Rodolfo Uribe's criminal record
By Register Staff
November 11th, 2009
November 10th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
September 10th, 2009
Napa County Superior Court records show Rodolfo Uribe, accused of shooting a Calistoga man last month, has been convicted of numerous crimes in Napa County. Date listed is date of offense, not date of conviction or beginning of jail sentence.
Dec. 31, 2003
Arrested for suspected a hit-and-run. Pleaded no contest, sentenced to probation, two days in jail.
March 5, 2004
Arrested for suspected assault with a deadly weapon, gang activity, false imprisonment after gang-related violence at Jefferson Food Mart in Napa in which Uribe was believed to have held a man while others struck the man. Pled no contest to aiding and abetting. Sentenced to 90 days in jail, three years probation.
March 31, 2004
Arrested for domestic violence, accused of slapping and choking his girlfriend. Sentenced to 15 days in jail, probation, anger management program.
April 6, 2006
Arrested for possession of a deadly weapon, violation of probation. Police search of vehicle in which Uribe is a passenger reveals brass knuckles under Uribe’s seat. Charges dismissed.
May 7, 2006
Arrested for assault with a deadly weapon, violation of probation. Driving near Pueblo Avenue and Jefferson Street, Uribe gets out of car and confronts a woman. Using a golf club, he sought to strike her, then did strike a man who came to her defense. Pleads no contest to fighting in public. Sentenced to 75 days of jail time and ordered to pay fines.
May 27, 2006
Arrested for marijuana possession. Charge dismissed.
May 27, 2007
Arrested for domestic violence, accused of putting girlfriend in headlock, pulling her hair. Pled no contest. Sentenced to probation.
June 10, 2007
Arrested for assault with a deadly weapon, gang participation. Charges dismissed.
June 17, 2008
Arrested for mayhem and gang enhancement. Gang fight near Solano Avenue bar. Charges dismissed.
June 25, 2009
Arrested for murder of Luis Carrillo, kidnapping and rape of his former girlfriend. Preliminary hearing set for Sept. 9.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
krusty wrote on Aug 23, 2009 12:33 AM:
Hopefully this man never spends time outside a jail cell again. He's an evil person and a burden on society. "
efinnapa wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:34 AM:
yerbotherinme wrote on Aug 23, 2009 6:56 AM:
RenoDeano wrote on Aug 23, 2009 7:47 AM:
Piquemyinterest wrote on Aug 23, 2009 8:10 AM:
danfromnapa wrote on Aug 23, 2009 8:35 AM:
This guy should have been in the middle of a six year prison sentence. Not out committing a murder. "
jbmom wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:00 AM:
you wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:17 AM:
raybo wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:06 AM:
onofakingem2 wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:20 AM:
Magoo wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:31 AM:
Let's hope that this is the last chance that Mr. Uribe has a chance to hurt anyone else. "
MarkMiwords wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:41 AM:
crooked6pence wrote on Aug 23, 2009 10:51 AM:
The Tally:
- 10 arrests in total
- 4 jail terms totalling 182 days (probably served 122 days in all.
- 4 cases dismissed!
- 1 probation
- 1 pending
Out of the 9 closed cases, 4 dismissals. That's a 44.4% victory rate for the defense, not bad. I wonder who is attorney was? "
hawkeye wrote on Aug 23, 2009 12:08 PM:
AreYouSerious74 wrote on Aug 23, 2009 1:05 PM:
What a great judicial system we have. "
Brea wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:09 PM:
controm wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:11 PM:
napasfinest wrote on Aug 23, 2009 3:42 PM:
crooked6pence wrote on Aug 23, 2009 4:21 PM:
Steelhead wrote on Aug 23, 2009 5:48 PM:
Also, maybe we need to review the anger management process, as it clearly did not work with this individual.
I think the DA and the police have some 'splaining to dio. "
jbmom wrote on Aug 23, 2009 6:51 PM:
Joe wrote on Aug 23, 2009 7:55 PM:
angtink wrote on Aug 23, 2009 8:54 PM:
hawkeye wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:25 PM:
suze wrote on Aug 23, 2009 9:29 PM:
Our jails are already stuffed with Uribe type citizens (or non-citizens.)
It would seem that we need some more selective judgements made on individuals of this type. They are indeed extremely dangerous out in society as they have absolutely no respect for law or others.
I agree with jbmom, we need to release the 'Martha Stewarts' and keep guys like this in prison away from harming an innocent public. "
crackertransplant wrote on Aug 23, 2009 11:10 PM:
onofakingem2 wrote on Aug 24, 2009 1:02 PM:
fairworld wrote on Aug 29, 2009 12:12 PM:
thoughtank wrote on Aug 31, 2009 9:25 PM:
The Register needs to do a follow-up story on WHY all the charges against Mr. Uribe were thrown out. Is the problem poor police work? Lenient judges? Lack of interests on the part of the District Attorney's office?
It would seem that Mr. Uribe is the type of career criminal for which the three strikes law was passed. Yet for some reason, he kept getting off on felony charges on his "third" strike. What's the story here?
One thing that's very striking is how he had repeat domestic violence offenses. This is a real indication that some of our local judges don't get how important it is to take these cases seriously. "Anger management" classes? How about "Rot in Jail" classes after your second domestic violence conviction. "