NVR Logo
Altamuras ready to shake up downtown
Owners of empty storefronts launch aggressive leasing plan
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Save and Share Share
Criticized for letting their downtown commercial properties sit empty, members of the Altamura family announced a major leasing effort this week for Napa Town Center and holdings on First Street.

With new hotels and commercial projects opening all around them, the Altamuras said they would try to revive Napa Town Center and lease the Gordon and Merrill’s buildings.
The Altamuras have signed with a new Napa-based commercial real estate firm, Strong & Hayden, to find national and regional retailers. Independent stores may also be part of the mix. New signs say 50,000 square feet is available.

The family had tried in recent years to redevelop the eastern half of Napa Town Center with a hotel, then a residential condominium-retail project, George Altamura Jr. said Monday. In today’s ailing economy, such ambitious plans were going nowhere, Altamura said. The times call for a new strategy, he said.
Efforts to sign quality tenants to long-term leases might take a year or two, Altamura said. “The national chains are hurting right now,” he said.

“They have their work cut out for them,” Altamura said of Strong & Hayden’s leasing efforts. “If there’s anyone who can do it, it’s (Strong & Hayden’s) Gary Van Dam.”
Van Dam said the Altamuras willing to upgrade the appearance of Napa Town Center, carve up spaces differently and work with potential tenants on leasing terms and improvements.

The former Merrill’s drug store, an empty 20,000- square-foot space on First Street, is a candidate for razing, while preserving the historic facade, Van Dam said.

‘Great steps’

City officials and merchants applauded the new leasing effort, while expressing caution about the chances for success.

“I’m thrilled they’re marketing their space,” said Ed Gill, a co-owner of Gillwoods, a popular restaurant in Napa Town Center. “They need to get this end leased rather than wait for a prospect to tear it down.”

Kent Gardella, owner of Napa Valley Jewelers, said Napa Town Center had suffered while the Altamuras tried to sell it or find a major redeveloper. “It needs new painting. It needs lots of things,” he said.

Most of the eastern half of the center is either empty or filled with stores on month-to-month leases, which has hurt long-term merchants, Gardella said. If the Altamuras are serious about reviving the center, they need to restore the center’s promotion budget and rejoin the Chefs Market, he said.

“I only believe things when I see them,” said Scott Leonard, owner of Silver Sensations at Napa Town Center.

The Altamuras’ leasing plans could dovetail nicely with the fall reopening of the former Mervyns as a Kohl’s department store, Leonard said.

A 76,000-square-foot Kohl’s is expected to open in October. Although not a part of Napa Town Center, Kohl’s would draw shoppers to the area.

“These are great steps. Let’s see what happens,” said Cassandra Walker, the city’s economic development manager.

In these tough times, quality tenants want landlords to help pay for business improvements, which in the case of a restaurant can hit $2 million, Walker said.

In the past, the Altamuras haven’t been willing to do this, diminishing businesses’ interest in coming downtown, she said.

A new willingness to do long-term leases is “a first step,” Walker said. “George has to take many steps.”

Kate King, CEO of the Napa Chamber of Commerce, said “no one could be happier than the Chamber of Commerce if George is moving forward to fill these spaces appropriately.”

“We’ve been on record for quite some time that we were desirous for George to do something,” King said, speaking of George Altamura Sr. Numerous vacancies in Altamura properties created problems for adjacent retailers, she said.

“I’m thrilled,” said Craig Smith, executive director of the Napa Downtown Association. The new leasing effort “can only help,” he said.

The nation may be in a deep recession, but there are reasons for optimism that Altamura properties can be leased, Matt Connolly of Strong & Hayden said.

A string of major commercial projects, including the Westin and Avia hotels, the Riverfront mixed-use development, the Oxbow Public Market and the offices and restaurants at Napa Square have opened or soon will, Connolly said. Altamura properties sit in the middle of all this.

Downtown Napa “has a good story to tell,” Connolly said. “There are still people who want to grow their business.”

Town Center history

Built in 1987, Napa Town Center was promoted by the city’s redevelopment agency, which helped a private developer assemble the necessary land.

During its heyday in the 1990s, Napa Town Center managed to attract a string of national chains, including the Foot Locker, KB Toys, The Limited, Miller’s Outpost, Waldenbooks and GNC. All but GNC have since departed.

Merrill’s, as well an adjacent former women’s dress shop, has been empty for nearly two decades, well before the Altamuras bought it. The Gordon Building, with 9,000 square feet of first-floor space, recently lost Bookends, Napa Wine Merchant and Napa Net.

George Altamura Sr., in partnership with the Doctors Company, bought Napa Town Center in 2002 for a reported $16.25 million. He also acquired adjacent properties on First and made an unsuccessful bid to buy the Mervyns complex.

In 2004, George Altamura Sr. proposed a six-story, 225-room hotel that would have required the leveling of the eastern half of Napa Town Center and Merrill’s. The plan died when the city balked at turning over full use of the Pearl Street garage to Altamura.

In 2005, the senior Altamura twice nearly sold Napa Town Center for a rumored $40 million, but the deals fell through.

In 2007, he unveiled a five-story retail/condo project with the same footprint as the earlier hotel. City planners said they were interested in the concept, but the project never progressed.

While the Merrill’s building is a candidate for replacement, the Gordon Building is more of a landmark, George Altamura Jr. said. He is in negotiations with a high-end restaurant for the Gordon space facing First Street, he said.

Altamura said that he and his father had tried to redevelop their properties in ways that would benefit downtown, but city hostility to a hotel project and a poor market for mixed-use projects set them back.

“We’re not completely to blame,” he said. At the same time, “We have somewhat given fuel to the fire. I understand that.”

While Strong & Hayden tries to fill up current Altamura properties, the family appears to be on the verge of acquiring yet another, the former Pacific National Bank building, at 1300 First St.

The Altamuras reportedly are in escrow to buy the building, which is surrounded on three sides by Napa Town Center. Altamura Jr. would only confirm “we’re looking at it.”
42 comment(s)

clean and serene wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:34 AM:

" Right on! "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:41 AM:

" Like father, like son:

"Efforts to sign quality tenants to long-term leases might take a year or two, Altamura said." (Altamura Jr., paragraph 5 in article above).

Compare with:

"Altamura [Sr.], far more optimistic, had promised a grand opening for [the Uptown] last winter...Now Altamura is advising Uptown watchers to reset their watches for spring 2003" (8/31/2002 NVR Article, see hyperlink:

http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2002/08/31/news/export41687.txt )

Don't mind me, I'm just putting the best quote of the above article in context:

“I only believe things when I see them...”

Just like Mr. Leonard, I won't hold my breath... "

noblindershere wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:26 AM:

" i really don't understand their business philosophy. Waiting until the economy is at its worst to develop property is odd. We will see... "

selim wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:27 AM:

" Yeah, well...I'm with Scott Leonard: I'll believe THIS when I see it. "

JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:46 AM:

" Sounds good... but, I just don't trust the Altamura family. They really shouldn't be in the business. They have a long history of buying property, sitting on it, waiting for their dream ship to come in, while the property just sits there and languishes. Like the Silver Store said "I'll believe it when I see it." "

sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:33 AM:

" OMG. But I’m not holding my breath. Let’s not forget the Uptown. . . . "

UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:33 AM:

" I think the best thing about this article it the overwhelming sense that few people are going to believe it until they see it. I will believe it when I see some efforts.

By the way, Bookends wasn't lost. They were driven out of business because their landlord would not renew the lease and said they had a new renter coming into the space. It is important to report this fact in this story. "

Wendym wrote on Jun 24, 2009 8:49 AM:

" High end resturants? What about the Uptown theater that is still sitting fallow? It seems that the downtown area needs more shops that locals would want to shop at. There are enough places for tourists to shop at. Let's get our downtown back to a "local friendly" area. Maybe Napa would attract a broader range of tourists if there was shopping opportunities for all. "

cheezcakemaker wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:05 AM:

" Build live/work condos. Only when people can actually live and work downtown can there be a transformation. Every other growing community in the Bay Area gets this concept.

If it takes 2 years to lease the spaces, why not invest in the live/work units and have them be complete and generating revenue in the same time frame?

If you keep doing what you have always done, you will keep getting what you have always gotten. If the Altamura's buy yet another downtown property, well, guess what. "

Newview wrote on Jun 24, 2009 9:49 AM:

" Seriously, I believe that there is a majority of individuals who want to see the return of the thriving small business in downtown. There had been discussion of a assessment against empty buildings in downtown, the Altamura holdings are possibly a target for such a assessment if voters were to vote on any ballot containing an assessment code. Should Altamura consider lowering leasing rates in downtown that would certainly attract small business entrepenuers. I seriously believe that the community does not want Corporate Chains as a majority business renter. "

Piquemyinterest wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:00 AM:

" I agree with Wendym as they charge such high rents the locals move out of the store properties. We just lost a bead shop due to this phenomenon. A few are making the decisions for all the locals and that truly is a shame. It's all about revenue in this town and it always has been. This whole town is languishing and people are moving out. What will be left? Signed concerned citizen "

neesie1313 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:02 AM:

" Great! Can we get a Michael's in town, somewhere, anywhere??? "

kbc wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:42 AM:

" I'll believe it when I see it - they are always big talkers that never deliver. "

krusty wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:48 AM:

" Add me to the list of those who will believe it when they see it. I hope the Altamuras make me a believer.

I understand business is going to come first for the Altamuras. They're not in business to help us. But at the same time, I think they owe it to the residents of town to be reasonable in their expectations. No one is asking the Altamuras to lose money in order to benefit Napa. We just want them to make a valid effort to fill their vacant properties. "

bennyd wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:18 AM:

" We've been waiting years for the Up Town to open. I can't understand why anybody would sit on this property and not open it for more options of things to do downtown besides eat. local property owners should feel a civic duty and pride in their own town and help downtown mature. I guess we'll have to see... "

Sickothis wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:31 AM:

" Krusty - just because someone is in business to make a profit doesn't make them bad for the community, too. Look at what Harry Price has done.

And the Altamuras live/work development got shot down by the City because it was simply too low quality to match the character of the other developments being done downtown. They tried to lowball it, and the City called them for it. Told them to go back to the drawing board. "

amazed wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:08 PM:

" Wasn't Gary Van Dam with Coldwell Banker Commercial Properties, and wasn't Coldwell Banker the broker who was trying to lease the space at the front of McCaulou's (formerly Dekor)? How is this such a major step for the Altamuras? "

winewoman wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:22 PM:

" ...a little less talk, and a lot more action... "

Kathy Concened wrote on Jun 24, 2009 12:45 PM:

" Sorry "Newview", I want a Barnes and Noble! "

napasfinest wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:02 PM:

" I find it hilarious when Napa residents criticize the business savvy of the Altamura's. Are you one of the wealthiest people in the Napa Valley? I think not. How do you think they got to this point in the first place people? "

krusty wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:03 PM:

" I never suggested that, Sickothis. Everyone is in business to make a profit. I think whomever the Altamuras lease their space to, it's going to benefit downtown Napa. "

Rob C wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:09 PM:

" This is where the editorial voice of the NVR needs to hold Altamuras feet to the fire.

Methinks this is just PR spin and posturing in response to the well-deserved pummeling they have taken from posters. (Plus maybe just a little cash-flow issue coming home to roost as well.)

The NVR editorial board should take note - public opinion has impact and maybe, just maybe, newspapers should take stronger positions on local issues like they once did in order to remain relevant - we can't do all the heavy lifting here ya know...

(Plus, it's not like the Altamuras are going pull some huge advertising budget for their vast vacant empire.) "

crooked6pence wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:10 PM:

" I'll explain their business philosophy, 3 main factors are at play, and there is just no losing:

First: When you have as much income as these guys, sometimes it pays to let properties just sit empty. They write the loss of rent off as an expense come tax time.

As they write off those losses, they are also waiting...

Second: Waiting for what you ask. For the completion of the Riverfront development of course! Which was expected to have "premium rents in the vicinity of $5 a square foot." - NVR 9/8/07

Everyone who owns property downtown hoped that these "premium" rents at the Riverfront would have a net ripple effect, causing the overall price per square foot in downtown Napa to increase.

Third: Which explains why so many tenants are currently on month-to-month leases.

If the Riverfront development had worked... which it didn't, every renter in a 1-mile radius would have received a 30-day notice, informing them of a rent increase.

Since it is obvious that the Riverfront Development wasn't received with the 2005 frenzy everyone now remembers as a distant memory, it is time to rent these properties out and get what they can before they have a ghost town on their hands - and no one wants to rent at all.

Nice gamble... better luck next time ;) "

Alter ego wrote on Jun 24, 2009 1:45 PM:

" Plus there is a limit on how long one can right off losses. "

bennyd wrote on Jun 24, 2009 2:24 PM:

" crooked6pense, it's exactly that business philosophy that causes and created boom and bust scenarios. Back in the 80's, real estate investors could right off "projected" loses. This encouraged too many useless buildings, this also means a business or developer is encouraged to be a passive participant in the market place and not a pro-active business/investor that takes a risk on their investment thats more productive. It all comes down to investing in one's own economy, not just waiting... "

duckfan wrote on Jun 24, 2009 3:31 PM:

" Chew on this Altamura Jr: 75k and plus Napa residents. All need clothes, shoes, and misc. wares. We shop at Target and Walmart. And then go to Fairfield or Vallejo to go to the mall or Old Navy. If you renovated the drugstore into an Urban Outfitters, you would be even richer. Napa needs shopping....if you cater to the tourists you fold (example Copia). And better finish the Uptown before the other theatre moves in by the river!I choose IMAX over cute old theatre all day long. "

john olney wrote on Jun 24, 2009 4:22 PM:

" It seems in view of all the future planning efforts, the “blight of empty store front building space” has now suddenly caught the eye of a number of vehemently protesting citizens placing all the blame for the distressed buildings downtown on the visionary landlords who investment in downtown land and buildings when nobody else wanted them.

I suspect these “visionaries” knew that that such land and buildings were not economically viable to remodel to today’s building code requirements which would have resulted in a rent charge they could not get in this economy.

I think their plan is to wait out time until the economy improves and demand for their rundown buildings - thus the land they stand upon - would suddenly become valuable to a stimulated economy and developers. That time is upon us now: to wit, the tear down of the old and building of the modern new office, lodging, residential and retail mixed use buildings like Avia, The Riverfront, Zeller, Napa Square, and more!

Why do you think these vacant building landlords have not routinely responded to all those who so malign these property owners? Why stop those who are now routinely proving that their earlier decisions to buy means that these visionary landlords are about to reap the benefits.

My hat is tipped to the visionary and entrepreneurial landlords! They saw the future and where monitory reward would come to them if they had patience and let the damning fools do their marketing for them to increase the value of their holdings. Ever time the complaining commentators complain about the vacant building landlords the latter silently grins and says to him/herself, “Cha ching, thank you, very much!” "

samaker wrote on Jun 24, 2009 5:32 PM:

" It's about time, too bad they didn't think of this before the economy tanked. I find humor in the fact that public officials quoted in this article refer to downtown's pronlem in public statements simply as, "George." Apparently the Altamura family finnaly realized how many enemies they had made when there was an outpooring of comments about what they have done in the last article about them. I wonder if they finnaly got tired of downtown looking more like a ghost town, or if they are just trying to win a little more support behind their acquisition of Copia.... "

pta mom wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:05 PM:

" Every once in a while I pop into McCaulous for an emergency find. Last time was for a raincoat in December, no luck there. That would be the beginning and the end of downtown shopping for me. In March took my daughter to Taqueria Rosita, yummy and worth it. That is all that downtown offers my bank account for eating out. My family lives on just over 100k, but we refuse to be in debt for food and $100 plus jeans. We are looking toward the future and like to vsit other places. Locals are screaming out loud! We want to shop in Napa, but nobody is listening therefore we must drive away and give other counties and cities our money. SAD, SAD. SAD "

UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 24, 2009 6:51 PM:

" In urban areas such as Washington DC, owners are required to pay 3-4 times more in property taxes because their derelict and empty properties invite problems. I think maybe it is time for Napa county to enact such a policy. That way foreclosed houses being held by banks and the purposeful destruction of the Napa downtown area might benefit the county.

Maybe that would significantly change the business model so that our downtown becomes a thriving and delightful place. If the Altamuras are going to continue doing nothing but sit on properties, then they can at least pay a little extra to the city for the privilege.

It would also be *really* nice if they didn't get so much positive free press. "

UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 24, 2009 7:35 PM:

" In many communities, the urban blight of empty store fronts is paid for by a blight tax that is four to five times the normal property tax rate. These blight properties seem to quickly become profitable storefronts as soon as the new tax kicks in. Just think about it. Fewer empty storefronts, more foreclosed homes being rented or sold to families and people who really want to be a part of a community, not just a speculator. This might be a very good solution for Napa. "

mof2 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:01 PM:

" It sounds like just about everyone who is commenting agrees that the Altamura's should develop their properties. I think it would be a travesty if they aquired yet another property downtown that they will let sit empty. Our downtown and lack of stores is an embarrassment, especially when compared to nearby Petaluma and Sonoma. I LOVE the idea of a blight tax on these owners that are sitting on their properties. I don't care if it makes 'business sense' or not, the Altamura's and their empty storefronts are destroying downtown and it would be nice if someone at City Hall would do something about it. I know this tax would pass without a hitch. Maybe it could even help pave some streets. "

longtime wrote on Jun 24, 2009 10:59 PM:

" How many small businesses will remain? People with something to offer this community, other than the same thing that is in every other town in this country? What makes a downtown survive? Relationships. Believing in what you are offering and enjoying what you do? Like the people at Bookends. Now gone, triple the rent to drive them out. Now that whole building is empty and ready for sale or demolition so we can make it shiny and new for some national store that has no heart. Just recordings when you call. Let's put big green signs in them from a new firm filled with employees from the firm that used to pimp them out. Let's offer them at prices (son't forget triple net) that could push you into losing you business. Let's let the floors rot out, the mold grow, the windows break. We'll rent to you in that condition unless it's a problem that can be fixed in one day with little effort and care. It's your problem. We're just doing you a favor until the big bucks come along and turn this town into
the one just down the freeway. Welcome to fill in the blank. Your on a month to month, easy enough to get rid of you. Don't we already have enough national stores at the outlets? "

jmo wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:02 PM:

" Oh Please!
Turning blue!!!
Waiting, waiting and yes waiting for the Downtown Theater to open.

Written before reading any prior comments which is where I am headed now. "

napa1957 wrote on Jun 24, 2009 11:05 PM:

" Did all this come from owning a dry cleaners on Jefferson St. in the 50's? Same family? If so...somebody was pretty good at investing! "

thoughtank wrote on Jun 25, 2009 11:11 AM:

" The Altamuras are wealthy, savvy investors? So what? They only benefit from laws that allow vacant properties to sit vacant without penalties. They're just greedy opportunists in my opinion. "

amazed wrote on Jun 25, 2009 2:19 PM:

" Thoughtank, what exactly is the difference? "

UpValleyReader wrote on Jun 25, 2009 6:25 PM:

" What is the process for creating a new tax for derelict properties? "

juls wrote on Jun 27, 2009 5:26 PM:

" pta mom, there other places downtown to eat at the price range of Taqueria Rosita: Buckhorn, a number of Asian restaurants, Gillwoods for lunch, Red Rock, ok so its a little off down town. Tuesday night local night at the Oxbow Market is priced right and lots of fun to boot

Newview whats wrong with chains? Typically the selection is better and the prices are lower. I don't think all Napans dislike chains. "

juls wrote on Jun 27, 2009 5:30 PM:

" The Altumaras own the Yountville Inn. Its up and running and nice, clean has art in the front area. They can do something good, complete and visually pleasing. They are actually in the process of upgrading it from a 3 to a 4-4.5 star resort with a full spa. "

coigue wrote on Jun 28, 2009 1:21 PM:

" We need to hold the city council's feet to the fire. Krider, in particular, promised to create a penalty for long-empty businesses when he was campaigning. His tune changed once in office. Altamura, I gather, has more political clout than the people of Napa. "

northside resident wrote on Jun 30, 2009 8:00 AM:

" <<Efforts to sign quality tenants to long-term leases might take a year or two, Altamura said. “The national chains are hurting right now,” he said.>>

What is the mentality that thinks only national chains are good for downtown? I think we should be cultivating interesting local businesses. But the Altmuras are only a fraction of the problems. Red tape from city hall and the county, along with insane rents, insure a boring downtown. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy