NVR Logo
Where’s the water?
County launches study of aquifers from Angwin to American Canyon
Monday, July 06, 2009
Save and Share Share
Napa County wants to find out what it knows and what it doesn’t about its underground aquifers, and is drilling through the data to get a clear assessment of the water supply under the heart of the valley.

Napa County has hired an engineering firm, Luhdorff & Scalmanini of Woodland, to go through the groundwater data and try to paint as full a picture of the water supply as possible from what might be sketchy information. The project is expected to take between seven months and a year and cost around $230,000.
What the engineers find could result in policy changes. Maybe the county will have to drill monitoring wells or ask private landowners if they would volunteer information or allow their wells to be monitored.

Jim Lincoln, chair of the natural resources committee at the Napa County Farm Bureau and vineyard manager for Beckstoffer Vineyards, said people get really nervous when you start talking groundwater, even studying groundwater. “They believe the next logical step is groundwater regulations, and that frightens a lot of people,” he said.
But Lincoln said he believes the more information available, the better. “If there had been better information in the MST (Milliken-Sarco-Tulocay) and Carneros, maybe we could have made better land-use decisions,” he said.

Lincoln believes sharing information and landowners working together is critical to helping solve their underground water problems in the MST, where the county and property owners are considering building a recycled water pipeline for agricultural uses and other options. “Their wells are not doing so good and they see working together is helping,” he said.
Lincoln said that if a continuous picture of the county’s groundwater situation had been maintained since the 1960s, when vineyard plantings began to intensify, it probably would have resulted in better planning and conservation of water.

“I see this (first phase) as positive. Everyone just needs to be careful of people’s property and water rights. But we can’t be afraid of information,” Lincoln said.

Felix Riesenberg, principal water resources engineer for Napa County Public Works Department, said there is a lack of understanding of the current groundwater conditions up and down the valley.

“This particular effort is not to quantify, but is effort to understand the behaviors of the ground water basins,” Riesenberg said.

He said some people are concerned about an overdraft — when more water is removed than is replaced in an underground aquifer. “That does not seem to be the case in the main Napa Valley basin,” he said. “But every so often there seem to be issues in very specific locations.”

Riesenberg said it is clear that MST is a deficit groundwater area, and that information is sketchy in Carneros — where there is a push to obtain recycled water. “We hear about Carneros, but it is hit or miss. They have issues from time to time and yet we don’t have any data out there,” Riesenberg said.

With a comprehensive study, “in the future the county can address issues more proactively. The goal is to improve our overall groundwater knowledge in the county. “People fear management (of groundwater), but that is not what this is about at this point.

The underground aquifers the county is focused on include the main basin on the valley floor, Carneros, MST, American Canyon, Angwin-Deer Park area, Pope Valley and Chiles Valley. “Primarily we want to look at areas where there are populations and developed agriculture,” Riesenberg said.

“If you don’t know what is going on, you won’t know if you are having a problem later on,” Riesenberg said. “We need to know the history to make a sound decision.”
15 comment(s)

kbf wrote on Jul 6, 2009 7:39 AM:

" Sorry Mr. Lincoln,the county has been told for years about depleating the ground water and paid no attention to it. Why do you think spending thousands of dollars is going to make them listen now. The county won't put a moritium on building or new vineyards so it is senseless. "

telebender wrote on Jul 6, 2009 8:03 AM:

" This is a total boondoggle. I care for 2 wells, 40 feet apart. The water in each of theses wells appears to be at different levels ALL the time...current science, and certainly statistical analysis, are useless in understanding underwater water behavior. "

MarkMiwords wrote on Jul 6, 2009 9:25 AM:

" There's nothing "innocent" going on here. If you have water, this is bad. It is the first step in having it taken away from you. If you don't have water, it's good because it looks like the water will be distributed between the "haves" and "have-nots". If you're a developer, rejoice! The "haves" will be forced to give theirs up so you can make oodles of money. "

Rob C wrote on Jul 6, 2009 10:42 AM:

" They are a solid engineering and consultative firm whose fact-based consultative work has, at times, concluded and advanced judicial reversals of locally-held assumptions of overdrafts and saltwater intrusion "facts" in areas such as the central coast.

The valley could benefit from a solid, comprehensive study to clarify the actual aquifer status(s) of the valley. Outside of the somewhat recent USGS MST study, there is little empirical basis for a subject known to have substantial 'opinion-as-fact' in valley public discourse. "

MarkMiwords wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:16 AM:

" Hmmmm...... Rob C., you speak "Engineering Lingo". Do you work for the County, or are you an engineer? "

napablogger wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:46 AM:

" I agree with Rob C, although it scares people that it could lead to an attempt at curtailing water rights, which it could, it is also needed information.

While the science is not absolutely certain it would certainly give us a better idea. I suspect that we will find what we have found before with less thorough analysis, there is a lot of water here in most places. What that will mainly do is alleviate a lot of concern. "

native74 wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:50 AM:

" I'm leary of any water district governed or managed by the County (just look at whats happening to the Berryessa Districts). However, I'm for the valley study. I hope the 'water takeover' as predicted by markmiwords wouldn't happen, but it'll also keep me on the cautious side. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 6, 2009 12:04 PM:

" We need the study. It's not about taking from the "haves" and giving to the "have nots". The study is about awareness of our limitations. Do we want to make yet another, costly Berryessa Estates mistake? "

kbf wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:08 PM:

" How many studies are we going to have? I thought there was one done a year or two ago and there are already test wells around the county. Put a stop to building and vineyards for a year or two then do your study and see how much the aquifers come back. "

napagrl1960 wrote on Jul 6, 2009 1:28 PM:

" This has been an issue since the vineyards have started drilling wells. My parents had a well that was only 50 feet deep, this is very shallow for a well. This well served them from the early 60's until 1987. The well never ran out of water until two of the neighbors drilled for their two wells. Bingo! my parents had to re-drill their well (250 feet deep this time) and nothing was done about my parents water rights. Let them build....they will take the water. "

whyn? wrote on Jul 6, 2009 3:38 PM:

" The MST Basin has been studied and mapped by the USGS. The only solution the powers that be came up with is recyled city sewer water piped in to use on outdoor landscapes and vineyards. The proposed pipeline covered only one half of the MST Basin. Silverado would continue to draw on the basin without restriction as well as all other users north of Hagen Road. "

angwindeac wrote on Jul 6, 2009 8:30 PM:

" Where's all the property rights arguments NB? If development depletes resources who cares? Every development plan currently before the county sups has had your vocal editorial support and yet somehow now water is an issue? You can't have it both ways when it suits you. "

concerned 1 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:06 PM:

" The article fails to mention that the Napa Valley Water Basin is in over draw. Hydrologist, Dennis Jackson, reported, “Faye (USGS,1973) showed that groundwater levels would significantly lower when groundwater rates exceed 24,000 acre feet per year. West Yost and Associates Technical Memorandum No. 6 (2005) showed that groundwater extraction, from the Napa Valley groundwater basin, was 24,856 acre-feet in 2005. So, during dry years, the current level of pumping can significantly lower groundwater levels. Since the summertime flow in the Napa River is from the groundwater table, significantly lowering the water table will diminish the flow or even dry up portions of the mainstem of the Napa River in dry years.” EDEN filed a complaint with the Division of Water Rights that since the groundwater basin is “hydrologically connected” to the river the State Water Resources Control Board has jurisdiction, not the County and that either a moratorium or an immediate reduction in drawdown by wells in the valley should be ordered. Jackson’s report can be found at the Board of Supervisor’s meeting on March 17. Look for Item 9H, Document C. John Stephens "

concerned 1 wrote on Jul 8, 2009 9:33 PM:

" Actually it was Living Rivers that filed a complaint with the Division of Water Rights. John Stephens "

geo wrote on Jul 9, 2009 12:28 PM:

" You have to be kidding ! we fought the Carnerous Inn and Lodge on the grounds of pumping water and killing our local wells. As you can see no one cared and let them expand this eye sore. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy