NVR Logo
Police: Ex-dispatcher admits lying about having cancer
Attorney claims Vanderpool is mentally ill
Friday, April 17, 2009
Save and Share Share
October 27th, 2009
October 26th, 2009
October 24th, 2009
October 16th, 2009
September 10th, 2009
3:45 p.m.The ex-Napa police dispatcher accused of fraud reportedly admitted to police investigators she lied about having ovarian cancer and used that lie to obtain slightly more than $50,000 in donations and city pay.

Her attorney, however, says money was never the reason for falsifying cancer claims, adding that she is mentally ill.
Dannille Vanderpool pleaded not guilty to 13 counts of grand theft and one each of forgery and identity theft and was taken into custody Wednesday afternoon on $50,000 bail. Vanderpool posted bail and is no longer being held in the county jail, said her attorney, Seth Chazin.

“Evidence obtained through search warrants revealed that Vanderpool never had or suffered from cancer,” noted officer Ron Appel of the Napa Police Department in court documents. “When interviewed, Dannille Vanderpool admitted to lying about her illness while accepting donations.”
Appel’s statement in court documents highlights how the police investigation proceeded, including uncovering evidence where police claim Vanderpool falsified medical forms from Kaiser Permanente, where she stated she was being treated for ovarian cancer and various side effects.

“She admitted that she did not have cancer and never had cancer,” noted Appel. “She admitted taking a Kaiser form, falsely filling it out and submitting it to the city ... she also acknowledged that she had taken money, goods and services from many individuals under the false pretense of having terminal cancer.”
Chazin said Vanderpool first made claims of having cancer back in 2001 but never accepted money or was offered money from fundraisers until 2007, so he said money was clearly not the reason behind her false cancer claims.

“It was because she had a psychiatric condition to cause her to erroneously report she had cancer,” said Chazin. “She was mentally ill.”

Vanderpool kept friends and family up-to-date on her supposed battle with cancer via a blog on a social networking Web site. In a December 2008 entry she listed various issues she stated she had been dealing with.

“I have had two heart attacks, two seizures ... somehow in the last eight years the cancer has spread from my ovaries to my liver, to my stomach, to my lungs and now my brain,” Vanderpool wrote.

Concerns within the police department arose when, shortly after posting her details about her illness, Vanderpool submitted a Kaiser form to her employer showing she was cleared to return to work full time in about one month.

Appel’s statement indicates Cmdr. Steve Potter of the Napa Police Department researched the Kaiser note because he was concerned, “that having Vanderpool return to dispatch work while suffering from seizures did not seem prudent or safe.”

Potter was unable to confirm through a visit to Kaiser that Vanderpool’s note was authentic, so he requested Appel begin his investigation, according to court documents.

“She was suffering from a mental disease at the time, she was diagnosed for it and we are still gathering information for it,” said Chazin. “That has been discovered by a mental health professional.”

Chazin declined to give the name of the physician treating Vanderpool.

Financial irregularities came up when Det. Darleen Elia, treasurer for the Napa Police Officers Association — the group overseeing a checking account where donations to Vanderpool were deposited — came across a $2,500 check to another bank. Elia, court documents show, was concerned donation money was being used for Vanderpool to purchase and remodel a Yajome Street home in Napa.

She questioned Vanderpool, who court documents state, denied using donations for purchasing a house.

The investigation led to numerous search warrants being issued for Vanderpool’s home, work, banks and medical records. Banking records detailed the amounts raised from fundraisers like $2,231 from a Mary’s Pizza Shack one.

Nearly $14,000 of the money came from Vanderpool being granted a total of 90 days of catastrophic leave for cancer treatments, according to court documents.

The review of medical records showed nothing to verify Vanderpool’s claims of having ovarian cancer.

“Warrants served on Kaiser Hospital for Vanderpool’s medical file failed to produce any records demonstrating diagnosis or treatment for cancer,” according to Appel’s investigation statement.

Vanderpool is due back in court May 28-29.
42 comment(s)

Wannabee wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:15 PM:

" A mentally ill police dispatcher of the year?

Makes on wonder what other unknown skeletons are hiding in the NPD. "

lovingnapa wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:16 PM:

" in this article it states that she was mentally ill? what do they mean by when they say WAS? so she is not ill anymore??????? "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:20 PM:

" 'It was because she had a psychiatric condition to cause her to erroneously report she had cancer...'

That's a great defense! If only I had a psychiatric disorder that caused me to erroneously report my income for tax purposes. I could have saved a bundle!!!

But seriously. The allegations about falsifying the Kaiser documents definitely explains a lot. That's how she must have allegedly supported the chemo procedures she allegedly did not receive.

Did this mental illness also cause her to allegedly divert funds for the purchase and remodeling of her home? What is this strange illness? And how can I get one so that I can allegedly defraud others, and then blame that condition for my alleged malfeasance?

Inquiring minds want to know. "

VERUM wrote on Apr 17, 2009 4:47 PM:

" A candidate for probation, restitution and community service?

Is "discovered" actually a professional diagnosis?

We have to wait until the end of May for more to be revealed. "

pb wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:07 PM:

" How wonderful that all of you who are making these comments are so emotionally healthy - and so all-knowing that you can't even understand that emotional illnesses DO in fact exist. Are these comments being made because you are victims in this? If not, why are you this concerned about something you don't have all the facts about? And is the mental health professional referred to here, a liar? That person could lose their license and livelihood for making something up like that!

How would you feel if you had an emotional dysfunction and people talked to you in this way? Can you even consider for one nano-second that maybe there is an illness present here? Or would that mean that you have to let go of your anger? Those of you that have made these negative judgments, are not much better yourselves if you will so harshly slam someone who is ill. This is not a "legal defense" but a reality - a real condition. No one is condoning what this woman did and she will surely pay the price - and in many ways is already doing so. But to have so little understanding in your hearts is frightening to me. This is a real person with a real problem. Maybe you don't like hearing that there may be an underlying reason for her behaviour. Goodness sakes... you just might have to release your rage. You might just have to look at it from a different vantage point. This is a troubled soul and a fellow human being who has done something she doesn't even understand. She is trying to make it right. Won't you let her? Tune into Martha Stewart and then get back to us on that... "

NV33girl wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:07 PM:

" Thank You Mr. Feasor for seeing the big picture. "If a thief breaks into your house and steals from you are they mentally ill or just a thief?" "

Two Cents wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:10 PM:

" So if she didnt do it for the money, then does she have $50K sitting in her bank account?
No, my guess is that she frivolously spent it.
This absolutely disgusts me... I have a friend who's mother is dying of cancer and I know the emotional toll it is taking on her.
To subject a little girl to that fear and pain unnecessarily is UNFORGIVEABLE... "

mhnapavalley wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:21 PM:

" As a society, we have determined that alcoholism, drug abuse, child abuse and murder can all be explained by mental illness. Are we really expected to believe that greed and manipulation are also caused by mental illness. At some point, no one will be capable of commiting a crime because they are all sick. If she is mentally ill, why does she still have custody of her daughter? "

Napa local wrote on Apr 17, 2009 5:42 PM:

" One word.... Karma.... No one is going to feel sad when it really happens... "

napathoughts wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:03 PM:

" Münchausen syndrome

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchausen_syndrome "

AmCan Mom wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:11 PM:

" Her poor, poor daughter... "

VERUM wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:31 PM:

" I get it. Kleptomania. Of course. "

mumble wrote on Apr 17, 2009 6:42 PM:

" Having Munchhausen's is one thing. Wanting all the attention and getting it by faking an illness is not a crime against society, but one against your friends and family. Vanderpool took it one step further and actually took money using her faked illness to play on people's heart-strings. My mother was diagnosed with cancer last year. She is now skin and bones and lying in a bed waiting for the end. As an adult, this has been very difficult to deal with. I can't even imagine what it would be like to a child, who all she has ever known is her mother's love and companionship. Shame on Vanderpool for doing that to her child. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:01 PM:

" I do feel pity for the daughter. That's for sure. And I can be flip with my comments. I will cop to that.

But I have no regard or pity for this alleged mental syndrome (whether it be Münchausen or otherwise). It is not a legal defense. She should have sought help before this spun out of control, and now she is facing the penalties.

For example, should we excuse serial killers because they are sociopaths? No. And there is a reason for that. To be found not guilty by reason of insanity, it must be shown by a preponderance that Ms. Vanderpool "was incapable of knowing or understanding the nature and
quality of his or her act and of distinguishing right from wrong at
the time of the commission of the offense." Pen. Code 25(b).

Regardless of this disorder, she most likely knew right from wrong. So I doubt that an insanity plea will carry much weight. They are clearly trying to plea diminished capacity under subdivision (c) at the sentencing phase (should a jury convict her).

Sorry, call me old fashioned. You are responsible for your wrongful acts. And I am getting sick of people and corporations shirking accountability and passing on the blame (from Wall Street executives down...) "

1964 wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:14 PM:

" pb.....pb.......can you hear me ? Come down from the clouds and join the real world! Sometimes bad people do bad things and need to suffer the consequences,whether its public ridicule or time in prison. Anyone who commits a crime like this has something wrong with them,a rational person wouldn't even think about it. "

mafi wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:40 PM:

" Amen Mr. Feasor!! "

katt wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:45 PM:

" must dispatchers undergo the same intense psychological analysis as law enforcement officers? if so, i would think that any sort of mental illness would be detected during this process, putting a hole in this defense since she has allegedly been lying about this since 2001, which was before her date of hire. "

mypoint wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:56 PM:

" If you choose the behavior, you choose the consequences...words to live by... "

manxkat wrote on Apr 17, 2009 7:57 PM:

" She may be mentally ill but she outsmarted all the cops. Shows what a pretty face will do to big tough cops and firemen! "

Rocketman wrote on Apr 17, 2009 8:18 PM:

" manxhat.............just goes to show you that public safety folks are human. They all believed her and you want to make a mockery out of this. I hope when you or your family need help, we all trust you! "

napachatter wrote on Apr 17, 2009 8:19 PM:

" No, manxkat, it shows what big hearts that police and firemen have and how far they will go to help one of their own. "

napan79 wrote on Apr 17, 2009 9:31 PM:

" Vanderpool saying she was mental ill as a defense is another lie in my eyes. It is easier to fake that you have a mental illness than having cancer. I believe the mental illness is her plan number two if her cancer lie did not workout. She is going to try to let everyone think she was mental ill at the time she was making false claim, so Vanderpool can knock time off her sentence. Also if others believe Vanderpool and she can convince a doctor she is mental ill maybe she will do time at a mental hospital instead of prison. Vanderpool to me is trying to try anything to get off from doing time for her crimes. Hopefully Vanderpool if charged will do the max time and will have to do community service for years to come. "

concernednapacitizen wrote on Apr 17, 2009 9:41 PM:

" There is a huge difference between being mentally ill and debilitated and mentally ill while still knowing the difference between right and wrong. Vanderpool dispatched for several years; she had to decide if a call she was taking was a crime or not, which shows she knows the difference beteen right and wrong--she was awarded dispatcher of the year because she could sort out in her head what was right and what was wrong. Surely she knows that faking cancer, whether or not she received money, is wrong. Obviously she should have come foreward when donations were taken in her name. I do have to agree with everyone regarding her daughter though. As far as she knows her mother has been "dying" ever since she can remember. How much psychiatry will be needed so that little girl will trust anyone ever again? "

andilee wrote on Apr 18, 2009 4:25 AM:

" First off no one said she was going to plead insanity, diminished capacity, etc. How do you know she doesn't want to make restitution or do whatever she needs and can do to pay for what she is being accused of? You don't think she is already paying a price? She has been 100% cooperative. No one has said she doesn't know the difference between right and wrong. AND no one is condoning what she has done. Are you all that naive to think that she is an all bad person? How many of you actually know her and can say she is a bad person?? Good people do bad things and no one knows better about that then her. Like pb said all she wants to do is make it right, but in this case it will never be enough and this is something she will pay for for the rest of her life. "

pb wrote on Apr 18, 2009 7:00 AM:

" 1964... My point EXACTLY. To quote: “Anyone who commits a crime like this has something wrong with them, a rational person wouldn't even think about it.” Yes!

And..."Sometimes bad people do bad things and need to suffer the consequences whether its public ridicule or time in prison." Do I feel she's "bad"? No. Just troubled. Do I think she will suffer the consequences? Of course! I've said this all along. And again, she WANTS to make restitution. And in addition to "suffering the consequences" she will have to live with what she did - and the effects of it on her daughter, family and friends for the rest of her life. That’s likely to be the worst punishment of all.

Ms. Vanderpool did not "say she has a mental condition". Her physician did. And I'm sure she will be evaluated by another physician through the courts. Let them make that diagnosis. If she's not, so be it. If she is, try to have at least some sympathy. Things go awry in the brain the same way they do in other parts of the body.

Gee... my head in the clouds. That's a much nicer place to be than to try and keep this anger going on and on. To me, the “real world” is a place where we try to get along and to try to understand. Yes, anger is a part of it. But there also comes a time to know that everything that can be said, has been said. It’s time to cool off and see what the doctors and courts decide. Hopefully everyone – especially her daughter – can heal and move on. For Dannille herself, this will all be resolved one way or the other. "

Project707 wrote on Apr 18, 2009 7:37 AM:

" No one has yet questioned if she is lying about having a "mental illness" the same as how she lied about her "ovarian cancer".

How many times are we going to believe her lies and its sounding more and more like she is not going to serve the punishment for her crimes. "

mamyt wrote on Apr 18, 2009 10:18 AM:

" Who is going to start the fund to treat her mental Illness?

Any one who commits crime is mentally deficient in some way. That is a given not a reason for commuted punishment. "

stshagwell wrote on Apr 18, 2009 12:10 PM:

" Actually I think pb is one of the few that gets it...
Further.. Let the non 'mentally deficient' person speak up!
After reading these posts, I would rather be in her position than to actually 'be' half of you people...
Further still.. Let the Jerry Springer types be silent, children are resilient...

More later
jeeeeez "

jmo wrote on Apr 18, 2009 12:23 PM:

" pd yes, she is suffering from "the illness of convenience disease".
Are going to start a defense fund for her? "

robot wrote on Apr 18, 2009 4:19 PM:

" Moral of the story: If you are (in all truth) terminally ill, and you are out of money, apply for police dispatcher or any other position like that. Police seem to be really giving and caring.

Not to be mean, but if she is actually mentally ill, she should have seeked donations for that instead. "

aivat wrote on Apr 18, 2009 6:29 PM:

" I bet jail is no fun....If she is really mental I feel sorry for her, well either way I feel sorry for her. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 18, 2009 6:29 PM:

" andilee - if this psychological condition is raised by defense counsel, it is highly probable that it will be raised as a defense (likely diminished capacity if the matter goes into the sentencing phase). Otherwise, why even mention it?

stshagwell - huh?

As someone who lost several close relatives to cancer, Ms. Vanderpool's conduct - if true - is morally reprehensible. And I find it interesting that she wants to make restitution all of the sudden. After being caught, of course. "

rebob wrote on Apr 18, 2009 8:26 PM:

" Awesome! 'Mentally Ill' is becoming the new scape goat for the system. I feel for her if she "really" is mentally ill. However, I ma sure a low security mental institution is much less of a punishment than a federal prison. "

Grl 2sda wrote on Apr 18, 2009 8:55 PM:

" I am confused about what some are questioning to be "TRUE". Ms. Vanderpool has admitted that she LIED about her claims of having cancer. Where is the confusion?? Granted, this woman is exceptionally good at acting and lying therefore it is hard to believe anything that comes flying out of her mouth, however this is the one admission that is closest to what the investigation has already uncovered.

Many of you are making flippant comments about the NPD for not being thorough about verifying her illness. I believe that to be completely uncalled for. The only one to blame is Ms. Vanderpool. This woman went to the extreme of shaving her head and provided medical documentation supporting her claims. It is hard to believe anyone would try to pull this off, even more disturbing that she felt she could manipulate and lie to her law enforcement colleagues.

It sickens me!

It is my understanding that she is out on bail...I hope she reads every one of these posts and realizing how hurt and angry people are with her actions...and for what Ms. Vanderpool, ATTENTION????

I wonder if you are truly remorseful with your actions or if you are thrilled that you are yet again getting the attention you want. Applause to you, Ms. Vanderpool...
As William Shakespear said "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players...”

It's clear you we played the role as fool in your little production! Exceptional acting...Exceptional!!! "

VERUM wrote on Apr 18, 2009 9:29 PM:

" $50,000 dollars donations and $50,000 dollars bail. Hmmm.

What is not clear in this article is the existing balance of the donations, and how much was misspent; and did the check (s) require more than her signature? "

mypoint wrote on Apr 18, 2009 10:09 PM:

" I wonder why nobody thought it was strange that a "dying" woman purchased a home, and remodeled while saying she couldn't cover her medical costs. And why would a "dying" woman purchase a home in the first place...That would have been the first indication something was not right. "

littlered56 wrote on Apr 18, 2009 10:34 PM:

" Many of you have raised excellant questions and made some very good points. Now that being said, with all this in the papers will the Judge have to grant a change of venue for her trial??
I can not imangine anyone living in Napa county who could serve on the jury with an open mind. I am not trying to be mean about this I just think people in Napa are outraged at this situation as is understandable.
I hope she pleads quilty and asks for help with what must be a mental problem. "

fyreball wrote on Apr 19, 2009 9:30 AM:

" mypoint- If you have never owned a home. And you could die. Would you get one. So that your kid and dog could run and play in the backyard for the frist time? I would. It's to show that you have hope. That things can get better in your life. And that you will be around for a long time. "

mypoint wrote on Apr 19, 2009 4:52 PM:

" fyreball - To answer your question, no I personally would not purchase a home if in fact I way dying. However, I don't understand your point, because she clearly admitted that she wasn't dying. If, however, I did get cancer and I did not already own my own home, I would wait until I was healthy to buy a home, and it wouldn't be with donated money. It would be with my own hard earned money. I wouldn't accept donation money, which should have gone strictly to hospital bills. If you can't afford hospital bills, you also shouldn't be able to purchase a home. "

Ephemerol wrote on Apr 21, 2009 12:56 AM:

" I highly suspect that this woman falls into the general class of people who are sociopaths vs. any mental illness. They are very good manipulators and cunning predators as they are not fully formed humans despite all appearances, social status or occupation. One needs to know about this group of people in life as one will encounter them in many venues along life's road. "Who are these people? Why are they the way they are? Apparently it has little to do with upbringing. Many studies have been done trying to find out what kind of childhood leads to sociopathy. So far, nothing looks likely. They could be from any kind of family. It is partly genetic, and partly mystery" Google "Common everyday sociopaths" for more. "

Mr. Feasor wrote on Apr 21, 2009 7:58 PM:

" Ephemerol - I was kind of leaning that way too (as per my prior posts). I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who had this thought...I hear they can be quite charming and clever too!

Who knows, though. It'll be up to the court system now... "

banjist wrote on Apr 21, 2009 10:44 PM:

" Thanks, verum. My thoughts exactly. How INTERESTING that the bail amount equals the amount she is alleged to have accrued for her treatments. I guess she covered it! "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy