NVR Logo
Napa mayor latest to consider run for supervisor
Thursday, July 02, 2009
Save and Share Share
Napa Mayor Jill Techel is considering a run for Napa County supervisor next year in what could shape up to be at least a three-way battle with incumbent Brad Wagenknecht and former Napa Police Chief Dan Monez.

“I’ve thought maybe somewhere down the line, when I’m done being mayor, I’d be interested in doing that,” said Techel, who still has three years left in her term. But she noted that she lives in District 1, which is Wagenknecht’s district, and that the seat comes up for election in 2010. “I’ve said I will explore it, but that’s about as far as I am right now.”
Techel, 61, said numerous people have approached her about running for supervisor in District 1 —  which includes Carneros, west Napa, Browns Valley and Mount Veeder — but she said discussions are “way preliminary.”

“I think right now I’m enjoying what’s happening with the city of Napa,” she said. “On the other hand, there’ve been people coming to me that have said, ‘You’ve shown good leadership at the city; would you consider moving that over to the county?’”
Techel declined to say specifically who has approached her about the election. She noted only that they have been “a mix of people,” including business people and residents who would like to see improved relations between the city and the county.

“People are checking to see who the candidates might be out there,” Techel said, adding that the same people who approached her might have approached other potential candidates as well.
Wagenknecht said he is surprised to hear Techel is considering a campaign against him, but he is good-natured about the challenge.

“The job of supervisor is a great job; I didn’t know it was that great,” he said. “I’ve very much have enjoyed Jill’s leadership on the city, and I’m surprised. I’d heard that Dan (Monez) was thinking about it, but I had not heard that Jill was.”

Techel said she will wait until she makes a final decision before she unveils her campaign platform. She did say that, if elected, she would seek to improve city-county relations and to place housing in cities rather than in unincorporated county areas.

Techel said she would maintain her current position on the mixed-use development proposed at the former Napa Pipe site. Located in south Napa County just outside Napa city limits, the project has been a hot-button issue for both county and city officials, with the city pushing for jurisdiction over the project.

“No matter where I would sit, I feel that, philosophically, that it would be an issue that (should be) looked at within the city,” Techel said. “Growth really needs to happen in the incorporated areas.”

Techel also looks favorably on the controversial eco-village proposed in Angwin. She called the eco-village a “well thought out project” and said she would be “thrilled if a developer came to Napa with a project like that.”

As for whether the residential development is appropriate for the rural Angwin town, Techel said, “I haven’t sat with that lens on to look at it … (but) I do think we have to share housing Upvalley and downvalley.”

Techel, a Republican, moved up to mayor five years ago after two terms on the Napa City Council. Wagenknecht, a Democrat and slow-growth advocate, has also served on the Napa City Council and held his seat as supervisor for 11 years.

Monez is also considering a campaign for the supervisor in District 1. A Republican, Monez has said he would represent a moderate voice on the board.

Race may form in Upvalley

Meanwhile, the race may be heating up in District 3 represented by Supervisor Diane Dillon.

Michael Haley, an Upvalley vineyard owner and president of the Napa Valley Taxpayers Alliance, said he is considering a campaign against Dillon, who has represented the large — and often tumultuous — Upvalley district for two terms.

“I want to do it,” he said, “but I don’t want to do it unless I feel like I have a reasonable chance of winning.”

Haley said he will make a decision in the next two weeks.

Haley, 55, said he would represent a different voice on the board with regard to growth than Dillon, a Democrat who — like Wagenknecht — traditionally votes according to a slow-growth philosophy.

“You could end up killing the goose that laid the golden egg by trying too hard to control everything,” Haley said, adding that the need for affordable housing in Napa County could be the Agricultural Preserve’s Achilles heel.

“I’m concerned that we could become so rigid and so ‘nothing but grapes’ that we could end up through the backdoor hurting the Ag Preserve,” Haley said. “The Ag Preserve includes some development rights. We need that because people have other needs besides growing grapes. People need a place to live.”

Dillon said that her slow-growth votes have always adhered to the General Plan, which is dedicated to preserving agriculture.

“I think that if we were going beyond the dictates of the General Plan, then there could be some merit to that statement,” Dillon said. “But I don’t see that this board is behaving in any way that is not just purely within the spirit of the General Plan.”

Dillon said she stands on her record, and challenges Haley to offer up specific examples in which she has voted out of accordance with the General Plan.

“If he wants to engage in that dialogue, that’s great,” she said.

After growth, Haley said he would also run on a platform of fiscally conservative planning.

“Our government revenues in California are going to go down, and they are going to go down a lot,” Haley said. “I have the strength and willingness to make the cuts that need to be made.” In particular, Haley said the county must cut the salaries of its most expensive employees and deal with what he says is an out-of-control pension system.

Haley has lived in Napa County for the last six years and owns a vineyard in the unincorporated area just south of Yountville. Before his current position as president of the loosely organized Napa Valley Taxpayers Alliance, Haley served on the board of the Napa Valley Land Stewards Alliance. A registered Republican, Haley said he plans to re-register as an independent.
17 comment(s)

clean and serene wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:24 AM:

" Brad all the way. Good guy, great leadership and great supervisor. He always does the footwork, does his homework and he very smart.

Jill should stay as Napa's Mayor and possibly run for supervisor in a couple years. I believe Dan or Jill do not stand a chance against Brad.

Brad has been doing a great job. He doesn't even represent my district but he always returns calls and does the footwork regardless of where you live in Napa County.

Brad is awesome! "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 2, 2009 4:45 AM:

" Why would the county need to have a supervisor who was a flop as mayor?

~Ruff "

kbf wrote on Jul 2, 2009 7:12 AM:

" Ruff, you said it all. We don't want a flop. Brad is a great supervisor and person. When he dsoen't want the job we need to find someone like him, with like goals, not a mayor that is a do nothing person, or a police chief that can't keep his people in line. "

vector wrote on Jul 2, 2009 7:57 AM:

" Jill has been a great Mayor and will be a great Supervisor. I look forward to supporting her in her next endeavor. "

montana wrote on Jul 2, 2009 8:59 AM:

" kbf and Ruff,

I always find it humorous to see people like you sit back and criticize (anonymously) those that have actually stepped up to the plate to be a leader. I bet neither of you have any experience with anything remotely close to what it takes to run a city or police department. But continue to do what you do, it is just background noise to those that are getting things done. "

boise1 wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:20 AM:

" Jill will quickly realize that Napa County voters will not fall victims to out of state land speculators and developers who want to destroy our agricultural heritage. She will see the grass roots efforts all pull together that have put Diane and Brad into office in the first place. Developers money will not win you votes. "

livinggood wrote on Jul 2, 2009 9:31 AM:

" Jill and Diane should just go away.. either one of them have really done anything.... "

raybo wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:15 AM:

" I'll be voting for Brad. He's done a good job. I expect he will continue to do so. "

kkjp wrote on Jul 2, 2009 10:42 AM:

" Too bad people can't limit comments to positive remarks about the candidates they support (like vector and raybo have done) and forego the rude, critical comments about those they don't support. These are always the same people who complain that there aren't more people willing to run for public office to challenge incumbents who run unopposed election after election. But potential candidates look at this process and often decide not to run because they don't want to subject themselves or their families to such personal, mean spirited attacks. "

Jasper wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:02 AM:

" Ms. Techel needs to do some homework before she takes a position on the so-called eco-village in Angwin. Napa voters would be dismayed if she voted for a project which would increase the number of Napa households by 43%. She needs to know the outrage of Angwin residents who would see 380 units with only 59 of them affordable. And a big increase in the number of calls our volunteer (unpaid) firemen and ambulance workers would have to make on beastly hot summer days or in the dark of the night. And she would understand the impact of more traffic up and down the road to the valley.

I think she is under the illusion that Angwin should be the hub for up-valley workers. Yes, housing should be part of any proposed project. But there are no jobs in Angwin outside of the college and the existing community is already providing affordable homes for workers who must commute to Napa, St. Helena, and Santa Rosa for work.

I hope Ms Techel's off-the-cuff support of the PUC Triad project just represents a lack of information. An eco-village is a good idea, but not if its impacts on a community are an environmental disaster. "

napablogger wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:04 AM:

" It's kind of an odd comment for Diane Dillon to make about adhering to the General Plan, and I don't know in what context she said that because the reporter distills a lot of conversation down to one sentence.

But she micro managed the GP and changed things the steering committee had put in place as I recall. So when you are the primary writer of the general plan, or one of them, and you change or reintepret items to your satisfaction personally then it casts a different light on saying you adhere to the general plan.

Lake Luciana is an example. The Steering Committee specifically discussed allowing golf courses in the ag watershed, and most of them were in agreement we should do so. I also think the GP even as it got rewritten by her and the other supervisors does allow it.

So there is one instance of her not following the Gen Plan. Her whole argument on that turned on saying that golf was an urban activity because there was a clubhouse and people would socialize, and therefore it was urban.

Well, Supervisor Dodd said, ok, lets approve it without the clubhouse and she still voted no.

I think that will hurt us in the lawsuit. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:04 AM:

" montana- You'd lose your bet about me.

I've seen success and failure from the inside of national and multinational executive suites and board rooms.

I know a flop when I see one, and I always speak my mind.

Jill Techel is not as bad a flop as George W. Bush and Dark Cheney. She has a nice personable demeanor, like George W. Bush when he wants to be liked, but that does not equal competence.

I've shaken Jill's hand, but I'd never vote for her. She's already reached her 'Peter Principle' level of incompetence.

~Ruff "

freeport56 wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:10 AM:

" the question we have to ask is who is the lesser of the evils Monez, Techel, or Waganknecht?

I would love to see a fiscal conservative in the bunch. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:41 AM:

" Wagenknecht is already on the board of Supervisors and the County has been run in a fiscally responsible manner.

Just knowing that Schartzeneggar was going to be hijacking county funds again the County has been getting ready.

I would say that there is already a fiscally conservative Board of Supervisors... just not one that kowtowed to the Lake Luciana developers.

~Ruff "

montana wrote on Jul 2, 2009 1:30 PM:

" ruff,

You said “I've seen success and failure from the inside of national and multinational executive suites and board rooms”. Blah, blah, blah. I have seen “success and failure” and the inside of the white house. I was eight and on a school tour, but my statement is just as valid as yours, and it doesn’t make you or me an authority on anything. You won’t use your real name, name the companies and positions you have had, or offer verification of any of it. “I know a flop when I see one” is simply an opinion that could be made by a five year old. If you want to be believable, back your position with proof of personal expertise and experience or facts about the person’s record you criticize. "

LMW wrote on Jul 2, 2009 3:04 PM:

" No way! We need Napas mayor to stay put! The city and downtown transformation needs direction, because south county is looking like the scope of this county,i would think we need Napas leadership to explain the impacts from councils decisions.

Our BOS will hopefully see to it that we can get by with what Techel folks have done. City of Napa has allowed lots of growth, that has lots to do with traffic and how the rest of county should deal with that growth. Let's hope the BOS gains a candidate that'll shoot some new, bold and hidden energy that'll help kick start this county to get the residents in this county to care about matters they can help in. don't think it's time to play musical chairs. "

Raven wrote on Jul 2, 2009 3:36 PM:

" well for all those who dislike the three announced there is a solution, find someone you do like and convince them to run.. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy