The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
pharper wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:10 AM:
She kept the dog on a leash, but other unleashed dogs in the area ran up to greet this one, who snapped and snarled at the end of his leash while the woman chatted, presumably unaware of her dog's scary behavior. I decided to leave and take my friend's dog with me - I didn't want to be around when that dog got off-leash. As we left, I was careful to warn the elderly woman about to bring her poodle into the area about the dog.
It's not a pit bull issue, it's an owner issue. I'm always very careful to keep my dog on a leash when I go to Alston, because he's not always friendly with other dogs (he's very protective when I'm not around other people he knows). Unfortunately, other owners don't obey the rules and allow their dogs off-leash in the on-leash area, so I can't even bring my dog to walk on the trails anymore.
Anyway, my point is, don't blame the pit bull, blame the irresponsible owner. "
Hear Ye wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:11 AM:
napablogger wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:51 AM:
glenroy wrote on Jun 26, 2009 6:18 AM:
Cadence wrote on Jun 26, 2009 8:07 AM:
071007100710 wrote on Jun 26, 2009 9:19 AM:
sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:05 AM:
proudmama2 wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:10 AM:
A fellow dog lover. "
LocalNapa wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:14 AM:
NapaCitizen wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:42 AM:
Many owners sit ready books or chatting and are totally NOT aware of their dog's behavior.
I've left many times as soon as aggresive dogs show themselves, and actually use the park on non-peak hours as a result.
C'mon people! Know your dog and DON'T bring them around other dogs if they don't get along.
I'd be suing the Pit Bull owner if I were the owner of the small dog. Or perhaps just bite them.... "
Napan since 1965 wrote on Jun 26, 2009 11:14 AM:
Unfortunately, the fence was old and slightly less than 6 ft. high, and the weight of the pit bull broke off one of the fence posts at ground level, making the fence itself insecure and unsafe.
Because of the very real safety issue for both my dog and myself, I ended up having to replace the fence with a 7 ft. fence (the recommendation of an Animal Control officer), at a cost of well over $2,000.00!! And to add insult to injury, the absentee owner--who permitted her tenant to keep the dog, over my objections--refused to pay her fair share of the replacement cost!
My vote would be to ban pit bulls from the dog park, as a result of this incident. I sincerely hope that little dog will survive, but it will probably never be the same, even if it does survive. SO SAD!! "
4gnapan wrote on Jun 26, 2009 11:23 AM:
some breeds have innate abilities and tendencies..
If an owner of a breed like "pit bull" doesnt acknowledge this, and raise and train the dog accordingly, It is NOT the dog's fault.
I raised a pit/lab cross from a handful of puppy into the sweetest old man. He never attacked, not once in his entire life. He did defend himself once or twice when others jumped him (hm.. a shepherd, and a boxer are the two i remember, both at alston.) and yet, People always scowled at him, or shied to the far side of the path because the "dangerous pit bull" was approaching... as he looked at them totally unconcerned.
In my experience with dogs I've had more incidents with Shepherds and chihuahua's... but since neither of those breeds has the strength of a bulls bite, they rarely get the press.
Pasting a label on the breed is wrong. Incidents like this arent the dog's fault, they lie squarely upon the owner. If you own a breed like this, it is your responsibilty to adequately train and control your dog. "
pharper wrote on Jun 26, 2009 11:52 AM:
It has everything to do with the owner. Yes, it is true that pit bulls are very protective and liable to be aggressive if not properly trained. However, if they are trained well and socialized as puppies, they are sweet, caring, wonderful dogs (and, incidentally, they LOVE children). I'd trust my dog with my life, the life of my other animals, and even the life of my three-year-old cousin.
There are far more bad dog owners than people think, and pit bulls attract owners who are less-than-savory, because they look big and intimidating - so people who want to seem that way buy them, and they're not always great owners. When that happens, it's the dog that gets the bad rap, not the ilk of the owner. "
pharper wrote on Jun 26, 2009 11:54 AM:
cookies wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:06 PM:
kdbk wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:16 PM:
In fact, maybe one thing even more nauseating than that is the actual site of a Pitbull and it's proud owner walking down the street...the owner's so cool, so proud...could CARE LESS what might happen between their dangerous dog and an innocent person or pet. "
Bill wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:23 PM:
I often see pit bulls walking their owner, not he other way around. If it were my dog that were harmeds not only would there be abill to pay for that harm but the oweners would see my lawyer or worse.
Of course for those who advocate packing a fire arm it might be just as advantageousd and politivcally correct for everyone to own a pit bull. "
fmmt47 wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:36 PM:
wipemedown wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:50 PM:
A registry like megans law for pitbulls. That way we call all know where these violent beasts live.
Dog off leash- got a fix for that too.
Publish the names of the owners for a month straight like the DUI list.
Problem solved. "
LocalNapa wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:58 PM:
MP wrote on Jun 26, 2009 12:59 PM:
napablogger wrote on Jun 26, 2009 1:13 PM:
I am sure there are wonderful pit bulls and if properly trained, yada yada yada. But why do I never hear that a corgi has done this, or even a lab? It is always pit bulls.
Some owners are never going to be responsible, so at some point society has to take over and ban some things. Yes, other dogs could sometimes be as aggressive, but pit bulls are the main and constant offenders.
We at least have to license pit bulls and make sure that the owners and dogs have gone through some kind of training for safety. "
diehard4ever wrote on Jun 26, 2009 1:58 PM:
I seriously doubt that. Even if it is true, maybe it's YOUR dog. OUr 100lb. lab has only been attackes twice in nearly 3 years going there... and he's not fixed. Most dogs won't attack another dog unless both are male with man-hood intact. Most owners with "antisocial" dogs are smart enough to put them on a leash around other dogs, and most owners are smart enough to pull their dog in when they seee one of "those dogs".
Pitts only feel pain in their noses and feet, so if ones atacking your dog, or any dog for that matter, get a stick and whack it in the nose or foot. Hard.
BTW-
Onleashers: Start using your section of the park or we will. "
bv wrote on Jun 26, 2009 2:01 PM:
c'mon_people wrote on Jun 26, 2009 2:11 PM:
Here's the bottom-line as I see it, and for the record I am not a dog expert, just a dog owner for my entire life, a dog lover and a proud supporter of a handful of dog rescue organizations (which is where I got my current 4-legged pal)... Pit-bulls have just as much right as any other breed to become a person's loving pet, accompany that person to places like dog parks, etc. It is 100% an owners responsibility to understand the behavioral characteristics of their dog and act accordingly and responsibly. Unfortunately, not every dog owner lives by these standards... that's just the way it is.
However, to victimize a specific dog breed is simply not rational. If you get anxiety when you are at the dog park just because a person has a pit bull there, then don't go to the dog park! If you see an aggressive dog at the park (which I have seen many times from many different breeds) then form a group and talk to the owner. If they don't comply, call the police and ask for help.
But for crying out loud... don't form an opinion that is not educated! C'Mon People! "
winemd wrote on Jun 26, 2009 2:43 PM:
Fortunately, now other parks (and Tulocay Cemetery) are open to dogs on leashes 6 feet or less and owners are required to pick up after their dogs (and to those who don't, please pick up after your dog). And dogs are still not allowed in play areas for children. So given that more area has opened up for on-leash dogs, I say expand the off-leash areas also.
And to all dog owners, please obey the rules (about leashes and waste and children's areas) so that we can all benefit. If things do not go well with the expanded area for on-leash, I suspect that MP is right and that privileges will be taken away. "
eas001 wrote on Jun 26, 2009 2:56 PM:
Right now it is pit-bulls, ten years from now it will be another breed. You hear about pit bulls just as we are hearing about the swine flu - media attention. The sweet pit-bull who rolls over when a Chihuahua barks (yes they exist) doesn't make headlines!
And yes, when I see a pitbull I am apprehensive until I am certain the dog is safe, same with any large dog as my dogs are munchable sized!
Unfortunately certain irresponsible people like to own pitbulls. Same as murderers, they like to own guns - doesn't mean every gun owner is a murderer!
To read up on vicious pit bulls....(get a kleenex)
http://www.bestfriends.org/vickdogs/
I do wish the best for the dog attacked and for the owners - how horrible to experience!! "
cookies wrote on Jun 26, 2009 2:57 PM:
You are one of the ones that think they own the park. NO I am not kidding about my dog being attacked everytime. She 35lbs and not agressive at all. we were walking in the leash trail area when the irresponsible dog owner decide to walk their dog off leash and again not following the rules. I really think that Ceasar would question your thoughts on dogs and owners. You are trying to segrogate the park, you don't need to take over the leash area, just put one on, it doesn't hurt a thing. Use common sence, don't be a bully. You wreck for everybody. "
Bill wrote on Jun 26, 2009 3:38 PM:
Bad advise. Don't try hitting any bull dog especially a pit bull on the nose or feet with a stick. You will be lucky if all you loose is the stick.
The bulldog is bred as a fighting breed with a pug pulled back nose that enables it to grab with its powerfull jaws and hold to hold on and not be suffocated. The pit bull was developed especially for dog fighting.
Using a stick is usless get your mom to buy a 45. "
cjac wrote on Jun 26, 2009 4:46 PM:
kevin wrote on Jun 26, 2009 5:18 PM:
But they did eat my fence.
Not knock it down.
They ATE it... "
misfit wrote on Jun 26, 2009 5:40 PM:
isthatso wrote on Jun 26, 2009 6:39 PM:
John Richards wrote on Jun 26, 2009 6:59 PM:
So if you saw a pit bull's jaws clamped around a child's limb what would you do, Bill? If hitting the dog on the nose is not effective, what about poking the sharp end of the stick into the dog's eye? You are trying to save a child's life, so desperate measures are called for. "
Enlightened Coelacanth wrote on Jun 26, 2009 7:12 PM:
the middle of it all? A pit bull!
How unusual.
And of course it's never the dog's fault. It's always the bad owner's fault.
Odd. Why does one particular breed, and perhaps Rottweilers too, always have
a monopoly on "bad irresponsible" owners?
Because dog owners that have issues with being tough macho customer (women as well as men)
always gravitate to this canine fighting machine.
It is the owner. AND the dog! In unison. The dog acts as a stupid-magnet attracting the worst sort
of people imaginable.
Pit Bulls should never be allowed in public, in my view. The potential for disaster is too great should
anything ever go wrong." "
suma1971 wrote on Jun 26, 2009 7:16 PM:
My thanks to everyone who has shown cocern and offered their best wishes. "
a teacher wrote on Jun 26, 2009 7:19 PM:
When was the last time anyone heard of a poodle eating a kid? "
vizslamom wrote on Jun 26, 2009 7:25 PM:
My husband took our puppy up to the dog park this evening. We are in a difficult situation...we have a puppy and she needs to play and burn off energy. I would like nothing more than to never return to Alston...but, my husband is going to see if things improve. I hope that my letter to the editor will alert dog owner's to be respectful and mindful that if they have an aggressive dog... Leave him/her at home.
My kids are still upset about that day and do not return to the park. It is sad. We enjoyed going to the park as a family and watching our puppy play. However, that has ended...thanks to the ignorant owner's of the pit.
I hope Alston will not have an episode like the one that I witnessed with my children ever again...but, until people
are mindful...it will continue to happen. "
thoughtank wrote on Jun 26, 2009 9:05 PM:
Well, poodles can bite savagely. So can chihuahuas and other small breeds.
Keeping pepper spray on hand during your dog forays into Alston Park might be the best idea. Even a pit bull in attack mode would respond to it. Just be careful not to spray it carelessly.
I wish Napa Police Officers would take excursions into Alston Park occasionally. Maybe someone on a bike patrol, perhaps? It would go a long way toward discouraging irresponsible behavior in the park.
vizslamom: Your kids will get over it. Use this as a learning experience so that they can begin to learn about safety with animals and animal behavior. Try taking the puppy to Kennedy Park and use the area around the ballparks and BMX park.
Glad to hear that Pepper is doing well and the owners of the pit bull paid the vet bill. "
shareathought wrote on Jun 26, 2009 9:14 PM:
Very few dogs are under voice command, many owners don't care. "
John Richards wrote on Jun 26, 2009 9:35 PM:
That leads to a more general policy question. Are taxpayers obligated to fund the services of a park where dog owners can safely exercise their dogs? Why not privatize that service, the same way you pay a fee to use a golf course. Both golfing and dog ownership are optional activities that the general taxpayer should not have to fund. "
cookies wrote on Jun 26, 2009 9:53 PM:
winemd wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:07 PM:
steph wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:15 PM:
In researching dog aggression, I found a police dog trainer (Leerburg dogs) online who has many great free articles and for-sale videos about raising and training dogs. This breeder of Shepherds is definitely against bringing dogs to dog parks because of the high risk of attacks. Once a dog believes his owner will not protect him from attack, he very likely will himself become dog aggressive. He does not ever allow unleashed dogs near his always leashed dogs for the same reason--too high a risk of attack. And he recommends that owners carry pepper spray which I always do now, because any confrontation with an off-leash dog will result in a fight with my leashed dog, and I won't risk that.
I'm convinced that my next dog will be a puppy, and I will find her a few trustworthy friends to play with--never a dog park.
Caesar Milan has changed my opinion of pitbulls as a breed, though the truth is that he has to rehabilitate so many of them because, as someone described here, they seem to attract irresponsible owners. So I don't trust them in general unless the owner is very responsible. But I know some nice people who have a very aggressive pitbull who was babied too much and now is the leader in the house.
Very sad letter. "
napaconservative wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:22 PM:
I'm just saying to look at the owners, not the breed. "
misfit wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:31 PM:
Hear Ye wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:46 PM:
" When was the last time anyone heard of a poodle eating a kid? "
I remember a Pomeranian eating an infant a few years back. "
sayavelvessa wrote on Jun 27, 2009 12:01 AM:
I am continuing to take my dog here but have definitely become more cautious. My experience (and I come nearly everyday, sometimes twice a day) at alston is that the vast majority of people and dogs that frequent the park are well behaved and not aggressive.
vizslamom, I am so sorry your children had to witness that and hope you'll eventually be back. Our puppy really enjoyed playing with your dog.
To the owner of that tiny dog that got attacked, I am so sorry that happened to you and am glad that your dog will at least physically recover. fyi for people who were not present this little dog did NOTHING to provoke this pitbull. It had barely come through the gate when this dog charged at least a hundred yards to get at the poor thing.
To everyone else that put their two cents in, if you weren't there and you haven't frequented the park lately you have nothing to offer. Shame on you for squabbling over the pitbull bad-rap (I personally have no problem with pitbulls) instead of addressing the original topic. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Jun 27, 2009 1:44 AM:
charliesheen wrote on Jun 27, 2009 8:18 AM:
prunepicker wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:19 AM:
vizslamom wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:23 AM:
And, charge them big bucks for their ignorance!!! "
pharper wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:35 AM:
Big, scary-looking dogs attract a certain kind of person who want to own them. The tougher the dog seems, the tougher the owner seems (or so the thinking seems to go).
Pit bulls in and of themselves have characteristics that, when properly treated, can be assets. They're protective and loyal, fairly intelligent, and surprisingly easy to train. They love people, and they're not hyper or jumpy. However, when the owner doesn't do their job properly, these can become bad things. Fiercely protective can mean aggressive. Loving people can mean hating other animals, particularly other dogs. These are things that are entirely up to the owner - it's the person who makes or breaks a good dog.
Other dogs have characteristics that can be good or bad in the same way. Border collies, for example, are extremely intelligent and extremely active - in a very athletic, active family, this can be a good thing, aprticularly if the dog is trained to use these traits in a specific way (agility training, for example). But if the dog belongs to a family with a small yard, little time to play, and no interest in being active with their dog, this dog is liable to become destructive, to escape, and to be so hyper as to be out of control.
It has EVERYTHING to do with how you train the dog. Yes, pit bulls do have certain personality traits, but it's up to the owner to train their dogs in order for those traits to be an asset rather than a danger. "
pharper wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:49 AM:
I recommend this link from American Humane about pit bulls. It clears up some of the myths surrounding their temperaments and abilities.
http://www.americanhumane.org/assets/docs/protecting-animals/PA-resources-pit-bull-myths.pdf
A couple more things I learned through research spurred by this article and the comments - first, the American Pit Bull Terrier was the most common family dog in the early 20th century. According to the American Canine Temperament Testing Association, 82.5%of the American Pit Bull Terriers that took the temperament test passed, compared to a 77% passing rate for all breeds on average. Pit Bulls have achieved the fourth highest passing rate of all 122 breeds tested.
And finally, approximately 150 people are killed every year by falling coconuts. Therefore, you are more than 60 times more likely to be killed by a falling coconut than a pit bull. "
funnyme wrote on Jun 27, 2009 10:42 AM:
In fact, last November we witnessed first hand that more than 50% of Americans detest pit bulls (Sarah Palin was portrayed as one, remember?), that's why we don't have one in the White House, even though I believe we need one, no, not to replace Bo the White House dog, but BHO.
My family and I enjoy Alston Park, its visitors and their owners very much.
The majority of dog owners there (off-leash and on-leash) are nice, polite, friendly and respectful people who 'understand' the nature of their furry friendly beasts (animals are unpredictable). Fights between dogs -and owners- are not frequent but do happen, so if you don't want to witness one or be part of one, just avoid "The Dog Park"!
Bill,
I couldn't agree with you more on the '45'...I should start working on my 'concealed' one if pit bulls are ever to become the rule and not the exception at Alston. "
winewoman wrote on Jun 27, 2009 12:14 PM:
shareathought wrote on Jun 27, 2009 12:14 PM:
on researching dog aggression
and the idea
misfit shared on Jun 26, 2009 10:31 PM:
" I suggested a membership type situation at the Fairgrounds"
I agree in part with what
pharper wrote on Jun 27, 2009 9:35 AM:
" The common thread here is the owner. Note that most complaints have to do with the type of owner these dogs usually have."
and what
napaconservative wrote on Jun 26, 2009 10:22 PM (and many have fear)
I've met some very beautifully behaved pit bulls.
Owners make a difference...
I had a difficult neighbor; he taught his Rottweiler to attack my car when I drove up to my home (note: it is too late for suggestions on this, at the time, I couldn't prove it to the authorities).
My worst observance of a pit-bull OWNER was at an elderly relative's home (I was on the roof, cleaning the house's gutters).
I observed a grown man, with a silent whistle teaching his dog to attack my relative's dog (which, was within an enclosed cyclone fence); the owner actually turned his pitt lose as, they approached my relative's house.
I've seen two at-large pits kill a cat.
Meanwhile, I've known of people calling animal control to make up stories about a neighbor's well-behaved pit because they didn't want one in their neighborhood.
IF we had better behaved people, I would suggest having more fenced areas within our community parks for dog socializing, but we don't. "
CharSolo wrote on Jun 27, 2009 2:02 PM:
russ wrote on Jun 27, 2009 3:16 PM:
shareathought wrote on Jun 27, 2009 3:52 PM:
"And finally, approximately 150 people are killed every year by falling coconuts. Therefore, you are more than 60 times more likely to be killed by a falling coconut than a pit bull. " "
diehard4ever wrote on Jun 27, 2009 4:09 PM:
You're wrong. I talked to a guy at Alston who's family had been breeding them for years. I think he knows a little... "
vizslamom wrote on Jun 27, 2009 4:25 PM:
napaconservative wrote on Jun 27, 2009 6:01 PM:
How many more people have to drive drunk before we ban alcohol?
How many more people have to be killed by guns before we ban guns?
How about knives? Those kill people too.
Rollercoasters... those can be dangerous so we should ban them as well.
OH! I've got it! Since so many people die in their sleep, we should ban sleep.
Come on now, lets use some common sense and stop jumping the gun! My pit is amazing and if you would ever like to meet her, give me a call! "
pharper wrote on Jun 27, 2009 7:02 PM:
John Richards wrote on Jun 27, 2009 11:25 PM:
What you are overlooking is that there are severe restrictions on how alcohol can be produced, sold, and imbibed. I can see the day coming that repeat DUI offenders will be required to have ignition interlocks on their cars. The point is, where are the restrictions on pit bulls? As a minimum, they should be muzzled at all times when out in public. "
napaconservative wrote on Jun 28, 2009 7:38 AM:
As I sit here and write this response, she is licking my little sister on the feet. Should I take her away because her mouth is so close to her?? I'm sick of people looking past the real issue here which as I said before is the owner/trainer... maybe we should muzzle them while in public. "
a teacher wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:08 AM:
All dogs can bite savagely. All dogs are capable of doing damage. Few dogs are capable of killing humans singularly. It takes a combination of aggression and power to do so. Pit bulls have both. They are untrustworthy and I understand people's reactions to them.
And Ms. Harper - Rattlesnakes kill less than 6 people a year in the USA. However, I think most people would think you are nuts if you had such a clearly dangerous animal for a pet. "
winewoman wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:36 AM:
napadad wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:49 AM:
steph wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:53 AM:
Frankly, Angelina, your antennae are off.
Anyone who would admit to being a pitbull breeder "for years" is worthy of
disdain. There are thousands of pitbulls, including puppies waiting in
animal shelters and being put down. I wish people would STOP breeding them.
That someone would admit to BREEDING THEM shows he is ignorant and/or totally insensitive.
Then, for that man to claim such expertise, that pitbulls don't feel pain except in their nose or feet--don't you know baloney when you're hearing it?
Especially when it comes out of the mouth of a pitbull breeder who's been
breeding pitbulls "for years" ???
Ah, you're young, I guess. Wisdom comes with age and experience. But
something tells me, you're a smart girl, I know that, even YOU knew there
was something not quite right, didn't you? (Please say yes.)
Pitbulls can be soooo sweet, it's true. I can see why a responsible dog
owner might want one. I would expect a responsible owner to pick one up at a
shelter, because they just can't stand the idea of so many pitbull puppies being euthanized!
Oh, the idea of proudly breeding pitbulls just makes my blood boil!
People should have to have a license to breed any dogs.
Lookit me--a small-government proponent. You should HAVE to have a license to breed dogs. No license, you get your dogs confiscated and you pay a BIG fat fine. License fees would pay for inspecting property for humane pet-keeping.
Ugh!!!" "
Paddy wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:54 AM:
pharper wrote on Jun 28, 2009 12:01 PM:
And if you're looking for a lifelong companion - mutts typically live longer and have fewer health problems than purebred animals, because they don't have longs lines of inbreeding and overbreeding.
Winewoman, while I agree that animals are unpredictable, by that logic every dog should be muzzled while in public. Pit bulls, with proper training, caring owners, and lots of socialization, are no less predictable than any other breed.
But I've said it before, and I'll say it again - what kind of people do they attract? Just as miniature poodles and Pomeranians attract elderly women, and Golden Retrievers attract families, pit bulls attract "tough guys" and gangbangers and people who should not be allowed to own ANY dog. Crack down on who can own a pit bull, not on whether pit bulls can be owned at all. (Perhaps if the licensing of breeders was put in place, that would be easier to keep track of.) "
vizslamom wrote on Jun 28, 2009 12:18 PM:
http://www.justicejunction.com/judicial_injustices_building_the_perfect_beast.htm "
cab e-girl wrote on Jun 28, 2009 1:49 PM:
Against my better judgment, we introduced a small calico kitten into our family (gopher control). As a one year old cat, she now dictates the pet pecking order in our family, and on any given day, I can look out in the back yard and see our yellow lab, our Staffie and our calico cat all basking in the sunlight on the cool grass, lying very close to each other.
I can assure you, our Staffordshire, feel’s pain. He is much more pain sensitive than either our cat or our yellow lab.
I now have a new appreciation for a dog that I believed I could never trust or become attached to. He ranks at the top of my all time favorite pets. My son will be hard pressed to regain custody! "
a teacher wrote on Jun 28, 2009 2:25 PM:
Oh yeah, blame the media...
All you have to do here is ask the question, why own a dog that has a deserved reputation of being a vicious, aggressive killer. "
thoughtank wrote on Jun 28, 2009 3:15 PM:
traceeg wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:15 PM:
doglover wrote on Jun 28, 2009 5:22 PM:
John Richards wrote on Jun 28, 2009 6:44 PM:
And it never crossed your mind that the reason for that is because only pit bulls have the strength to do terrible, even fatal, damage to what they attack. Once a pit bull sinks his teeth in, it is almost impossible to get him to let go. A poodle, on the other hand, you can smack over the head and it will whimper away. "
shareathought wrote on Jun 28, 2009 10:35 PM:
I did not do the research, nor did I claim to; I only found it interesting and thanked the person who did do the research.
I suggest re-reading the posts and perhaps do your own research (then, share with us and site references). "
napadad wrote on Jun 29, 2009 8:32 AM:
napadad wrote on Jun 29, 2009 8:44 AM:
with lots of actual fact based info with reference studies noted (for those doubters) and though it does show three breeds (and thier sub breeds ) responsible for the majority of dog related deaths (60%) and pit bulls are one those breeds, it states clearly
In Canine homicides and the dog bite epidemic: do not confuse them, it has been pointed out that the dog bite epidemic as a whole involves all dogs and all dog owners, not just the breeds most likely to kill.
In all fairness, therefore, it must be noted that:
Any dog, treated harshly or trained to attack, may bite a person. Any dog can be turned into a dangerous dog. The owner or handler most often is responsible for making a dog into something dangerous.
An irresponsible owner or dog handler might create a situation that places another person in danger by a dog, without the dog itself being dangerous, as in the case of the Pomeranian that killed the infant (see above).
Any individual dog may be a good, loving pet, even though its breed is considered to be potentially dangerous. A responsible owner can win the love and respect of a dog, no matter its breed. One cannot look at an individual dog, recognize its breed, and then state whether or not it is going to attack. "
lberryessa wrote on Jun 29, 2009 9:24 AM:
http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/breedinfo.php#dogparks. "
Ballermjq wrote on Jun 29, 2009 10:23 AM:
brucemac707 wrote on Jun 29, 2009 12:25 PM:
eas001 wrote on Jun 29, 2009 2:14 PM:
So glad to hear your dog is on the mend!!! Good to hear the owners paid for the vet bill, but still, sorry that it even happened. If they could offer no explanation on why their dog attacked both they and their dog are not well enoughed socialized to be entering a dog park! "
coffebeat wrote on Jun 29, 2009 2:21 PM:
Fortunately my dog didn't get attacked. I was scared because if the pitbull got loose there would be nothing I could do. I'm not stupid enough to pick my dog up and risk getting mauled myself.
I really wish people were smarter about taking aggressive dogs out. I'm sorry that happened and that your kids had to see! "
lberryessa wrote on Jun 29, 2009 2:27 PM:
elhundo wrote on Jun 29, 2009 4:18 PM:
http://www.ourpack.org/
Also, BAD Rap in Berkeley has indispensable info:
http://www.badrap.org/rescue/index.cfm "
xmrs09 wrote on Jun 29, 2009 5:05 PM:
As for the comment: "news stories about poodle attacks don't sell. so we hear about pit bulls," give me a break. News stories don't sell anything. In the news business, advertising is what pays the bills. Any dog attack of any significance (i.e. serious injuries) is highly likely to be reported. "
John Richards wrote on Jun 29, 2009 5:38 PM:
I think you'll find that most of those victims were children, or frail/elderly people. The average male is able to defend himself against most dogs, except for pitbulls and rottweilers; that's why the latter two breeds have such a bad reputation. "
steph wrote on Jun 29, 2009 6:29 PM:
Sables Mom wrote on Jun 29, 2009 6:31 PM:
siberian husky. My dog turned around and barked at him. The owners of the male dog did nothing. My dog then went over to the other side to play with a lab mix. When she came back a medium size male dog ( Rocko, Rocky ? ) black/white/tan dog ran up to her. Showing aggressive moves. The next second the dog attacked. I tried pulling the dog off of my dog. He was biting and my dog was unsure of what to do. The owner of Rocko/ Rocky screamed. As I pulled him off of Sable I was bit. My dog ran to the gate to leave. I was shaking. The woman said my dog started it. Not true. I over heard her talking about this aggressive dog she rescued to another woman. I was bleeding and my dog was scared we just left in a hurry. I did not even get her information about her dog and rabies vac. Today my dog is very cautious around other dogs. My hand is still sore. People if you know your dog is aggressive and have issues, you should not be in the play area with other dogs. Use the other side until you correct the problem. Be a responsible pet owner. I was warned last Friday morning about a pitt that comes several times a week that is a trouble maker. "
cab e-girl wrote on Jun 29, 2009 8:35 PM:
This is really an owner issue, not a breed issue. If you own an aggressive breed be responsible for your dog and be respectful of others and their dogs. Even if your dog is not aggressive, think about the person/dog on the other side and how your dog will be perceived. A little civilized courtesy and respect will go a long way. "
winewoman wrote on Jun 29, 2009 8:51 PM:
Herding dogs are German or Belgian shepherds, Border Collies. Sport herders are Golden or Labrador retrievers. Hounds are used in hunting, Gun dogs are retrievers, flushing spaniels, and pointing breeds. Guide work is generally performed by Golden Retrievers, Labradors, and German Shepherds. St. Bernards are search dogs and are used to find lost travellers and search in avalanches. Newfoundlands have long been used for water rescue. Guard dogs are generally Bulldogs, Pinschers, Pit Bulls and Schnauzers. Bichons, Pekingese, Pugs and Maltese are generally companion dogs.
There is a reason why Newfoundlands do water rescues and Bulldogs don't. There's a reason why Maltese don't make good guard dogs, There's a reason why Pekingese are not good guide dogs.
A dog's nature involves more than human training. No amount of training can make a Chihuahua a water rescue dog, for example.
Dogs have inherent traits that are unique to their breed. Pit Bull owners can defend them all they want. But, dogs are animals. They don't think, behave or reason like humans. They are unpredictable. Again, there is a reason why the Pit Bull is a guard dog - and a reason why it has been a fighting dog for centuries. Read about their history. Every dog owner should now the history of their chosen breed. "
LMW wrote on Jun 29, 2009 9:57 PM:
City should consider, just like apt complexes allowing pets, watch those gray areas, fairness to animals. "
proudmama2 wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:37 AM:
norcalgal wrote on Jun 30, 2009 9:23 AM:
Don't knock the breed. I have a 13 year old pit that I got as a pup. I have taken her to obedience classes and she is a very well behaved dog. HOWEVER, she IS very protective. She has never once bit anybody or gone after anyone, but she does have a very intimidating bark and people that don't know her are afraid of her. I keep her on a leash when I have her out and about, but on the property she runs free and doesn't cause anybody any trouble. "
grits wrote on Jun 30, 2009 9:35 AM:
sandra wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:45 AM:
The problem is that many of the OWNERS are NOT RESPOSIBLE. The hype that goes along with this breed attracts many foolish people for obvious reasons.
I onced owned a Belgium Shepherd. A wonderful breed easily bored. I would never own the breed again, even though I probably loved that dog for it's personality more than many I've owned. She needed so much interaction and stimulation to be happy. She needed a ranch, or a job of some sort. She was a rescue that was on her third strike. In other words, we were her last hope. She was an escape artist. She lived for 5 more years with us, than she would have lived had we not taken her in. BUT, she was eventually killed by a hit and run driver on her last escape, after we truly thought we had secured her in our yard for good. She was well trained and not destructive, but could find ways out of a yard that seem unfathomable. We had even gotten a companion dog for her, which we have to this day, to occupy her free time. In spite of being what I consider to be a responsible pet owner, the nature of the breed won out over me.
The outcome was a great dog was killed. This is why I would never own this breed again. The outcome of a pitbull succumbing to its nature can be so much worse.
When you choose this breed, please be aware of what you are getting yourself into. "
vizslamom wrote on Jun 30, 2009 10:56 AM:
JustMyyOpinion wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:26 PM:
It seems simple enough that people should know the temperment of their dog and know if it's safe or not for them to be put in a situation where they'll be interacting with unfamiliar dogs! This is not rocket science, folks! "
sandra wrote on Jun 30, 2009 12:53 PM:
A pit bull should not be allowed to roam off leash around other animals in a public park, period. It is not the only breed that should be leashed at all times in public. There is enough unpredictable dog behavior based on other things besides genetics, that adding this to the mix just seems insane. "
napahawaiinapa wrote on Jul 1, 2009 3:58 AM:
kcnapa wrote on Jul 1, 2009 10:02 AM:
Go to: http://www.badrap.org/rescue/dogpark.cfm
Here is an excerpt from their article re PBs and dog parks: As we know, all breeds will fight. Success at the dog parks depends on how realistic owners are about their pets' limits. Unfortunately, it's not uncommon for dog owners to overestimate their ability to prevent trouble and newer pit bull owners to underestimate their dog's potential. Most never see trouble coming until its too late. Murphy's Law Says: Your maturing pit bull WILL get entangled with a sour tempered bad boy on the one day you're feeling fuzzy, distracted and unprepared. Responsible, educated owners know their dogs' limits and know how to keep them out of trouble. These same owners know that keeping their pits out of dog parks is the very best decision for their mature dog. Honestly? The most responsible pit bull owners among us choose to avoid the unstructured, chaotic setting of crowded dog parks altogether and finds other ways to exercise/socialize their dog. "
magnum wrote on Jul 3, 2009 7:21 AM:
4gnapan wrote on Jul 3, 2009 3:07 PM:
yea?.. what does it say when I rescued mine, from the gutter, with a busted leg, at the ripe old age of 9 weeks??.. Moved out of my nice little apartment, because my landlord wouldnt let me keep the dog there??.. Raised him to be a gentleman, voice trained him?.. pretty much never let him off leash in dog parks, until i'd walked him around enough to judge what the rest of the mutts attitudes were? Held his head and his gaze, 15 years later, when it was time for him to go...
Dont pass judgment lest ye be judged.
Dogs are dogs.. they tend to do the darndest things when you least expect. But, in my years of dealing with them, and yes, being bit.. (3 inch scar on my head, another 1inch tween the eyes.. it was a shepherd, I was 6 yrs old, with a toy machine gun..very close up view of canines... ooops :) ) its really all about the Owners and whether they are willing to learn the job of being a partner to the dog, or just someone at the end of a leash. "
reddog wrote on Jul 5, 2009 8:01 PM:
alucawanza wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:35 PM:
My son's dog is an Anatolian Shepherd. She loves everyone and everything. Loves to play, go to the park, is very obedient off-leash. She obeys word commands immediately. Quite a remarkable dog. She cannot be in the same yard or area as my daughter's dog. The pit will attack her every time even though many efforts have been made to engage them in friendly play. It just doesn't work.
So here are two dogs, raised similarly, with loving owners who follow the owners' every command....except the pit loses all control when she sees another dog. Don't say it's the owner. "
kkkkaty wrote on Jul 8, 2009 4:49 PM:
MyThought wrote on Jul 8, 2009 10:45 PM:
There are two equal paths up to the plateau, one for off-leash and one for on-leash; the off-leash crowd thinks they own both, just like they continue to think that the entire park is their own personal backyard. I have yet to walk Alston Park without encountering off-leash animals in on-leash areas. The City was supposed to be increasing fines and actually doing some enforcement but I see no evidence of that. "