Helping a friend in need — or so they thought
Former Napa police dispatcher Dannille Vanderpool is accused of faking claims of having cancer and cashing in on that claim to the tune of more than $50,000. Six of her friends talked of how they helped Vanderpool when they believed she was ill, and what they did when they came to the conclusion she may be lying. Register File Photo |
Buy photos
Dannille Vanderpool of Napa told people she had cancer. Now she faces criminal charges. Her former supporters explain why they helped, and why they turned her in.
By DAN ROSS
Register Online Editor
They all have close ties to local law enforcement, but those aren’t the ties that bound this group of people together for the past two years. Instead, they came together to help Dannille Vanderpool, a friend and Napa police dispatcher they all believed was soon to lose her life to a virulent form of ovarian cancer.
American Canyon Police officer Wendy Daniels, who is battling breast cancer, and her husband Rick helped care for the garden at Vanderpool’s home on Yajome Street.
Jim and Patty Stephenson, he a Napa Police Department crime analyst and she a records assistant with the department, jumped in to help Vanderpool with issues from childcare to remodeling her house.
Lisa Claudino, a Napa County Sheriff’s Department records supervisor, said there was a sign-up sheet at work for people to help at Vanderpool’s house. Her husband, John Claudino, convinced his employer, North Bay Plywood, to donate doors for Vanderpool’s house.
Lynn Campagna, a Napa nurse who was among the many to offer financial and emotional support to Vanderpool, said, “People in the (police and sheriff’s) department would get off shifts and go straight to Dannille’s house to work on the house. We went to companies and asked them for donations of products that we could use to make Dannille’s house better.”
But as time passed, they all noticed what they saw as inconsistencies with Vanderpool’s behavior. Separately, they began to harbor suspicions about her illness. After months of uncertainty, Lisa Claudino stepped up and brought her friends together.
As they talked, they realized the stories Vanderpool told them were all different — dramatically different.
“We started to figure stuff out as we talked about what she told each of us,” said Jim Stephenson. “Before that, we never compared notes because there was not any reason to.”
Today, none believe Vanderpool had cancer. In fact, their suspicions helped lead police to arrest Vanderpool last month. She now faces more than a dozen felony charges of grand theft and fraud for collecting $50,000 in donations, much of it from police and firefighter benevolent associations. The law enforcement colleagues who wanted to help her in her battle with cancer are the ones, according to the California Attorney General’s office, who got burned the most.
Vanderpool has pleaded not guilty to the charges and is due to appear in court next on May 28.
If the charges are true, Vanderpool did more than take $50,000. She took her friends for their time and their compassion.
Doubts surfacing
In the photograph, Dannille Vanderpool is wearing a blue bandanna to cover her bald head. She is holding her daughter, then 8, in her arms.
“She shaved her head because she said she did not want to wait for her hair to fall out,” said Campagna.
Campagna thought Vanderpool’s decision to shave her head was unusual, but she tried to let go of any questions. “I take care of breast cancer patients and you never question anybody, especially friends, about whether they really have cancer,” she said.
While friends pitched in on nearly every aspect of her day-to-day life, there was one exception: Her medical treatment. No one had been asked to take Vanderpool to the hospital or doctor’s visits or assist in her care.
“If no one would talk to her for a week or so, she’d tell us she spent three days in the hospital being treated for a recurrence of the cancer,” said Patty Stephenson. “Not one person ever visited her in the hospital because she never told anyone about these things until after she was out.”
As a breast cancer survivor, Daniels had bonded with Vanderpool over what was apparently a shared medical burden. Last year, they even walked the Survivors Lap together at the Relay for Life cancer research fundraiser on the track at Donaldson Way Elementary School in American Canyon.
They also spent time together socially, and this gave Daniels pause.
“As soon as I found out I had cancer, I quit drinking (and) started taking all sorts of organic things, but here I am watching her at parties playing beer pong,” said Daniels. “I questioned it long ago but I felt horrible even thinking about questioning it.”
Wondering about the medical process, Claudino asked Vanderpool about her treatments. Vanderpool said that she went to an Oakland hospital for radiation.
So, Claudino said, she called the hospital, only to learn it did not offer radiation. As for Vanderpool’s local medical appointments, “She would not let us go. She told us her mom and sister went, that it was something the family did and I did not want to intrude on that.”
One day, an ex-boyfriend of Vanderpool’s called Claudino. He said he thought Vanderpool should not drive herself to radiation treatment if she is having seizures. He asked Claudino to please go check on her.
“I went to her house to find Dannille’s sister and mom there, but no Dannille,” said Claudino. “They said Dannille went for a drive because she had a fight with her boyfriend.”
Claudino asked about doctor’s visits. Vanderpool’s family members stated they never went, either, that Vanderpool said it was something she needed to do on her own to show she could do it.
Claudino spoke to the ex-boyfriend again, and all the pieces began to fall in place for her. “I was trying to help him at first, and realized the story she was telling him and telling me were not the same ones,” she said.
Another cause for suspicion was the timing of Vanderpool’s cancer revelations.
Jim Stephenson had been best friends with former Napa Police officer Craig McCarthy, who died in October 2007 of a brain tumor. Vanderpool told friends she too had a brain tumor, according to Stephenson.
“She would question us about his symptoms. Here we were thinking we are going to lose him and then we are going to lose her, too. She was just using us to get information about him,” he said.
“Craig had a brain tumor, he died of it, she used that for her brain tumor story,” said an angry Stephenson, almost barking out the words. “Craig has a seizure and they yanked his driver’s license because of it. She told Lisa one of her seizures left her unconscious on her floor, with her waking up to a dog licking her face.”
If McCarthy lost his driver’s license, why was Vanderpool driving herself to treatment and errands all over Napa?
“When I questioned her about the seizures, she said they were not very bad, but I asked if they were bad enough to where she should not drive and she said yes,” said Stephenson. “I challenged her about why hospital staff did not follow through with DMV to make sure she had her license taken away. She couldn’t answer why they never did that. She then went onto the blog she had on her MySpace page” — Vanderpool chronicled events in her life on the Web (see related story) — “and started talking about her seizures.”
The MySpace page tripped up Vanderpool shortly thereafter. Claudino said she was reading an entry one day in which Vanderpool said she was in treatment and complaining about eating “hospital eggs.”
The entry was only 10 minutes old, so Claudino decided it was time to test out her suspicions.
She jumped in her car and drove to Vanderpool’s house. As she reached the door, she saw Vanderpool peeking out at her through the curtains.
“Dannille said someone must have taken her phone and was pretending to be her by making up those Web site posts,” said Claudino.
It was time for the showdown.
“I confronted her by saying I did not doubt she had cancer ... I see now even that’s not true ... but I asked her why she was lying about different things,” said Claudino.
Vanderpool steadfastly denied everything, Claudino said.
Afterwards, Vanderpool again turned to her Web page. This time, however, it was not to talk about cancer. It was to attack Lisa Claudino.
This pitted friends against friends. Some following Vanderpool’s saga believed she was under attack by a person masquerading as a friend, and made harsh comments on the Web page.
Meanwhile, Claudino and the others had begun to compare notes. “Lisa brought everyone together on the fact stories did not match up, and Dannille turned on her,” said Patty Stephenson.
Toward the end of 2008, Claudino took decisive action. She went to supervisors at Napa dispatch and laid out the concerns that she, the Stephensons, Campagna and Daniels shared. Around the same time, Napa Police officials had begun to question checks Vanderpool had written on an account created in her name and medical documents she had provided to her supervisors.
Napa Police turned over the results of the probe to state prosecutors, since so many people in local law enforcement agencies appeared to be victims of Vanderpool. A few weeks after the investigation concluded, prosecutors and Vanderpool’s defense attorney negotiated for her to make an appearance in court and face formal charges.
According to court documents, Vanderpool admitted to police investigators that she lied about having ovarian cancer. Her attorney said Vanderpool has a mental illness that predates by years all the police and firefighter fundraisers, the MySpace diary or McCarthy’s death from brain cancer.
Generating money was not her motive, said Chazin. “It was because she had a psychiatric condition to cause her to erroneously report she had cancer,” said Chazin last month. “She was mentally ill.”
Lynn Campagna is skeptical.
“People might be thinking Dannille is mentally ill to be able to do something like this, and that is totally untrue,” said Lynn. “She worked hard to pull this off on people in the medical field, law enforcement and people with cancer. She knew what she was doing all along and she used people to get what she wanted.”
Daniels, the American Canyon police officer battling breast cancer, said, “She is making it harder on those who have cancer because they have to work harder to convince people they really are too sick to work sometimes. She made it worse for all of us who are ill.”
In the interview, Lynn Campagna explained why she, Claudino, Daniels and the Stephensons made the effort to examine Vanderpool’s story.
“This is not because we are doing any sort of witch hunt, it is to talk about the fact she pulled the wool over everybody’s eyes,” she said. “This is showing the catastrophic hurt she caused all of us.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
cutiepie wrote on May 17, 2009 6:15 AM:
gaslight wrote on May 17, 2009 7:43 AM:
What compelled her behavior? The need for attention? Mental illness? Financial gain? (In that regard, how did she spend the money donated to her? What was she paying for that created suspicion by those monitoring the bank account?)
The closest the article comes to addressing the "Why?" is to include comments by one of the victims of the scam who rules out mental illness because the woman's actions seemed very intentional. But one could have a mental illness and still know that their behavior is wrong. It would've been interesting to include in the article a professional opinion by a mental health expert of why people in general perpetrate these types of hoaxes.
The Register will have other opportunities to focus on the "Why" as the case winds its way through the legal system. Hopefully it will do so. "
OUTOFTOWN wrote on May 17, 2009 8:14 AM:
Baraki wrote on May 17, 2009 8:24 AM:
telebender wrote on May 17, 2009 9:38 AM:
Public service in law enforcement can sometimes lead to cynicism. Maybe it would even been the appropriate response in this case, but God bless them all for caring and helping. "
lavgirl wrote on May 17, 2009 10:03 AM:
All the worst of all....to lose the respect of your daughter. What a shame. "
sayithowitis wrote on May 17, 2009 10:03 AM:
gaslight wrote on May 17, 2009 10:19 AM:
VERUM wrote on May 17, 2009 10:29 AM:
yamamama wrote on May 17, 2009 11:08 AM:
alucawanza wrote on May 17, 2009 11:17 AM:
VERUM wrote on May 17, 2009 11:28 AM:
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. "
cutiepie wrote on May 17, 2009 12:50 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on May 17, 2009 1:51 PM:
If the facts complained of are found to be true, this "mental illness" claim would not excuse her alleged culpability here. If anything, it looks like another attempt to obtain further sympathy through unscrupolous means. But she clearly does have some "issues," that's for sure.
That stated, I do feel for her daughter, family, the victims, and those with terminal illness, who will all have to deal with the fallout in some way or another.
Yayama has an interesting point about the child's father. I wonder what the real story is behind that. "
silence dogood wrote on May 17, 2009 2:53 PM:
http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:PEZ7bhVBO04J:dreamweaverstheatre.org/index2.php%3Foption%3Dcom_content%26do_pdf%3D1%26id%3D130+dannille+vanderpool&cd=15&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us "
Napkan wrote on May 17, 2009 4:33 PM:
lsw1969 wrote on May 17, 2009 5:31 PM:
Wannabee wrote on May 17, 2009 5:55 PM:
mypoint wrote on May 17, 2009 7:53 PM:
VERUM wrote on May 17, 2009 8:10 PM:
At least not in this county. "
Baraki wrote on May 17, 2009 8:28 PM:
thoughtank wrote on May 17, 2009 9:15 PM:
i think if the people who volunteered to help Dannille Vanderpool viewed their gifts of time and energy this way they would be better volunteers and feel less "duped."
It's sad that this situation turned out the way it did but the volunteers did probably do some good in making Ms. Vanderpool's daughter feel safe and secure in the knowledge that the community was there for her mom.
I also think some of the volunteers got overly emotionally invested in Ms. Vanderpool's life and they're angry at themselves, too. There's a good lesson here: things aren't always what they seem.
Maybe the answer is let go of the outcome when you volunteer. Who knows what good will come out of this?
Mother Teresa had a poem called "Do It Anyway" which spoke to this conundrum. Some of the verses are:
"People are often unreasonable, irrational and self-centered. Forgive them anyway.
If you are honest and sincere, people may deceive you. Be honest and sincere anyway.
In the final analysis, it is between you and God. it was never between you and them anyway." "
native74 wrote on May 18, 2009 8:22 AM:
My heart goes out to all those who believed this woman and pray that they are not afraid of believing in the next person who really does have life threatening conditions. It truly saddened me that the replacement co-worker for the fired con-artist really did have cancer, but since everyone was burned so recently most turned a blind eye to her treatments and recovery. I had known the replacement before I worked with her so I trusted what she was going through was the real thing, but it was also hard seeing the rolling eyes by others who weren't so quick to trust again... "
pb wrote on May 18, 2009 9:14 AM:
The words "donating under false pretenses" have been used many times. I understand that. I, too was a donor (what would be considered significant). Volunteering by its nature, is a choice. Those who gave, please remember that in your generous gifts, you had the best of intentions. (God bless you all) and that what you put out there will come back to you in some way.
(And those who donated actual products and perhaps money as well, will have likely taken a tax write-off.)
Those of us who have known Dannille for some time, will recall that we began to hear about the cancer right around 2001. I don't in any way condone what she did, but I don't feel that it started out just to get money. It obviously goes much deeper than that. One way or another, she will pay her dues & has already has begun that process.
I look forward to this being behind everyone. I don't know how much more can be said that hasn't been said already - especially by those who don't know her, nor have been personally affected. It's turning into the same old chatter over and over again.
As far as the NVR addressing "why" - enough reference has been made to the mental illness factor. I'm sure that Dannille herself doesn't understand the “why”. It's obviously not normal behavior.
I say trust the system - or even karma if you will. She has done serious wrong and will surely pay the price. I’m sure that she is seeking her own answers as to “why” and will make whatever restitution that she can. In the meantime, it's good to reread those gems from Mother Teresa. "
jjkel wrote on May 18, 2009 3:58 PM:
napa1234 wrote on May 18, 2009 9:55 PM:
I mean come on, if she is claiming she isn't responsible because of mental illness, which to me is not an excuse here, then she isn't responsible enough to have custody. Child services needs to step in here and protect this child from any more trauma inflicted by her mother. "
jo wrote on May 19, 2009 12:58 PM:
jpm4444 wrote on May 19, 2009 4:33 PM:
Napaneighbor wrote on May 20, 2009 7:49 AM:
andilee wrote on May 20, 2009 11:20 AM:
mypoint wrote on May 20, 2009 11:37 AM:
mypoint wrote on May 20, 2009 12:00 PM:
andilee wrote on May 20, 2009 12:18 PM:
bgood wrote on May 20, 2009 3:54 PM:
Napaneighbor wrote on May 21, 2009 5:01 PM: