NVR Logo
BART cop from Napa to face murder charge
Thursday, September 10, 2009
Save and Share Share
3:15 p.m.A judge today rejected defense motions to drop or reduce a murder charge against the former BART officer from Napa accused of the New Year's Day shooting of Oscar Grant on the Fruitvale BART platform.

The attorneys for Johannes Mehserle, a 2000 graduate of New Technology High School in Napa and the Napa Valley College Police Academy, have argued that the former BARTofficer should be charged with involuntary manslaughter, not murder.
Cell phone video caught Mehserle shooting and killing 22-year-old at Oakland’s Fruitvale BART station during a disturbance.

Defense attorneys maintain that Mehserle meant to use his stun gun on Grant, not fire his handgun.
In issuing his ruling Thursday, Alameda County Superior Court Judge Thomas Reardon said video images shot by passengers refuted the defense’s accidental shooting claim.

Mehserle's trial is set to begin Nov. 2
24 comment(s)

Dirty Napkin wrote on Sep 10, 2009 2:08 PM:

" Can we all say change of venue?? "

wowquebonita wrote on Sep 10, 2009 2:35 PM:

" Change of venue...what will that accomplish? This case has gotten a lot of press. There are 9 bay area counties...very unlikely that no one has heard about this case. "

skeptical wrote on Sep 10, 2009 3:11 PM:

" i'm going to go outside, light something on fire, jump up and down on someone's car and break a store window. "

supernapawoman wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:09 PM:

" I think that eventually Johannes Mehserle will have all the charges in this case dropped against him. It is a shame that he has to go through all of this nonsense when Oscar Grant was the criminal here !!! What a world we live in !! "

car2007 wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:33 PM:

" I'm glad charges were not drop or reduce for this guy. "

Cowboy wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:48 PM:

" supernapawoman wrote on Sep 10, 2009 4:09 PM:
" I think that eventually Johannes Mehserle will have all the charges in this case dropped against him...."

Yes. Then cops could execute people in the street with impunity, and save us a lot of money and court costs.

What a great job to have, being a cop, and not having to be accountable for your actions. "

John Richards wrote on Sep 10, 2009 5:04 PM:

" Why does the change of venue have to be to a Bay area county? I think Orange county would be perfect.
Mehserle is entitled to a jury of his peers. "

Black n white wrote on Sep 10, 2009 5:12 PM:

" Actually this is not the worst thing that could have happened. With them holding him to answer for murder it should make getting an acquital easier. The reason I say this is becuase there was no intent. Murder is a specific intent crime. This was clearly an accident. "

Kathy Concened wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:07 PM:

" Alameda DA caved to the pressure. "

RN wrote on Sep 10, 2009 7:22 PM:

" I agree with black n white. Where is the intent ? "

jimihil wrote on Sep 10, 2009 8:11 PM:

" Talk about not receiving a fair trial! Posters Supernapawoman suggests this is "nonesense" and B&W "clearly a mistake". Let the guy stand trial. One could just as easily surmise there is a obvious difference in the wieght, balance and appearance between a 9mm pistol and a stun gun. Funny how some people have already made up their mind without having all the facts and evidence. Sheesh! Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! "

Black n white wrote on Sep 10, 2009 9:17 PM:

" jimihil,

I dont disagree with you about the size, shape, and balance difference between a firearm and a taser. But there is one thing your no taking into account. There are well documented physiological effects of stress on the human body. Tunnel vision, and auditory exclusion are very common. It is not at all unreasonable to say that because of the high stress situation he was in he honestly couldnt tell the difference between the two. "

K9 wrote on Sep 10, 2009 10:16 PM:

" What is not in doubt? Johannes Mehserle shot his 9mm pistol into a prone man, fully restrained by numerous other officers, and killed him. There is no doubt that this is what happened. There is video, audio, and first person testimony that this is true.

What must happen next is that there will be a trial to determine the degree of guilt of Johannes Mehserle, and his culpability before the law.

Our opinions don't count in court, only what is established there matters. "

Hear Ye wrote on Sep 11, 2009 12:41 AM:

" Black n WHite-


There doesn't have to be intent. It's right there in the law. "

shrapnal wrote on Sep 11, 2009 1:35 AM:

" The only way he'll get a free trial is if they move it to So.Cal. Any court up here will cave to pressure and find him guilty. As people before me has posted there was no intent to kill him, he was probably running on adrenaline and made a grave mistake. "

Black n white wrote on Sep 11, 2009 3:24 AM:

" Here ye,

You are incorrect. 187 PC- "Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought."

Malice (there are two kinds expressed and implied) is defined in the penal code as, "Expressed malice is when there is manifested a deliberate intention unlawfully to take the life of a fellow creature." (specific intent)

"Implied malice is when no consideration or provocation appears, or when the circumstances attentding the killing show an abandond and malignant heart." (grave indifference)

Manslaughter is defined in penal code 192. "Manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human beling without malice." (three kinds, but vehicular doesnt apply in this case)

Voluntary-upon a sudden quarrel or heat of passion.

Involuntary-in the commision of an unlawful act.

So the question in this case would be was the use of the taser in situation lawful? The suspect in this case was resisting officers trying to cuff him by concealing his hands under his body where a weapon could be. That more than justifys the use of a taser.

They could still get hung up with the "sudden fight or quarrel" verbage, but it all boils down to that fact that he did nto intend to use a firearm. "

GregN. wrote on Sep 11, 2009 6:00 AM:

" Murder must be premeditated (he must have willingly known he was going to kill that man all night).

I know it will be hard to prove that, so it's surprising they did not drop the charge or even accept a voluntary manslaughter. "

GregN. wrote on Sep 11, 2009 6:01 AM:

" K9..."and first person testimony that this is true."

Biased first person opinion though? "

Cowboy wrote on Sep 11, 2009 4:35 PM:

" A trained police officer has higher accountability than an ordinary citizen who shoots his neighbor "by mistake".

There's no such thing as an "aww shucks" defense for a killing under the color of authority.

Cops cannot make "mistakes" that result in death. If they do, they must pay the highest price. "

Hear Ye wrote on Sep 11, 2009 5:51 PM:

" Black n white-

So you say I'm wrong then post the penal code that proves I'm right? Interesting technique! "

Kathy Concened wrote on Sep 11, 2009 6:54 PM:

" Remember OJ case? Venue was changed from Santa Monica to east Los Angeles. WOW, what they overlooked in that case for the "community." We are doing it again. What about justice?? "

Farmgirl wrote on Sep 11, 2009 8:59 PM:

" Why would anyone want to be a cop? A man trying to do his duty - makes a mistake - and is tried for murder? I'm sorry - Grant was looking for trouble and found it. Mehserle should not be up on any charges at all. It all boils down to a white cop and a black thug. If the cop had been black this would not even had made the news! Someone is shooting someone in Oakland almost everyday - oh yes, it is blacks killing blacks - so it is just any everyday thing. Poor white cop tries to do his duty and look where it got him! "

3030 wrote on Sep 16, 2009 7:13 PM:

" Why does the race card come into play? It was tragic for everyone involved. Both familys lost a son, brother, and friend. I'm personally sick and tired of race being a theory. "

napahawaiinapa wrote on Sep 21, 2009 2:22 AM:

" I have to agree with you 3030..what does race have to do with it?? i just read these comments for the first time tonight and man are people critical. I think we should remain humble about this because it's time to be logical for a minute. I don't think the officer is some dummy who fell off the turnip truck, and why in the world would he intentionally shoot anyone when there was no threat? That should be an investigators first suspicion, and reason to believe something out of the ordinary happened. The officer knew his surroundings included fellow officers, and others..it couldn't be some 'big shot' thing..he is not an infant on the force so why does everyone think he wanted to give up his job and his freedom for no reason? The only explanation, and this may be too much for the world to deal with, has to be a sudden brain electrode malfunction/dysfunction..if someone can go into a coma, brain activity ceases to function, then come out of the coma sometimes with no deficit at all, whose to say what all of that signifies? Which leads me to believe that if they didn't check him with an MRI or CAT scan within several hours, you will all have to check with God to know what really happened..i don't think anyone is so ignorant to attempt a ridiculous and completely obsurd act as shooting for no reason, and the video shows Grant subdued, the officer must have known that no harm was possible by Grant, right? Being humble in any case, we will see the truth prevail, or we won't. I would feel sick if I found out that he had a brain dysf/malf and I maintained that he must be a killer. FACTS first!! "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy