NVR Logo
Voters said no, but keep working on state budget fix
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Save and Share Share
In what was rather anti-climactic the five state propositions devoted to the state budget mess went down tonight. Most voters simply checked out in what looks like it will be the lowest voter turn out for a state election in decades. That alone tells you that something was seriously wrong, and it will be up to the legislature and the media to try to sort out what the message is here.

There are a lot of reasons that voters turned this down, taxes too high, the Governor and legislature not doing their job, and more. But some also turned against it because they didn't want the spending limit in 1A, particularly some of the unions.
But does the message even really matter? The truth is that the state is finally going to have to make serious reform in the way that it does business, and a lot of spending cuts will have to be made.

We simply cannot spend this much money, pay people so well, grant big pensions, spend twice as much as many states per prisoner in the prison system, etc, etc, and have all the regulatory bodies and boards full of employees that we do and continue to function economically.
Can't do it.

We can't cut everything out of education and human services while we have so many high paid employees in all the other departments and divisions of government, like safety, like prisons, like overlapping environmental boards, like engineering. We have to start to look at that.
Local governments are going to feel the sting of this promptly, and our local governments have to turn immediately to ways to cut back. They also have to make more consideration of increasing revenues.

It is better to cut the salaries of people rather than lay more off. Right now public employee union rules require that senior people (i.e. high paid) get cut last. The unions also demand that rather than cut salaries, the people at the bottom get laid off. That has got to change.

Far better to give the local home health aides their extra $2.00 an hour while cutting the wages of those making $50 an hour, in fact cut them 10 bucks an hour and save 8 while we are at it.

The State Legislature and the Governor need to come forward with real spending cuts like they should have a year ago. They know who the well heeled are and where all the money is going. State spending has been growing far faster than inflation since Schwarzeneggar was elected, and the CHP has continued hiring throughout this whole budget debacle. Couldn't they at least have frozen hiring? Not when you can lay off teachers, I suppose.

Throughout this major recession it is going to be very important to keep as many people working as possible, even at lower salaries. People who are working pay taxes, people who are working are the driving force through their spending that will return the economy to growth and end the recession.

Whether intentional or not, the voters have sent a big message that spending is to be cut. And a lot of spending is to be cut. Time to start looking at the fairest and economically least damaging way to do that.
8 comment(s)

a teacher wrote on May 20, 2009 9:27 AM:

" If you ask me, it hails the success of the "starve the beast" philosphy. The Grover Norquists of the world have convinced Californians (and Americans) that they are over taxed, that government is bad, that unions are corrupt, that private buisness can do it better.

We will see. "

glenroy wrote on May 20, 2009 9:58 AM:

" Just like the real world eventually government learns to live within means or goes belly up….

The worst part of this avoidable scenario is those who caused this mess will never be held accountable….the fat cats, Gray Davis and the state legislators, keep getting fatter while the poor cats, the state hourly wage earners, hang on.

Our federal government isn’t much better. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on May 20, 2009 11:17 AM:

" Soooo, NB - When are you going to come up with that list of $21 BILLION in cuts?

The number I've heard is actually $21.3 BILLION but I gave you $300 Million for cutting the wages of prison guards who make too much money.

So, what gets gutted next, my man?


~Ruff "

Raven wrote on May 20, 2009 11:26 AM:

" and why do you not mention the voters glenroy, who have had an insatiable appetite for funding via the ballot box. "

glenroy wrote on May 22, 2009 9:44 AM:

" LOL raven…because the voters don’t write budgets….….because the voters don’t write legislation…….because the voters aren’t empowered to manage government….. And even if they did….what difference would it make…lol…

Amazing…. "

Raven wrote on May 22, 2009 5:49 PM:

" So when they vote for a special fund via the ballot box, they are not budgeting, they are not raising taxes, dictating spending?

Get back to us after you reread the state constitution, because the voters can write legislation, can direct management of the government and can write a budget via the ballot box... "

Rick wrote on May 23, 2009 10:01 AM:

" MH - Whether state govt. is capable of doing something as sensible as you have suggested, even under the greatest duress, is unfortunately highly questionable. "

napablogger wrote on May 23, 2009 3:18 PM:

" Rick, maybe not this year, but my theory is that about the second or third year into this people will come around--they will be forced to. It will probably get pretty ugly til then. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy