The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
wined0wnnapa wrote on Sep 16, 2009 8:25 AM:
crooked6pence wrote on Sep 16, 2009 8:54 AM:
1 - Take care fellow citizens, simple vehicle code violations will now be followed by a search, or request to search if you fit the "profile" - of course you may and should politely decline. Expired registration is a ticketable offense.
2 - A junkie with a bad habit and a baggie of meth is not a "drug bust" - but is does sound so sensational.
3 - What was that arresting officer's name?
Also, was it the front or rear plate that was covered in plastic, i.e. did a plastic bag on the road blow up and cover the front plate? It changes the context of the story if the rear plate was deliberately masked... "
NapaNana wrote on Sep 16, 2009 9:01 AM:
Lexme2 wrote on Sep 16, 2009 9:56 AM:
sprklsunshine wrote on Sep 16, 2009 10:37 AM:
And why are you on here defending drug users and trying to put officer’s lives at risk by asking for their names? "
crooked6pence wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:30 AM:
I live in the United States of America, a country with a Constitution, a Constitution that affords me and you the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.
The officer has to have probable cause to conduct a search, either that or consent from the driver. You never have to give consent!
I am defending OUR rights, not just the rights of some drug addict.
Publishing the names of people who are caught with drugs, puts them at far more risk of being targeted, than the arresting officer doing his job!
The public has just as much right to know who is arrested, as who makes these arrests and conducts these searches.
What fantasy world do you live in? "
sprklsunshine wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:55 AM:
I also believe that ‘the license plate was covered with plastic. However, he was able to check the plate’s history and he found the vehicle had false tags on its registration.’ counts as probable cause. But then again, I’m not a lawyer. "
amazed wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:55 AM:
napawineo wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:57 AM:
Cowboy wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:11 PM:
BigRod wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:11 PM:
blackpony wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:29 PM:
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:29 PM:
The last large-scale report on meth in Napa County, written by NVR, was in '05. Since it published, there have been 301 more NVR-printed articles on meth.
here are links to the 3-part '05 series
Manny Ruiz's first love -- meth -- has never let him go
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2005/09/26/news/export1285.txt
A mom behind bars
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2005/09/25/news/export1238.txt
Medical fallout from crank use ranges from frayed nerves to nasty cases of 'meth mouth'
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2005/09/25/news/export1236.txt "
justnana wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:44 PM:
napawineo wrote on Sep 16, 2009 12:49 PM:
it is 2009 time to start writing again.. I don't really care about those types of stories I want the facts.. Not just some story on users..or regular stories on arrests, how about some more facts.
A) how about a list showing the number of arrests for Meth offenses in the county per month.
B) of those arrested how many of those arrests actually end up with a conviction? Or dropped by the D.A.? due to prop 36?
C) How about a detailed story on prop 36 explaining just how many chances meth users get in Napa County? Even those on parole for meth and continue to use and be arrested time and time again?
D) why the parole board doesn't violate parole on parolees when arrested for meth?
These are some good questions that you can't just answer sending us to a link that was created in 2005..
How about the real story Dan? The story is right in front of you Dan, we the people want to know the facts.
How about interviewing the D.A. and some of the Judges? "
funnyme wrote on Sep 16, 2009 2:57 PM:
Thank you NPD for doing whatever it takes to keep drugs off the streets, now if the DA could tweak the laws better to keep these losers in jail it would be really worth the time spent arresting people. "
livetolovetolive wrote on Sep 16, 2009 4:18 PM:
If anyone in a vehicle that is pulled over has a warrant out, that vehicle is to be searched regardless of the innocence of the owner of the car.
You guys are all complaining about the meth problem in Napa and what the cops are doing about it. But then the cops become more pro-active and you freak out!
The point is....another druggie off the street! StOP your whining!
If your gonna get all political about your rights, why don't you call a crackhead instead of the police next time you need help!
BIGROD: if you were on probation in the past...why the heck would you say no? You already have an illegal past, so saying no makes you look guilty...like your hiding something. You can argue otherwise...but seriously, accept the obvious. Saying no is challenging authority and showing disrespect for the law. "
livetolovetolive wrote on Sep 16, 2009 4:30 PM:
"Publishing the names of people who are caught with drugs, puts them at far more risk of being targeted, than the arresting officer doing his job!"
How the heck is publishing the names of people who are caught with drugs, putting them at risk of being targeted? By who...other than the police? They are put @ risk just by using drugs! That is their choice! You are completely wrong about an arresting officer doing his job...they are always targeted! Why do you think they have to watch their backs? Why do you think that most of them are unlisted in the phone book?
Its funny when people say "I have rights!" Yes you do, but be educated about them. People with a criminal past have totally different rights than those of us who don't.
ALSO, once you have a criminal history, you give up a whole lot of rights. Its called suffering the consequences. "
crooked6pence wrote on Sep 16, 2009 5:33 PM:
"Saying no is challenging authority and showing disrespect for the law."
We should never challenge authority or show disrespect for the law?
Wait until your rights are unjustly violated and you'll be singing a different tune.
Sounds like you need an education on your constitutional rights. Starting with the fact that you don't get to waive mine. "
savenapa wrote on Sep 16, 2009 6:49 PM:
Two officers came to the house and questioned me. They asked permission to search my car. I said "sure". They proceeded and came to a locked glove box. They wanted in the glove box and I told them I would open it for them when they produced a search warrant. They told me they would arrest me and search it anyway. I said "ok". Long story short, they tried to convince me to open it, I denied them permission on the basis of principle and they finally backed off and left.
We do have rights and the law must function within it's boundaries.
I was a mid-twenties male with long hair so I was probably viewed by them to be a troublemaker of some sort. "
napa1957 wrote on Sep 16, 2009 11:09 PM:
napahawaiinapa wrote on Sep 19, 2009 2:21 AM:
napahawaiinapa wrote on Sep 19, 2009 2:31 AM: