Monez launches campaign for supervisor
Dan Monez, a former Napa city police chief, formally announced Monday his intention to run for county supervisor. |
Buy photos
Ex-police chief to challenge Wagenknecht
By BILL KISLIUK
Register Editor
November 12th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
October 31st, 2009
November 10th, 2009
September 26th, 2009
September 14th, 2009
July 27th, 2009
July 26th, 2009
Ex-Napa Police Chief Dan Monez formally announced Monday that he will run against Brad Wagenknecht next year for a seat on the Napa County Board of Supervisors.
The race is in District 1, which includes west Napa, Browns Valley, Carneros and part of central Napa.
Napa Mayor Jill Techel has also expressed interest in the seat, but has not declared whether she will run. Techel could not be reached for comment Monday.
Monez was Napa’s chief of police for 17 years and spent more than 30 years in law enforcement.
Currently the executive director of Napa Valley TV, he said he will resign from that post in December to focus on the campaign.
Monez has played leadership roles on many nonprofit boards and commissions over the years, including United Way, Aldea, Dreamweavers Theatre and the Napa County Hispanic Network.
“My experience working in these diverse areas of Napa County life has given me the knowledge, competence and perspective to be an effective leader on the board of supervisors,” he said in a prepared statement.
Monez said his priorities will include keeping the local economy healthy; ensuring long-term availability of water throughout the county; maintaining strong public infrastructure; supporting services to seniors, the disabled and children; and challenging state mandates for growth and residential density in Napa County.
Wagenknecht is a teacher at Redwood Middle School and former member of the Napa City Council. He was first elected to the city council in 1984 and left in 1998, when he was first elected to the board of supervisors. He is serving his third term on the board.
Wagenknecht is a reliable slow-growth vote who recently called for a summit to consider all the hotel projects proposed around Napa County, saying the county must balance what it does for tourists with the need to protect agriculture and open space.
“I’ve had to make some tough decisions over the years,” said Wagenknecht. “I feel the decisions I’ve made have been in the best interests of Napa County and have been representative of the views of the people in my district.”
“I’m planning on running again,” said Wagenknecht. “I just wasn’t planning on making the announcement at this point,” he added, as the primary election is in June 2010, nine months away.
(Note: The first version of this article published at 9:30 a.m. Monday)
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
steph wrote on Sep 14, 2009 1:00 PM:
Big Mac wrote on Sep 14, 2009 3:37 PM:
abouttime wrote on Sep 14, 2009 3:50 PM:
napan79 wrote on Sep 14, 2009 6:52 PM:
Brownsvalley wrote on Sep 14, 2009 7:30 PM:
danmonez wrote on Sep 14, 2009 8:04 PM:
Dan Monez monez4supervisor.org "
napa1957 wrote on Sep 14, 2009 10:08 PM:
kbc wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:10 AM:
Old Time Napkin wrote on Sep 15, 2009 7:36 AM:
I also don't understand the question about union issues. Why would he have to recuse himself? As the COP he was management and not a union member. Brownsvalley, enlighten us as to why he has to recuse himself. "
Not so common sense wrote on Sep 15, 2009 9:38 AM:
sdnapa wrote on Sep 15, 2009 10:07 AM:
you're asking a man who served his community, who has no idea what his future holds as far as his health, etc. to give up his pension?
i can also attest that the city of napa does pay retirees a very small stipen toward health care, but believe me, it's not much.
get serious brownsvalley. this man wants to continue to serve his community. would you give up your pension? please remember that these CalPers people have had money taken out of their checks toward this pension for years. it's not something for nothing.
now if we could just find someone to get diane dillon out of there! "
glenroy wrote on Sep 15, 2009 11:10 AM:
I wonder why those who question Dan’s sincerity fail to question the other Supervisors who have been paid by UCD while holding public office and then voted on controversial issues UCD supported. That would include the Land Trust which supposedly is nonpartisan… "
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 15, 2009 11:58 AM:
Many of you may not be aware, or particularly appreciative of the fact that Wagenknecht and Dillon (and now Caldwell) have played a significant role in keeping growth in check.
Development, held back for such a long time, has created what developers view as a vacant void needing to be filled. As developers pile up to fill this void, the pressure (and influence) build up to the point that any amount of weakness will unlock that gate and everything we've worked so hard for will collapse. We are not immune from becoming another San Jose.
From what I have observed about Monez, he's a well liked man in the community. Being well liked is not the only ingredient needed to be an effective supervisor. We need to maintain a strong anti growth position in this County. It's what makes the County unique. Monez appears to be pro growth, pro development. He will tip the scales toward growth. If that's what you want, vote for him. If not, you are wise to vote for those who already have a strong, anti growth record. "
sdnapa wrote on Sep 15, 2009 1:20 PM:
factcheck wrote on Sep 15, 2009 3:30 PM:
For every house built in Napa county the County loses money, something like 15-20 cents on the dollar.
If you think the tourist revenue will continue when there are houses border to border around our vineyards you do not know the hand that feeds us.
If you think that houses use more water than vineyards just down load the Napa County User Permit and see that a home uses more water than an acre of vineyard (8 homes per acre??????).
If you think that houses will replace the $9+ billion Wine industry in revenue and jobs for the county you need an Economics 101 Class.
If you think that traffic increases with vineyards, again, look at the use permit. The average home does 9.6 vehicle trips per day, the average vineyard is much less.
Unless Dan Monez swears an oath against houses (not going after development driven state mandates alone) you are jeopardizing the golden goose. He can espouse all the wonderful 2nd order issues he wants but kill the Goose and we are just another bedroom community.
I guess that you would recommend that Santa Clara County votes to build more houses and squeeze out Intel, Google, Cisco etc etc etc. We have vineyards, they have tilt up cement buildings.
Is that growth or short sightedness?
Dan you decide, I know Brad's answer! "
Lexme2 wrote on Sep 15, 2009 4:08 PM:
sdnapa wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:09 PM:
the county has put the kabosh on several projects that have cost people in this county their jobs. several of my co-workers are among them. "
jfz wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:24 PM:
Thank you for your clarification.
Some politicians in the state and federal governments pull in multiple pensions and will never have Obamacare forced down their throats.
Good going and best o' luck! "
brownsvalley wrote on Sep 15, 2009 5:26 PM:
Do you feel it appropriate for public employees to “double dip” that is take retirement benefits and a public employee salary at the same time? How about when the county budget is in dire straights, will be reduced again next year and for some time to come?
Are you opposed to meeting our legal obligations to provide low income housing in Napa as your “challenging state mandates for growth and residential density in Napa County” seems to imply?
Where in the county would you locate low income housing other than American Canyon?
The cost of existing public employee salary and benefits are un sustainable by definition, do you have a plan to contain these costs or do you believe the county can “grow” their way out of the problem? "
steph wrote on Sep 15, 2009 6:39 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 15, 2009 11:36 PM:
The custom home builder is usually a small business contractor who does not typically benefit from large scale development. They more likely benefit from remodels and new construction on larger lots.
The large scale developers are often from out of town. They hire cheap labor crews to come in and do a job in an assembly line like fashion. When the massive project is complete, they all go home, elsewhere.
The independent contractor such as a skilled local plumber or electrician is typically not hired to work on these large scale developments.
If you do not believe me, go by a tract development, even a smaller one. Observe who is doing the work. Ask them where they live.
Sadly, the demand for skilled and qualified contractors has decreased as a result of the influx of the low wage worker into California. This has permeated into just about every labor type of industry around.
Slow growth does not typically deter the construction of custom homes on legally zoned lots. Slow growth holds back the massive influx of tract development into the County. It defends hijacked zoning laws.
Put blame where it belongs. We have tolerated low wage workers taking over the jobs of higher paid, skilled workers. California is tilting too far toward low wage workers who require other types of support for survival. The middle class cannot afford to pay for these services AND hire a contractor to finish their remodeling! THAT'S the real problem. "
sdnapa wrote on Sep 16, 2009 9:11 AM:
i can only tell you what i see for myself in the line of work that i'm in. construction is a huge part of the industry i work in, and i can tell you that the people that have been laid off due to the slow down in construction are paid somewhere between $25-$30 per hour.
i also know that civil engineering, which is no low paying career, has been affected by the no growth. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 17, 2009 1:31 PM:
Keep this in mind: we either face a "little" pain now or massive amounts of pain later because the greater the number of people who become dependent on the growth foundation we have built, the harder it's going to be to repress the revolt that's bound to come along when limited resources step in to do the job that humans were not self disciplined enough to do for themselves. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 17, 2009 10:08 PM:
glenroy wrote on Sep 27, 2009 7:41 AM:
hogwild1030 wrote on Sep 27, 2009 10:31 AM: