Road budgets explained
By MICHAEL HALEY
October 28th, 2009
September 23rd, 2009
August 31st, 2009
August 20th, 2009
There was one big pothole on Highway 29 that I had driven over for years, I learned to look out for it every time I drove home, and there it would be. I could count on having to swerve around it. After a while I grew to like looking out for it, swerving on cue every time I went by.
Ever mindful of doing service for the community, I even got to the point where I would try to warn the tourists driving behind me, here it comes, by making a big swerve a ways out in front of them, and sure enough I would occasionally induce the cars behind me to swerve around it like I did. It was one of those little things in life that you can be proud of doing for humanity.
Like a faithful dog waiting at the door at home, that pothole let me know I was almost there. Then one day it was gone, finally patched over by CalTrans. It was kind of an odd letdown, like a town that changed when you grew up and it just wasn’t the same.
But what the heck, it’s just a pothole, there is a lot of other more important things to cry about, like maybe the 10 million potholes left in Napa after that one. We all have plenty of swerving left ahead of us here.
In case ... like me ... you wonder how we got to such a place of primitive roads, it is helpful to understand where the road budget money comes from and why of all things it seems to be the one thing that is chronically underfunded.
The main problem is that most of the money for roads comes from the state, and we all know what is happening with the state budget. Still, this has gone on for years even in good budget years for the state (a good budget year being defined as a $6 billion deficit instead of a $24 billion one).
One reason is that transportation dollars for local roads comes from an 18 cents a gallon gas tax, and that gas tax amount has not increased over time for inflation, gradually reducing the amount available for road maintenance.
There is also the regular sales tax on gasoline, a small portion of which is supposed to go to local governments, called Prop 42 money after the proposition that mandated that it only be used for transportation.
The problem here is that neither of those two together are nearly enough to even do maintenance, and nothing has ever been done about it. On top of that the state is contemplating taking ALL of it to balance the budget. Our road departments will be devastated if that happens.
Despite the fact that we know that there is not enough money to fix the roads, local governments do not plan and take money out of other funds to make up for the above mentioned lack of funds. And remember, this is an ongoing problem that is there whether we are in state budget trouble or not.
Bill Dodd, to his credit, tried to fix this for the entire county by proposing a new local sales tax to pay for it. At this point, however, new local taxes are an obvious non starter.
The thing that is never contemplated that maybe we ought to start thinking about is cutting the budget elsewhere and shift the money over to fix the roads. The County added nearly $2 million out of the general fund last year to help out, but with the current budget crisis that could not be continued.
And it isn’t nearly enough anyway, we really need about $10 million a year more in the county, the same in the city of Napa. St. Helena has a woeful $112,000 roads budget this year, about enough to fix a couple of driveways.
Part of the reason we don’t shift other monies over is that it would in a sense be letting the state off the hook for having shirked its responsibility. The other part is that the whole system is in a routine, streams of money and where they flow are very ordered and the state and counties and cities are locked into an organizational structure that does not easily allow changes.
Where would you get the money? Every department has its budget plus increases locked down every year and you would have to cut something. If you follow my writing you know where I would look, to employee compensation which I think has gotten too high. Due to the fact that it is all locked down in union contracts and expectations of maintaining the same levels that other local governments pay, it is going to take a real fight to change the system.
But how long can we really keep swerving around this? Most think that the state has to do something, but the state is in so much trouble that no matter what happens with the economy it will be years before the state is solvent again. It is time to think about more than putting a patch on the roads, and allocating more local resources to improve them.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 30, 2009 6:35 AM:
We can hire a crew and put people to work getting our roads ship-shape.
The problem with the 'never raise taxes' idea that has been a reliable vote-getter for Republicans is that costs go up and soon the money available is about enough to 'fix a couple of driveways'.
Since electric cars are coming to our roads starting next year largely because of the huge fuel-price advantage, I'm going to bite the bullet and say that electric car charging pylons should supply revenue for road repair as well.
It's OUR government, OUR roads, and the condition of OUR roads is wrecking OUR cars.
Nobody 'likes' paying taxes, but I think most drivers realize that having OUR infrastructure become third world is lowering OUR standard-of-living.
Politicians: It's time for you all to stand up and be counted and get OUR streets repaired. The cost of paving materials has dropped and there are LOTS of people needing jobs.
Voters: It's time for you to stand up and vote for folks who will fix our streets as a first priority. That will mean taxes, but it will save us all money in the long run.
~Ruff "
Alter ego wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:37 AM:
http://www.californiagasprices.com/Tax_Info.aspx
Californians pay the highest gas taxes in the country; 63.9 cents per gallon.
No surprise there.
And yet we don't have enough money to fix the roads?
The problem is not that we don't pay enough taxes. The problem lies with the government who spends that money. We are not getting a proper return for our dollars.
Seems like a pretty simple solution to elect Representatives who would keep that tax money in the counties where it is generated.
How about it? In the next election, instead of worrying about the candidates views on abortion or homosexuality or global warming we focus on one specific question: Will you support counties keeping more of their own gas tax revenue? "
city resident wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:42 AM:
kevin wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:11 PM:
No wonder we don't have a functioning government with Representatives like Noreen Evans.
She doesn't even grasp simple concepts like "living within your means"... "
Ruff Limblog wrote on Jul 1, 2009 6:38 AM:
But it doesn't matter if you want to blame one party or another for the state of our roads, they need fixing now.
One way to do that immediately is for bond issues with obligated tax revenues funding them separate from today's budget mess.
For example, a bond issue to repave some highway miles could be passed with a tax stream of 2 times the face amount of the bonds so that the repaving could be started immediately and it could be completed for CASH after the bonds were retired. If there were money left over we could require that the money be rolled into transportation projects before more bond/tax transportation projects could be implemented.
If we were smart we would not require bonds for very long. Why pay interest when you can pay cash?
I mean if you are really serious about 'living within your means' you pay cash you don't pay usurious interest rates to Wall Street Weasels.
~Ruff "
freeport56 wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:07 AM:
Napa just showed you how to get the roads fixed. Okay an increase in garbage services and say its "reparations" for damaging the streets.
Its called hosing the citizens! Meanwhile, neighborhoods in dire need are neglected.
P.S.- the state funds for transportation have been put into the general fund for years. They have been used for "other" services, probably wasted on social programs.
How about we LOWER taxes, drop business taxes, and motivate our economy? The constant insistence on tax increases shows a failure to see the even bigger picture. Our new Central Government is poised to tax EVERYTHING, new state taxes will not just hurt some groups like the poor, but destroy them.
A much better idea would be to change state law. Dump the housing requirement by county, put control of revenue back into the counties hands, and reduce the size of our state government. Make the legislature part-time on a per diem basis only. "
Cadence wrote on Jul 1, 2009 7:22 AM:
If you can't beat 'em, join 'em. "
native74 wrote on Jul 1, 2009 9:01 AM:
I'm also upset about the recent article regarding the stimulus funds being used on local roads in Napa. Where I work we were the first one to open bids in this Caltrans District. I don't have time to find the exact wording, but the jist of the quote was that the environmental process tied up the City of Napa from moving forward on road projects. I didn't comment because it's a touchy subject, I wanted to give the 'benefit of the doubt' that perhaps miscommunication occurred somewhere or perhaps instead of shovel ready overlays/reconstruction projects, the City has utilities needing upgrade as well. I find it unusual that not one (to many) streets just needed partial reconstruct and/or overlays that would only require an exemption from environmental review. Were their hoops? Yes, but workable.
How do I know this? Us Engineers next door to the west got 'er done without any consultants so why not Napa?!?!?!? "
LMW wrote on Jul 2, 2009 12:39 AM:
angwindeac wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:21 AM:
I'm with you on the change to required housing and could get on board with a reduction in the number of employees(non-essential--paper pusshing management types), but let's get clear that since 1980 the Republicans have pushed for reducing taxes and corporate responsibility and it has gotten us where----to the worst depression since the 1930's. No amount of blaim on liberals can't allow the Republican party to pass the buck. They were in charge for 20 of 28 1/2 years and thouroughly ruined the banking, legal, and accounting worlds with deregulation. It's not the concept of deregulation that is bad it is execution. Leaders are corrupt and the corporate greed is all consuming. Trickle down can only work if people care about others and at the top all that is cared about is getting another plane, car etc. Unfortunately, the Sunday Christians have been in charge too long and we are paying the price for their corruption. "
NAPAdocumentor wrote on Jul 2, 2009 11:47 AM:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxFakrEsyNA&feature=channel_page
And, the City roads funding and budget explained further in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPlmYYeI7oE&feature=channel_page "
freeport56 wrote on Jul 3, 2009 8:13 AM:
First, when you blame one party for the failure of our system you do yourself and your arguement an injustice.
What crushed our financial markets was an incrediable stupid housing market policy that began with Jimmy Carter. it was exacerbated by the Clinton Administration. Not everyone in America can afford to or should own a home.
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pushed home loans based on fluctuating rates. In good years the monthly was affordable, in bad years the monthly shyrocketed out of reach of the owner. Since the 90's democratic appointees have run Freddie and Fannie pushing these failed policies, while making huge bonuses, conducting false account techniques, and driving the financial institutions to buy "bad paper".
With less than 6% of the bailout money in the market place, it has no effect. They should have let these companies fail, survival of the fittest, and purchased the bad loans. Rather, the Democrats created trillions in Pork and are now in the process in creating Trillions in new taxes.
If you think the economy is tough now, wait a few more months! "
kevin wrote on Jul 3, 2009 4:28 PM:
If you LIKED what derivitives did to the financial markets your gonna LOVE what's coming with B.O.'s new "Cap and Trade" scam!
It will make the housing market crash look like some school kid who lost his milk money... "