NVR Logo
Berryessa Highlands residents agree to water rate increase
Property owners want county to OK agency to run service
Monday, October 05, 2009
Save and Share Share
Berryessa Highlands residents are paying more to keep their Lake Berryessa water and sewer district afloat.

The new water and sewer rates became effective Oct. 1, after the vast majority of property owners in the Napa Berryessa Resort Improvement District accepted the proposed water and sewer rate hikes. Fewer than 2 percent of property owners in the area filed protests with the district by last Tuesday’s deadline.
Under the new hikes, residents will pay 82 percent more than current rates between Oct. 1, 2009, and June 30, 2010; and 61 percent more between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2011. The rates then will decrease to their current levels.

A committee of residents proposed the new structure after a majority of property owners in the area dealt a defeat to higher increases in June.
The new rates are meant to be temporary while Steele Park Resort, the district’s biggest customer and revenue generator, is shutting down. The resort is scheduled to close at the end of the month as the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation reviews bids on Steele Park and four other resorts on the shores of Lake Berryessa.

Committee members said they were pleased with last Tuesday’s tally.
 “I think we’re heading in the right direction,” committee member and Berryessa Highlands resident Stu Williams said Friday.

This Tuesday, the members of the Napa County Board of Supervisors, who run the Napa Berryessa Resort Improvement District, will discuss whether two engineering firms recommended by the residents to run the district should be evaluated without a formal bid process.

County staff have recommended going through the normal bid process. Committee members oppose the plan because it could take three to four months.

The district’s water and sewer systems need major repairs, but the district has not been able to issue bonds to pay for the improvements because Steele Park — which has been expected to pay more than a quarter of the estimated $14 million cost — is closing.

The burden on Steele Park raised concerns in the Bureau of Reclamation and elsewhere that no new operator would bid to take over the popular lakeside resort.

But on Friday, Bureau of Reclamation spokesman Pete Lucero said the agency has received “an acceptable range of proposals” to run all the resorts, presumably including Steele Park. The contract for Steele Park includes a requirement to pay money into the NBRID water treatment system.

The bureau hopes to award resort contracts by March, said Lucero, who declined to say how many bids were submitted by the Sept. 30 deadline.

In 2006, state water regulators imposed a moratorium on new construction at Berryessa Highlands because of a series of violations of rules for disposal and treatment of wastewater. The violations most often occur in winter.

The moratorium remains in effect until the district upgrades its infrastructure. According to San Francisco Regional Water Quality Board, the improvements must be completed by 2012.

Bart Barthelemy, another committee member who has spearheaded the grass-roots campaign to find alternatives to run and manage the troubled district, on Friday said he wants county officials to evaluate the two engineering firm proposals without soliciting additional bids.

“Time is of the essence. We have winter coming up,” Barthelemy said.
2 comment(s)

Landshark wrote on Oct 5, 2009 8:29 PM:

" The VSP was initiated in 2000 and after ten years of planning, the recreation industry is dead. Water & Sewage rates are increasing at a alarming rate and the health & fire, life, safety issues at Pleasure Cove are deplorable.

The resorts along the west shore are a health issue and a waste of resources caused by incompetent planning. “Remove all buildings, infrastructures, boat ramps, roads and the NEW CONCESSIONAIRE will build NEW FACILITIES”. How about the existing underground transite pipe, asbestos contained materials (ACM’s/ Ref: Rule 902)which is probable in flooring adhesives, drywall taping compound, interior pipe insulation and roofing materials that were widely used in the early 1960’s when these resorts were constructed.

When does the planning and permit phasing begin? What are the limits of demolition? Will the CBC be enforced on the federal estate? What is the plan for ADA requirements at the resorts?

Some of the disappointing figures from this year’s recreation at Lake Berryessa include six reported drownings and an estimated 100,000 visitors which are unacceptable statistics.

The BOR’s seamless transition continues as the next round of their Prospectus has closed on September 30, 2009 and will bring yet more “hope & change”. Posted in the article above, Mr. Pedro Lucero offers "hope" yet declines to state how many bidders responded to the Bureau of Reclamations failed process of RFP’s.

“Next year will be better” and we’ll have to ask, better that what Mr. Lucero?

Over 1,000,000,000 people have been direclty impacted ethically, financailly and potentially illegally by the incompetent planning of the Bureau of Reclamation.

Write you CONGRESSMAN and share the facts of Reclamation's failures and incompetence. "

Water Cannon wrote on Oct 7, 2009 2:46 PM:

" If anyone hasn't noticed, NVR has fewer post's on the subject of BOR and Berryessa. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy