The facts about St. Helena's school system
By Cindy Warren
I would like to address issues regarding the St. Helena Unified School District that have been in the paper and been the subject of e-mail blasts. There is much misinformation and perhaps a little gossip.
Rumor: The district is paying for Superintendent Gordon’s trip to Bordeaux. Fact: No.
Rumor: The board has already picked a successor for SHUSD Trustee Jim Haslip’s seat. Fact: Depending upon community input, it’s likely a special election will be held this fall.
Rumor: Retirement packages for teachers and administrators are expensive and unexpected. Fact: Retirement incentives were agendized and openly discussed at board meetings in September, December and January. By law, we cannot offer retirement incentives unless they save the district money and are available to all who are eligible. Alan Gordon, Jim Zoll and six teachers took “retirement incentives” this year. Over five years, these incentives will save the district $1,244,193.23 — almost $250,000 per year.
Rumor: Our teachers are overpaid. Fact: We want to pay our teachers well. They are our most important resource. What matters is how we hire. Last March when three new hires didn’t meet our standards, we (legally) released them and were excoriated for “letting teachers go” who didn’t measure up. We invest in ongoing teacher development and may have the best-trained teachers in California.
Rumor: We are spending too much on salaries and not enough on students. We are spending over state “averages.” Fact: To that we plead guilty. We do not want our students to be average. Compared to our “peer schools,” those schools similar to ours in size, culture or test scores we wish to emulate (high-achieving schools like Piedmont or Del Mar), we are neither the highest nor lowest in any category. In spending per pupil, we generally exceed our peers and in salaries as a percentage of overall budget (around 85 percent of most budgets goes for salaries) we are competitive (www.ed-data.k12.ca.us), Our teachers and administrators are constantly recruited by other districts for more money.
Rumor: We are a college-bound prep school. Fact: We have upgraded our vocational/career offerings to better prepare our students for the job market in the 21st century. It’s true. We don’t have home ec or typing. We have culinary arts, computer science and keyboarding. We don’t have auto mechanics (engines are now computerized), but we do offer agriculture mechanics (woodworking, welding, electricity, masonry, wood and metal construction), Web development, graphic design and digital publishing, video production, development/broadcasting, floral design, viticulture and information technology skills for Special Ed. (Check our Web site for complete list of vocational courses). Driver’s ed and sewing have indeed been dropped.
As befits our community, our ag program (which has tripled in size) may be the best in California.
The International Baccalaureate Program is for all students K-12, not just college bound. It is an approach to education, not a list of courses. Our district is unique in that we offer MAP (Multi Age Program), dual immersion and a traditional program, all under the IB umbrella.
Rumor: Special Ed is being dismantled. Fact: We are committed to offering a comprehensive Special Ed program. We moved our Special Ed students to the center of campus so they would be integrated with the student body. We want to mainstream them and prepare them for independent living. We are committed to improving our Special Ed program.
Rumor: The board doesn’t communicate. Fact: For the past five years, administrators, teachers, board members, parents and community members have worked together to create a vision for our district. We meet several times a year for strategic planning. It has been a collaborative process.
In strategic planning workshops, continuity in leadership was emphasized. As a board, we expected Dr. Robert Haley to step in whenever Superintendent Gordon stepped down. However, we did not thoroughly communicate to the entire community our desire to keep our administrative team intact. We are responsible for our errors in “process” and could have done a much better job in preparing the community for the transition and soliciting more community input. We have learned a great lesson.
By developing great relationships with our community, the district has been the recipient of new facilities, paid for with private funds. The new Boys and Girls Club is a jewel. The new multi-purpose facility/gym, all-weather track and football field were privately financed by people who believe in what we are doing. We are planning for a new choral classroom, pool complex, ag barn and ag classrooms.
By any measure, this is an outstanding school system — one that truly reflects the community in which it is located.
(Warren is a trustee with the St. Helena Unified School District.)
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
pvboy wrote on Jul 4, 2009 1:24 PM:
mind that the USA least equitable distribution of income and by far the highest per capita incarceration rate of any country in the world. So before you get too riled up over how much St. Helena teachers are paid, stop and think for just a second where our priorities should be. I have no problem with paying great teachers a solidly middle class salary, say $150,000 a year plus benefits. In a short time, very smart people with a social conscience will be leaving the law, medicine, and business to become teachers. Would this be bad?n "
bluebird wrote on Jul 5, 2009 11:41 PM:
The plan was never presented to include management employees. The retirement packages for Gordon and Zoll were NOT on the agenda and therefore the public was unaware of the plan including them. Gordon, in January 2009, signed the very document that amended the teacher's plan which allowed him to be included in it less than 12 weeks from when he signed it. This addendum was NOT on the agenda for the January board meeting and the January board minutes were void of any reference to it. The board couldn't have approved it. Public records support this.
On June 29, 2009 the board recently held a "special meeting", two days before the district's year end, to correct "errors of process", aka Brown Act violations. In that meeting the district's attorney made numerous contradictory statements. One of those statements was "this plan did not need to have a financial savings to the district". Funny, that's not what Warren states above. So what is the real story? He also went on to say that the teachers plan was adopted in December, true, but he fails to address the conflict of interest issue of the January amendment by Gordon which slid the two administrators in. No agenda item and no board approval. Conflict of interest?
So, this begs the question… who's running the show here? The admin or the board?
Lane's states "Right now we are contractually obligated. There aren't a lot of choices right now." Really?! You mean the board can't disapprove an invalid contract unilaterally entered into by the Superintendent? What other types of neat benefits does the Super get? "
Frenchtoast wrote on Jul 6, 2009 9:00 AM:
joytoyou wrote on Jul 6, 2009 11:51 PM:
I believe that these parents are concerned that the teachers are not being paid enough and do deserve more. These parents seem concerned that the amounts paid to the Administration (being management/ non-union level for example: Superintendent, Assistant Sup, principals) are above the State average while they spend fewer dollars then State average per student. To put it more plainly: St Helena, being a Basic Aid district, takes more tax money in then most schools, yet spends less on the kids then the State average and the most on Administration then the State average.
Check out the numbers and expense percentages in relation to other schools in California. These numbers are all taken from public sources such as: www.cde.ca.gov/ds/ and www.ed-data.k12.ca.us
Its fascinating to research and it is these parents American Right to question our Publicly Elected officials as too why the School board is making certain decisions in regards to the use of their hard earned Tax dollars. Maybe on a larger scale, if more people stood up as these parents are and questioned other Publicly Elected officials, our State Government wouldn't be in the mess that it is currently. "