Slowing the Browns Valley 'slingshot'
City mulls action at high-speed intersection
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 21st, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
Napa city officials will study whether it makes sense to redirect traffic on a stub of Browns Valley Road east of Buhman Avenue, so cars don’t merge at high speeds in front of Dezerai Court.
Residents on Dezerai Court asked the city’s Traffic Advisory Commission last week to consider blocking the merge in front of their street.
Celeste Cave said vehicles come down Browns Valley from Buhman as if fired from a “slingshot,” making it difficult for her neighbors to exit Dezerai onto Browns Valley.
Napa County Supervisor Brad Wagenknecht, who lives in Browns Valley, read a letter from a Dezerai Court resident who asked that the merge be eliminated.
Vehicles going east on Browns Valley from Buhman should be redirected to the three-way stop about 150 yards to the west of Dezerai, opposite Century Oaks Park, the resident said. This is the spot where Partrick Road joins Browns Valley.
Forcing vehicles to come to a stop would reduce speeding on eastbound Browns Valley, residents said. The posted limit between Buhman and Dezerai is 25 mph, but violations are common, they said.
Adding to unsafe conditions, motorists trying to merge with the main stream of Browns Valley traffic look to their left, ignoring cars trying to leave Dezerai, residents said.
If eastbound motorists joined Browns Valley at the three-way stop, conditions at Westview Drive and Browns Valley Road would also be made safer, they said.
Currently, vehicles coming out of the “slingshot” only have a short distance to get into the left-turn lane for Westview.
The commission, led by council members Peter Mott and Jim Krider, asked staff to come back in September with an analysis of the situation. Staff will analyze the area’s accident history.
As an interim solution, Napa Fire Chief Tim Borman said it might make sense to keep the existing street connection in front of Dezerai, but eliminate the merge. Installation of a stop sign for vehicles entering Browns Valley from Buhman should solve the problem, he said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
reason-ator wrote on Jul 14, 2009 1:10 AM:
The kicker in this "illogic" was the complaint that motorists trying to merge with the main stream of Browns Valley traffic look to their left, ignoring cars trying to leave Dezerai. I guess that makes it more unsafe for cars trying to leave Dezerai to pull right out in front of cars if the people they pull out in front of aren't expecting them to fail to yeild to traffic when they don't stay at the stop sign until it's safe to proceed.
This intersection was designed/reconfigured years ago, presumably with the knowledge that houses would be built in that area. I think the biggest safety hazard in that area is drivers trying to keep from hitting all the potholes. If we have to cause hundreds of cars to wear out their brakes and tires and needlessly burn tons of fuel with the extra exhaust this will cause just because a few people on one street ( who knew what this intersection was like when they bought their houses ) can't be bothered to take their turn, then we should have a traffic light down by First Christian School, also. Before we realign traffic by Delirious Court. "
someguyinnapa wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:25 AM:
They put a stop sign in my neighborhood on my corner 3 years ago. You know how many people stop there? ZERO! It is a rolling 15mph stop sign. Why just the other day I saw a rarity: a Napa PD cruising my "hood" and I convinced him to stop and wait a minute or two. He got more than one stop sign runner in 15 minutes around 2pm. I only imagine the day when Napa PD hangs out there at 5pm! Talk about generating money!
Good luck with your problem Dezerai Residents! People are too busy to drive safely. "
andy wrote on Jul 14, 2009 7:32 AM:
The residents of Dezerai Court would like to have traffic stop in front of their street rather than flow by? Because that's what will happen if the traffic is stopped at BV Road and Partrick. They won't be able to get out at all during certain times of the day because the traffic will be so backed up.
Ridiculous. "
napkin75 wrote on Jul 14, 2009 7:48 AM:
I also witnessed a traumatic accident at the "slingshot" when, as I was on a an evening stroll, I heard screams. Come to find out , there lied a young lady flat in the street right at thr merge. A car had hit her while she was on foot. Then, as I was making my way home, I thought to myself, "wow! That could haave been me" Before I could stop ruminating on the pedestrian accident, I was in a crosswalk and a vehicle seemed to come out of nowhere and the car came within about one foot of hitting me. I believe the nearby accident with lit up police, fire and paramedic rescuers caught the attention to the driner as he nearly hit me also.
I believe that will slow down traffic somewhat. But I would like this to be more patrolled because of stop-sign runners. "
Farmgirl wrote on Jul 14, 2009 8:10 AM:
SuzieSwirled wrote on Jul 14, 2009 8:42 AM:
I think what might be most practical as well as greatly increasing safety, would be something between what currently exists and the proposed "T" that requires a full stop.
I think a "T" that had a YEILD for those turning right off of the Browns valley "spur" would be both safe and would still allow good traffic flow. This way, those comming from the spur would be at right angles to, and with a good view of the Partrick Rd. traffic, and would be able to merge in much more safely without stopping. "
JustMyyOpinion wrote on Jul 14, 2009 9:08 AM:
Surely the funds used for this study and installation of a stop sign could be better used elsewhere in our city. "
sprklsunshine wrote on Jul 14, 2009 9:57 AM:
I think we should have the mayor order a $100k study on this subject. "
cagirl wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:12 AM:
raybo wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:19 AM:
mikeb wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:23 AM:
he wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:41 AM:
Are these the same kind of "improvements" we can expect at this intersection too? "
registername wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:48 AM:
cheezcakemaker wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:02 AM:
What we do need is roundabouts. Why would a stop sign even be proposed this day in age? Why don't people get this? "
db76 wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:11 AM:
bluehole wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:31 AM:
John Richards wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:32 AM:
napan007 wrote on Jul 14, 2009 12:24 PM:
bv wrote on Jul 14, 2009 12:39 PM:
jpcrash wrote on Jul 14, 2009 12:52 PM:
reason-ator wrote on Jul 14, 2009 1:22 PM:
But at least the accidents would be at slower speeds, even if there are more of them. "
amazed wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:10 PM:
jpcrash, I bet there's a "yield" sign there already, being ignored, of course. "
Piquemyinterest wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:30 PM:
Two Cents wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:39 PM:
If the residents of Dezerai Court want something done so that they dont have to wait as long getting out of their street, let them pay for it..
Save the taxpayer dollars for things that affect a greater percentage of the community... "
Two Cents wrote on Jul 14, 2009 2:46 PM:
Also, in front of BV Elementary at the beginning/end of the school day... cant you just picture the gridlock!
Come on Napa, dont create a massive backup for hundreds, just because of 20 or so who live on Dezerai... doesnt make sense! "
reason-ator wrote on Jul 14, 2009 4:25 PM:
And with all these cyclist-haters that are personally offended because cyclists run stop signs faster than the cyclist-haters do, I can see why the cyclist-haters would like more stop signs just so they can create more opportunity to be outraged.
But of course, you have said you're not one of those. I believe you. If you were a cyclist-hater, you'd try and introduce your cyclist-hate into a totally unrelated thread about stop signs.
Oh, wait. You just did.
Oops. Better re-iterate again how you don't have a problem with bicyclists again so I can believe you again. Sigh, again....snicker-snicker "
whoa cowboy wrote on Jul 14, 2009 10:21 PM:
downtownsupporter wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:54 AM:
smart growther wrote on Jul 15, 2009 9:45 AM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Jul 15, 2009 7:17 PM: