Dead center: Outsiders fight for Copia's remains while the site sits idle, perhaps for years
October 28th, 2009
October 3rd, 2009
August 15th, 2009
August 7th, 2009
July 26th, 2009
June 27th, 2009
June 26th, 2009
June 12th, 2009
June 7th, 2009
It’s been nearly five months since Copia hosted its last dinner.
It may be much longer than that before life stirs anew on the 12-acre property that was, for seven flawed but sometimes spectacular years, Napa’s center for wine, food and the arts.
The Copia bankruptcy case has taken unpredictable turns.
Larger economic forces are impeding progress in the case. The future is uncertain.
The tasks of winding down Copia, selling off the assets, freeing up the property, finding a buyer or buyers, having the new owner or owners gain city approval for their plans and actually seeing the land come back to life might take as long as Copia’s entire lifespan, from grand opening to sudden closing.
Here’s what has happened so far. In November, Copia closed. In December, it filed for bankruptcy, with officials proposing the center could work its way out of debt
Soon thereafter, its bankruptcy plan was rejected and the plan shifted: Copia would sell off its assets, the primary one being the 12 acres bordering the Napa River, and distribute the proceeds to the highest-priority creditors among the nearly 400 left out in cold when the center closed.
Now it appears that plan is to be reset.
The chances are good that next week, a new bankruptcy plan will be approved for the defunct center for wine, food and the arts, one in which people who have had absolutely nothing to do with Copia will take control of its bones.
The reason this firm, Copia Claims LLC, might earn this right is that it stands a better chance of paying off priority creditors than the company that currently has that responsibility, ACA Financial Guaranty Corp.
ACA, a Maryland insurance company, has financial troubles — stemming from the wider mortgage and securities meltdown — far more serious and costly than the collapse of Copia.
Should a bankruptcy judge approve the new plan, Copia Claims LLC, which was formed precisely to take over the bankruptcy process, expects to pursue a complicated financial claim having to do with whether the investors who provided the money to build Copia in 1999 were adequately protected by the refinancing of the center in 2007.
This involves tangled financial and legal questions. What it does not involve is anyone who cares at all about Napa, about the 12 acres in the Oxbow district, about the Copia gardens or anything to do with the center. Copia now is just a pawn in a money game.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
winewoman wrote on Apr 5, 2009 10:00 AM:
JimClark wrote on Apr 5, 2009 10:44 AM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Apr 5, 2009 11:09 AM:
~Ruff "