In July of 2006, the board approved a 5 percent local vendor preference for its fleet of vehicles, but other goods are still acquired based on cost alone.

Today, that issue is back up for debate.

Wagenknecht acknowledges that all of these ideas, if implemented, could cost Napa County in the short term. But it would be repaid with a more vibrant local economy.

“Local people spend taxes,” Wagenknecht said. “We may lose in the short term, but we gain in the long term.”

Tony Grillo, Napa County’s purchasing manager, said county staff will meet this week to consider local hiring and purchase preferences. The county will also form a steering committee made up of members of both the public and private sectors, he said.
17 comment(s)

kbf wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:00 AM:

" Good idea to buy locally. I also think the local businesses need to protect Napa also buy giving the best price to local government not gouging them. On projects that have to go out to bid, put in a clause that states materials must be purchased locally. "

rpcv wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:10 AM:

" Well, duh. "

Not so common sense wrote on Oct 12, 2009 5:39 AM:

" I like to keep my tax dollars local as well. Build me a Costco and I will never leave town! Down at Napa Pipe would be fine.... "

Cadence wrote on Oct 12, 2009 6:50 AM:

" Maybe the city and county could start with hiring their many, many consultants locally. Seems to me that whenever I read about consulting firms being hired to study whatever, the firms are from somewhere else in the Bay Area, not Napa County.
Doesn't the county have any local consulting firms? "

Mr4 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 8:51 AM:

" And if every community in this country bought "local" we could spend three times as much of the taxpayer's money without obtaining any additional product or services. "

BilLy wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:08 AM:

" Ingenious just like the NVR "

cheezcakemaker wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:25 AM:

" What a waste of time and money to have a meeting about the obvious.

How can this be the first time that consideration is being made to buy local?

Elected representatives at their finest! "

glenroy wrote on Oct 12, 2009 10:12 AM:

" It might be a good idea to hire ‘competent’ employees for starters…then make it conditional upon relocating if they are not residents. "

LMW wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:18 AM:

" Bill 43. I say change is need here. "

LMW wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:20 AM:

" Also, if we want government money to stay here, ask someone who is not in government. "

danmonez wrote on Oct 12, 2009 11:37 AM:

" A local business preference ordinance should have been adopted long ago. I am so glad that someone just realized that local businesses need some support from local government.

Isn't it wonderful how a contested Board of Supervisors race can inspire incumbents to do things they had no intererest in doing before? "

xmrs09 wrote on Oct 12, 2009 12:36 PM:

" Not so common sense: A Costco in Napa County???!!! While I agree that we need to shop locally as much as possible, I certainly don't want to go anywhere near the slippery slope of allowing big box stores any closer than they already are. I prefer the inconvenience of driving to Fairfield or Vallejo for the items I can't get here to paving over more of the Napa Valley. "

funnyme wrote on Oct 12, 2009 1:46 PM:

" I agree with the concept of "keeping it local", for the most part. Allow me to explain.
It would seem absolutely absurd to 'force' a government agency to spend a lot more than it should just by obeying 'keep it local'. Recently, we were in the process of purchasing a new fireplace and we went to a local 'dealer' in Napa and then checked the same item at a store in Santa Rosa and Fairfield and the difference was in the THOUSANDS of dollars.
I understand the cost of living is higher in Napa, but WE certainly considered the amount we are saving by just driving 'around the corner' instead. "

crooked6pence wrote on Oct 12, 2009 3:45 PM:

" Pure genius.

The headline could have read, "County should buy local!"

A little investigative reporting might have brought this story to the front page years ago and motivated a little change - before the situation became critical and necessary.

Instead of being reactive, NVR, try being proactive - this may take a little more investment time wise, but you will be rewarded by having a stronger and more satisfied readership.

I have always advocated that money should be spent within the circle of people you know.

Who knows, maybe with this "new" philosophy, Napa County might just be able to overcome being the poorest county in the Bay Area. "

Raven wrote on Oct 12, 2009 3:58 PM:

" so it is okay for govt to pay more than they need to as long as they do it locally "

larrysbird wrote on Oct 12, 2009 8:57 PM:

" Another eye opening article from Jillian Jones.
Thanks NVR, I needed a laugh today. "

dommale wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:20 PM:

" How can you buy local when there's nothing quality to buy. I go to Marin or S.F to buy my clothing and shoes. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy