NVR Logo
Investing in the workforce to rebuild the U.S. economy
Monday, July 13, 2009
Save and Share Share
Nearly six months ago, my administration took office amid the most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression. At the time, we were losing, on average, 700,000 jobs a month. Many feared that our financial system was on the verge of collapse.

The swift and aggressive action we took in those first few months has helped pull our financial system and our economy back from the brink. We took steps to restart lending to families and businesses, stabilize our major financial institutions and help homeowners stay in their homes and pay their mortgages. We also passed the most sweeping economic recovery plan in our nation’s history.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act was not expected to restore the economy to full health on its own but to provide the boost necessary to stop the free fall. So far, it has done that. It was, from the start, a two-year program, and it will steadily save and create jobs as it ramps up over this summer and fall. We must let it work the way it’s supposed to, with the understanding that in any recession, unemployment tends to recover more slowly than other measures of economic activity.

I am confident that the United States of America will weather this economic storm. Once we clear away the wreckage, the real question is what we will build in its place. Even as we rescue this economy from a full-blown crisis, we must rebuild it better than before. If we do not seize this moment to confront the weaknesses that have plagued our economy for decades, we will consign ourselves and our children to future crises, sluggish growth, or both.
There are some who say we must wait to meet our greatest challenges. They favor an incremental approach or believe that doing nothing is somehow an answer. But that is exactly the thinking that led us to this predicament. Ignoring big challenges and deferring tough decisions is what Washington has done for decades, and it’s exactly what I sought to change by running for president.

Now is the time to build a firmer, stronger foundation for growth that not only will withstand future economic storms but that helps us thrive in a global economy. To build that foundation, we must lower the health care costs that are driving us into debt, create the jobs of the future within our borders, give our workers the skills and training they need to compete for those jobs and make the tough choices necessary to bring down our deficit in the long run.
Already, we’re making progress on health-care reform that controls costs while ensuring choice and quality, as well as energy legislation that will make clean energy the profitable kind of energy, leading to whole new industries and jobs that cannot be outsourced.

In an economy where jobs requiring at least an associate’s degree are projected to grow twice as fast as jobs requiring no college experience, it’s never been more essential to continue education and training after high school. That’s why we’ve set a goal of leading the world in college degrees by 2020. Part of this goal will be met by helping Americans better afford a college education. But part of it will also be strengthening our network of community colleges.

Our community colleges can serve as 21st-century job training centers, working with local businesses to help workers learn the skills they need to fill the jobs of the future. We can reallocate funding to help them modernize their facilities, increase the quality of online courses and ultimately meet the goal of graduating 5 million more Americans from community colleges by 2020.

Providing all Americans with the skills they need to compete is a pillar of a stronger economic foundation, and, like health care or energy, we cannot wait to make the necessary changes. We must continue to clean up the wreckage of this recession, but it is time to rebuild something better in its place. It won’t be easy, and there will continue to be those who argue that we have to put off hard decisions that we have already deferred for far too long.

Earlier generations of Americans didn’t build this great country by fearing the future and shrinking our dreams. This generation has to show that same courage and determination. I believe we will.

(The writer is president of the United States. This essay first appeared in the Washington Post.)
43 comment(s)

kevin wrote on Jul 13, 2009 4:49 AM:

" I wonder when was the last time the State Run Media printed a Republican President's propaganda? "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:12 AM:

" President Obama, your stimulus package was NOT BIG ENOUGH!

The more time lost while unemployment rises the more misery the Second Republican Great Depression will engender.

We need a JOBS bill much more than we need another stimulus bill but we need more non-debt money put in working class America's pockets.

I know you have a lot on your plate thanks to the Bushite-Republicans who had not an economic care in the world while the ecnonomy went south for years, but your administration is losing support for continuing the Bush policies of bailing out Wall Street Weasels as epitiomized by Goldman Sachs.

Please, President Obama, stop listening to Larry Summers and Timothy Geithner.

Things are getting worse.

~Ruff "

russ wrote on Jul 13, 2009 7:13 AM:

" Mr. President, you own the economy now, otherwise you would not be writing this editorial to the people, trying to reduce the fear in America that your administration does not know what you are doing.

Unemployment is increasing and the stock market is giving back earlier gains, indicating lack of confidence in our future.

Americans are pessimistic that you can put the economy on the right track and are concerned about excessive spending and deficits and see no results in the "stimulus".

There is a hole in the Treasury. Plug it and stop borrowing and printing money. "

glenroy wrote on Jul 13, 2009 7:20 AM:

" We spend hundreds of billions on k-12 public education with a large chunk going to Vocational Training. We spend tens of billions on Community Colleges that include every conceivable job training certificate from herbal therapies to mowing lawns, as well as industrial skills like welding fabrication. We spend billions on vocational rehab programs to retrain career welfare types…..all totaled neither our state or the federal government has any idea how much is being spent, where and on whom, what if any measurable results either short or long term, the bottom line is absolutely no effective oversight.

Government and educators say they work hard and many of them certainly do…but nothing about efficiency or smart…hard work is wasted work without efficiency.

Obama’s solution….throw more money at it….himself being the product of inner city play BB at the community center for pay, no work all pay rap sessions, and of course his most compelling job skill… pay but pretend to work registering Democrats to vote for Democrats community organizing. Given the benefit of doubt, it’s the logical solution for someone with such limited job or management skills…unfortunately it is ruining or has already ruined public education, and if allowed to continue our country. "

rpcv wrote on Jul 13, 2009 7:55 AM:

" Kevin, this piece is on the OPINION page. It is the writer's OPINION. President Bush had 8 years during which he could have submitted an Op-Ed piece to national newspapers, had he so desired... in fact, he still can. So can you. "

Jasper wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:06 AM:

" I am not happy with the priority being given to bailing out the financial institutions which have not been able to compete. And yesterday we read that Goldman Sachs was back in operation and planning to give multi-million-dollar bonuses to its people, an average of $600,000 per employee. Well, cheers.

Washington and Wall Street are too much in bed together, a bit too much of the capitalisti c system to suit me.

The philosophy that we should recapture our disastrous lifestyle of borrowing to buy should be discouraged, not encouraged. We should never go back to the consumer society of recent years.

Fortunately, Americans are coming to their senses. They are paying off their debts, rather than rushing out to borrow more to buy more, even if that would create some jobs. No many jobs because most of what we buy is made in China anyway.

I do agree that we must become really competitive in this global economy. The Japanese and the Chinese have destroyed our automobile and electronics industries, and the Arabs control our destiny in petroleum, but we have a chance to build a new economy based on new technologies. And we must become a nation of producers not a nation of consumers, of foreign products.

Can we compete in new technologies? I doubt it, but this is a life and death challenge, or the Chinese will be dictating out financial future, through control of our national debt and the value of the dollar. "

a teacher wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:17 AM:

" Is Kevin telling us that the Napa Valley Register is "State run media"? Do we have state run media? "

shareathought wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:27 AM:

" I agree that education and focused skills are more necessary now then, perhaps, ever (and it doesn't matter if one is a Republican or Democrat, Christian or not, gay or straight).
The most affordable place to start is with "...a two-year program"

"...give our workers the skills and training they need..."

"Now is the time to build a firmer, stronger foundation..."

"In an economy where jobs requiring at least an associate’s degree are projected to grow twice as fast as jobs requiring no college experience, it’s never been more essential to continue education and training after high school."

"Our community colleges can serve as 21st-century job training centers, working with local businesses to help workers learn the skills they need to fill the jobs of the future."

"Providing all Americans with the skills they need to compete is a pillar of a stronger economic foundation..."

Students have had twelve years of reading, writing and arithmetic; fine tune the knowledge they have and redirect the students energy into marketable skills.
Napa Valley College has had two-year health-care programs (including nursing, psychiatric technicians, inhalation theraperapy), for many years; an expansion of those kinds of skilled programs can only enhance the ability of the working force.
Electricians, plumbers, communications workers or computer technicians are all viable skills.
At times as a youth we hope to be or achieve so much more but we all need a place to start, a skill to "fall back on".

The more answers/skills we have the more we are...
"strengthening our network" "

Sandra wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:29 AM:

" "There are some who say we must wait to meet our greatest challenges. They favor an incremental approach or believe that doing nothing is somehow an answer. But that is exactly the thinking that led us to this predicament. "

That is the thinking that led us into this predicament? Can we be shoveled a bigger load of bull than this and still swallow it? It seems to me what led to this predicament was a purposeful set of actions specifically designed to line the pockets of corporate american leaders and members of our government.
Well it succeeded masterfully. They, for the most part, walked away richer and scott free. We, the average american cititzens, are now paying the price for their greed.
And to compound the problem, we have a leader that is making things worse by driving us farther into debt. How many average citizens, right here in Napa received even the smallest bit of help from that stimulas bill?
Wake up America.....meet the new boss, same as the old boss..... "

Paddy wrote on Jul 13, 2009 8:47 AM:

" ruff - even Obama recognizes this economy has evolved over 'decades'. This would include Clint and the liberal band of brothers and sisters who ruled DC for far too long... this is a bi-partisan disaster and it began when globalization of the economy somehow seemed to be a good idea.

Until we bring jobs back to this country and permit the economy to return to it's former glory I'm not sure we can ever recover.

Let the American people set the agenda and not lobbyists, foreign governments and big business. "

freeport56 wrote on Jul 13, 2009 9:33 AM:

" Ruff-

It was big enough, $1.5 Trilliuon is enough, only 15% has been spent. What most people have forgotten is that it is being incrementally distributed over a number of years.

as for the economy, selective memory does not suit you Ruff. Barry just quadrupled the deficit. For every green job they create, 2.2 real jobs will be lost. Barry's policies are unsustainanble.

Today tow professors are holding a press conference in Sacrament to discuss the effects of AB32 (environmental legislation which is the basis of the Federal Cap&Trade Bill). Their study concludes that AB32 will cost small businesses an estimated $50,000 annually. Add that to their attempt to dismantle Prop 13. See your property tax go to 5% X $450,000 home price =$22,500 in taxes.

I guess the real plan is to depopulate California of homes and businesses! "

manxkat wrote on Jul 13, 2009 10:21 AM:

" Obamunism from the horse's mouth! Marx, Engels and Hitler tried the same stuff. "

freeport56 wrote on Jul 13, 2009 11:39 AM:

" Meanwhile, California supports 32% of the nations welfare recipients. With 3.9 million unemployed I do not see how Barry can tell us that the, we only bailed out the financial institutions, stimulus is working.


Wait till the hyperinflation hits! $4000,000 for a l;oaf of bread???? "

napagrammy wrote on Jul 13, 2009 11:46 AM:

" 1. President Obama insults us..."the stimulus has not worked. I would never wish anyone to lose their job but the fact that the teachers have not lost their jobs does not stimulate the economy. Maybe it keeps a small, tiny portion of the economy from getting worse but it has not created job one.

2. Ruff, you seem so angry and sarcastic. I wish you could just state an opinion without all the sarcasm. I worry about you.....really. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 11:56 AM:

" freeport56- My memory is just fine, thanks for your concern.

Until the economy starts reaching near full utilization there is no inflation scenario worth discussing.

We need to use the government as the buyer of last resort to keep money circulating as businesses and families 'clean up their balance sheets'.

The best thing that the government could do is to launch 'green' energy initiatives to start slowing the hundreds of billions we spend on foreign oil and put people back to work in jobs that can not be outsourced.

As usual, Republican 'numbers' are fear-mongering balderdash.

How many times do Republicans need to be told that amassing money results in the 'Paradox of Thrift' death-spiral as the CIRCULATION of money dries up.

The money supply is going down because of credit destruction as well as the velocity of circulation is falling as well as people hold on to cash in a declining economy.

The working class of America are the main folks suffering right now and Republicans hope that by chanting about tax cuts and balanced budget that everybody will be fooled.

Well, I'm here to make sure the truth gets out.

Unlike Republicans, I can remember who ran the economy into the ground in the 1920s and 30s as well as for the last 30 years.

~Ruff "

post-it wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:04 PM:

" Businesses need to look at how they spread their payroll dollars. I am constantly amazed to see stock prices go up when layoffs happen. Who is going to continue to supply a better product with fewer workers? Are investors only interested in short term gains in profitability?

If corporations took the same labor dollars and spread them more evenly across the entire labor pool, more workers would have more to spend in an economy driven by consumption.

But then again I don't have an MBA so what do I know.... "

russ wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:41 PM:

" Obamanites & Ruff,

Why do you suppose Obama, in his $ trillions of stimulus plans and budget busting, has NO earmarks, line items or plans to build WIND and/or SOLAR farms? Aren't these the GREEN jobs you are talking about?

Hint: they are not viable!

What is a Green job anyway? "

russ wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:41 PM:

" Ruff!

"Paradox of Thrift" is Keynesian falderall. Here is the counter argument, properly attributed. "Non-Keynesian economists criticize this theory on two grounds. First, if demand slackens prices will fall (barring government intervention), and the resulting lower price will stimulate demand (though at lower profit or cost -- possibly even lower wages). Second, and perhaps more important, savings represent loanable funds. These funds represent an increase in potential lending and investing by borrowers of said savings. Among other things, this represents an increase in the supply of such loanable funds that will lower interest rates and stimulate borrowing. So a decline in consumer spending is offset by an increase in institutional (e.g., banks) lending and subsequent spending. This criticism is especially significant because the extreme degree of saving, that would obviously connect saving to hard times, is rare. The aforesaid "saving for a rainy day" is never considered paradoxical."

-Wikipedia "

shareathought wrote on Jul 13, 2009 1:49 PM:

" “Written Jul 13, at 7:13 AM:
" Mr. President, you own the economy now, otherwise you would not be writing this editorial to the people, trying to reduce the fear in America that your administration does not know what you are doing.”

Please explain/re-write the above.
If you are trying to tell us that Obama is trying to reduce the fear, that he found this nation in when he became President, I can only agree.

Written Jul 13, at 7:20 AM:
“Given the benefit of doubt, it’s the logical solution for someone with such limited job or management skills…unfortunately it is ruining or has already ruined public education, and if allowed to continue our country.”

Please explain/rewrite the above.
If you are trying to say that our nation's elected representative has (within 6 months of his administration), ruined our education system, I think that your opinion is wrong.

I do agree with this:
"Earlier generations of Americans didn’t build this great country by fearing the future and shrinking our dreams."

And that:
"...it’s never been more essential to continue education and training after high school. " "

vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 13, 2009 2:17 PM:

" I'm not an economics pro, but it seems to me that "growth" escalated far too quickly during this decade. Too many people migrating here (look at the population spike), too many who work but don't pay taxes (thanks to a very vibrant underground economy), too many who don't work at all and depend on others for support, and too much of everything for cheap.

And what's the problem with "cheap"? Just take a look the very junky plastic toys that even the poorest of our society have scattered all over the house and yard. It took energy to produce products which are going to be thrown away in a year. When it's too "cheap", it's not appreciated. Our disposable, over populated, entitlement oriented society is going to destroy us.

#1 - I support national healthcare "with boundaries". The plan should be more of a catastrophic plan with a deductible of maybe $700 a year for two people. Anyone added on above that level should be an additional $300 per year PER person.

Stop enabling people to over populate our planet by giving things away for free. They need to earn it. No one should be rewarded for having children, period. If you REALLY care about our future and our environment, you will start talking about population growth as the root of all environmental problems.

Foods with high fat content, junk foods, should be taxed at a higher rate. This will help pay for the costs of their future heathcare needs.

Stop allowing the import of people from outside the U.S. to fill jobs. Targeted vocational training of our own population is a necessity.

Stop allowing jobs to discriminate based on second language fluency. It favors a huge displacement of existing skilled workers. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 2:31 PM:

" russ - Just because there are critics of the Keynesian 'Paradox of Thrift' that does not make it invalid.

There are folks who still chant that the earth is flat.

There is a big difference between recession and depression and that is unemployment.

Unemployed people do not add to demand even if prices fall. Increasing numbers of unemployed shrinks demand causing more unemployment.

How many times do Republicans have to be reminded that unemployed people do not contribute to the economy nearly as much as folks with jobs do? People without good prospects to support their family can't spend money they don't have, nor can they borrow the money that is 'piling up' in banks.

Businesses don't invest because they can't sell to folks that don't have any money.

And, russ, there are gigawatts of electricity being generated by wind turbines right now, and those projects make money. Not only that but as fossil fuel prices rise, wind and solar make MORE money as fossil fuel plants make LESS.

It funny to hear the critics pretend that the businesses like Better Place are uneconomic, while these critics continue to cling to technology over 100 years old and petroleum fuels which get more expensive to extract as the oil fields are depleted.

You know, russ, the president if IBM is famous for making the prediction that the world only needed 25 computers because they were two big and expensive to own. Now we both write on the NVR online with our PCs that we "can't afford".

New technology changes things!

It's time to break up some of that old mental concrete, russ!

~Ruff "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 2:48 PM:

" napagrammy- I'm fine! And very happy doing what I'm doing.

What you regard as sarcasm I regard as truth-telling, and it invigorates me.

Thanks for your concern, but my family is saving up for our first electric car and we are going to be distributing our hybrids to our kids which means a lot to them since gas is back hovering around $3 a gallon and will trend higher even with a sick economy and unemployment suppressing demand.

I've had every Republican voice in Napa County in rotation making fun of what I've been saying for years about economics, fossil fuels, hybrid cars, plug-in hybrids and full-electric cars, solar rooftops and green energy.

Every last one of my Republican critics has turned out to be wrong, while I've been proved correct in my forecasts.

Even showing video of the the new tech working 'on schedule and, on-or-under budget' doesn't seem to make some people wake up to the opportunity.

But it's enough for me that the Ruff Limblog family is awake and preparing for the oncoming future of expensive fossil fuels while we can.

Just think of me as Noah foretelling the flood and chuckling at the foolish folks who laughed at him when invited to come on board.

Somehow I don't think that it should be a political fight to offer electric cars to the public on a level economic playing field.

But thanks again!

~Ruff "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 3:33 PM:

" Paddy-

Clinton ruled Washington for eight years just like Bush did. And for the last six of the Clinton years, Republicans ran Congress.

Bush had a Republican Congress until 2006 for SIX years.

It's very unconvincing to many independents like myself to have Republicans still trying to blame Clinton for Republican buffoonery.

Clinton had zipper problems, but he left the country in pretty fair shape economically, and Republicans did not do nearly as well as he did in that regard.

As a matter of fact, the Republicans did not do all that well in the zipper department either.

~Ruff "

glenroy wrote on Jul 13, 2009 4:37 PM:

" Makes no difference Ruff what drives the economy and government is simple little thing call 'policy' as in legislation....what does it take a cartoon?

It's not who controlled what....it's what policy was supported by whom....DUH.... "

glenroy wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:09 PM:

" Post it….I do….all successful businesses ebb and flow with economic trends. Not much different than a home budget….income goes down, expenses go down…income goes up, expenses go up. Your theory would work for a while…but as we see our government works on a similar theory.

Publicly held companies are bound by fiduciary, or at least until Obama took over GM, to manage the business in the interest of the shareholders of the company stock, or unlike Freddie and Fannie have been managed since 1996 where the management was purely to enrich Clinton’s political appointees.

Reality is a business per se, including mine, doesn’t dictate what their product sells for, they price their product and hope it sells, if it’s a service hope someone pays…in the end, without government interference, the market ultimately determines what the end price will be given adequate market inventory. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 5:56 PM:

" glenroy- Still trying to pretend that Republicans had little to do with the messes Dubya presided over and left as his parting 'gifts' to America.

Republicans make a big stink for instance about the Bailout given to the Wall Street Weasels with 'Teabag' events and such while conveniently forgetting that Obama inherited the Weasel Bailouts from Dubya.

Now I'm a critic of those policies myself, but the difference is I criticize both Bush/Bernacke/Paulsen and Obama/Bernacke/Geithner, and make sure I 'credit' both administrations with their portions of the mess.

Republicans want to pretend that this mess sprang full grown from Obama's forehead as did the greek goddess Juno/Athena from the forehead of Zeus.

The mythology of the Greeks kind of ties in kind of nicely with Republican mythology, ya know.

Just like there is no Athena, the mess did not spring from Obama but he's stuck with it and all the Republican carping along with it.

Republicans lose creditability when they pretend that their gangsters had nothing to do with it, even when it is well documented that the Bush SEC let Bernie Madoff keep robbing people blind AFTER they were repeatedly warned.

Like I said, it's Republican creditability that is lost while mine is increased.

~Ruff "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 13, 2009 6:19 PM:

" glenroy- One of the inventories in the market is the inventory of money.

People with no or dwindling amounts of money curtail their spending. If enough 'Demand' is destroyed, then production must fall to balance, leading to more jobs lost and thus the death-spiral sets in.

For services, when there is an inadequate supply of money then sales fall, followed by prices, until no profit can be made on the sale of the service and more people get out of the business of providing that service.

Republicans seem to understand the 'Supply-side' of the marketplace reasonably well, but they seem to have no concept of how to manage the 'Demand-side' of the economy.

Unfortunately the economy consists of buyers with money to spend and sellers with goods or services to sell.

Many businesses can not survive if the money supply falls far enough. At some point somebody will buy bread for their kids instead of a service they can do without.

Laughing at the trevails of others in this economy is unwise... better to remember that 'There but for the grace of God, go I'.

~Ruff "

glenroy wrote on Jul 14, 2009 9:48 AM:

" LOL OK…Ruff….I’ll give you the same opportunity I’ve given every other leftist know it all …. ‘If you wish to compare resumes, business experience, jobs created, community service, coaching record, mentoring history, dollars donated, assets, whatever you want to compare.. let me know….”

I don’t usually bring this up but with libs who know it all but can‘t actually debate the issue or the process by which it was implemented, there really isn’t much else to do.

In the meantime…since you obviously don’t understand our political process whether committees, sub-committee vote, floor vote, the entire legislative process per se, nor which party is responsible for the legislation that has destroyed our country, which party essentially stays in power by giving away the hard earned wages of the workers…..since you don’t understand basic economics…. What’s left to discuss? Rugby? Football? Track? Hunting? Middle East or American History? "

russ wrote on Jul 14, 2009 11:07 AM:

" The Dow Jones Average, following the 9/11 attack was almost exactly as it is today, about 8200.

George W. Bush and Republicans cut taxes, accelerated the economy, reduced unemployment to less than 5%, lowered interest rates and inflation and drove the DJI to about 14000 in four years.

Barack H. Obama and his Democrat Congress raised taxes, increased spending, increased the deficit 10-fold, failed to turn around unemployment, and have plans to increase taxes further with energy taxes, healthcare taxes, and transfer wealth from producers to non-producers.

It took Roosevelt 10 years and a war to end the Great Depression. The DJI bottomed in 1930 and recovered by the mid-1940's.

http://stockcharts.com/charts/historical/djia19401960.html "

manxkat wrote on Jul 14, 2009 3:17 PM:

" When Ruff dominates the blogs like this there is a reason -fear. Democrats live in fear of two things - that Obama will trip and fall and that Sarah Palin will not. "

russ wrote on Jul 14, 2009 4:51 PM:

" manxat,

Right dude, Obama is on the defense. "

Sandra wrote on Jul 15, 2009 8:04 AM:

" I am in the service industry....and what have I noticed? Business was not booming, but it was moving along adequately....then what happened? Obama was elected and spent the first 2 months in office crying economic gloom and downfall. The results? People tightened up the purse strings and business dropped 30%. Businesses had not even started any layoffs yet. But he frightened people with all the negativity, and no words of hope. NOW, after layoffs have happened, and I am sure there are more to come, business has picked up about 10% above the low point. Why? Not because of "the Obama" and his wisdom. People have seen it is not as bad as he said it would be. In fact, I think he directly contributed to hastening my businesses 30% drop by creating panic. I also think his words were spoken with the intention of doing just what they did. Now he is making the very desperate, and lame attempt to set us up for another ignorant financial decision, hoping that by the panic he created, he can implement his programs. Are we going to fall for it again? "

Mr4 wrote on Jul 15, 2009 2:44 PM:

" "most severe economic downturn since the Great Depression."

That is the mantra of the Obamanation.

When the telepromter started spewing out this clause in early 2008 the American GDP was at the highest level ever recorded (and growing!) and unemployment was below 6 percent. But by repeating this mantra hundreds of times every day, the teleprompter was able to take a manageable mortgage crisis and escalate it into a fullscale economic panic. This intentionally induced panic enabled the democratic party to oust the incumbent republican presidency. Once in power, the panic was intentionally continued in order to enable the majority party to make the greatest power grab in the history of this country.

Mr. Obama, we are on to you. We know that you do not care a whit about the well-being of the American economy. You care only about your own personal accumulation of power, and you know that a socialist/statist approach is the means to your end.

It will not stand. "

glenroy wrote on Jul 15, 2009 10:28 PM:

" So, as if most of us needed any proof, even the Chinese Marxists understand economics better then Obama/Pelosi Socialist Democrats…. But then again Democrat’s only interest is to horde as much wealth as we’ll let them.

China’s stimulus, which consisted entirely of reducing business taxes, personal income taxes while providing investment tax credits turned their economy from recession to growth this last quarter…roughly 6.9% growth.

China took a page right out Reagan’s model, they didn’t waste stimulus monies on registering new Marxists or disturbing Mao’s Little Red Book…or giving the DNC another couple million dollars….they spent their money in the only place where it could have any effect, reducing the tax burden.

Proof enough Obama’s Cuban model stimulus of increasing the tax burden…and giving those riches to his cronies the elitist Democrats like Soros’s and Madoff‘s, though no one knows for sure how many billions have been funneled to ACORN because congress no longer has oversight….as many of us have been saying all along…a complete and utter waste.

Lincoln knew well…. ‘you can fool some of the people all the time, and all the people some of the time…but you can’t fool all the people all the time’… not even the liberal messiah can do that. "

jack27022003 wrote on Jul 18, 2009 10:15 AM:

" E-verify for everyone. "

XMAN wrote on Jul 18, 2009 10:31 AM:

" The economic meltdown of the U.S. economy was a direct cause of repealing a single law that prohibited the issuance of sub-prime loans. Such malfeasance of policy led to the Great Depression 1929. It created financial liability without there being any true equity to back it up. The law was repealed by a Democrat Congress to accommodate for minorities who wished to realize the great American dream - to own their own home. A seemingly noble intention indeed. A million loans were made very quickly and people not only invested - they speculated using so called "liar loans."
Within a short space of two years the borrowers found themselves in foreclosure and the banks ended up holding mortgages that were uncollectible. The housing market collapsed nationwide, the banks collapsed, the car industry collapsed, the job market collapsed. This is a fact and it is history and it is not going to go away. What was George W. Bush's participation in this? He could have (and should have) vetoed the bill that did away with the prohibition of sub-prime loans. Had he done this he would have been labeled a racist by the liberal left but his presidency was already down the tubes anyway. It would have been good for our country had our nation not indulged in so much dishonesty. Now we are all paying for it and those who are directly to blame are totally in charge of the show. What has Obama done to fix the problem with liars loans? He has made policy to extend the mortgages and have the government give up to $1,500 to what he calls "victims" so they can refinance. Eventually, most will default. "

XMAN wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:44 AM:

" Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae's regulator reported that the company's quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were "illusions deliberately and systematically created" by the company's senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.

The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae's former chief executive officer, OFHEO's report shows that over half of Mr. Raines' compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.

The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator's examination of the company's accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.

Senator John McCain .....
January 26, 2005 "

XMAN wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:53 AM:

" The disgrace of Franklin Raines. The bad guys were all in bed together and should be indicted for fraud.

In June 2008 The Wall Street Journal reported that Franklin Raines was one of several public officials who received below market rates loans at Countrywide Financial because the corporation considered the officeholders "FOA's"--"Friends of Angelo" (Countrywide Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo). He received loans for over $3 million while CEO of Fannie Mae.

Angelo Mozilo will eventually be indicted. The wheels of justice move slow but they do move. "

Raven wrote on Jul 20, 2009 2:30 PM:

" XMAN, just want to point out that in 2005, the GOP controlled both houses of congress and could have passed any bill they wanted. "

XMAN wrote on Jul 20, 2009 4:22 PM:

" Raven ~

As is frequently the case - you are correct, sir.

SB 190 died in committee.

Passage of the "Help America" bill was a bipartisan fiasco. Bush signed it thinking he was doing a noble thing. After all, who doesn't want to help America?

Very few of the applicants for "liar's loans" actually qualified under ordinary circumstances. Thus: "liar's loans."

Banker's took them on for the usual reason - greed. Realtor's undersigned on the phony values of the property for the usual reason - greed. In the midst of all this blood bath did anyone make billions of dollars? Ask Peter Soros. He sold all of his "bundled" mortgages to the banks that ended up needing bail-out funds. The whole thing is about dishonesty and greed. And you see where it got us. In the dumper - that's where. Do we need to go any further into the dumper or have we yet learned our lesson? No more schemes involving more taxes please. Not for the next 100 years. "

kevin wrote on Jul 20, 2009 10:12 PM:

" In reality raven, unlike the Democrats currently controlling the Senate, the Republicans did NOT have a 60 seat majority in 2005 and could not "have passed any bill they wanted".... "

Raven wrote on Jul 22, 2009 9:40 PM:

" kevin....the GOP controlled Senate didn't even bring it to the floor for a vote...and news reports from the period show no threats of a filibuster from the Demos...so why didn't they want to even vote on it?....maybe because they wanted as much deregulation as they could get? "

glenroy wrote on Jul 25, 2009 11:40 AM:

" Raven...you still don't understand the process... unless the majority is 60 seats in the senate the majority means little when dealing with libs.

Look up filibuster…. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy