Altamuras ready to shake up downtown
Owners of empty storefronts launch aggressive leasing plan
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 8th, 2009
October 16th, 2009
October 11th, 2009
October 9th, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
Criticized for letting their downtown commercial properties sit empty, members of the Altamura family announced a major leasing effort this week for Napa Town Center and holdings on First Street.
With new hotels and commercial projects opening all around them, the Altamuras said they would try to revive Napa Town Center and lease the Gordon and Merrill’s buildings.
The Altamuras have signed with a new Napa-based commercial real estate firm, Strong & Hayden, to find national and regional retailers. Independent stores may also be part of the mix. New signs say 50,000 square feet is available.
The family had tried in recent years to redevelop the eastern half of Napa Town Center with a hotel, then a residential condominium-retail project, George Altamura Jr. said Monday. In today’s ailing economy, such ambitious plans were going nowhere, Altamura said. The times call for a new strategy, he said.
Efforts to sign quality tenants to long-term leases might take a year or two, Altamura said. “The national chains are hurting right now,” he said.
“They have their work cut out for them,” Altamura said of Strong & Hayden’s leasing efforts. “If there’s anyone who can do it, it’s (Strong & Hayden’s) Gary Van Dam.”
Van Dam said the Altamuras willing to upgrade the appearance of Napa Town Center, carve up spaces differently and work with potential tenants on leasing terms and improvements.
The former Merrill’s drug store, an empty 20,000- square-foot space on First Street, is a candidate for razing, while preserving the historic facade, Van Dam said.
‘Great steps’
City officials and merchants applauded the new leasing effort, while expressing caution about the chances for success.
“I’m thrilled they’re marketing their space,” said Ed Gill, a co-owner of Gillwoods, a popular restaurant in Napa Town Center. “They need to get this end leased rather than wait for a prospect to tear it down.”
Kent Gardella, owner of Napa Valley Jewelers, said Napa Town Center had suffered while the Altamuras tried to sell it or find a major redeveloper. “It needs new painting. It needs lots of things,” he said.
Most of the eastern half of the center is either empty or filled with stores on month-to-month leases, which has hurt long-term merchants, Gardella said. If the Altamuras are serious about reviving the center, they need to restore the center’s promotion budget and rejoin the Chefs Market, he said.
“I only believe things when I see them,” said Scott Leonard, owner of Silver Sensations at Napa Town Center.
The Altamuras’ leasing plans could dovetail nicely with the fall reopening of the former Mervyns as a Kohl’s department store, Leonard said.
A 76,000-square-foot Kohl’s is expected to open in October. Although not a part of Napa Town Center, Kohl’s would draw shoppers to the area.
“These are great steps. Let’s see what happens,” said Cassandra Walker, the city’s economic development manager.
In these tough times, quality tenants want landlords to help pay for business improvements, which in the case of a restaurant can hit $2 million, Walker said.
In the past, the Altamuras haven’t been willing to do this, diminishing businesses’ interest in coming downtown, she said.
A new willingness to do long-term leases is “a first step,” Walker said. “George has to take many steps.”
Kate King, CEO of the Napa Chamber of Commerce, said “no one could be happier than the Chamber of Commerce if George is moving forward to fill these spaces appropriately.”
“We’ve been on record for quite some time that we were desirous for George to do something,” King said, speaking of George Altamura Sr. Numerous vacancies in Altamura properties created problems for adjacent retailers, she said.
“I’m thrilled,” said Craig Smith, executive director of the Napa Downtown Association. The new leasing effort “can only help,” he said.
The nation may be in a deep recession, but there are reasons for optimism that Altamura properties can be leased, Matt Connolly of Strong & Hayden said.
A string of major commercial projects, including the Westin and Avia hotels, the Riverfront mixed-use development, the Oxbow Public Market and the offices and restaurants at Napa Square have opened or soon will, Connolly said. Altamura properties sit in the middle of all this.
Downtown Napa “has a good story to tell,” Connolly said. “There are still people who want to grow their business.”
Town Center history
Built in 1987, Napa Town Center was promoted by the city’s redevelopment agency, which helped a private developer assemble the necessary land.
During its heyday in the 1990s, Napa Town Center managed to attract a string of national chains, including the Foot Locker, KB Toys, The Limited, Miller’s Outpost, Waldenbooks and GNC. All but GNC have since departed.
Merrill’s, as well an adjacent former women’s dress shop, has been empty for nearly two decades, well before the Altamuras bought it. The Gordon Building, with 9,000 square feet of first-floor space, recently lost Bookends, Napa Wine Merchant and Napa Net.
George Altamura Sr., in partnership with the Doctors Company, bought Napa Town Center in 2002 for a reported $16.25 million. He also acquired adjacent properties on First and made an unsuccessful bid to buy the Mervyns complex.
In 2004, George Altamura Sr. proposed a six-story, 225-room hotel that would have required the leveling of the eastern half of Napa Town Center and Merrill’s. The plan died when the city balked at turning over full use of the Pearl Street garage to Altamura.
In 2005, the senior Altamura twice nearly sold Napa Town Center for a rumored $40 million, but the deals fell through.
In 2007, he unveiled a five-story retail/condo project with the same footprint as the earlier hotel. City planners said they were interested in the concept, but the project never progressed.
While the Merrill’s building is a candidate for replacement, the Gordon Building is more of a landmark, George Altamura Jr. said. He is in negotiations with a high-end restaurant for the Gordon space facing First Street, he said.
Altamura said that he and his father had tried to redevelop their properties in ways that would benefit downtown, but city hostility to a hotel project and a poor market for mixed-use projects set them back.
“We’re not completely to blame,” he said. At the same time, “We have somewhat given fuel to the fire. I understand that.”
While Strong & Hayden tries to fill up current Altamura properties, the family appears to be on the verge of acquiring yet another, the former Pacific National Bank building, at 1300 First St.
The Altamuras reportedly are in escrow to buy the building, which is surrounded on three sides by Napa Town Center. Altamura Jr. would only confirm “we’re looking at it.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
clean and serene wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:34 AM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:41 AM:
"Efforts to sign quality tenants to long-term leases might take a year or two, Altamura said." (Altamura Jr., paragraph 5 in article above).
Compare with:
"Altamura [Sr.], far more optimistic, had promised a grand opening for [the Uptown] last winter...Now Altamura is advising Uptown watchers to reset their watches for spring 2003" (8/31/2002 NVR Article, see hyperlink:
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2002/08/31/news/export41687.txt )
Don't mind me, I'm just putting the best quote of the above article in context:
“I only believe things when I see them...”
Just like Mr. Leonard, I won't hold my breath... "
noblindershere wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:26 AM:
selim wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:27 AM:
JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:46 AM:
sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:33 AM:
UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:33 AM:
By the way, Bookends wasn't lost. They were driven out of business because their landlord would not renew the lease and said they had a new renter coming into the space. It is important to report this fact in this story. "
Wendym wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:49 AM:
cheezcakemaker wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:05 AM:
If it takes 2 years to lease the spaces, why not invest in the live/work units and have them be complete and generating revenue in the same time frame?
If you keep doing what you have always done, you will keep getting what you have always gotten. If the Altamura's buy yet another downtown property, well, guess what. "
Newview wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:49 AM:
Piquemyinterest wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:00 AM:
neesie1313 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:02 AM:
kbc wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:42 AM:
krusty wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:48 AM:
I understand business is going to come first for the Altamuras. They're not in business to help us. But at the same time, I think they owe it to the residents of town to be reasonable in their expectations. No one is asking the Altamuras to lose money in order to benefit Napa. We just want them to make a valid effort to fill their vacant properties. "
bennyd wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:18 AM:
Sickothis wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:31 AM:
And the Altamuras live/work development got shot down by the City because it was simply too low quality to match the character of the other developments being done downtown. They tried to lowball it, and the City called them for it. Told them to go back to the drawing board. "
amazed wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:08 PM:
winewoman wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:22 PM:
Kathy Concened wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:45 PM:
napasfinest wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:02 PM:
krusty wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:03 PM:
Rob C wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:09 PM:
Methinks this is just PR spin and posturing in response to the well-deserved pummeling they have taken from posters. (Plus maybe just a little cash-flow issue coming home to roost as well.)
The NVR editorial board should take note - public opinion has impact and maybe, just maybe, newspapers should take stronger positions on local issues like they once did in order to remain relevant - we can't do all the heavy lifting here ya know...
(Plus, it's not like the Altamuras are going pull some huge advertising budget for their vast vacant empire.) "
crooked6pence wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:10 PM:
First: When you have as much income as these guys, sometimes it pays to let properties just sit empty. They write the loss of rent off as an expense come tax time.
As they write off those losses, they are also waiting...
Second: Waiting for what you ask. For the completion of the Riverfront development of course! Which was expected to have "premium rents in the vicinity of $5 a square foot." - NVR 9/8/07
Everyone who owns property downtown hoped that these "premium" rents at the Riverfront would have a net ripple effect, causing the overall price per square foot in downtown Napa to increase.
Third: Which explains why so many tenants are currently on month-to-month leases.
If the Riverfront development had worked... which it didn't, every renter in a 1-mile radius would have received a 30-day notice, informing them of a rent increase.
Since it is obvious that the Riverfront Development wasn't received with the 2005 frenzy everyone now remembers as a distant memory, it is time to rent these properties out and get what they can before they have a ghost town on their hands - and no one wants to rent at all.
Nice gamble... better luck next time ;) "
Alter ego wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:45 PM:
bennyd wrote on Jun 24, 2009 2:24 PM:
duckfan wrote on Jun 24, 2009 3:31 PM:
john olney wrote on Jun 24, 2009 4:22 PM:
I suspect these “visionaries” knew that that such land and buildings were not economically viable to remodel to today’s building code requirements which would have resulted in a rent charge they could not get in this economy.
I think their plan is to wait out time until the economy improves and demand for their rundown buildings - thus the land they stand upon - would suddenly become valuable to a stimulated economy and developers. That time is upon us now: to wit, the tear down of the old and building of the modern new office, lodging, residential and retail mixed use buildings like Avia, The Riverfront, Zeller, Napa Square, and more!
Why do you think these vacant building landlords have not routinely responded to all those who so malign these property owners? Why stop those who are now routinely proving that their earlier decisions to buy means that these visionary landlords are about to reap the benefits.
My hat is tipped to the visionary and entrepreneurial landlords! They saw the future and where monitory reward would come to them if they had patience and let the damning fools do their marketing for them to increase the value of their holdings. Ever time the complaining commentators complain about the vacant building landlords the latter silently grins and says to him/herself, “Cha ching, thank you, very much!” "
samaker wrote on Jun 24, 2009 5:32 PM:
pta mom wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:05 PM:
UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:51 PM:
Maybe that would significantly change the business model so that our downtown becomes a thriving and delightful place. If the Altamuras are going to continue doing nothing but sit on properties, then they can at least pay a little extra to the city for the privilege.
It would also be *really* nice if they didn't get so much positive free press. "
UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:35 PM:
mof2 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:01 PM:
longtime wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:59 PM:
the one just down the freeway. Welcome to fill in the blank. Your on a month to month, easy enough to get rid of you. Don't we already have enough national stores at the outlets? "
jmo wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:02 PM:
Turning blue!!!
Waiting, waiting and yes waiting for the Downtown Theater to open.
Written before reading any prior comments which is where I am headed now. "
napa1957 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:05 PM:
thoughtank wrote on Jun 25, 2009 11:11 AM:
amazed wrote on Jun 25, 2009 2:19 PM:
UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 25, 2009 6:25 PM:
juls wrote on Jun 27, 2009 5:26 PM:
Newview whats wrong with chains? Typically the selection is better and the prices are lower. I don't think all Napans dislike chains. "
juls wrote on Jun 27, 2009 5:30 PM:
coigue wrote on Jun 28, 2009 1:21 PM:
northside resident wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:00 AM:
What is the mentality that thinks only national chains are good for downtown? I think we should be cultivating interesting local businesses. But the Altmuras are only a fraction of the problems. Red tape from city hall and the county, along with insane rents, insure a boring downtown. "