Pandemic reality check | Napa Valley Register

Home » Opinion » Editorial

Pandemic reality check

What can and can't be done to protect against H1N1

Monday, June 29, 2009

Comment

By John M. Barry

This month, the World Health Organization finally declared that the H1N1 virus has become pandemic. It reported a big jump in cases and fatalities since June 19. How many people this virus will sicken and kill depends, ultimately, on three things: the virus itself; the impact of what are known as non-pharmaceutical interventions; and the availability and effectiveness of a vaccine.

The virus will be the most important factor. Influenza is one of the fastest-mutating organisms in existence, which makes it unpredictable. There have been four pandemics that we know about in some detail: 1889-92, 1918-20, 1957-60 and 1968-70. All four followed similar patterns: initial sporadic activity followed four to eight months later by waves of widespread illness.

In all four pandemics, lethality changed from wave to wave — sometimes increasing, sometimes decreasing. It’s impossible to know what will happen this time.

For a mild pandemic, we may not need to take steps beyond washing hands, exercising “cough etiquette” and keeping the sick at home. But if the virus increases its virulence, other measures, such as closing schools, urging people to telecommute and even banning public meetings, could mitigate the impact.

The most important intervention is, of course, a vaccine. Because influenza mutates so rapidly, a new vaccine has to be made each year just for seasonal flu. Vaccines for most diseases approach 100 percent effectiveness, but a good flu vaccine is 70 percent effective.

Supply is another problem. In a best case, enough vaccine for the entire U.S. population could be available by October. However, only about 30 percent of the supply will be made in the United States. The more virulent the virus, the more likely it is that foreign governments will refuse to allow export of the vaccine until their own populations are fully protected.

The bottom line? Little can be done in the short term beyond exerting diplomatic pressure to guarantee that foreign governments allow manufacturers to honor contracts to export vaccine. In the medium term, sustained investment could make it possible to produce massive amounts of vaccine in a few weeks. In the long term, we need a vaccine that works against all influenza viruses. Enough work has been done to suggest that this Holy Grail is achievable. Had influenza been taken seriously for the past 30 years, we would probably have one by now. No matter what happens over the next year or two, that’s one history lesson we need to learn.

(Barry is a distinguished scholar at the Center for Bioenvironmental Research at Tulane and Xavier Universities and the author of “The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History.” This essay first appeared in the Washington Post.)

1 comment(s)

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jun 29, 2009 6:31 AM:

" I read Mr. Barry's book, a fascinating read.

However, there is something longer term that can be done on the public health level for pandemic preparedness.

1) Get enough vaccine production capability within the USA to produce enough vaccine for our population without relying on diplomatic pressure on others! YES, even if the government 'wastes' some money on this, "We, the People..." would be better served by having a dependable supply under our control.

2a) Devote much more money to biomedical research and let the government hold any patents created in the public domain. Then any company can manufacture drugs held in the public domain.

OR...

2b) Do away with patents on medicines and vaccines altogether after refunding every dime spent on private medical research.

OR...

2c) Require that all medicines and vaccines be licensed on equal terms to all potential manufacturers of said medicine or vaccine.

Medical researchers should be able to make money off their research, but that must be balanced by equal access to medical advances for all human beings.

~Ruff "

Join the conversation

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login? (requires cookies)
	Forgot Your Password?

Create an account

Comment Guidelines

The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.

What gets your comment posted?

• Staying on topic

• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less

• Avoiding name-calling

• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger

What gets your comment deleted?

• Personal attacks

• Derogatory remarks

• Name-calling of any sort

• Going off-topic

• Hate speech

• Racially-insensitive comments

• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict

• Posting e-mail addresses

• Posting comments of a commercial nature

• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS

• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.

The fine print

- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.

- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.

- Comments may take several hours to be posted.

- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.

- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.

- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.

Search: