The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
ao1982 wrote on Aug 20, 2009 10:18 AM:
Bauhausfan wrote on Aug 20, 2009 10:47 AM:
It is interesting for anyone to state that they were trying to "restrain" someone who was already restrained. Unless you consider someone face down on the ground with their hands behind their back and someone already holding them down not "restrained". "
sickonapkins wrote on Aug 20, 2009 1:32 PM:
NVC wrote on Aug 20, 2009 2:41 PM:
I'm not implying that he should not be held accountable either, but it was clearly a horrible mistake.
Bauhaus, it's really hard to tell from the video where his hands were and if he was fighting getting cuffed, or reaching under his belly for a possible weapon I think a taser would be used in a heartbeat in either case.
There's no way any officer (at least in CA) is going to willfully choose to discharge a firearm if he doesn't have to. Knowing 1. his job is on the line. 2. IA investigation to follow. 3. Possible charges against him. It's a worst nightmare situation for a cop i.e. lose/lose outcome.
Without being there it's all presumption, but there isn't any reasonable explanation for it to NOT be a horrible, unfix able mistake.
But that's still not 'murder' and therefore not justice. IMO "
sickonapkins wrote on Aug 20, 2009 5:01 PM:
Excerpt from http://definitions.uslegal.com/m/murder/
By that definition a murder charge would be correct. Will he be convicted? We shall see. "
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Aug 20, 2009 6:42 PM:
ADark1 wrote on Aug 20, 2009 6:57 PM:
Should anyone look at the headlines adjacent to this article, instead of remorse, you see arrogance!
Now I guess the *mistake* is trial strategy. Even money says we'll have a compromise verdict!
More then a few of you would be shocked at how many unarmed and *un-cooperative*, people, white and non-whites are killed by police
BTW, any takers on how many minorities will be in the jury pool much less the jury itself?
George Lopez stated on his new special..."I will treat you with the dignity and respect you gave me" (sic) in reference to Mexicans becoming the majority in California...THAT, should give more then a few folks pause.. "
lsw1969 wrote on Aug 20, 2009 7:18 PM:
Grommitt wrote on Aug 20, 2009 7:36 PM:
Raven wrote on Aug 20, 2009 7:37 PM:
John Richards wrote on Aug 20, 2009 9:59 PM:
The trial will bring out that Grant repeatedly ignored lawful orders to place his hands on his back. "
Ephemerol wrote on Aug 20, 2009 10:09 PM:
NVC wrote on Aug 20, 2009 10:30 PM:
grave risk of death to a person other than himself..."
I'm going to assume this is part of your statement that applies to the
topic. And if so, no I don't agree that he engaged in reckless behavior.
I believe it to be a grave error, but not reckless.
ADark1 wrote"More then a few of you would be shocked at how many unarmed and
*un-cooperative*, people, white and non-whites are killed by police"
So they hide all the bodies where, at Tony Sopranos Waste Management Co? Get
real. Unless it's auto accidents you'll have to provide valid source for
that claim.
Grommitt, that video is exactly where I saw it was obviously a tragic
mistake. His body language shows it, his facial expression. The reactions of
other officers. He was struggling to pull, what, I believe, he thought was a
taser out of it's holster. Perhaps you didn't read my 1st post, but explain
to me why he'd be "hell bent" on firing his weapon, let alone into another
soul?
Raven: If that was directed to me,it doesn't deserve a response. "
NVC wrote on Aug 20, 2009 11:03 PM:
1. The suspect was not restrained, from what I could see on the video. Whatsoever. In fact I believe the other officer backed off and got up because he knew the young man was going to get tasered.
2. "...3 seconds..." Several tasers have a laser dot aiming system. Perhaps he was looking for the dot (for the safety of fellow officers) and then assumed it malfunctioning/bad battery and then optically sighted and fired. This is a guess. Side arms are often equipped with similar laser dot sights also.
I'm not making the officer out to be a saint, but rather, trying to be logical in the given circumstances and it was clearly (to me) a terrible error.
The officer's body looks like it got hit with 5 gallons of adrenaline AFTER the discharge. There's no way, IMO, he intended or planned that. Look at the body language, and that of his fellow officers. Everyone there was shocked beyond belief.
Again, horrible in countless ways for both families. One never gets to go home. Another has to bear it for the rest of his life. "
sickonapkins wrote on Aug 20, 2009 11:18 PM:
ADark1 wrote on Aug 20, 2009 11:19 PM:
~Shrugs doesn't matter...
Being in the civil rights movement from barely out of diapers, to being a Junior Panther, to dealing with the system within AND without, to PERSONAL experience, Would more then likely fall on deaf ears !
The defendant should pray for a juror like you!
Do yourself a favor and research the DOJ ( U.S. Department of Justice) site and look at the stats!
Or, look at the tape!
Or, even attend the trial and listen to the facts as they are presented!
If you've noticed, I haven''t made a determination of guilt...The facts are the facts until they change and until such..I do believe based on the above I am more then correct!
Perhaps you think this officer will be thrown under the bus to appease the residents of Oakland? Its a big conspiracy?
I think not!
Ever hear of a DWB? Or even the old joke from the civil rights days?
A *militant* person of color was found in the river, chains wrapped around his neck , hands and feet. Sheriff looks at the body and says...Just like a Stole more chains then he could swin with!
Relax !
I smile at that joke, its a bittersweet one as I have lived it all my life.
No matter how much money I made , clothes I wore, cars I drove or homes I OWNED , or lived in, skin COLOR, dictates how I was / am treated by law enforcement! Oscar had had enough, and it killed him! "
NVC wrote on Aug 21, 2009 12:30 AM:
wow, no not a cop.
Link the DOJ stats. I have been referring to CA officers. I wouldn't doubt some states in certain counties.
I watched the tape. Over and over in slow mo & paused frame. Do the same without emotion or assumption.
"If you've noticed, I haven''t made a determination of guilt...The facts are the facts until they change"
Here, we agree entirely.
"Perhaps you think this officer will be thrown under the bus to appease the residents of Oakland? Its a big conspiracy?"
If our society has digressed to this, we have more to worry about.
"No matter how much money I made , clothes I wore, cars I drove or homes I OWNED , or lived in, skin COLOR, dictates how I was / am treated by law enforcement!"
I guess I should say 'Awe' and give you a hug here but I'm just not feeling it. ;) Things have come a long way since the late 50's early 60's. Are they perfect? Of course not, they never will be. People of ALL skin colors get hassled, depending on what they look like, where they are and at what hour of night/morning
(picture late night white tweakers)
Forgive my insensitivity, but I came out of farmers . . . $uck it up and keep working.
And no I've never heard of the DWB or the joke. I grew up with Saturday Morning Cosby Cartoons and never knew racism. I guess I was lucky. But it's made me defensive if I'm implied as such. (not that you have, BTW)
Don't let your past negative experiences hold you back from future positive ones. "