Evans to seek Wiggins' seat
By JILLIAN JONES, Register Staff Writer
November 12th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
October 31st, 2009
September 28th, 2009
September 24th, 2009
September 22nd, 2009
September 15th, 2009
August 26th, 2009
September 30th, 2009
September 29th, 2009
August 25th, 2009
November 25th, 2009
November 23rd, 2009
November 22nd, 2009
November 21st, 2009
Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, announced Monday that she will run next year for the open state Senate seat to represent District 2, the expansive North Bay district that includes Napa County.
The announcement came only one day after state Sen. Pat Wiggins told supporters that she will not seek re-election in 2010 due to unspecified medical problems. Evans will now square off against David Rosas, a Santa Rosa Democrat and school board trustee who filed his intention to run earlier this month.
“First, I want to thank Sen. Wiggins, Pat, for her many years of excellent and dedicated public service to her constituents, her District and to California,” Evans said in a prepared statement. “Pat has been a friend, a leader and a colleague for many years and I know I have my work cut out for me to fill her shoes.”
Evans, who is prevented from running for re-election in the state Assembly due to term limits, originally planned to run for state Senate in 2014.
She said in an interview that it was “a struggle to make the decision to run for senate (in 2010), because I have other options when I’m termed out,” such as seeking a seat on the Sonoma County Superior Court. However, Wiggins’ decision not to seek re-election in 2010 caused Evans to reevaluate her timeline, she said.
“Because the position will be open in 2010, and I don’t want to have to run against an incumbent, and I’m termed out in 2010, timing-wise it just made sense,” Evans said.
Some of California’s top Democratic leaders have already given Evans the nod.
Reps. Mike Thompson and Lynn Woolsey, both of whom represent parts of the 2nd Senate District; state Senate President Darrell Steinberg; Assembly Speaker Karen Bass and Wiggins herself all announced their support for Evans Monday.
“Assemblymember Evans is just the kind of experienced, hard-working problem solver that California needs right now as we work to create jobs, fix our state budget problems and revive our state economy,” Steinberg said in a prepared statement. “Assemblymember Evans is the best choice for District 2.”
Evans is currently serving her third term representing Assembly District 7, which includes all of Napa County and parts of Sonoma and Solano counties. She is chairwoman of the Assembly Budget Committee and the Assembly Select Committee on Wine, and a member of the Committees on Banking and Finance, Governmental Organization, and Judiciary. Evans also serves on the Joint Legislative Audit Committee.
If elected to the state senate, Evans said she hopes to improve California’s foster care system and to reform the budget system.
“The issues facing the state are highly complex and very difficult to solve,” she said, “and I think the experience that I’ve had as an assemblymember for the last six years — and as chair of the budget committee in the Assembly and as a member of leadership in the Assembly — that’s the kind of leadership we’re going to need going forward.
Evans added that Rosas is “a well-respected man in Sonoma County” and that she expects they will both run “good clean campaigns.”
Rosas could not be reached for comment.
Primary elections will be held in June, with general elections in November 2010.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
antipc wrote on Aug 24, 2009 7:01 PM:
Explorer wrote on Aug 24, 2009 7:30 PM:
kevin wrote on Aug 24, 2009 8:33 PM:
Raven wrote on Aug 24, 2009 9:10 PM:
MarkMiwords wrote on Aug 24, 2009 10:31 PM:
jmo wrote on Aug 24, 2009 11:21 PM:
Raven--we'll try our best.
Talking about change; Noreen I am sorry but you represent the same old tired politics/politicians. "
David j. Ingraham wrote on Aug 25, 2009 12:37 AM:
a real control legislator who has a total disrespect for the liberty of the people.
a person who raised our sales tax with out our permission. she is an an advocate of government by the government, for the government, and we are going to pay for it weather we like it or not. "
napablogger wrote on Aug 25, 2009 10:11 AM:
A third grader could come up with that solution.
Right now we need some moderates in the legislature to work together with both sides, to end the partisan stalemate up there. The real problem with the Democrats is that they only do what the public employee unions will let them do.
Witness the prison situation now, even though releasing prisoners is part of the left's agenda, because the police unions don't like it because they might lose some jobs, the Democrats won't do it. This is exactly why California is going down the tubes, fast. "
funnyme wrote on Aug 25, 2009 10:37 AM:
manxkat wrote on Aug 25, 2009 10:55 AM:
If you realized that she was the Assembly budget chairwoman, largely responsible for the buget fiasco and the largest tax increase in California history on April 1, 2009 then maybe you wouldn't vote for her.
If you realized that she plays the Sacramento political game so well that she has already received a golden parachute from the Assembly leaders by being placed on the Coastal Commission in a job that pays over $100K per year, may you wouldn't vote for her.
But, if you're a typical Napa Democrat you will vote to kick her upstairs to the State Senate to rise to another level of incompetence to even more authority and mismanagement just because she is a Democrat. Sad but true! "
Raven wrote on Aug 25, 2009 8:23 PM:
why wait...expose away.. "
lupmart wrote on Aug 25, 2009 10:22 PM:
I know that partisan Democrats must like living in a district owned through gerrymandering, but honestly, do you think that makes for good democracy? It's amazing to think that the same people who have been behind the wheel during this entire mess will get re-elected easily just because the system is so thoroughly gamed. Raven may call that whining, but if your district was so carefully cut up to elect a right winger I doubt you'd be so glib. Bad policy is bad policy regardless of partisanship. "