NVR Logo
Extending a hand to the homeless
Police program provides more than enforcement
Thursday, July 02, 2009
Save and Share Share
Wes, a 63-year homeless ex-felon with diabetes, high blood pressure and a bum knee, left his camp before dawn and hobbled nearly two miles to the Napa police station.

He needed a bicycle, an apartment, medical care and some hand-holding. After cooling his heels for nearly an hour until the doors opened, he went into the lobby and dialed up Brandon.
That would be Brandon Gardner, the police department’s homeless outreach advocate.

Within Napa’s homeless community, Gardner is nearly as popular as the free meals at the Salvation Army and The Table at First Presbyterian Church.
Gardner is a big bear of a man with a gentle touch. Hundreds of Napa’s down-and-out have had his business card pressed into their hands over the past two years. When you want help, call me, he tells them.

Before Gardner, “law enforcement was just doing law enforcement stuff,” said Sgt. Debbie Peecook, Gardner’s boss. And public complaints about the homeless soared.
In 2006, police received more than 3,000 calls about anti-social activity, from boisterous loitering and drunkenness to fights, trespassing, thieving.

Homeless calls were consuming an ever-greater share of patrol officers’ time, police Chief Rich Melton said. “With outreach, we wanted to work on the problem before it became a call.”

The program has been phenomenally successful, Melton said. Homeless calls plunged by two-thirds to 1,000 last year. In downtown, such calls dropped from 1,197 to 275. Over the same two-year period, the number of arrests of homeless people fell by nearly half, from 554 to 302.

One by one, the police homeless outreach has redirected some of the city’s most recalcitrant street people into housing, treatment programs and jobs.

Jim Featherstone, the county’s assistant director of Health and Human Services, praised having the Police Department as an ally. The county has many treatment services, but specialists who plunge into homeless encampments are a rarity, he said.

Gardner invited Wes into a small interview room. He had previously helped Wes find food and clothes. He’d even bestowed one of his own sweatshirts.

The task this day: Motivate Wes to complete a federal application for Supplemental Security Income. This would give him barely enough money get an apartment if he got a roommate.

Wes promised to get to the SSI office that afternoon, then presented Gardner with his wish for a mountain bike to help him get around. “They have them reasonable at Wal-Mart,” he said.

Gardner was noncommittal. He needs to work with Wes on how to budget, he said later.

Wherever the homeless are — under bridges, along the river, shopping center parking lots, homeless services centers — Gardner goes, often assisted by Peecook.

“When we go out together, he’s the good guy, I’m the bad guy,” Peecook said. Sometimes it takes being threatened with citation or arrest for people to accept help, she said.

“I do whatever it takes to get people off the street,” Gardner said. He creates resumes, acts as a chauffeur, makes calls for social services, pumps people with optimism.

The street homeless tend to have a host of problems, leading to perpetual discouragement, Peecook said. “They get told ‘no,’ ‘no,’ ‘no,’ ‘no,’” she said.

“I try to be very upbeat,” said Gardner, who claims success in helping 38 people get their own housing this year. Over the long haul, he will be happy if 50 percent stick.

“There are always underlying issues,” Gardner said. “If you can admit what the faults are, we can work with you.”

Lowell Downey, a resident of Old Town, credits the police program with reducing the magnitude of his neighborhood’s homeless problem, but the aggravation is still huge, he said.

He encounters loitering, drug and alcohol use and boisterous behavior on a daily basis, he said. If police calls are down, part of it could be citizens weariness that the situation will remedied, he said.

On an early June morning, Peecook and Gardner set out in an unmarked police car to make their rounds.

On Randolph Street, across from the HOPE homeless center, they touched bases with George Elicker, a 75-year-old man who lived for nine years in his camper until police had it towed. Elicker, who was now living with his brother, had a line on an apartment just a block away.

Gardner had Elicker initial and sign a rental agreement, then turned his attention to Eric Honodel, 44, a recovering alcoholic who said he was “living under a tree in a sleeping bag.”

Honodel had been housed, but lost it, Peecook said. Now the mission is find a less expensive place and team Honodel up with a roommate who won’t lead him astray, Peecook said.

Honodel said he was worried about continued homelessness and idleness. “I’m right on the verge of falling back in this mess,” he said.

Honodel suggested a likely roommate, but Peecook looked askance. “He has issues,” she said of his choice. “Who else could you reasonably room with?”

Homeless people are in a Catch-22, Peecook said. They can’t get housing unless they have a job and they can’t get a job unless they have housing.

“Employers tend to like real addresses,” she said. “There is a stigma they won’t show up for work if they’re homeless.”

Having a criminal records is not a plus in the search for jobs and housing, Gardner said. Many homeless have rap sheets. Some are sex offenders. Personal demons, such as mental illness and addictions to drugs and alcohol, are common.

“These are some of Brandon’s challenges,” said Peecook, noting that Napa’s homeless shelters won’t take the most problematic cases. “We’re the one agency that doesn’t discriminate,” she said.

Saying good-bye to Honodel, Gardner and Peecook cruised over to Riverside Drive where they found Jeff, parked with a bike trailer loaded with cans and bottles, feeding the ducks.

“Thank you for keeping this place a lot cleaner than before,” Peecook said. “We appreciate your effort.”

Jeff used to store his junk along the bank, drawing complaints from neighbors. “It was horrible,” she said. “They think they’ve found treasure, then they can’t get money for it.”

At South Napa Marketplace, Peecook knocked on an RV known to double as a local man’s permanent home. “You have to be careful when you knock on an RV,” Brandon said. No one was home.

Finally, they visited a woman with three young daughters living in an RV parked on Solano Avenue, across from Redwood Plaza. “Debbie from the police department,” Peecook called out. “Put your clothes on. I’m not going to arrest you.”

Kay, 36, stumbled out and greeted her visitors. She complimented Peecook’s earrings.

Before engaging in chitchat, Peecook announced that she would search the RV, as permitted by Kay’s probation agreement. Nothing suspicious turned up. The children were away at a school event.

Standing on the sidewalk, Gardner urged the woman to apply for waitressing jobs. Once she had employment, she could better qualify for housing, he said.

Kay recited roadblocks to getting a job. The court had yanked her driver’s license. She owed $2,000 for two speeding tickets. Some social service agencies have rebuffed her. “I don’t knock on doors anymore,” she said.

Kay “talks a good story,” Peecook said later. More was going on than met the eye, she said.

Although the Police Department is cutting back support staff, the homeless outreach program is secure, Melton said. The city will be spending about $90,000 this year, with the county contributing $25,000 in federal funds, he said.

For this amount, Gardner will work full-time, with a part-time assistant who has yet to be hired, the chief said.

Gardner said he would continue to visit Kay, wherever she happened to be parked. “It makes it hard, but we’ll get it done as long as she shows forward momentum,” he said.

“We don’t think anybody is beyond reach,” Gardner said.

“We can’t do 100 percent for them,” Peecook said.
33 comment(s)

amazed wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:06 AM:

" Exactly one paragraph in this very long article was devoted to somehow who works or lives downtown, and has to put up with this garbage. Lowell Downey nailed it -- people have grown weary of asking the police for help. If I called the police every time I saw people drunk downtown, loitering, fighting, and screaming obscenities at each other, you could add another 365 calls (or more) to the yearly totals.

We've created a vibrant downtown, alright, in the same sense that San Francisco's Tenderloin is vibrant. We've made Napa a very nice place to be homeless.

Now we're going to spend another $90,000 annually to lead the proverbial horse to water, and show the homeless how to best access the social programs we're already paying for.

Give the homeless my breakfast. I'm too nauseated to eat. "

DL wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:29 AM:

" I would like to recommend that Mr. Gardner help Eric Honodel to get into one of the sober-living homes that Johnny Apadocca runs. I think it would be very good for him. The roomates he would have there are clean & sober & working hard every day to stay that way, just like Eric. Good luck to all. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:50 AM:

" It's far cheaper to assist the homeless and jobless than it is to do the arrest-and-release cycle.

With unemployment growing by 500,000 per month Napa, like the rest of America is going to have increasing numbers of folks without a home.

It might be a good idea to see how much it would cost to turn some of the Napa Fairgrounds parking to RV parking with some facilities for folks like the woman with three kids mentioned in the article.

~Ruff "

krusty wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:10 AM:

" I think this program is great. I wouldn't even know where to start if I needed assistance if I were ever without a place to live.

I would assume a lot of these people may have minor infractions on their record that keep them from going to the police department for help. People won't change unless they have the desire to, but at least the police department is giving them the information they need to help get their life back together if they choose to do so. As the article states, they've put 38 people in housing this year. Even if only half of those people remain in housing it was worth the $90,000 cost. "

Praetorian wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:11 AM:

" I don't suppose your Republican god, Ronald Regan, conservative attitudes or social and economic policies would bear even a small degree of responsibility for your lament. Napa has always been a nice place to live for the less fortunate. What it hasn't been in the past is a place for vocal, resentful, niggardly mean spirited elitists. Peacock and Brandon are the answer to a continuing and worsening social climate. $90,000 well spent. If you can't accept the social order of things perhaps you would consider a move to Marin or Contra Costa county. Oh! I forget they have the same problems as well, the difference being a matter of degree. Go Peacock! Go Brandon! Thanks for your meal. "

amazed wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:51 AM:

" Ridiculous. Put the $90,000 into another salaried officer, and clean 'em out.

A new bike from Walmart? Buy it yourself. Or go to a second-hand store. The thrift stores are good enough for me and mine.

George Elicker lives in his old Lincoln Continental. He's a familiar face downtown, and he has been for years.

Nobody outside the Hope Center is looking for work. They don't have time to work, what with the drinking, smoking cigarettes, and standing around.

Some of the homeless are sex offenders? Great, round them up. They can't continue to be described on the Megan's Law website as "transient." That isn't good enough.

A woman who's living in an RV (and driving it without a license) shouldn't have custody of children. And nobody owes $2,000 for "speeding tickets." Not the kind of speed you acquire with a vehicle, anyway.

Come on, people, take a hard line. The situation requires more than a big, warm, fuzzy hug. Spend a day downtown, and get the real picture. "

napaisburning wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:53 AM:

" When these homeless outreach coordinators were hired some years ago, I wondered whether or not they were bilingual. I will sooon find out. Like it or lump it, there are some LEGAL Spanish speaking homeless folk out there who could use some servicing. I have personally seen, and have been advised of a double standard regarding the treatment of whites versus the Hispanic homeless in the community. Oftentimes, the Napa police officers treat the Hispanic homeless like redheaded stepchildren. Believe it!!! JWPeay "

crooked6pence wrote on Jul 2, 2009 12:23 PM:

" Now that was a good story! Keep up the great work Officers Gardner & Peecook! Thanks NVR for a well researched article. "

1959Napan wrote on Jul 2, 2009 12:24 PM:

" I remember back in the olden days when Mr. Reagan was Gov. (Actually, "The Olden Days" for me are when Gerry Brown's father was Gov.) I believe he was the individual responsible for releasing "The Undesirables" into the wild. Many of these citizens have been here in this community since before the nouveau rich descended upon us. It's a part of the landscape and should be taken into stride along with rest of the wonderful things the Napa Valley has to offer. Just think of it as "local color". I would suggest being a bit more proactive and put some of your, in my view, misplaced energy into fundraising or a community outreach organization to mitigate if not resolve what annoys you. Be a part of the solution not an additional burden on the resources of city services. "

NapaNana wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:16 PM:

" I seriously am touched......Ruff...I think that you meat that. Usually people want the homeless out of town! Most of them would rather not have a hand out.....but a hand up.

Ditto Krusty! There are a lot of lost people out there that just don't know how to get up and find themselves again.
You too Praetorian......rents are rising fast around here due to the number of forclosures...... making a higher demand for rentals.......
And what has happened to the way people think these days? People don't want to help......they just want them to go away.....until the day they may need help!
Huh Amazed?......what was that again? "

just b. cuz wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:48 PM:

" It's PEECOOK, not PEACOCK! Please excuse the type-o's Sergeant or should I say, Lieutenant? Congratulations on your promotion! :) "

krusty wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:51 PM:

" Clean 'em out, amazed? How will that help? It just keeps the cycle going. They would go to jail for minor infractions and then end up in the same place they are now. No one wins in that situation.

When was the last time you were downtown, amazed? I spend a lot of time downtown and I rarely see anything that might be considered a problem. The area around Franklin and Division streets is the most problematic. I can see how people who live in that area are affected by the homeless problem. Otherwise, I almost never see any homeless people in the rest of the downtown area and I've never felt threatened by any of them.

Does anyone remember what the homeless problem was like in downtown years ago? It was much worse than it was today. There were a lot of homeless people who would hang out in all areas of downtown. It wouldn't have been unusual to see a homeless person sleeping on the sidewalk in front of an empty storefront. Things are much improved and Mr. Gardner and Ms. Peecock deserve at least some of the credit for that. "

amazed wrote on Jul 2, 2009 2:22 PM:

" I'm downtown every day, Krusty. How about you? I still see the homeless sleeping in doorways -- drive by Community Projects in the evening. I sweep up broken bottles. I picked and threw away a used medical glove last week -- don't even want to know about that one. The Police Department deserves a huge thank-you for all its done. But if we keep providing the free meals, we're going to continue to have a homeless problem. Now we have an outreach coordinator to help people fill out forms for benefits because they've fried their brains to the point they cannot work. I just don't get it.

There's a young man who I believe is developmentally disabled, who lives downtown and walks to his job at Safeway every day. He lives in what I believe is Section 8 housing. THAT'S the kind of person who deserves help. "

NUHS67 wrote on Jul 2, 2009 2:31 PM:

" DUI drivers and drug dealers selling to minors is a much much bigger problem than the homeless. "

coffebeat wrote on Jul 2, 2009 2:34 PM:

" I'm glad to read about what these Officers are doing to help the homeless.
I was a little bit surprised that the calls about the homless have decreased.

I live on Franklin Street very near the Salvation Army and the church where the homeless people hang out and I admit I was apprehensive about moving there.
I was concerned that since they mill around there that I might have problems with them coming into my back yard and trying to steal stuff or sleep there, but I have never had that happen.
I do see drug deals happening in the open and when I drive down the street in front of the church many of the homeless people will be in the middle of the street or ride their bike/walk out in front of your car and yell profanities but I realize that they are on drugs and probably crazy to boot so I take it with a grain of salt. Other than that I don't think they are that bad... "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 2, 2009 3:29 PM:

" NapaNana- My family came to Napa during the First Republican Great Depression.

They were homeless 'Arkies' who lost their farm. The family of 14 (yes, a dozen kids - no birth control in those days) slept under the old First Street bridge and ate fish from the river.

Eventually conditions improved thanks to FDR and the Democrats and no thanks to the Republican Herbert Hoover.

There were some mean-spirited 'citizens' back then yelling for a crackdown.

But grandpa and the boys found work. Eventually they were able to rent a house. The boys went off to WWII and some of the girls became workers at Mare Island. After the war one uncle became sheriff of Napa County and later a banker. Others were business owners, building contractors and carpenters, but now most of them are gone.

It is not for us to JUDGE people. It is for us to HELP them if we can.

We can be proud of police who offer to provide information and/or do little things that may keep folks out of 'the system'.

A human being can change their life up to their last breath. I read recently about a homeless man who built a business plan at the Library, got venture capital funding for his first load of product, and he's now selling his goods and lifting other down-n-out people he met.

NOBODY is beyond help, except those who have no heart.

~Ruff "

Praetorian wrote on Jul 2, 2009 5:07 PM:

" I am certain the $90,000 is giving tremendous value per dollar. I might point out that ONE officer can only address ONE situation at a time.

Furthermore, this is a social issue not law enforcement. These are uncertain times and any one of us can suffer a reversal of fortune in the blink of a paycheck. Nuff said. "

Baraki wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:09 PM:

" Why's Peecook wearing Sgt stripes? I heard she got promoted... weeks ago! Has this story been on the drawing room floor that long? "

diehard4ever wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:40 PM:

" And we're STILL giving BILLIONS of dollars in "foreign aid" to the gov't of Africa, China, and other third world countries so they can buy their solid silver Rolls Royce... yes, they make those. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:07 PM:

" I've always said that these guys are nothing compared to SF. They add some local color for sure. And they are generally well-behaved.

I am encouraged by the efforts taken by Napa PD's program. It enables the authorities to know what is going on, and take action when necessary.

Sure, many of these people are a bunch of free-loaders who are enjoying the homeless version of "Wine Country Living" but as long as they are well behaved, I don't have any real issues. And I think that this program has a little bit to do with keeping their behavior in check.

Also, why are the pics in front of the NCTPA building? Isn't the shelter across the way from there? What's up with that? "

amazed wrote on Jul 3, 2009 9:39 AM:

" Mr. Feasor, your comments reflect how little you are downtown. Yes, the photo is near the NCTPA building, which is across the street from the Hope Center, next to the church with a meal program, one block from the meal program on Third Street, near the Salvation Army ... oh, you get the idea. That's part of the problem -- the meal and assistance programs are nowhere near the shelter, which is on the old Gasser property off Imola.

Ruff, I recognize the achievements of your family. I also recognize the fact that they didn't sit in front of the County building, swigging from a 40-oz., waiting for the free lunch at the church at 11:30. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Jul 3, 2009 5:45 PM:

" Amazed - I beg to differ. I'm near the area pretty often, actually. I was loosely referring to the Hope Center as the "shelter."

The Hope staff/volunteers are good about keeping their...clients (???)...near the Hope building. That's why I was sort of surprised that the pics were in front of the NCTPA building.

Well, at least they weren't holding any mysterious bottle-shaped paper bags...Actually, those two guys are fine; haven't seen them do anything unlawful in public, including any open container violations.

But, yes: most of them just hang out, smoke, talk a lot of smack, some amusing outbursts to no one in particular, etc. But, in the end, they are pretty much harmless and know their boundaries. VERY different from the City.

To that extent, I still say the outreach program is a success. If a little more money keeps them well behaved - and gets some of the non-regulars back on their feet - I see no problem with that... "

amazed wrote on Jul 3, 2009 8:33 PM:

" Wow -- "amusing" and "harmless." I beg to differ.

You're here "pretty often?" I am here, day in and day out. You folks who are in the so-called downtown, Main Street, First Street, the restaurant district, etc., do not deal with the homeless (or drunks or druggies) as I do in the Third Street/Franklin/Coombs/Fourth Street area, every day. I've been shaken down for cash, shouted at, intimidated. Some of these folks are cool -- David ("bicycle guy") might ask for a couple of dollars, but then he finds me to pay me back. There's a gal who asks for cigarettes, but is nice about it. But many are are not "well-behaved," by any stretch of the imagination.

You and I agree on one thing -- if the assistance programs can put the "non-regulars back on their feet," great. I suggest to you there are a great many "regulars" who are simply siphoning resources (your money and mine) on food and shelter so they can spend their SSI or whatever benefits they receive on alcohol and dope, and they continue to make downtown downright scary. Anybody who says otherwise just hasn't been here like I am.

I respect your opinions. Please respect my experiences for the past 10+ years. "

Raven wrote on Jul 3, 2009 10:13 PM:

" diehard, less than one percent of the budget goes to foreign aid....less than one per cent.

US aid as a percent of personal income is second to last among wealthy nations.

We give about 25 cents per American per day in foreign aid; with private giving, it comes to another dime. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Jul 4, 2009 12:15 AM:

" Amazed - if you're being "shaken down," you need to live in SF for a couple of years in order to learn how to deal with it (and them). I've never been "shaken down" by them. And I'm interested in hearing your definition of this term "shaken down."

I'm a native of Napa. And - a few years back - I returned here after several years of being away (for educational and vocational reasons). My workplace is within a block of Hope Center. I park on either 4th or Randolph. I walk by them every day. And they either smile at me, say "hello," or look away.

No one has even asked me for spare change. Not even a penny. So I would question your statements, and your 10 years of experience.

One caveat: if you live there, and these "shake downs" you speak of occur after 7:00 pm or so, then that would be outside of my personal knowledge.

If that is the case, please let me know. Since I can apparently handle them pretty well (being that they have not subjected me to any "shake downs" in the last few years), I can politely inform them that their behavior towards you is inappropriate. And that will be that.

Best,

Mr. Feasor. "

irishrover94503 wrote on Jul 4, 2009 9:12 AM:

" Time for some re-education here folks. I've been on both sides of the issue. Being helped and helping. I've lived in the Tenderloin for a few months. It is nothing compared to here. Yes, I understand and accept the comments of those here; it's your right. But for the number of positive or constructive comments posted here, the ones of a negative or uneducated need to understand the differences. There is only one "shelter" serving the entire county. The increase in homelessness is due to economic changes; it's not that Napa is bountiful. Yes, Reagan in his day, did close the hospitals and drive the undesirables out onto the streets. Yes, there are some homeless who cannot help themselves OR have been so hardened to life they refuse help. But when I constantly read or hear the "thow the bum out mentality" that goes on, I caution those who think that way that EVERY county in California, every state in the union has a homelessness problem it is trying to tackle. If you truly want to know what the community is doing to help those that can and need the help, read the article further. In other words, read BETWEEN the lines. The person deliverying your paper, the waitress in your favorite restaurant, the clerk in the grocery store, driving your bus, or in whatever job, could be homeless. Not a bum needing to be put on a bus out of the county. The good work of these people should be and must be appreciated. "

napafree wrote on Jul 5, 2009 7:56 AM:

" "A woman who's living in an RV (and driving it without a license) shouldn't have custody of children."
Please Amazed, tell me... are you that heartless? Since when did being poor mean you are a bad mother. You need to thank God that you have a roof over your head and that He doesn't decide to teach you a little lesson in humility. "

diehard4ever wrote on Jul 5, 2009 2:58 PM:

" Raven-
22 billion is 1%? "

Raven wrote on Jul 6, 2009 7:02 AM:

" closer to 28 billion, diehard ($91 per year times 304 million population as of July 2008)....excluding military assistance..for example...in 2006 the total foreign assistance was 39 billion, 12 billion of which was military aid, the rest economic assistance... the federal budget for that year was about 2.7 trillion, so less than 1 percent was spend on foreign ad. (statistical abstract of the US from the census bureau) Obama had planned on asking for a 10 percent increase in the aid but in the face of worsening economy for the use has revisited the idea, suggesting stretching the increase over several years "

O/U now wrote on Jul 8, 2009 7:32 AM:

" Please Napa..Do all you can for the homeless. They need you to care for them. If you build a big shelter, feed them, and find work for the ones that can work...they will come. And when I retire out of state, if I see a homeless person I can buy them a bus ticket to Napa so you will take care of them. That way all the crime, trash, and cost will be on Napa and not Ada. "

valleygirl wrote on Jul 8, 2009 12:48 PM:

" Gardner, if you are reading this, I would love to contact you in hopes of helping. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:21 AM:

" Raven, those cost are actually higher than $91 if you factor in that not everyone works or receives income (unemployed, stay at home mom, children, underground workforce). The figures certainly change if you observe the rate based on per "taxpaying" citizen. And here lies the problem. There's an awful lot of burden being dumped on the middle class who cannot carry the world on its shoulders forever. If our middle class sink too low, this country is going to be in really serious trouble. Paying an extra $20 a month (taxpaying citizen) to provide aid to another country may be a real hardship to some people in this economy. Time to take care of our own. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 16, 2009 7:40 AM:

" Drug and alcohol abuse take a toll on our social structure. The homeless are the visible tip of the iceberg. It's part of a complex, underground world which supports itself, somehow.

I do wonder how the homeless can afford their alcohol and tobacco habits. When I was driving down to SF regularly, I noticed most of the homeless smoking. For the price of cigarettes, they could feed themselves.

Part of the problem involves the way the homeless prioritize matters in their lives. Perhaps it's a mental health issue that prevents them from seeking order. If this is the case, I really wish we could bring back the old institutional, pre Reagan, way of handling the mentally ill population. Borderline cases are just thrown to the wind with the hopes that they don't land in someone's backyard.

I'm not sure it's something we can just get rid of. These people are using drugs and alcohol as self treatment for their unresolved mental health issues. Many of them were born with abnormal brain chemistry, making it difficult for them to adapt to living situations with other people. Basically, they have personality disorders. Their family members (who you would expect to help out) either share the same trait, or they are unwilling to be subjected to it. The situation is complex, for sure. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy