The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Dirty Napkin wrote on Sep 10, 2009 2:08 PM:
wowquebonita wrote on Sep 10, 2009 2:35 PM:
skeptical wrote on Sep 10, 2009 3:11 PM:
supernapawoman wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:09 PM:
car2007 wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:33 PM:
Cowboy wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:48 PM:
" I think that eventually Johannes Mehserle will have all the charges in this case dropped against him...."
Yes. Then cops could execute people in the street with impunity, and save us a lot of money and court costs.
What a great job to have, being a cop, and not having to be accountable for your actions. "
John Richards wrote on Sep 10, 2009 5:04 PM:
Mehserle is entitled to a jury of his peers. "
Black n white wrote on Sep 10, 2009 5:12 PM:
Kathy Concened wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:07 PM:
RN wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:22 PM:
jimihil wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:11 PM:
Black n white wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:17 PM:
I dont disagree with you about the size, shape, and balance difference between a firearm and a taser. But there is one thing your no taking into account. There are well documented physiological effects of stress on the human body. Tunnel vision, and auditory exclusion are very common. It is not at all unreasonable to say that because of the high stress situation he was in he honestly couldnt tell the difference between the two. "
K9 wrote on Sep 10, 2009 10:16 PM:
What must happen next is that there will be a trial to determine the degree of guilt of Johannes Mehserle, and his culpability before the law.
Our opinions don't count in court, only what is established there matters. "
Hear Ye wrote on Sep 11, 2009 12:41 AM:
There doesn't have to be intent. It's right there in the law. "
shrapnal wrote on Sep 11, 2009 1:35 AM:
Black n white wrote on Sep 11, 2009 3:24 AM:
You are incorrect. 187 PC- "Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought."
Malice (there are two kinds expressed and implied) is defined in the penal code as, "Expressed malice is when there is manifested a deliberate intention unlawfully to take the life of a fellow creature." (specific intent)
"Implied malice is when no consideration or provocation appears, or when the circumstances attentding the killing show an abandond and malignant heart." (grave indifference)
Manslaughter is defined in penal code 192. "Manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human beling without malice." (three kinds, but vehicular doesnt apply in this case)
Voluntary-upon a sudden quarrel or heat of passion.
Involuntary-in the commision of an unlawful act.
So the question in this case would be was the use of the taser in situation lawful? The suspect in this case was resisting officers trying to cuff him by concealing his hands under his body where a weapon could be. That more than justifys the use of a taser.
They could still get hung up with the "sudden fight or quarrel" verbage, but it all boils down to that fact that he did nto intend to use a firearm. "
GregN. wrote on Sep 11, 2009 6:00 AM:
I know it will be hard to prove that, so it's surprising they did not drop the charge or even accept a voluntary manslaughter. "
GregN. wrote on Sep 11, 2009 6:01 AM:
Biased first person opinion though? "
Cowboy wrote on Sep 11, 2009 4:35 PM:
There's no such thing as an "aww shucks" defense for a killing under the color of authority.
Cops cannot make "mistakes" that result in death. If they do, they must pay the highest price. "
Hear Ye wrote on Sep 11, 2009 5:51 PM:
So you say I'm wrong then post the penal code that proves I'm right? Interesting technique! "
Kathy Concened wrote on Sep 11, 2009 6:54 PM:
Farmgirl wrote on Sep 11, 2009 8:59 PM:
3030 wrote on Sep 16, 2009 7:13 PM:
napahawaiinapa wrote on Sep 21, 2009 2:22 AM: