NVR Logo
Dispatcher who faked cancer gets 6 months in jail
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Save and Share Share
1:30 p.m.Former Napa police dispatcher Dannille Vanderpool was sentenced to 179 days in jail and five years of probation today for bilking friends and law enforcement benevolent associations of tens of thousands of dollars.

Vanderpool falsely claimed to have cancer and told friends and coworkers for years about treatments she did not receive and obstacles she did not face. Charged with several counts of grand theft as well as falsifying documents, she pleaded guilty to one charge of grand theft. Her attorney told the court that Vanderpool is battling mental health issues that contributed to her conduct.
At today’s hearing three victims of Vanderpool’s actions spoke, including American Canyon police officer and former Vanderpool friend Wendy Daniels, who truly is battling cancer.

Daniels told the court this morning that she would help Vanderpool by mowing her lawn, cooking meals and working in her garden, all the while battling breast cancer herself.
At one point, Daniels said she was too sick to help Vanderpool and informed her of this.

"She made me feel guilty that I could not help her," Daniels said while fighting back tears.
Daniels and Darlene Elia of the Napa Police Officer's Association both spoke in court about how Vanderpool faked having brain cancer at the same time officer Craig McCarthy was dying from brain cancer.

"She played on our raw emotions and she lied," said Elia.

"She talked about her symptoms and it scared me to death because someday I would have those same symptoms," said Daniels.

Vanderpool's attorney, Seth Chazin, said Vanderpool suffers from bipolar disorder and that mental illness is what caused her to fake having cancer, not a determination to gather donations from others.

"Things went awry when the mental illness took over and got the best of her," said Chazin.

Judge Francisca Tisher admonished Vanderpool while approving the 6-month sentence.

"It is one thing when you take property from someone, it is another when you take from their soul," said Tisher. "When an offense like this takes place it is almost unspeakable."

Tisher ordered Vanderpool to make full restitution of the roughly $50,000 donated to her and received through the city's fund for employees needing additional time off work.

Check back later today for more on this story
23 comment(s)

whatsgoingon wrote on Sep 17, 2009 11:55 AM:

" Wow! She is lucky to get probation for this. She could have been in Chowchilla for a while. "

napagrl1960 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:42 PM:

" that's it???!!! Wow, I guess crime does pay....

She should have gone to prison, anyone else that did this would have. I guess she still has "connections" somewhere...

what a bunch of crap - 6 Months! "

NapaNana wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:54 PM:

" Unreal.......a little slap on the wrist for such awful behavior.
Mental illness. Alright...I'll buy that. But anyone that commits crimes of any kind....and she isn't alone on this one....can't all be too tightly wrapped in the first place.
It shouldn't be an "excuse" for defence.
Sorry.....just my opinion.
At least in Chowchilla.....should she have been sent there.....she may have understood the seriousness of her offence....both the Moral (not telling the truth to her friends and co-workers)and the financial end (ripping of thousands of $$ from caring people and organizations) of what she has done.
I can almost hear her sigh a big "Whew!" Suckers! "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Sep 17, 2009 12:58 PM:

" She pleaded guilty to one charge of grand theft. In order for a plea bargain to be approved by the court, the DA must recommend it.

Penal Code § 489.

Grand theft is punishable as follows:

(a) When the grand theft involves the theft of a firearm, by imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, 2, or 3 years.

(b) In all other cases, by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or in the state prison.

So six months of jail time for a first time offender is not unusual.

The most conspicuously missing information here is restitution. What amount must she pay to the victims??? "

rsbrooks wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:05 PM:

" Amazing! Due to her actions another deserving person in Napa may be deprived of help from the police officers association. They are being very cautious-understandably! I hope she takes those 6 months and seriously thinks about the lives she has effected by her wrongdoings.
What about restitution?? She should at least pay her co-workers back! "

Little Lord Fauntleroy wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:07 PM:

" Bipolar Disorder? If that's the reason she stole from people, then send her to Napa State Hospital, not jail. "

raybo wrote on Sep 17, 2009 3:24 PM:

" Is there some legal difference between 179 days and 6 months? I suspect the 179 days, being less than 6 months, falls into another classification. Does anyone know for sure? "

stray wrote on Sep 17, 2009 3:40 PM:

" And how do we know she isn't faking Bipolar disorder? "

NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:14 PM:

" She was sentenced to 180 days, 1 day off for having been held one day previously, so she serves from here a 179-day sentence
--Dan "

MarkMiwords wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:19 PM:

" 6 months? I've been wondering for a long time, but now it is official. There IS no justice here in Napa County. Bipolar? I've known folks with Bipolar Disorder. It didn't make them crooks. "

raybo wrote on Sep 17, 2009 4:27 PM:

" Thanks, Dan. I guess my conspiracy side was at work. "

nocal wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:17 PM:

" She'll only do 2/3 of the 179 days with 1/3 of her sentence time taken off for "good time and work time." "

amcan27 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 5:47 PM:

" I want to know how is going to pay peole back if she is in jail? How is that going to work? How do you pay people back without a job? How do you pay for you kid to eat and all that? I think she should be out and work and pay people back. Are people mad yes. are you hurt yes. But think this what you want? Is this right? Now you have to pay for her. Again. Good job people. Good job. WOW!!!! "

Gmey1082 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:09 PM:

" This is absolutly ridiculous. I guess somehow praying on peoples good intentions is less of an offense than outright stealing from them. 6 months in county definatly does not seem like a fair punishment for stealing 50,000 dollars and enslaving a cancer patient. "

snowmom2 wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:21 PM:

" So if she has a mental illness, why doesn't she go to Napa State Hospital? She would get the medication and treatment she deserves and not be behind bars. I think the lawyers need to rethink where she is going to get rehabilitation, not just jail. "

Baraki wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:27 PM:

" I think she got 179 days because she served one day when she was originally arrested... "

msdemo wrote on Sep 17, 2009 6:43 PM:

" Lots of luck collecting the money. Unless someone complains and finds out where she may be working in years to come. this is a dead issue. The drunk driver that hit me still owes me money and I decided life was too short to pursue it. "

SubValleyGirl wrote on Sep 17, 2009 7:42 PM:

" She worked for the police department, yet she was mentally unstable...

That says that either the police department is too lax in who they hire,
or it's a convenient, and apparently effective, defense.

It 's really one or the other. "

areyoubitter wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:06 PM:

" She really should spend more than a few months in jail as punishment for what she did. People dont forget stuff like that. "

Ephemerol wrote on Sep 17, 2009 8:42 PM:

" These are not the actions of someone with bi-polar disorder and I would like to know just how her so called lawyer arrived at that conclusion? It's really an insult to anyone who struggles or suffers with any form of depression to attempt to hind behind this legal or social defense. Ms. Vanderpool betrays all of the symptoms and behaviors of a malignant sociopath who has no conscience. These are the deeds of a very focused and controlling person who has no regard for anyones' heart or soul. It would be helpful to interview her parents about all of this, if you can locate them or if they are willing to talk and answer truthfully. Better yet have an entire team of forensic psychiatrists interview Ms. Vanderpool over a prolonged period of time. Such claims tend to collapse across time. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Sep 17, 2009 9:31 PM:

" Thanks for the update, NVR, regarding restitution.

Bi-polar, huh? What a racket. I'm not sure which is worse: the fact that defense counsel tendered the issue, or that the DA recommended such a sweet plea bargain.

Oh well, what's done is done. I hope that the victims get their money back, and that this won't tarnish legitimate charity benefits for people who actually have cancer... "

amcan27 wrote on Sep 18, 2009 8:23 AM:

" How you would you feel if this was your kid? Would you want to talk about it? Would you ant to be interviewed? NO. Don't drag her parents in to this. Dannille did it not Dannille and her Family. "

lionkng wrote on Sep 18, 2009 4:52 PM:

" Can the city of Napa just give me 50,000 and I will do 6 months in Jail I don't want to steal from anyone. Just give me the money. my nephew got 8 years for shooting a fully automatic weapon into a roof........ Ya he did the bad and paid for it but that same time a kid from Justin was beat to death and the guys did 2 years...
Then they let a child molester run food at the bingo hall??
What is with this town? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy