Police: Ex-dispatcher admits lying about having cancer
Attorney claims Vanderpool is mentally ill
By DAN ROSS
Register Online Editor
September 18th, 2009
September 17th, 2009
July 31st, 2009
October 27th, 2009
October 26th, 2009
October 24th, 2009
October 16th, 2009
September 10th, 2009
3:45 p.m.The ex-Napa police dispatcher accused of fraud reportedly admitted to police investigators she lied about having ovarian cancer and used that lie to obtain slightly more than $50,000 in donations and city pay.
Her attorney, however, says money was never the reason for falsifying cancer claims, adding that she is mentally ill.
Dannille Vanderpool pleaded not guilty to 13 counts of grand theft and one each of forgery and identity theft and was taken into custody Wednesday afternoon on $50,000 bail. Vanderpool posted bail and is no longer being held in the county jail, said her attorney, Seth Chazin.
“Evidence obtained through search warrants revealed that Vanderpool never had or suffered from cancer,” noted officer Ron Appel of the Napa Police Department in court documents. “When interviewed, Dannille Vanderpool admitted to lying about her illness while accepting donations.”
Appel’s statement in court documents highlights how the police investigation proceeded, including uncovering evidence where police claim Vanderpool falsified medical forms from Kaiser Permanente, where she stated she was being treated for ovarian cancer and various side effects.
“She admitted that she did not have cancer and never had cancer,” noted Appel. “She admitted taking a Kaiser form, falsely filling it out and submitting it to the city ... she also acknowledged that she had taken money, goods and services from many individuals under the false pretense of having terminal cancer.”
Chazin said Vanderpool first made claims of having cancer back in 2001 but never accepted money or was offered money from fundraisers until 2007, so he said money was clearly not the reason behind her false cancer claims.
“It was because she had a psychiatric condition to cause her to erroneously report she had cancer,” said Chazin. “She was mentally ill.”
Vanderpool kept friends and family up-to-date on her supposed battle with cancer via a blog on a social networking Web site. In a December 2008 entry she listed various issues she stated she had been dealing with.
“I have had two heart attacks, two seizures ... somehow in the last eight years the cancer has spread from my ovaries to my liver, to my stomach, to my lungs and now my brain,” Vanderpool wrote.
Concerns within the police department arose when, shortly after posting her details about her illness, Vanderpool submitted a Kaiser form to her employer showing she was cleared to return to work full time in about one month.
Appel’s statement indicates Cmdr. Steve Potter of the Napa Police Department researched the Kaiser note because he was concerned, “that having Vanderpool return to dispatch work while suffering from seizures did not seem prudent or safe.”
Potter was unable to confirm through a visit to Kaiser that Vanderpool’s note was authentic, so he requested Appel begin his investigation, according to court documents.
“She was suffering from a mental disease at the time, she was diagnosed for it and we are still gathering information for it,” said Chazin. “That has been discovered by a mental health professional.”
Chazin declined to give the name of the physician treating Vanderpool.
Financial irregularities came up when Det. Darleen Elia, treasurer for the Napa Police Officers Association — the group overseeing a checking account where donations to Vanderpool were deposited — came across a $2,500 check to another bank. Elia, court documents show, was concerned donation money was being used for Vanderpool to purchase and remodel a Yajome Street home in Napa.
She questioned Vanderpool, who court documents state, denied using donations for purchasing a house.
The investigation led to numerous search warrants being issued for Vanderpool’s home, work, banks and medical records. Banking records detailed the amounts raised from fundraisers like $2,231 from a Mary’s Pizza Shack one.
Nearly $14,000 of the money came from Vanderpool being granted a total of 90 days of catastrophic leave for cancer treatments, according to court documents.
The review of medical records showed nothing to verify Vanderpool’s claims of having ovarian cancer.
“Warrants served on Kaiser Hospital for Vanderpool’s medical file failed to produce any records demonstrating diagnosis or treatment for cancer,” according to Appel’s investigation statement.
Vanderpool is due back in court May 28-29.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Wannabee wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:15 PM:
Makes on wonder what other unknown skeletons are hiding in the NPD. "
lovingnapa wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:16 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:20 PM:
That's a great defense! If only I had a psychiatric disorder that caused me to erroneously report my income for tax purposes. I could have saved a bundle!!!
But seriously. The allegations about falsifying the Kaiser documents definitely explains a lot. That's how she must have allegedly supported the chemo procedures she allegedly did not receive.
Did this mental illness also cause her to allegedly divert funds for the purchase and remodeling of her home? What is this strange illness? And how can I get one so that I can allegedly defraud others, and then blame that condition for my alleged malfeasance?
Inquiring minds want to know. "
VERUM wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:47 PM:
Is "discovered" actually a professional diagnosis?
We have to wait until the end of May for more to be revealed. "
pb wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:07 PM:
How would you feel if you had an emotional dysfunction and people talked to you in this way? Can you even consider for one nano-second that maybe there is an illness present here? Or would that mean that you have to let go of your anger? Those of you that have made these negative judgments, are not much better yourselves if you will so harshly slam someone who is ill. This is not a "legal defense" but a reality - a real condition. No one is condoning what this woman did and she will surely pay the price - and in many ways is already doing so. But to have so little understanding in your hearts is frightening to me. This is a real person with a real problem. Maybe you don't like hearing that there may be an underlying reason for her behaviour. Goodness sakes... you just might have to release your rage. You might just have to look at it from a different vantage point. This is a troubled soul and a fellow human being who has done something she doesn't even understand. She is trying to make it right. Won't you let her? Tune into Martha Stewart and then get back to us on that... "
NV33girl wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:07 PM:
Two Cents wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:10 PM:
No, my guess is that she frivolously spent it.
This absolutely disgusts me... I have a friend who's mother is dying of cancer and I know the emotional toll it is taking on her.
To subject a little girl to that fear and pain unnecessarily is UNFORGIVEABLE... "
mhnapavalley wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:21 PM:
Napa local wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:42 PM:
napathoughts wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:03 PM:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchausen_syndrome "
AmCan Mom wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:11 PM:
VERUM wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:31 PM:
mumble wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:42 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:01 PM:
But I have no regard or pity for this alleged mental syndrome (whether it be Münchausen or otherwise). It is not a legal defense. She should have sought help before this spun out of control, and now she is facing the penalties.
For example, should we excuse serial killers because they are sociopaths? No. And there is a reason for that. To be found not guilty by reason of insanity, it must be shown by a preponderance that Ms. Vanderpool "was incapable of knowing or understanding the nature and
quality of his or her act and of distinguishing right from wrong at
the time of the commission of the offense." Pen. Code 25(b).
Regardless of this disorder, she most likely knew right from wrong. So I doubt that an insanity plea will carry much weight. They are clearly trying to plea diminished capacity under subdivision (c) at the sentencing phase (should a jury convict her).
Sorry, call me old fashioned. You are responsible for your wrongful acts. And I am getting sick of people and corporations shirking accountability and passing on the blame (from Wall Street executives down...) "
1964 wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:14 PM:
mafi wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:40 PM:
katt wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:45 PM:
mypoint wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:56 PM:
manxkat wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:57 PM:
Rocketman wrote on Apr 17, 2009 8:18 PM:
napachatter wrote on Apr 17, 2009 8:19 PM:
napan79 wrote on Apr 17, 2009 9:31 PM:
concernednapacitizen wrote on Apr 17, 2009 9:41 PM:
andilee wrote on Apr 18, 2009 4:25 AM:
pb wrote on Apr 18, 2009 7:00 AM:
And..."Sometimes bad people do bad things and need to suffer the consequences whether its public ridicule or time in prison." Do I feel she's "bad"? No. Just troubled. Do I think she will suffer the consequences? Of course! I've said this all along. And again, she WANTS to make restitution. And in addition to "suffering the consequences" she will have to live with what she did - and the effects of it on her daughter, family and friends for the rest of her life. That’s likely to be the worst punishment of all.
Ms. Vanderpool did not "say she has a mental condition". Her physician did. And I'm sure she will be evaluated by another physician through the courts. Let them make that diagnosis. If she's not, so be it. If she is, try to have at least some sympathy. Things go awry in the brain the same way they do in other parts of the body.
Gee... my head in the clouds. That's a much nicer place to be than to try and keep this anger going on and on. To me, the “real world” is a place where we try to get along and to try to understand. Yes, anger is a part of it. But there also comes a time to know that everything that can be said, has been said. It’s time to cool off and see what the doctors and courts decide. Hopefully everyone – especially her daughter – can heal and move on. For Dannille herself, this will all be resolved one way or the other. "
Project707 wrote on Apr 18, 2009 7:37 AM:
How many times are we going to believe her lies and its sounding more and more like she is not going to serve the punishment for her crimes. "
mamyt wrote on Apr 18, 2009 10:18 AM:
Any one who commits crime is mentally deficient in some way. That is a given not a reason for commuted punishment. "
stshagwell wrote on Apr 18, 2009 12:10 PM:
Further.. Let the non 'mentally deficient' person speak up!
After reading these posts, I would rather be in her position than to actually 'be' half of you people...
Further still.. Let the Jerry Springer types be silent, children are resilient...
More later
jeeeeez "
jmo wrote on Apr 18, 2009 12:23 PM:
Are going to start a defense fund for her? "
robot wrote on Apr 18, 2009 4:19 PM:
Not to be mean, but if she is actually mentally ill, she should have seeked donations for that instead. "
aivat wrote on Apr 18, 2009 6:29 PM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 18, 2009 6:29 PM:
stshagwell - huh?
As someone who lost several close relatives to cancer, Ms. Vanderpool's conduct - if true - is morally reprehensible. And I find it interesting that she wants to make restitution all of the sudden. After being caught, of course. "
rebob wrote on Apr 18, 2009 8:26 PM:
Grl 2sda wrote on Apr 18, 2009 8:55 PM:
Many of you are making flippant comments about the NPD for not being thorough about verifying her illness. I believe that to be completely uncalled for. The only one to blame is Ms. Vanderpool. This woman went to the extreme of shaving her head and provided medical documentation supporting her claims. It is hard to believe anyone would try to pull this off, even more disturbing that she felt she could manipulate and lie to her law enforcement colleagues.
It sickens me!
It is my understanding that she is out on bail...I hope she reads every one of these posts and realizing how hurt and angry people are with her actions...and for what Ms. Vanderpool, ATTENTION????
I wonder if you are truly remorseful with your actions or if you are thrilled that you are yet again getting the attention you want. Applause to you, Ms. Vanderpool...
As William Shakespear said "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players...”
It's clear you we played the role as fool in your little production! Exceptional acting...Exceptional!!! "
VERUM wrote on Apr 18, 2009 9:29 PM:
What is not clear in this article is the existing balance of the donations, and how much was misspent; and did the check (s) require more than her signature? "
mypoint wrote on Apr 18, 2009 10:09 PM:
littlered56 wrote on Apr 18, 2009 10:34 PM:
I can not imangine anyone living in Napa county who could serve on the jury with an open mind. I am not trying to be mean about this I just think people in Napa are outraged at this situation as is understandable.
I hope she pleads quilty and asks for help with what must be a mental problem. "
fyreball wrote on Apr 19, 2009 9:30 AM:
mypoint wrote on Apr 19, 2009 4:52 PM:
Ephemerol wrote on Apr 21, 2009 12:56 AM:
Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 21, 2009 7:58 PM:
Who knows, though. It'll be up to the court system now... "
banjist wrote on Apr 21, 2009 10:44 PM: