Worst ever turnout for state special election
BY ASSOCIATED PRESS
11:15 a.m.LOS ANGELES — California voters showed little interest in Tuesday’s special election, with most not bothering to cast ballots.
According to the secretary of state’s office, counties are reporting a preliminary turnout of 23 percent, or roughly 4 million of California’s 17.1 million registered voters.
In Napa County, there were 19,751 ballots counted election night, for a total of 27.9 percent of all registered Napa County voters. Of that total, there were 12,436 votes cast at polling places and 7,315 mailed in.
The number is expected to rise in the days ahead as counties count provisional, damaged and vote-by-mail ballots that were turned in on Election Day.
It’s unclear how many outstanding ballots remain to be counted. County election officials are expected to report their number of uncounted ballots by Friday.
The lowest turnout on record for a California special election was 36 percent in 1993.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Paddy wrote on May 20, 2009 1:25 PM:
B-side wrote on May 20, 2009 2:50 PM:
Hear Ye wrote on May 20, 2009 7:07 PM:
JMB wrote on May 20, 2009 8:20 PM:
jjnnapa wrote on May 20, 2009 8:31 PM:
" Very telling of the pathetic nature of a very liberal state...
Maybe it was a "very" liberal state. But if it were still "very" liberal then these props would have passed. And don't forget, the terminator (our gov) is a republican.
There are parts of this state that are very liberal such as Berkley, SF, Hombult, etc... but looking at the state as a whole, I would not agree with your statement. In fact, I would argue that the majority of Napa is conservative. "
lupmart wrote on May 20, 2009 10:22 PM:
I think the problem with the turnout isn't because people don't care ... its because no solution was available. It was a completely negative situation. The only choices available were to raise taxes which would leave the state in a big financial crisis OR say no to more taxes which would leave the state in a slightly bigger financial crisis.
Given a real shot at real reform, maybe more people would have come out. "
Paddy wrote on May 21, 2009 7:17 AM:
I agree that if more of this liberal vote turned out for the election perhaps, as happened with Prop. 8, these latest propositions would have passed. Because of the apathy of many of these young liberals they didn't show up for this one and the results reflect that. "