NVR Logo
Rodolfo Uribe's criminal record
Sunday, August 23, 2009
Save and Share Share
Napa County Superior Court records show Rodolfo Uribe, accused of shooting a Calistoga man last month, has been convicted of numerous crimes in Napa County. Date listed is date of offense, not date of conviction or beginning of jail sentence.

Dec. 31, 2003
Arrested for suspected a hit-and-run. Pleaded no contest, sentenced to probation, two days in jail.

March 5, 2004
Arrested for suspected assault with a deadly weapon, gang activity, false imprisonment after gang-related violence at Jefferson Food Mart in Napa in which Uribe was believed to have held a man while others struck the man.  Pled no contest to aiding and abetting. Sentenced to 90 days in jail, three years probation.

March 31, 2004
Arrested for domestic violence, accused of slapping and choking his girlfriend. Sentenced to 15 days in jail, probation, anger management program.

April 6, 2006

Arrested for possession of a deadly weapon, violation of probation. Police search of vehicle in which Uribe is a passenger reveals brass knuckles under Uribe’s seat. Charges dismissed.

May 7, 2006

Arrested for assault with a deadly weapon, violation of probation. Driving near Pueblo Avenue and Jefferson Street, Uribe gets out of car and confronts a woman. Using a golf club, he sought to strike her, then did strike a man who came to her defense. Pleads no contest to fighting in public. Sentenced to 75 days of jail time and ordered to pay fines.

May 27, 2006

Arrested for marijuana possession. Charge dismissed.

May 27, 2007

Arrested for domestic violence, accused of putting girlfriend in headlock, pulling her hair. Pled no contest. Sentenced to probation.

June 10, 2007

Arrested for assault with a deadly weapon, gang participation. Charges dismissed.

June 17, 2008

Arrested for mayhem and gang enhancement. Gang fight near Solano Avenue bar. Charges dismissed.

June 25, 2009

Arrested for murder of Luis Carrillo, kidnapping and rape of his former girlfriend. Preliminary hearing set for Sept. 9.
29 comment(s)

krusty wrote on Aug 23, 2009 12:33 AM:

" I'm a little curious. Why is the name of the rape victim published?

Hopefully this man never spends time outside a jail cell again. He's an evil person and a burden on society. "

efinnapa wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:34 AM:

" If our courts were tougher with a repeat criminal like this guy, he would not have been able to kidnap, Rape or Murder. He got sentenced to 90 days in jail and 3 years probation but was able to commit another violent crime less than 30 days latter and only get 15 days in jail and anger management. I guess the anger management course really worked. "

yerbotherinme wrote on Aug 23, 2009 6:56 AM:

" .....mmmm three strikes your out. Apparently the court can't count. "

RenoDeano wrote on Aug 23, 2009 7:47 AM:

" Need a misdemeanor conviction three strike rule...then send them to state prison for 5 years. "

Piquemyinterest wrote on Aug 23, 2009 8:10 AM:

" It's amazing the extent of these charges. Ten in all and the culmating result is the loss of life. Given this man's history and it sounds like he was in a gang the abuse continued for years. I thought they had a gang task force in Napa? Obviously this man took no accountability for his actions and would just serve short term sentences to amend the condition and then continue on with his violent acts. Maybe he is from a violent background but most of the time this behavior is learned. Too bad early intervention couldn't of been attempted and now with them letting all the prisoners out early more of this stuff will occur much like this man who serve short spans for misdemeanor crimes. What's the solution to this? "

danfromnapa wrote on Aug 23, 2009 8:35 AM:

" Who is dismissing all these charges? And Why?

This guy should have been in the middle of a six year prison sentence. Not out committing a murder. "

jbmom wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:00 AM:

" Wow, I thought if you were involved in gang activity they threw the book at you. If he had been taken off the streets this fine young man would still be alive. It is pretty clear he was deep in the gang life, just plead no contest and you get a few days in jail and some probation....not so bad. "

you wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:17 AM:

" why were some of these charges dropped? If he had been held accountable for earlier incidents maybe Louis would have still been here today. This makes me wonder how many other people are on our streets. could someone please explain to me why he has gotten away with violent offenses for so long with a only a slap on the hand. It seems to that slap was mis interpreted as a high five rather than a punishment.Interventions could have helped this guy out rather than short stints in jail and continued probation, obviously this was not working. What can be done to avoid another incident such as this from happening again?So sad that this family has lost a loved one when the system should have been protecting society as a whole considering this guys criminal past.prayers go out to all involved. "

raybo wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:06 AM:

" All those probations didn't seem to do much good. "

onofakingem2 wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:20 AM:

" why are all these charges against him being dismissed? the system kept putting this guy back on the streets, to continue his constant acts of violence. "

Magoo wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:31 AM:

" My condolensces to the victems and their families.

Let's hope that this is the last chance that Mr. Uribe has a chance to hurt anyone else. "

MarkMiwords wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:41 AM:

" Uribe has been on a six year assault on this area starting his senior year in high school but still, the judges kept dismissing his cases. This is a horrible failure of our local justice system. There is NO possible justice for his victims, but for their sake and the sake of the entire community, LOCK UP this monster and throw away the key! "

crooked6pence wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:51 AM:

" All these arrests while on 3 years probation for his second offense, yet no major prison time or one year in county jail after subsequent arrests. Interesting...

The Tally:

- 10 arrests in total
- 4 jail terms totalling 182 days (probably served 122 days in all.
- 4 cases dismissed!
- 1 probation
- 1 pending

Out of the 9 closed cases, 4 dismissals. That's a 44.4% victory rate for the defense, not bad. I wonder who is attorney was? "

hawkeye wrote on Aug 23, 2009 12:08 PM:

" UNBELIEVABLE that this animal was given a free pass to go right back out there to do whatever crime he pleases, on way more than one occasion!! Wow! I hope this sparks an utter outrage against our broken justice system. Reading this article, the longest he ever was sentenced to prison was 90 days. For 9 crimes (not including the accusation for murder)!! All I see is charges dismissed, charges dismissed, charges dismissed. Why?! Is this the same judge hearing his case over and over again? If it is, there ought to be a probe launched into this judge. But I doubt it. I think this likely represents our justice system as a whole. And yet, those convicted of petty crimes sometimes rot in prison longer than 90 days. Am I the only one downright angered by this long list of crimes resulting in getting off free or at worst, a stand in the corner for 5 minutes?? "

AreYouSerious74 wrote on Aug 23, 2009 1:05 PM:

" Well if the record is any indication he will either get probation or charges dropped.

What a great judicial system we have. "

Brea wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:09 PM:

" OMG!!!! Who in the heck is this creep and why would so many charges be dropped? It's almost as he got the green light for his criminal activity and now we are shocked that he killed another human being? "

controm wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:11 PM:

" why has this man not been sent to federal prision already! he has obviusly had enough chances to be a productive member of this society in which he has failed according to the police record 9 times when will our judicial system get the message? "

napasfinest wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:42 PM:

" What a loser! The fact that this guy was even free is appalling to me. "

crooked6pence wrote on Aug 23, 2009 4:21 PM:

" Do I smell a rat? "

Steelhead wrote on Aug 23, 2009 5:48 PM:

" Having supported the current DA for many years, I find this troubling. I think Gary Lieberstein needs to stand up and address the history of this individual and why he was not put away a long time ago.

Also, maybe we need to review the anger management process, as it clearly did not work with this individual.

I think the DA and the police have some 'splaining to dio. "

jbmom wrote on Aug 23, 2009 6:51 PM:

" How many more of these GANG FREAKS are out roaming the streets?? Maybe we should let the Martha Stewarts go and lock up the really bad guys.....just a thought. "

Joe wrote on Aug 23, 2009 7:55 PM:

" Mr. Uribe hasn't even had his day in court yet, so he shouldn't be viewed as being guilty of murder yet. "

angtink wrote on Aug 23, 2009 8:54 PM:

" With a record like that he should have been in PRISON where he BELONGS! Thank god he isnt on the streets anymore! Hopefully they get smart and send him away, too bad someone had to lose their life for something so stupid. That is so sad. "

hawkeye wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:25 PM:

" Joe, maybe innocent until proven guilty is the usual way to go, but you have to admit his history doesn't paint a nice picture of this guy. He's a monster with a proven track record. He has absolutely no regard for human life and it is proven 100% that he has no regard for the laws or human life. Sure, there may be a sliver of a chance he didn't commit murder, but so far, the evidence points that he did. I think everyone commenting here except you, would be shocked if he were found innocent. Then again, with our broken justice system, he'll probably be found innocent even if he really did it. So that part won't be a shock. "

suze wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:29 PM:

" What is truly frightening to me is that the system is already clogged with individuals of this type.
Our jails are already stuffed with Uribe type citizens (or non-citizens.)

It would seem that we need some more selective judgements made on individuals of this type. They are indeed extremely dangerous out in society as they have absolutely no respect for law or others.

I agree with jbmom, we need to release the 'Martha Stewarts' and keep guys like this in prison away from harming an innocent public. "

crackertransplant wrote on Aug 23, 2009 11:10 PM:

" The whole system is messed up and needs to be more closely monitored. "

onofakingem2 wrote on Aug 24, 2009 1:02 PM:

" hey joe.........court or no court.........he murdered someone "

fairworld wrote on Aug 29, 2009 12:12 PM:

" Wow where do we stand in regards to our system... so here it is we pay taxes in which we all hoped it would go to help us as a communitie but the way i see it we are paying justice to let criminals like Mr. Uribe to go out and do more harm... And as if it wasnt enough come to the point of killing someone and still consider to the point of etting him go even if he "didnt" kill Mr. Carrillo who seems to be someone who helped out the communiti! it is an emberessment. "

thoughtank wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:25 PM:

" Well, it seems our judges and DA think we need to reserve our jail cells for non-violent offenders, like our local school embezzlers, rather than violent repeat offenders like Mr. Uribe.

The Register needs to do a follow-up story on WHY all the charges against Mr. Uribe were thrown out. Is the problem poor police work? Lenient judges? Lack of interests on the part of the District Attorney's office?

It would seem that Mr. Uribe is the type of career criminal for which the three strikes law was passed. Yet for some reason, he kept getting off on felony charges on his "third" strike. What's the story here?

One thing that's very striking is how he had repeat domestic violence offenses. This is a real indication that some of our local judges don't get how important it is to take these cases seriously. "Anger management" classes? How about "Rot in Jail" classes after your second domestic violence conviction. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy