NVR Logo
Flood control: The next three years
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Save and Share Share
Funded with nearly $100 million in federal stimulus money, the Napa River / Napa Creek Flood Protection Project will be in high gear for the next three years.

Two-thirds of a mile of Napa Valley Wine Train tracks will be elevated several feet and shifted East by up to 35 feet. Two new rail bridges will be built.
Work on the $65 million railroad contract began this summer and should wrap up at the end of 2011.

Next summer, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will award a smaller contract for flood protection along a mile of Napa Creek. This work is expected to take two years.
Federal money will also pay for the design of a bypass channel to divert flood water from the river's oxbow. Construction could start in 2011.

Oringal graphic by Kelly Doren, produced for the web by Brian Kennedy. Larger map

Still to come

After the construction of Napa Creek defenses, the bypass channel and the relocation of railroad tracks, the flood project will be left with less spectacular work: the construction of flood walls and pump stations.

Flood walls need to be built along most of both banks between Third Street and Imola Avenue, a stretch of more than a mile. More flood walls will border the bypass channel and the Oxbow. Yet another flood wall will run along the west bank from the Westin Verasa hotel to slightly beyond Lincoln Avenue.

These flood walls will range in height from three to five feet. Pump stations will be built to get surface runoff through the flood walls and into the river during times of high water.

These future projects, including the construction of the bypass, are estimated to cost $75 million. The funds must be allocated by Congress. If federal funding keeps up with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ schedule, the flood project, approved by voters in 1998, could be completed in 2015.
10 comment(s)

thisisnotatest wrote on Oct 11, 2009 12:34 AM:

" I wish they had done this a long time ago. That way I would have grown up in "awesome Napa with a nice park" not "Napa that floods periodically."
Either way, kudos for getting the grant and having a great plan. It looks worth waiting for. "

Get Real wrote on Oct 11, 2009 8:00 AM:

" Just remember, if you accept redevopment funds from the Feds, you will beholden use a certain percentage of the funding for low income housing, that's how it works. The more redevelopment funds you use, the more low mandated low income housing. What to know Vallejo's success? They accepted lots of redevelopment funding, and now have lots of low income rentals and projects... "

shareathought wrote on Oct 11, 2009 9:02 AM:

" "Pump stations will be built to get surface runoff through the flood walls and into the river during times of high water."

Won't the area of the river, within the flood walls, be flowing at flood depths during a flood event? If the river is already full and/or beyond capacity, then (no matter how much pumping is done), how then can more or surface water be added? "

reader wrote on Oct 11, 2009 9:12 AM:

" I have always been and remain a supporter of the NV Wine Train. The article doesn't say exactly how much of the 65 milllion railroad contract is stimulus money, or tax payer money in any form. With any amount of tax payer money being spent on this upgrade it is time, now, to put an effective commute run on that train. Begin with a morning and evening commute car runnining between Napa Valley College, Napa and St. Helena, at a cost that workers can afford. I predict that in no time at all you will need to add a 2nd car. It's time. "

kevin wrote on Oct 11, 2009 9:46 AM:

" I would be far more interested in knowing what the original budget was and what the current budget is.

Are they on budget? "

tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Oct 11, 2009 3:56 PM:

" Just curious what Napa street being turned into a cul de sac has to do with the flood project? Does anyone know? "

nogrooveinsolano wrote on Oct 11, 2009 4:21 PM:

" Two words: "Kenya diggit?" "

napa local wrote on Oct 11, 2009 8:10 PM:

" Why do I seem to be the only one that is so upset that $65 million out of $100 million of our tax dollars is going to raise the railroad tracks for a privately owned company??? The wine train should pay for their own tracks. Is it not better to spend the stimulus money on something that benefits all citizens of napa?? The city could use eminent domain and buy the property for much less than $65 million... then use the remainder for more flood improvements. The wine train should shorten their trip, why do they want to see the backyards of that part of town anyway?? "

John Richards wrote on Oct 11, 2009 10:24 PM:

" napa local, we can't just flood out the wine train tracks by changing the flood plain. In the same way that the government has to pay you if they want to take your property by eminent domain, likewise the government has an obligation to not mess up the wine train operation. Either that, or buy them out. "

Napa local wrote on Oct 12, 2009 9:21 AM:

" I'm saying buy the property needed for the flood plain through eminent domain. It would be a much less expensive proposal than $65 million to raise the tracks at tax payer expense to benefit a private company. The wine train could start their upvalley journey on California avenue. Even buying the current wine train land needed and buying the self storage facility on California for a new wine train depot would still be less than 65 million... Not to mention we already poured millions into the trancas overpass increasing the value of this private company. Every napa citizen should have complimentary passage on the wine train for life after all the tax payer dollars given... "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy