Dispatcher who faked cancer gets 6 months in jail
-
-
img
Former Napa police dispatcher Dannille Vanderpool was sentenced Thursday to six months in jail after accepting a deal to plead guilty to one count of grand theft. Vanderpool admitted faking having cancer and receiving some $50,000 in community donations. -- J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
By ALISHA WYMAN and DAN ROSS
Register Staff Writers
September 18th, 2009
September 17th, 2009
July 31st, 2009
1:30 p.m.Former Napa police dispatcher Dannille Vanderpool was sentenced to 179 days in jail and five years of probation today for bilking friends and law enforcement benevolent associations of tens of thousands of dollars.
Vanderpool falsely claimed to have cancer and told friends and coworkers for years about treatments she did not receive and obstacles she did not face. Charged with several counts of grand theft as well as falsifying documents, she pleaded guilty to one charge of grand theft. Her attorney told the court that Vanderpool is battling mental health issues that contributed to her conduct.
At today’s hearing three victims of Vanderpool’s actions spoke, including American Canyon police officer and former Vanderpool friend Wendy Daniels, who truly is battling cancer.
Daniels told the court this morning that she would help Vanderpool by mowing her lawn, cooking meals and working in her garden, all the while battling breast cancer herself.
At one point, Daniels said she was too sick to help Vanderpool and informed her of this.
"She made me feel guilty that I could not help her," Daniels said while fighting back tears.
Daniels and Darlene Elia of the Napa Police Officer's Association both spoke in court about how Vanderpool faked having brain cancer at the same time officer Craig McCarthy was dying from brain cancer.
"She played on our raw emotions and she lied," said Elia.
"She talked about her symptoms and it scared me to death because someday I would have those same symptoms," said Daniels.
Vanderpool's attorney, Seth Chazin, said Vanderpool suffers from bipolar disorder and that mental illness is what caused her to fake having cancer, not a determination to gather donations from others.
"Things went awry when the mental illness took over and got the best of her," said Chazin.
Judge Francisca Tisher admonished Vanderpool while approving the 6-month sentence.
"It is one thing when you take property from someone, it is another when you take from their soul," said Tisher. "When an offense like this takes place it is almost unspeakable."
Tisher ordered Vanderpool to make full restitution of the roughly $50,000 donated to her and received through the city's fund for employees needing additional time off work.
Check back later today for more on this story
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
whatsgoingon wrote on Sep 17, 2009 11:55 AM:
napagrl1960 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:42 PM:
She should have gone to prison, anyone else that did this would have. I guess she still has "connections" somewhere...
what a bunch of crap - 6 Months! "
NapaNana wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:54 PM:
Mental illness. Alright...I'll buy that. But anyone that commits crimes of any kind....and she isn't alone on this one....can't all be too tightly wrapped in the first place.
It shouldn't be an "excuse" for defence.
Sorry.....just my opinion.
At least in Chowchilla.....should she have been sent there.....she may have understood the seriousness of her offence....both the Moral (not telling the truth to her friends and co-workers)and the financial end (ripping of thousands of $$ from caring people and organizations) of what she has done.
I can almost hear her sigh a big "Whew!" Suckers! "
Mr. Feasor wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:58 PM:
Penal Code § 489.
Grand theft is punishable as follows:
(a) When the grand theft involves the theft of a firearm, by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, 2, or 3 years.
(b) In all other cases, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in the state prison.
So six months of jail time for a first time offender is not unusual.
The most conspicuously missing information here is restitution. What amount must she pay to the victims??? "
rsbrooks wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:05 PM:
What about restitution?? She should at least pay her co-workers back! "
Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:07 PM:
raybo wrote on Sep 17, 2009 3:24 PM:
stray wrote on Sep 17, 2009 3:40 PM:
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:14 PM:
--Dan "
MarkMiwords wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:19 PM:
raybo wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:27 PM:
nocal wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:17 PM:
amcan27 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:47 PM:
Gmey1082 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:09 PM:
snowmom2 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:21 PM:
Baraki wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:27 PM:
msdemo wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:43 PM:
SubValleyGirl wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:42 PM:
That says that either the police department is too lax in who they hire,
or it's a convenient, and apparently effective, defense.
It 's really one or the other. "
areyoubitter wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:06 PM:
Ephemerol wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:42 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Sep 17, 2009 9:31 PM:
Bi-polar, huh? What a racket. I'm not sure which is worse: the fact that defense counsel tendered the issue, or that the DA recommended such a sweet plea bargain.
Oh well, what's done is done. I hope that the victims get their money back, and that this won't tarnish legitimate charity benefits for people who actually have cancer... "
amcan27 wrote on Sep 18, 2009 8:23 AM:
lionkng wrote on Sep 18, 2009 4:52 PM:
Then they let a child molester run food at the bingo hall??
What is with this town? "