NVR Logo
Altamura interested in Copia
Another local developer joins fray, Copia prepares suit against bond insurer
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Save and Share Share
Could George Altamura be the next owner of Copia?

“I’m interested,” said Altamura, after attending Copia’s latest bankruptcy hearing in Santa Rosa on Friday.  
Altamura and others were at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to hear the latest developments in the dissolution of the defunct Napa food, wine and arts center launched by vintner Robert Mondavi in 2001.

Apparently, Altamura has been eyeing Copia for some time. Several months ago, the Napa businessman made an initial offer for the property. Although he declined to name his price, “We’re prepared to buy it if they’re prepared to sell it to us,” Altamura said.
The local developer and owner of several downtown Napa properties wouldn’t elaborate on his plans for Copia if he were to acquire it, only that it would involve “something to benefit us and the community.”

Nor is he alone. A local group led by developers John Salmon and Harry Price is also interested in the property, and the Culinary Institute of America has asked about using at least part of the 12-acre site on the banks of the Napa River.
“It’s a great piece of property,” Altamura said. “It’s got a lot of potential. The building and property are first class,” he said.

Talking and suing

Friday’s court session was called to see if representatives of Copia and bond insurer ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation could make any progress in settling their differences over the future of the site. But a closed-door conference early in the day bore little fruit, and representatives of Copia are preparing a separate lawsuit over a 2007 bond transaction involving ACA if negotiations falter.

In court, Copia attorney Jean Barnier asked for a two-week extension in the bankruptcy case. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Alan Jaroslovsky agreed to her request.

If the judge gives his OK to Copia’s proposed plan of liquidation, Copia could be for sale for a minimum of $25 million, all cash. 

But ACA objected to Copia’s liquidation plan.

In court documents filed on Thursday, ACA stated that Copia has failed “to discuss or disclose how it will be able to sell the property which is no longer the debtor’s to sell in the first place.” The proposal to sell the property for a minimum of $25 million is “a confusing, convoluted and improper scheme.”

ACA attorney Lou Cisz said the bond insurer has been in communication with the local group the Coalition to Preserve Copia and the CIA about possible reuse plans.

“I think we’ve made some progress” in coming to an agreement that would be best for the community, Cisz said.

Copia representative Joe Fischer said, “We sent a settlement offer to ACA earlier this week. We have not been able to discuss the specifics of our proposal with ACA and are hopeful we can advance a conversation in the coming week that would be the most beneficial for all concerned.”

“We remain committed to doing something that is positive for the community as soon as possible,” Fischer said.

Separately, a claims trader who bought into the Copia bankruptcy case in the hopes of challenging the 2007 Copia bond transferhas abandoned efforts to claim the transfer was fraudulent.

According to bankruptcy court documents, Copia Claims LLC in San Francisco withdrew its offer to pay $1.35 million to litigate the case. Bill McGrane of Copia Claims LLC could not be reached for comment.

Meanwhile, Copia appears ready to take on the fraudulent bond transfer argument previously made by Copia Claims. Copia attorneys have drawn up documents to sue Bank of New York Mellon, ACA and the Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank of Sacramento, asking for the return of $71 million and alleging the original Copia bonds were not paid off correctly from one group of bondholders to another. Copia officials say they hope negotiations will be successful and that they aren't compelled to proceed with th suit

Copia has also withdrawn a motion to sell its inventory of 5,000 bottles of wine to pay for utilities and other bills incurred by the bankrupt center.

“The motion was withdrawn because ACA resumed making payments to preserve the Copia property,” including power, water and insurance, Fischer said.
54 comment(s)

krusty wrote on May 30, 2009 12:20 AM:

" Please. If Altamura buys the place, the only way it will benefit the community is by giving the kids one more vacant building to write graffiti on. "

glenroy wrote on May 30, 2009 6:46 AM:

" Getting financing on that building will be extremely difficult even for the Altamura…..extremely difficult. "

misfit wrote on May 30, 2009 7:07 AM:

" Oh nooooo! "

Kathy Concened wrote on May 30, 2009 7:14 AM:

" krusty.....You are soooooo right. Altamura is a good person but he DOES let buildings sit empty. "

duckfan wrote on May 30, 2009 8:18 AM:

" Agreed...doesn't he own 3 or 4 eyesores already? Maybe he can use that 25 Million to clean up his dumps...He is like the neighbor that can't finish their projects! "

Jmo wrote on May 30, 2009 8:46 AM:

" OH GREAT!!!

Just love the newly renovated Downtown theater....how long has it been vacant and we've waiting????????????? "

shareathought wrote on May 30, 2009 8:46 AM:

" Altamura is also a man of vision and community heart. It could be that he knows we need a a civic center here in Napa and is checking into that possibility. "

winewoman wrote on May 30, 2009 8:47 AM:

" Noooooo. The building will remain boarded up and vacant for years. Then we'll hear some hype that the building is being restored, which will be false, and the building will remain boarded and empty for another ten years. Pleeeeeaasse, no. "

shareathought wrote on May 30, 2009 8:48 AM:

" Can the writer, an editor or a public person explain what ACA is and the difference between Copia and Copia Claims LLC. "

napaknowitall wrote on May 30, 2009 9:09 AM:

" Great another downtown location to add to his vacant graveyard pile. "

bennyd wrote on May 30, 2009 9:24 AM:

" Copia needs to be sold to someone willing to invest and be pro-active for Napa's future. The Uptown has been empty for too long and void of any economic life. "

naplus wrote on May 30, 2009 9:40 AM:

" you must be kidding ! pass a law to force him to renovated his building first !
What kind of credential does he bring to the community to bring life to Downtown Napa ? where is the UPTOWN Theater ?
now we have posters on empty building to tell us to come and shop downtown ! Let's be REAL bring somebody with a vision .. enough of this waste !. "

Paddy wrote on May 30, 2009 9:50 AM:

" C'mon George! Complete your other projects first and retrofit your buildings currently not up to seismic code. Duckfan is right. You're like a bad neighbor who never completes a project. "

AThought wrote on May 30, 2009 10:43 AM:

" It could be turned into a movie theater, or each of the sections could be used for restaurant use, like at the Oxbow, or it can be used as a social center with a restaurant, a theater, performances, live events, etc. Like before but more targeted for the younger crowds. :) "

hawkeye wrote on May 30, 2009 11:05 AM:

" That's the problem Shareathought. He's only a man of vision, but doesn't seem to follow through with anything. I agree that he needs to clean up his vacant dumps and USE THEM or sell them to someone who will use them properly before he buys another "Uptown theatre" with his "vision". His empty buildings are part of downtown's revitalization problems. Now we're going to acquire another one. Yipee!

If he really intends to do something USEFUL with the Copia building, we will believe it when we see it, but that is a huge stretch considering his exemplary track record. "

MyWrites wrote on May 30, 2009 11:13 AM:

" Hmmm...

"a man of vision and community heart"? Most of this community see a man incapable of finishing out his "projects" and one who constantly tries to run yet another scheme past the city and county planners.

The blight of downtown Napa is mostly the responsibility of Mr. Altamura. It's outside money and investors who are remaking this town into a newer and more vibrant community. Mr. Altamura may think vacant, shabby, boarded up relics of a bygone era are attractive, but nature abhors a vacuum.

I doubt that Mr. Altamura has the vision to turn Copia into anything that could benefit our community. The vitality of downtown commerce and community should not be left to one who considers it his personal Monopoly board game. "

Dayjob wrote on May 30, 2009 12:09 PM:

" Jmo wrote on May 30, 2009 8:46 AM:
" OH GREAT!!!
Just love the newly renovated Downtown theater....how long has it been vacant and we've waiting????????????? "

Jmo: Bad news. He's not renovating the theater for you. It's more like a guy restoring a car. Fix it up, drive it around the block then park it in the garage. It's not a for-profit venture to reopen a movie house. No soup for you. "

cheezcakemaker wrote on May 30, 2009 2:26 PM:

" “something to benefit us and the community.”

Please spare us. Call DeSimoni if you want someone to get it done downtown. "

Joe Fischer wrote on May 30, 2009 2:42 PM:

" Factual Correction -- The title line states that Copia has sued ACA. That is incorrect. Copia has included a draft complaint in its current Plan of Liquidation on File with the Court, and no suit would proceed unless approved. We are hopeful that we can advance talks toward agreement with ACA on a joint Plan of Liquidation (involving the sale of the property and disbursements to creditors) that would be beneficial to all and fulfill our duties in bankruptcy instead of proceeding down a litigation path. "

napanose wrote on May 30, 2009 2:57 PM:

" Super, the town can use another Altamura contribution to downtown blight. . .I suggest a "vacancy" tax equal to a resonable amount of the sales tax a commercial property would produce if said property is not actively promoted for lease/rent. Obviously, one could plead one's case for extenuating circumstances but, in the case of Altamura, greed would not be acceptable. "

WakeUpPeople wrote on May 30, 2009 3:40 PM:

" Okay, Napa it is time to wake up to this. I have been in Napa for 15 years and have been patient in waiting for improvements to come to downtown Napa. Many improvements have come, but I would like someone to point to one that has come from Mr. Altamura, or what his "vision" is. Rather than endorsing his purchase of this very important Napa asset, I would like to float the idea of seizing Mr. Altamura's other downtown assets, through eminent domain. He has been one of the greatest obstacles to downtown Napa's ability to rejuvenate, and most of his buildings are vacant and disintegrating, a cause of blight in the heart of our City. Ten years ago, I lived walking distance from the Uptown Theatre, and I remember how excited I was at the prospect of that special landmark being renovated and reopened. Well, there it is, vacant, unused, a symbol of Mr. Altamura's downtown vision. We cannot afford to let this main gain control of any more downtown real estate. "

naplus wrote on May 30, 2009 5:46 PM:

" Hey Georges , why don't you start by transforming the "small " chained Parking Area in front of Pizza Azzuro ,to a Green area with benches and fountain for example .. That will be a start But No Instead let's put some chains in case somebody decided to park here .. Yes You the Man with a vision . start somewhere design a small green place just for the pleasure of our eyes ! you can do it ... you have the will power !) "

suze wrote on May 30, 2009 6:11 PM:

" This just looks like more slick money people playing their slick money games. Toward the end, Copia continued to order goods and services from local small businesses knowing full well they would never get paid. I won't even start on how they treated their employees. Bankrupcy proceedings do not seem to take care of these victims of deluded vision and poor management.
As for Mr Altamura adding this property to his stable of winners - just pray it will not happen, for everybody's sake. "

napacabdriver wrote on May 30, 2009 6:24 PM:

" Mr. Altamura needs to finish a project before he starts another one. "

thoughtank wrote on May 30, 2009 7:11 PM:

" It really would be nice to have Copia become a "community" gathering place, not just a fancy tax write-off for rich people and another temple of excess for the wine worshiping crowd.

Why not use the community gardens as a way to address hunger and improve the eating habits in the community? People who want fresh produce could donate their gardening time.

Why not have a community dock nearby where people could store/launch non-motorized watercraft? This would encourage kayakers and canoeists to use the river and make the Napa river come alive.

Why not use the auditorium at Copia to host community performances? It's a wonderful performance space.

Why not use some of the space at Copia to provide indoor/outdoor skateboarding that's safe and well-designed?

Why not use the art gallery rooms for community classes?

Copia never became part of Napa because it offered so little for the locals.

I hope the bankruptcy judge requires a development clause in the sale of the property that requires the buyer to develop a use for it within a year. Otherwise, it will continue to sit empty and become an eyesore. "

naplus wrote on May 30, 2009 8:05 PM:

" thoughtank great ideas and propositions
The community need to be in charge of these gardens , they also can be used for community service . rehabilitation and so for .
Napa need to be in charge of Copia as a major anchor for locals ,,, "

gemini wrote on May 30, 2009 11:16 PM:

" i hope mr. altamura buys copia-just for all you haters !! "

napa1957 wrote on May 30, 2009 11:38 PM:

" Thank you thoughtank for the great options for use of Copia. I too hope for the best the community use for this building. I will admit to being a bit sketpic of Mr. A's ability to pull this off given the long term vacancy of "Merrills" and the extended remodel of the Uptown. I grew up in this town going to the Uptown for 25 cents and getting my dimestore purchases at Merrlls as a young wife working downtown. I get so sad seeing them empty. "

jmo wrote on May 30, 2009 11:58 PM:

" WOW! With the help of the NVR, this is my 3rd attempt, I think I may have it...enjoy......After all we should never take ourselves that seriously...especially George.

“something to benefit us and the community.”

Can you believe this statement by the man who has not yet opened the Downtown Theater and several other worse/dilapidated properties?

Please let’s not be so foolish to assume George meant more than anything beyond "something to benefit us". This man needs to let us know what social/community commitment he has made to Napa beyond writing a check. Sure a charitable donation here and there gets ink and does help. But the truth” lies” in he what he has done with his properties to enhance Napa...NOTHING.
Sure you can go by the Downtown Theater and see one or two people in side year after year....but come on....how many years has it been??????

George, may I call you George, you need to come forward an address your neighbors’ about your prior actions or should I say lack of action. We don't want you or your money in this case. Your handling of your local properties is well documented... Please do us all a favor George and pass on this one.

Will you respond to all our comments?
I didn't think so. Go ahead and hide behind your attorney's/pr, after all we’re are just the long term local nobodies...right? "

AltaFan wrote on May 31, 2009 2:40 AM:

" It must be nice to sit behind a computer and point a finger about issues you will never even begin to know about. You accuse Mr. Altamura of starting projects and never finishing, when I am absolutely certain you couldnt understand all the steps needed to complete a huge renovation on such a large cornerstone of the historic downtown center, such as the Uptown. Whats really the issue? You are mad because downtown is empty, yet you get down on the person trying to build it back up because its taking too long? I urge you to attempt to do a better job, but that of course would cut into all the time you need to sit at your computer berate people with your insular comments.

And while I am at it, you would rather Copia sit on the market unused than have someone purchase it because you believe (because somehow you all seem to know Mr. Altamuras motives better than he. It amazes me. Such Insight!) that it will be purchased and then let me guess:

A. Boarded up
B. Left to 'disintegrate'
C. Just sit

Sitting of course is perfectly fine as long as it doesnt do so in the hands of an Altamura, which begs the question:

What is the real issue?!

If i had to assume (which clearly you all LOVE to do) I would say its a borderline personal vendetta.

Come off it. Get outside, its officially summer. Try downtown... "

reason-ator wrote on May 31, 2009 11:14 AM:

" thoughtank, this is the bash-all-tamura thread, and all you did was bring constructive uses for Copia. Please stay on topic.

Everybody else, I share your optimism for Altamura's other properties.

OK, actually, I would share you frustration. But I avoid downtown, because it's a mess and there's nothing there I need to visit. Vacant buildings just contribute to this. But the man has the right to spend and/or waste his money in any way he sees fit.

Although we seem to have an administration who is leaning towards changing that. "

hawkeye wrote on May 31, 2009 4:13 PM:

" Altafan, if you don't want people to be angry, then they need to understand what is going on. I think we the people are entitled to an explanation. It's our town too! So answer this, why are so many of his properties sitting vacant? Could it be his rents are unreasonable? You tell us we have no idea what goes into renovations. Well THEN TELL US!! Why is he and all his followers keeping it all hush hush? You can't expect people to not be angry if they're kept in the dark and all they see are empty buildings year after year. Enlighten us! Tell us! Maybe we wouldn't be so angry or hold him in a certain light if we knew what the heck is going on. What's the other side of the story? "

nosocialism wrote on May 31, 2009 7:48 PM:

" Geez, most of you sound like a bunch of jealous, hateful individuals. Maybe, you should look at the city council and board of supervisors. Those elected groups make it very difficult to get anything done.

Any real significant busines person understands that it is very difficult to do business here in the the state of California. We are the highest taxed state and yet so many of you believe that we are not taxed enough!!

George is a tough; but, smart guy!! He earned his money and has a right to do with it as he pleases (as long as it is legal).

For you that say that eminent domain should be take place and/or he should be taxed on property (that is not generating sales tax) as if it was generating sales..can you say s-o-c-i-a-l-i-s-m!!!

C'mon!! It is easy to be 'Monday morning quarterbacks'. He does not owe you an explanation. Maybe, you haters might actualy question your own elected officials in the same manner as you are blasting Mr. Altamura!

You want to vent; then go to the city and county board meetings. "

Newview wrote on May 31, 2009 8:26 PM:

" We should have Mr. A head up a community committee for rent control. "

snapynapan wrote on May 31, 2009 8:34 PM:

" All mr. A cares about is his money, he's is putting people on the street , to rent from him, it is required to have a credit score of over 700 or more and he views the person bank account to see what that person makes-- it anit right!!!! "

winewoman wrote on May 31, 2009 9:32 PM:

" Hey altafan - other owners and developers are getting things done, despite all of the "steps needed to complete a huge renovation on such a large cornerstone of the historic downtown center". Oh, and we don't need to do a better job - Mr. A does. It's his property. Ever done business with Mr. A? I have friends who have - Mr. A deserves all of the criticism he's getting - plus some. "

hawkeye wrote on May 31, 2009 9:48 PM:

" If your argument that it's tough to do business in California, and I know that it is, then why are other property owners here getting things done in a more timely manner? And that includes earthquake retrofitting. Still no Altamura supporter has answered the question we are entitled an answer to; what is taking so long? If what people are saying is true that his rents are unreasonable, then why are they so high? You're right, it's his business if he wants to make Napa his own monopoly board. But if he's making claims about trying to improve Napa, he needs to tell us what the hold up is, or else people are gonna wonder about his motives, or lack of. If our city officials are the problem then why doesn't he just say so?

As far as being a smart person in business, I've had very smart employers that simply made bad business decisions habitually and other individuals I knew who were very smart, but were very bad people persons. So to be a successful business person, it requires more than just being "tough" and "smart". You have to be disciplined to make "smart" decisions and work well with others. "

msdemo wrote on Jun 1, 2009 3:19 AM:

" I think there is power in owning, not necessarily using properties. \i would like either the city or country acquire this property for community uses to serve the needs of people of the valley and possibly tourtists

\i realize the money is not available but in a perfect world this would be my ideal. "

shareathought wrote on Jun 1, 2009 5:51 AM:

" Excellent comments thoughtank!

These kinds of comments...
" I think we the people are entitled to an explanation."

" Maybe we wouldn't be so angry or hold him in a certain light if we knew what the heck is going on. "
...are not conducive to dialogue and I can not understand how the author concludes that "we" are entitled to anything.

"Why is he and all his followers keeping it all hush hush?"
I am not sure who "all the followers" are or if this is just written in anger.

There have been rumors that Mr A charges too much rent or disrupts lives when he purchases properties but I suspect that would be the case when any property changes hands.

He's been known to build and restore properties in an excellent manner, it may be that he takes on too much at once but he is a part of this community on many levels. "

Shorty94558 wrote on Jun 1, 2009 9:03 AM:

" I personally think it's smart for Mr. Altamura to not open the UpTown Theater yet. God knows, with this economy, he's smart to wait until the Riverfront opens and we get more tourists coming to Napa.
If he opens it now, how will he make any money? With the homeless hanging out at Nations and wandering aimlessly through that area, I wouldn't want to take my fmaily to that theater.
Maybe by getting a local with a strong sense of community and Napa values to buy Copia, even if it's not Altamura, we can get Napa back on track to attracting more tourists bringing revenue to the downtown area... instead of letting this bneautiful city corrode to the gang element, homeless persons and violence that has been our papers it seems every day I read online.
Please people, have some hope for Napa. I commend Altamura for standing up and being ready to help us.
But hey, that's just my lil' opinion. "

andeswines wrote on Jun 1, 2009 9:11 AM:

" I think with this economic crisis a lot of US businesses will learn to be profitable rather than big and not be able to pay the cost of management and operations.

Congratulations if Copia comes back!

In Chile this type of institutions and Centers get support by the government due to the high benefit the community get from it.

Max Morales
http://www.andeswines.com
andes@andeswines.com
Chile "

epicuria wrote on Jun 1, 2009 9:23 AM:

" The Altamura presence may galvanize the Coalition to Preserve Copia to come up with a viable competitive plan to keep ACA from persuading the Court to allow them to sell to Mr. A. It seem preposterous that someone as reviled as this man seems to be from the comments in this thread can manage to "defeat" the power and money elite of this valley. "

sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 1, 2009 10:43 AM:

" Anything but Altamura, please, anything. "

Hawkeye wrote on Jun 1, 2009 11:38 AM:

" shareathought wrote: "I am not sure who "all the followers" are or if this is just written in anger." Take a look at the comments of people defending Mr. A and there's your answer. You also admit that he might take on too much at once. So is it really a smart business decision then to buy a huge building when his others are far from finished? If the economy is to blame for his properties sitting vacant, then it's a SUPER dumb idea for him to acquire COPIA, but that's his business. Our community largely opposes his intentions. It's our right to be angry and care about what happens to our town.

As far as what a previous commenter said, I too have known people who have done business with him. Enough said. "

wrongsideofthetrax wrote on Jun 1, 2009 2:14 PM:

" G.A. can do what he pleases... he has money and power. The beautiful, historic Gordon Bldg. downtown is just one of his properties, allowed to fester and slip into decline. The Merrill's bldg is another... I have long thought that he lets the properties decline until the city/planning/zoning/council acquiesce to his plans, which probably include high-rise hotel and/or live/work spaces in the "low million$"... just how much is ENOUGH, George? and I would expect, after these comments, that the PR machine will start to roll and there will be articles re: GA's philanthropy and what a great guy he is. No words about the folks he has evicted and/or put out of business. This has been going on for many, many years and you people are only JUST noticing? "

sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 1, 2009 2:22 PM:

" For anyone who would like to tell me all the great ways Altamura has improved Napa and its surrounding areas, I’m listening . . . and I would like specifics, not just “he’s done great things.” "

hawkeye wrote on Jun 1, 2009 4:12 PM:

" Right on, spklsunshine! I was just about to pose that exact same question. Those G.A. defenders have yet to answer that question and why the properties are being left to rot. So far it's only been a bunch of beating around the bush, no specifics, from the commenters defending G.A. "

shareathought wrote on Jun 1, 2009 6:44 PM:

" I’d think it’d be best for those who live in and are a part this community to be invested in it and that, with huge amounts of Valley properties owned by people outside our county, state or country, the public would have concerns
(isn't it true that some 90% of the county’s land or properties on the valley floor/along the river are owned by people that don’t live here?).

[MYWrites: “Its outside money and investors who are remaking this town into a newer and more vibrant community.” How disheartening.]

Isn’t Mr Altamura a “self-made-man”?
Hasn't he been part of this community for decades?
I might not agree with all he’s wanted (like the hotel at Trancas/Silverado Trail), I've wondered about his disagreements with Yountville's floodwall, and I understand the public has no patience for his detailed restoration of the Uptown Theater but I commend him for his personal and financial support of our homeless, Hispanics and Molly's Angels.

It may be he only wants the power of ownership yet, have others posting here, donated as much of their “time” to this community as, he has?

Few have defended him nor made viable suggestions. One poster commends him for stepping-up, another suggests that he might be the catalyst for others to come up with a plan. Most write what he or others should be doing to make this a better community, not in how they are involved making it better.

Most who are enraged with Mr Altamura mention property but seem focused on bits of gossip, innuendo or hearsay.

This might make a forum for discussion about COPIA, not a place that we flay a person who is a part of our community. "

hawkeye wrote on Jun 1, 2009 10:40 PM:

" shareathought, you ask if any of us have donated any time to our community. I certainly have. How about you? But maybe we all don't have the money to afford taking as much time off of work as Altamura has spent in our community, as you say, donating. He's wealthy. He's got loads of time to do whatever he wants. Must be nice. The rest of the middle class has to go to work day in day out to earn their money so they can survive. I don't know about you, but I don't have nearly the time and money he does. "

shareathought wrote on Jun 2, 2009 9:22 PM:

" "I certainly have. How about you?"

Yes (that is how I know MrAltamura does too). Many who have become what, is considered successful, don't.

It seems that with most headlines that catches the poster's attention (at the NVR), responses are mostly negative. Then, rather then stimulating beneficial or constructive thought, it provokes angrier comments.

In this case, most who have complained about the man, say they know someone who has been done wrong (not that they personally have), or they write about his properties as if they are outraged because if they owned them, so much more would be getting done. (!?)

There've been other articles over the years mentioning MrAltamura and his acquisition of properties; below are portions of earlier articles (interestingly, it seems he owns properties with others and that the earthquake retrofit may be cost prohibitive), there were others.


From 2002
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2002/08/29/news/export41580.txt
"The sale of Napa Town Center to George Altamura and The Doctors' Company…
Altamura now owns more than a quarter of downtown's retail space."

From 2004
http://www.napavalleyregister.com/articles/2004/02/24/news/export10930.txt
"Sam Gordon Jr. said he sold to Altamura because "I didn't want to leave my kids a lot of seismic retrofit debt." Retrofitting ends up costing an owner twice as much as he originally intended to spend, he said."

"Altogether, Altamura owns five unreinforced properties -- all bought from the Sam Gordon family …he bought the Gordon properties in 2000..." "

sprklsunshine wrote on Jun 3, 2009 8:32 AM:

" So if earthquake retrofit cost is prohibitive (which, in Altamura’s case, I find hard to believe) what happens to the property? 1) fix it 2) tear it down 3) let it sit empty indefinitely.

Altamura seems to choose option 3. Why? What is the benefit of this?

Let’s not forget, the man can’t live forever. What kind of a mess is he leaving his family to deal with? Or are they of the same mindset? "

Froggie1559 wrote on Jun 4, 2009 3:23 PM:

" If we're all so worried about Altamura getting ahold of Copia, why don't we do something about it instead of complaining. Aren't there 10 or so investors out there willing to take it on? It could be a co-op, getting lots of people to hellp out with the gardens, etc. I know I'd love to help. Kick it around and see what you can dream of instead of exuding such negativity. Remember power of positive thinking? "

cutiepie wrote on Jun 9, 2009 5:30 PM:

" Sounds like George has found another toy that he would like to play with? Most of us who have childen recycle our childrens toys and give them to charity. George has lots of toys, but he doesn't recycle them. Sad for Napa. "

totally mario wrote on Aug 22, 2009 8:36 PM:

" I could see Copia becoming an Educational Center of Arts. We could have classes that instruct different forms of art and have classes in the gardens where people could learn on location different techniques and styles. We could have a computer lab and offer photography with the same principals we could bring students on location or downtown and edit our best shots. We could have gardening classes or time-slots to keep up the gardens. We could have nights were local band could come out, play, and meet up to get their music out. You could have a night dedicated to youth to come out and dance and play their music, it would be a safe environment with cool concepts that would appeal to the entire community. There would be a fee for classes and events so that there would be money to keep up the facility. I think Napa would Highly benefit from such an environment and everyone would want to interact in such a welcoming location. Just and idea, I would love to hear others opinions. We need a place for the community to have gatherings and events, the Copia building would be perfect. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy