NVR Logo
BART shooting trial needs new venue, jury consultant testifies
Officer in shooting grew up in Napa
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Save and Share Share
OAKLAND — A jury expert testified Tuesday that publicity ahead of the trial of a former San Francisco Bay Area transit officer accused in a fatal train platform shooting has resulted in an “astronomical” level of public knowledge in the case.

The expert, Craig New, said a recent survey by a California State University, Chico professor found that nearly 97 percent of about 400 potential jurors knew details about the case. Nearly 46 percent of those surveyed in Alameda County believe that the officer — Johannes Mehserle — is “definitely guilty” or “probably guilty,” he said.
“The numbers are off the chart,” said New, who was hired by Mehserle’s defense. He added that 82 percent of those surveyed also feared violence if Mehserle, 27, is acquitted.

Mehserle, who is white, has been charged with killing an unarmed, 22-year-old black man with a gun shot to the torso at a Bay Area Rapid Transit station on New Year’s Day in Oakland.
He has pleaded not guilty. His attorney, Michael Rains, is attempting to have the emotionally charged case moved out of Alameda County, arguing that his client wouldn’t get a fair trial there.

Rains has cited the violent protests in downtown Oakland that followed the shooting. He also has mentioned that two Alameda County judges have said publicly that they do not believe Mehserle’s defense.
New testified that about 80 percent of blacks polled said they think Mehserle is guilty of murdering Oscar Grant, compared with just 33 percent of whites who have the same belief.

Deputy District Attorney David Stein asked New if the wording in one of the survey questions dealing with the fear of violence could skew the results. “It could,” New said.

Rains argues that Mehserle meant to use his Taser to restrain Grant, but accidentally pulled his pistol while Grant was lying face down on the station platform.

The shooting was video-recorded by several bystanders, shown across the Internet and subsequently used as evidence in a preliminary hearing last spring.

New will continue his testimony on Wednesday.
6 comment(s)

Baraki wrote on Oct 6, 2009 8:42 PM:

" It's horrible that Oscar Grant died, but poor Johannes and this ongoing lynch-fest... bizarre. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Oct 6, 2009 10:44 PM:

" It's not frivolous to request a venue change, I will say that.

But considering the media coverage, Youtube videos, etc., how can another county's jury pool not be as equally informed? And if venue is changed, the media will report it and the jury pool will become equally as aware as the potential Alameda County jurors...

So I see your point about the ongoing lynch-fest, Baraki. However, Mehserle was the one who was videotaped pulling out his gun and shooting the victim.* Well, we'll see how it goes, I guess.


*NVR Mod - NOT saying anything about guilt or innocence. Just saying that there is footage of the defendant shooting the victim with his gun, that's all. "

Baraki wrote on Oct 7, 2009 6:48 AM:

" I hear what you're saying Feasor -- but think there's a possibility some other county will be less biased than Alameda / Contra Costa areas? :) Perhaps a county that BART doesn't go to would be appropriate. Either way, Oakland's not the jury pool for this trial... "

Normbc9 wrote on Oct 7, 2009 8:09 AM:

" I still cannot believe this is a question in the mind of that Judge or DA. But when the courts are in the clutches of the Ron Dellums machine anything can happen. I sure hope common sense and justice prevail in this case. "

srsly wrote on Oct 7, 2009 8:11 AM:

" No, really? A change of venue? Who would have guessed! "

Kathy Concened wrote on Oct 7, 2009 4:17 PM:

" Strange. OJ Simpson got a change of venue to East LA? That was not a jury of his peers. He was from Santa Monica..... "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy