NVR Logo
Hot Potato
Sunday, August 09, 2009
Save and Share Share
November 22nd, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 1st, 2009
October 25th, 2009
What stirs passion in Napa County politics?

This week’s health care reform forum sure did.
The reaction we’ve gotten from readers who were witnesses suggests that no two people had the exact same experience at the forum. Or, rather, that people had one of two very distinct experiences.

One set of people saw an ugly unraveling of what promised to be an enlightening political event, with five speakers, including Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, addressing the topic of health care reform.
The other side saw the inevitable deconstruction of what looked to be a sham event that only played at illuminating the complexities of the reform proposal.

In the last few years, Napa County has seen other public displays on national issues — immigration marches in Napa and St. Helena come to mind, as do the more modest displays of the anti-tax Tea Party people outside Thompson’s Main Street office in Napa, the anti-abortion activity on Jefferson Street and the gatherings against the war in Iraq staged in and around Veterans Memorial Park.
But local matters often draw the crowds.

Busloads of Pacific Union College students, as well as carloads of skeptical Angwin residents, descended on Chardonnay Hall in Napa and the Lincoln Theater in Yountville for meetings on the proposed Angwin eco-village a year or two ago. The county planning commission more than once has had to redirect overflow crowds out of their meeting chambers for hearings on the eco-village.

It is notable that after all that activity, almost complete silence has descended over that topic in recent months.

A major meeting on Napa County’s proposed stream setback ordinance drew huge crowds to a Napa County Board of Supervisors meeting at Chardonnay Hall in 2003. That meeting was a harbinger of what eventually came at the polls, as the ordinance that would have outlawed development near streams and seasonal waterways was defeated by voters.

Five years ago, I was at Donaldson Way Elementary School in American Canyon for a city council meeting addressing the proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter. The meeting had been moved from the cramped council chambers to the multimedia room at Donaldson Way.

But the multi-purpose room was overflowing with multifarious people, many of them clearly agitated that the Wal-Mart was apparently on its way to town.

Fire officials picked their way through the crowd, saw people where exit aisles and access routes should be, emptied the building and forced the city to reschedule the meeting.

All these years later, not only does American Canyon have a Wal-Mart, but it also has a much bigger city council chambers and even a new elementary school with a bigger multi-purpose room. American Canyon, it appears, is ready for the next hot potato.
6 comment(s)

another voice wrote on Aug 9, 2009 7:25 AM:

" "A major meeting on Napa County’s proposed stream setback ordinance drew huge crowds to a Napa County Board of Supervisors meeting at Chardonnay Hall in 2003. That meeting was a harbinger of what eventually came at the polls, as the ordinance that would have outlawed development near streams and seasonal waterways was defeated by voters."

Actually, the Stream Setback Ordinance WAS passed by tone deaf supervisors, and then was repealed by the first successful referendum in Napa County. It also taught us that our representatives DID NOT READ ordinances, regulations and bills they pass, and that instigated our need to pass the Read and Understand initiative.
We were mocked, but by now everyone can see what a systemic problem it is with our elected representatives. Time for a Read and Understand at a national level. And if bills are "too long" and "too complicated", then they should be shortened to manageable pieces, and then Read and Understood before they are passed. "

Shareathought wrote on Aug 9, 2009 7:37 AM:

" Bill Kisliuk 8/9:

"All these years later, ... American Canyon, it appears, is ready for the next hot potato."

Oh my gosh, there it is in print, American Canyon has done something right!

Heck, they may even be ahead of the City of Napa in this_one_aspect). "

Manxkat wrote on Aug 9, 2009 10:16 AM:

" Dear Bill. What stirs up politics are "Intolerable Acts" by oppressive tyrants. in 1773 Samuel Adams led the Sons of Liberty to defeat the "Tea Act" of the British Parliament and the "Boston Tea Party' was one of the main events that led to the Declaration of Independence in 1774 and the American Revolutionary War.

Today we have a tyrannical federal government attempting to cram an intolerable health care plan on us without adequate planning, discussion and input. The modern Sons and daughters of Liberty are creating a fuss that will not die down but will engage every true American. This will lead not to war but to the ballot boxes in 2010 and 2012 when every culprit is voted out of office. "

Manxkat wrote on Aug 9, 2009 10:32 AM:

" Ok, I agree with you, this is a political hot potato. But let me ask you something that is becoming increasingly obvious. Where are our local elected officials, especially the Republicans?

Yes, the tea baggers are primarily made up of conservative people (Republicans). Where then are our local Republican elected officials like Bill Dodd, Jim Kryder, Jill Techel? Why are they not supporting the conservative cause?

I think we have a crisis in Republican Party politics in Napa County. The people we elected are afraid to speak out, afraid to support conservatism, afraid, afraid afraid.
I would rather have a Democrat in office than a fearful untrustworthy person with no conviction with an R behind his/her name. At least I could read the Democrat. "

Bill wrote on Aug 9, 2009 3:10 PM:

" Bill,

This week and last week’s editorial reveal a surprising naiveté or lack of knowledge of local California political history from someone who appears to be from California. One of the historical good government movements, right or wrong, which California is known for, was the deliberate removal of many local and state offices from party politics. The reasons are not invalid today.

Over the last few years I have been astounded at the Registers duplicity in reinstituting theses partisan expressions back into local politics. If I dislike my district supervisor’s point of view or vote on a specific topic it is not due to his party affiliation or his support of a national Bill but the specific local issue that affects me locally. I don’t want to know who he is supporting for president or if he does or does not support national health insurance.

If it is their wish to identify with either major party and do so publicly with the caveat that they do not hold strict party affiliation then that is a possible reason to examine how they think and might govern but a poor guide for local accommodation. I don’t think there is a Republican or Democratic pot hole nor do I think that they need to weigh in on issues such as Health care, Iraq, foreign policy, Supreme Court Justices, Abortion or any other issue beyond their mandate.

If they wish to make the perceived national party agenda their personal contribution to local politics they do so at their own political peril. It is bad enough that at least two local supervisors feel the need to report their decisions to a local political party that closes its meetings to the public at large. "

bauhausfan wrote on Aug 9, 2009 4:06 PM:

" If they are so passionate for their ideas to get out to the public then why don't they hold a forum of their own?

Why is it that not one of them will do it?

Why is it that they are more interested in yelling and shouting about tort refrorm, socialized medicine etc (besides denying facts they don't like) than actually coming up with something that will help people? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy