30 days in jail for manslaughter?
By DAN ROSS
Register Online Editor
November 5th, 2009
October 8th, 2009
August 28th, 2009
August 25th, 2009
August 20th, 2009
Drive drunk, hit a petestrian and kill him, and what do you get?
If you a re a regular Joe, you get a dozen or more years behind bars. If you are a professional football player, you get 30 days in jail.
Witness Tuesday's decision to place former Sacramento area high school star Donte Stallworth, who pleaded guilty to DUI manslaughter in Florida, in lockup for a whole month.
There's justice for ya. The more you earn, the more high-priofile you are, the less you pay for your crime. Hard to be any less cynical after a decision like this one.
Oh wait, he gets two years of house arrest, a lifetime ban on driving and also eight years probation for using his Bentley to plow down 59-year-old Mario Reyes in the mid-morning hours of March 14 after a night of drinking while celebrating a $4.5 million bonus he gained the previous night.
Stallworth, who played high school football at Grant High in Sacramento, went on to play for the New Orleans Saints, Philadelphia Eagles, New England Patriots and most recently the Cleveland Browns
The Associated Press article about this incident states Stallworth got off with a month in jail die to a "lack of previous criminal record, cooperation with police and willingness to accept responsibility as factors in the plea deal."
Stallworth blew a .126 after the deadly crash. He was legally drunk.
Yes he did stop and admit hitting Reyes.
Yes he did say he was sorry.
No, 30 days is not right for killing another due to your own willful actions of drinking and driving.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
kingsavage wrote on Jun 16, 2009 6:15 PM:
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Jun 17, 2009 12:26 AM:
What is failed to be told in this story is that Mr. Stallworths actions didnt cause the accident. It wouldn't have matter if he was drunk or sober, Mr. Reyes tried to illegaly run across the freeway in the pitch black of the morning. Mr. Stallworth could have been completly sober and the outcome wouldve been the same. Mr. Reyes ran directly in front of a car traveling 50 mph, wether your drunk or sober doesn't change how quickly the car will stop, sure it will change your reaction time but in this case reaction time wouldnt have mattered, Thats why he got such a light punishment, because his actions didn't contribute to the death of Mr. Reyes. Mr. Reyes running infront of a car going 50 mph caused his own death. If Mr. Reyes was safely crossing in a crosswalk and Mr. Stallworth ran him over, then it would be a lot different circumstances, with a more severe punishment. So your last sentence of your story is not accurate, he didn't kill someone for his actions of drinking and driving, someone died because of their poor decision to try and run across a freeway in the middle of the night. "
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Jun 17, 2009 10:01 AM:
The crash happened at 7:15 a.m., not the middle of the night. What took place in the middle of the night was Stallworth's drinking.
Stallworth did stop right after striking and killing the pedestrian. He did take responsibility for his actions, and he through his attorneys negotiate a financial settlement with the family of the dead man.
All of those items were factors in a reduced sentence, along with where Mr. Reyes was in the roadway.
Despite those factors, 30 days in jail for causing the death of another is horrific. A direct cause was drinking and driving, an illegal action in the U.S.
A mandatory sentence in Florida for DUI manslaughter was bypassed.
Why?
Face it, if you or I stopped after hitting a man and paid the family for their grief, we'd still get more than 30 days in jail.
My opinion is wearing a face mask and shoulder pads for a living helped Done Stallworth fend off yet another defender. "
napaisburning wrote on Jun 17, 2009 10:14 AM:
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Jun 17, 2009 10:28 AM:
Read some of my previous columns and you'll see I took local legal beagles to task for what I felt were light sentences for locals convicted of child molestation.
And as you know from our conversations that I am a former sports editor and still a sports junkie, so the Stallworth resolution was a chance for me to jump on my sentencing-bandwagon again. "
napaisburning wrote on Jun 17, 2009 12:06 PM:
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Jun 17, 2009 12:22 PM:
To make sure of something here, Was Mr. Reyes Illegally trying to run across a freeway? And by illegally running across a freeway, did that put his life in direct mortal danger of being hit by a car traveling the speed cars travel on the freeway? Mr. Stallworth was dui, but its not like he jumped a curb and hit someone on the sidewalk, or ran a red light and plowed into someone. If he was so in the wrong then why would the family not press for a worst punishment and just accept his money, Why would the public not be in such an outrage? I don't know the laws of Flordia, I understand your claim that he got off because he wears shouder pads, But if he did get off, then it was because he has money. But I also believe because Mr. Reyes did something that put his life in direct danger was a factor of why Mr. Stallworth recieved a lighter sentence "
Alter ego wrote on Jun 17, 2009 2:45 PM:
TrickleDown wrote on Jun 18, 2009 12:19 AM:
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2008/02/07/news/local/doc47aabc95e4442607939612.txt
you will see that it was reported that the injured person was doing something both illegal and unsafe when she was hit by the drunk driver: double parking. Tiredofcomplaining strongly takes Stallworth's side here but struck a markedly different tone in the comment section here a year ago with the other incident even defending Stallworth with driving in the "pitch black" even though the sun rose at 7:30AM in Miami Beach according to almanac.com, defending his driving 50mph even though it was in a 40mph zone, and "running in front" of the car going 50mph even though the police report says something very different:
"Stallworth drove his Bentley around a stopped vehicle to beat a red light and struck 59-year old Mario Reyes, who was walking to a bus stop from work as an overnight crane operator, the newspaper said." http://www.upi.com/Sports_News/2009/06/16/Stallworth-pleads-guilty-to-manslaughter/UPI-64531245170350/
With this in mind, Tiredofcomplaining's last line "your last sentence of your story is not accurate, he didn't kill someone for his actions of drinking and driving, someone died because of their poor decision to try and run across a freeway in the middle of the night" is a sad way to view death in that a person jaywalking bears all of the fault for being hit by a person speeding around a stopped car to beat a red light with a blood alcohol level 50% above the legal limit. Sad indeed. "
JustMy$.02 wrote on Jun 18, 2009 5:39 PM:
His actions of taking responsibility, not fleeing, cooperating with police, addressing the family immediately, etc. etc. led to this apparent soft-scentance.
Honestly, isnt it refressing to see someone act like this? Own up to thier actions instead of blaming everything from thier parents to society? How many of us would have fled the scene, never called 911, done everything we could to avoid the consiquences, etc??
Its a crappy situation sure,and he will do some time, he will pay the family some compensation, and he will live with this the rest of his life.
Crying about special treatment because of his celebrity status is tabloid journalism at best. There is more to this story. "
Old Time Napkin wrote on Jun 29, 2009 7:29 PM: