Altamura interested in Copia
Another local developer joins fray, Copia prepares suit against bond insurer
By JENNIFER HUFFMAN
Register Business Writer
Could George Altamura be the next owner of Copia?
“I’m interested,” said Altamura, after attending Copia’s latest bankruptcy hearing in Santa Rosa on Friday.
Altamura and others were at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to hear the latest developments in the dissolution of the defunct Napa food, wine and arts center launched by vintner Robert Mondavi in 2001.
Apparently, Altamura has been eyeing Copia for some time. Several months ago, the Napa businessman made an initial offer for the property. Although he declined to name his price, “We’re prepared to buy it if they’re prepared to sell it to us,” Altamura said.
The local developer and owner of several downtown Napa properties wouldn’t elaborate on his plans for Copia if he were to acquire it, only that it would involve “something to benefit us and the community.”
Nor is he alone. A local group led by developers John Salmon and Harry Price is also interested in the property, and the Culinary Institute of America has asked about using at least part of the 12-acre site on the banks of the Napa River.
“It’s a great piece of property,” Altamura said. “It’s got a lot of potential. The building and property are first class,” he said.
Talking and suing
Friday’s court session was called to see if representatives of Copia and bond insurer ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation could make any progress in settling their differences over the future of the site. But a closed-door conference early in the day bore little fruit, and representatives of Copia are preparing a separate lawsuit over a 2007 bond transaction involving ACA if negotiations falter.
In court, Copia attorney Jean Barnier asked for a two-week extension in the bankruptcy case. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Alan Jaroslovsky agreed to her request.
If the judge gives his OK to Copia’s proposed plan of liquidation, Copia could be for sale for a minimum of $25 million, all cash.
But ACA objected to Copia’s liquidation plan.
In court documents filed on Thursday, ACA stated that Copia has failed “to discuss or disclose how it will be able to sell the property which is no longer the debtor’s to sell in the first place.” The proposal to sell the property for a minimum of $25 million is “a confusing, convoluted and improper scheme.”
ACA attorney Lou Cisz said the bond insurer has been in communication with the local group the Coalition to Preserve Copia and the CIA about possible reuse plans.
“I think we’ve made some progress” in coming to an agreement that would be best for the community, Cisz said.
Copia representative Joe Fischer said, “We sent a settlement offer to ACA earlier this week. We have not been able to discuss the specifics of our proposal with ACA and are hopeful we can advance a conversation in the coming week that would be the most beneficial for all concerned.”
“We remain committed to doing something that is positive for the community as soon as possible,” Fischer said.
Separately, a claims trader who bought into the Copia bankruptcy case in the hopes of challenging the 2007 Copia bond transferhas abandoned efforts to claim the transfer was fraudulent.
According to bankruptcy court documents, Copia Claims LLC in San Francisco withdrew its offer to pay $1.35 million to litigate the case. Bill McGrane of Copia Claims LLC could not be reached for comment.
Meanwhile, Copia appears ready to take on the fraudulent bond transfer argument previously made by Copia Claims. Copia attorneys have drawn up documents to sue Bank of New York Mellon, ACA and the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank of Sacramento, asking for the return of $71 million and alleging the original Copia bonds were not paid off correctly from one group of bondholders to another. Copia officials say they hope negotiations will be successful and that they aren't compelled to proceed with th suit
Copia has also withdrawn a motion to sell its inventory of 5,000 bottles of wine to pay for utilities and other bills incurred by the bankrupt center.
“The motion was withdrawn because ACA resumed making payments to preserve the Copia property,” including power, water and insurance, Fischer said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
krusty wrote on May 30, 2009 12:20 AM:
glenroy wrote on May 30, 2009 6:46 AM:
misfit wrote on May 30, 2009 7:07 AM:
Kathy Concened wrote on May 30, 2009 7:14 AM:
duckfan wrote on May 30, 2009 8:18 AM:
Jmo wrote on May 30, 2009 8:46 AM:
Just love the newly renovated Downtown theater....how long has it been vacant and we've waiting????????????? "
shareathought wrote on May 30, 2009 8:46 AM:
winewoman wrote on May 30, 2009 8:47 AM:
shareathought wrote on May 30, 2009 8:48 AM:
napaknowitall wrote on May 30, 2009 9:09 AM:
bennyd wrote on May 30, 2009 9:24 AM:
naplus wrote on May 30, 2009 9:40 AM:
What kind of credential does he bring to the community to bring life to Downtown Napa ? where is the UPTOWN Theater ?
now we have posters on empty building to tell us to come and shop downtown ! Let's be REAL bring somebody with a vision .. enough of this waste !. "
Paddy wrote on May 30, 2009 9:50 AM:
AThought wrote on May 30, 2009 10:43 AM:
hawkeye wrote on May 30, 2009 11:05 AM:
If he really intends to do something USEFUL with the Copia building, we will believe it when we see it, but that is a huge stretch considering his exemplary track record. "
MyWrites wrote on May 30, 2009 11:13 AM:
"a man of vision and community heart"? Most of this community see a man incapable of finishing out his "projects" and one who constantly tries to run yet another scheme past the city and county planners.
The blight of downtown Napa is mostly the responsibility of Mr. Altamura. It's outside money and investors who are remaking this town into a newer and more vibrant community. Mr. Altamura may think vacant, shabby, boarded up relics of a bygone era are attractive, but nature abhors a vacuum.
I doubt that Mr. Altamura has the vision to turn Copia into anything that could benefit our community. The vitality of downtown commerce and community should not be left to one who considers it his personal Monopoly board game. "
Dayjob wrote on May 30, 2009 12:09 PM:
" OH GREAT!!!
Just love the newly renovated Downtown theater....how long has it been vacant and we've waiting????????????? "
Jmo: Bad news. He's not renovating the theater for you. It's more like a guy restoring a car. Fix it up, drive it around the block then park it in the garage. It's not a for-profit venture to reopen a movie house. No soup for you. "
cheezcakemaker wrote on May 30, 2009 2:26 PM:
Please spare us. Call DeSimoni if you want someone to get it done downtown. "
Joe Fischer wrote on May 30, 2009 2:42 PM:
napanose wrote on May 30, 2009 2:57 PM:
WakeUpPeople wrote on May 30, 2009 3:40 PM:
naplus wrote on May 30, 2009 5:46 PM:
suze wrote on May 30, 2009 6:11 PM:
As for Mr Altamura adding this property to his stable of winners - just pray it will not happen, for everybody's sake. "
napacabdriver wrote on May 30, 2009 6:24 PM:
thoughtank wrote on May 30, 2009 7:11 PM:
Why not use the community gardens as a way to address hunger and improve the eating habits in the community? People who want fresh produce could donate their gardening time.
Why not have a community dock nearby where people could store/launch non-motorized watercraft? This would encourage kayakers and canoeists to use the river and make the Napa river come alive.
Why not use the auditorium at Copia to host community performances? It's a wonderful performance space.
Why not use some of the space at Copia to provide indoor/outdoor skateboarding that's safe and well-designed?
Why not use the art gallery rooms for community classes?
Copia never became part of Napa because it offered so little for the locals.
I hope the bankruptcy judge requires a development clause in the sale of the property that requires the buyer to develop a use for it within a year. Otherwise, it will continue to sit empty and become an eyesore. "
naplus wrote on May 30, 2009 8:05 PM:
The community need to be in charge of these gardens , they also can be used for community service . rehabilitation and so for .
Napa need to be in charge of Copia as a major anchor for locals ,,, "
gemini wrote on May 30, 2009 11:16 PM:
napa1957 wrote on May 30, 2009 11:38 PM:
jmo wrote on May 30, 2009 11:58 PM:
“something to benefit us and the community.”
Can you believe this statement by the man who has not yet opened the Downtown Theater and several other worse/dilapidated properties?
Please let’s not be so foolish to assume George meant more than anything beyond "something to benefit us". This man needs to let us know what social/community commitment he has made to Napa beyond writing a check. Sure a charitable donation here and there gets ink and does help. But the truth” lies” in he what he has done with his properties to enhance Napa...NOTHING.
Sure you can go by the Downtown Theater and see one or two people in side year after year....but come on....how many years has it been??????
George, may I call you George, you need to come forward an address your neighbors’ about your prior actions or should I say lack of action. We don't want you or your money in this case. Your handling of your local properties is well documented... Please do us all a favor George and pass on this one.
Will you respond to all our comments?
I didn't think so. Go ahead and hide behind your attorney's/pr, after all we’re are just the long term local nobodies...right? "
AltaFan wrote on May 31, 2009 2:40 AM:
And while I am at it, you would rather Copia sit on the market unused than have someone purchase it because you believe (because somehow you all seem to know Mr. Altamuras motives better than he. It amazes me. Such Insight!) that it will be purchased and then let me guess:
A. Boarded up
B. Left to 'disintegrate'
C. Just sit
Sitting of course is perfectly fine as long as it doesnt do so in the hands of an Altamura, which begs the question:
What is the real issue?!
If i had to assume (which clearly you all LOVE to do) I would say its a borderline personal vendetta.
Come off it. Get outside, its officially summer. Try downtown... "
reason-ator wrote on May 31, 2009 11:14 AM:
Everybody else, I share your optimism for Altamura's other properties.
OK, actually, I would share you frustration. But I avoid downtown, because it's a mess and there's nothing there I need to visit. Vacant buildings just contribute to this. But the man has the right to spend and/or waste his money in any way he sees fit.
Although we seem to have an administration who is leaning towards changing that. "
hawkeye wrote on May 31, 2009 4:13 PM:
nosocialism wrote on May 31, 2009 7:48 PM:
Any real significant busines person understands that it is very difficult to do business here in the the state of California. We are the highest taxed state and yet so many of you believe that we are not taxed enough!!
George is a tough; but, smart guy!! He earned his money and has a right to do with it as he pleases (as long as it is legal).
For you that say that eminent domain should be take place and/or he should be taxed on property (that is not generating sales tax) as if it was generating sales..can you say s-o-c-i-a-l-i-s-m!!!
C'mon!! It is easy to be 'Monday morning quarterbacks'. He does not owe you an explanation. Maybe, you haters might actualy question your own elected officials in the same manner as you are blasting Mr. Altamura!
You want to vent; then go to the city and county board meetings. "
Newview wrote on May 31, 2009 8:26 PM:
snapynapan wrote on May 31, 2009 8:34 PM:
winewoman wrote on May 31, 2009 9:32 PM:
hawkeye wrote on May 31, 2009 9:48 PM:
As far as being a smart person in business, I've had very smart employers that simply made bad business decisions habitually and other individuals I knew who were very smart, but were very bad people persons. So to be a successful business person, it requires more than just being "tough" and "smart". You have to be disciplined to make "smart" decisions and work well with others. "
msdemo wrote on Jun 1, 2009 3:19 AM:
\i realize the money is not available but in a perfect world this would be my ideal. "
shareathought wrote on Jun 1, 2009 5:51 AM:
These kinds of comments...
" I think we the people are entitled to an explanation."
" Maybe we wouldn't be so angry or hold him in a certain light if we knew what the heck is going on. "
...are not conducive to dialogue and I can not understand how the author concludes that "we" are entitled to anything.
"Why is he and all his followers keeping it all hush hush?"
I am not sure who "all the followers" are or if this is just written in anger.
There have been rumors that Mr A charges too much rent or disrupts lives when he purchases properties but I suspect that would be the case when any property changes hands.
He's been known to build and restore properties in an excellent manner, it may be that he takes on too much at once but he is a part of this community on many levels. "
Shorty94558 wrote on Jun 1, 2009 9:03 AM:
If he opens it now, how will he make any money? With the homeless hanging out at Nations and wandering aimlessly through that area, I wouldn't want to take my fmaily to that theater.
Maybe by getting a local with a strong sense of community and Napa values to buy Copia, even if it's not Altamura, we can get Napa back on track to attracting more tourists bringing revenue to the downtown area... instead of letting this bneautiful city corrode to the gang element, homeless persons and violence that has been our papers it seems every day I read online.
Please people, have some hope for Napa. I commend Altamura for standing up and being ready to help us.
But hey, that's just my lil' opinion. "
andeswines wrote on Jun 1, 2009 9:11 AM:
Congratulations if Copia comes back!
In Chile this type of institutions and Centers get support by the government due to the high benefit the community get from it.
Max Morales
http://www.andeswines.com
andes@andeswines.com
Chile "
epicuria wrote on Jun 1, 2009 9:23 AM:
sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 1, 2009 10:43 AM:
Hawkeye wrote on Jun 1, 2009 11:38 AM:
As far as what a previous commenter said, I too have known people who have done business with him. Enough said. "
wrongsideofthetrax wrote on Jun 1, 2009 2:14 PM:
sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 1, 2009 2:22 PM:
hawkeye wrote on Jun 1, 2009 4:12 PM:
shareathought wrote on Jun 1, 2009 6:44 PM:
(isn't it true that some 90% of the county’s land or properties on the valley floor/along the river are owned by people that don’t live here?).
[MYWrites: “Its outside money and investors who are remaking this town into a newer and more vibrant community.” How disheartening.]
Isn’t Mr Altamura a “self-made-man”?
Hasn't he been part of this community for decades?
I might not agree with all he’s wanted (like the hotel at Trancas/Silverado Trail), I've wondered about his disagreements with Yountville's floodwall, and I understand the public has no patience for his detailed restoration of the Uptown Theater but I commend him for his personal and financial support of our homeless, Hispanics and Molly's Angels.
It may be he only wants the power of ownership yet, have others posting here, donated as much of their “time” to this community as, he has?
Few have defended him nor made viable suggestions. One poster commends him for stepping-up, another suggests that he might be the catalyst for others to come up with a plan. Most write what he or others should be doing to make this a better community, not in how they are involved making it better.
Most who are enraged with Mr Altamura mention property but seem focused on bits of gossip, innuendo or hearsay.
This might make a forum for discussion about COPIA, not a place that we flay a person who is a part of our community. "
hawkeye wrote on Jun 1, 2009 10:40 PM:
shareathought wrote on Jun 2, 2009 9:22 PM:
Yes (that is how I know MrAltamura does too). Many who have become what, is considered successful, don't.
It seems that with most headlines that catches the poster's attention (at the NVR), responses are mostly negative. Then, rather then stimulating beneficial or constructive thought, it provokes angrier comments.
In this case, most who have complained about the man, say they know someone who has been done wrong (not that they personally have), or they write about his properties as if they are outraged because if they owned them, so much more would be getting done. (!?)
There've been other articles over the years mentioning MrAltamura and his acquisition of properties; below are portions of earlier articles (interestingly, it seems he owns properties with others and that the earthquake retrofit may be cost prohibitive), there were others.
From 2002
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2002/08/29/news/export41580.txt
"The sale of Napa Town Center to George Altamura and The Doctors' Company…
Altamura now owns more than a quarter of downtown's retail space."
From 2004
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2004/02/24/news/export10930.txt
"Sam Gordon Jr. said he sold to Altamura because "I didn't want to leave my kids a lot of seismic retrofit debt." Retrofitting ends up costing an owner twice as much as he originally intended to spend, he said."
"Altogether, Altamura owns five unreinforced properties -- all bought from the Sam Gordon family …he bought the Gordon properties in 2000..." "
sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 3, 2009 8:32 AM:
Altamura seems to choose option 3. Why? What is the benefit of this?
Let’s not forget, the man can’t live forever. What kind of a mess is he leaving his family to deal with? Or are they of the same mindset? "
Froggie1559 wrote on Jun 4, 2009 3:23 PM:
cutiepie wrote on Jun 9, 2009 5:30 PM:
totally mario wrote on Aug 22, 2009 8:36 PM: