Survey: Napa farmworkers are paid more
Economist tells grape farmers local workforce more stable than elsewhere
By MIKE TRELEVEN
Register Staff Writer
November 22nd, 2009
November 14th, 2009
A survey of conditions for vineyard workers in the Napa Valley shows they are paid better and earn more benefits than agricultural workers elsewhere in the state, according to a UC Davis professor.
Workers in the valley are also more likely to be employed full time.
In the Napa Valley, about 40 percent of the agricultural workforce is employed full time, 15 percent is part-time and the rest — about 45 percent — is seasonal.
These are some of the findings in a survey UC Davis Professor of Management Bob Yetman did for the Napa Valley Grapegrowers. “There is an effort by grapegrowers here to recognize the benefit of full or part-time employment over seasonal. Those benefits include lower turnover, which leads to higher quality in the vineyard,” Yetman said.
Yetman shared his impressions with members of the Napa Valley Grapegrowers at a workshop at Moulds Family Vineyards on Dry Creek Road earlier this week.
Yetman declined to reveal the specific results of the survey. Jennifer Putnam, executive director of the Grapegrowers, said the group keeps the findings confidential to encourage participation by wineries, vineyard management firms and owners and to protect the privacy of individuals.
Yetman said he sent out 300 surveys and received 62 responses. “It is the larger companies filling out the surveys,” he said. “Those who responded represent about half of all acreage planted to vines in the Napa Valley.”
Wineries with vineyards tend to pay slightly more across the board, according to Yetman. They also tend to hire fewer seasonal workers.
Vineyard supervisors are paid upwards of $20 per hour on average; a foreman earns slightly less than $20 an hour; and a vineyard worker earns in the low teens. Those with special skills, such as mechanics, can see an increase of $2 to $3 an hour over the wages of fieldworkers.
Management companies on average paid slightly less than wineries with vineyards, with top salaries in the mid-$20 an hour range. On average, management companies paid between $3 to $5 per hour less across the board.
Growers who responded to the survey paid between $1 to $4 less than management companies, according to Yetman’s analysis.
Pay raises between 2007-08 were between 1 percent to 9 percent, with an average of 3 percent, “which approximates the economy as a whole,” Yetman added.
As far as benefits, 61 percent of those surveyed offer medical benefits, 64 percent gave paid vacations and 46 percent offered some form of a 401(k) plan. “I am impressed that 46 percent offered some sort of 401(k) plan,” Yetman said.
“Will workers face pay cuts in the Napa Valley?” Yetman asked the audience. “I don’t know. Only you do.”
Yetman said it is harder to cut workers’ salaries if they are mobile or if their skills are easily transferable.
“Vineyard work is skilled work ... they could take it to another wine-growing state,” he said.
“The highest paid workers in agriculture labor can be found in the Napa Valley,” Yetman said in an interview. “It is reasonable to assume some of the highest quality workers in agriculture are here.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
chunk wrote on Mar 22, 2009 12:28 AM:
Maya wrote on Mar 22, 2009 7:26 AM:
Plus, you probably would need to be bilingual to be of benefit to a vineyard employer in order to be able to communicate with the other employees. "
kbf wrote on Mar 22, 2009 7:47 AM:
It would be interesting to see how many of the workers are legal? "
AreYouSerious74 wrote on Mar 22, 2009 8:58 AM:
Interesting, Actually ppl will do the work and the bi-lingual thing is a ruse. Your family has owned a vineyard let me ask what is your lifestyle like? You want to keep the myth up. That is why the results are confidential and so few replied. If I needed work and made $600 cache for two day work I would also keep it quiet. "
109823 wrote on Mar 22, 2009 9:19 AM:
Bill wrote on Mar 22, 2009 9:59 AM:
Does the survey include the labor contractors salary? Most of the truly difficult work is performed by migrant labor who recive few benifits. The plum jobs of managers and supervisors are performed by residents both anglos and hispanics who do not need to physically tend the vines.
Where is the cut off in this survey between field and winery? The bottling line is seasonal but not field work.
Where is the comparison to other grape growing regions instead of a broad agricultural class? "
winewoman wrote on Mar 22, 2009 10:11 AM:
Maya - you perpetuate the stereotype that hispanic people do the work that white people won't do. That is simply not true. Perhaps the "work is too hard" for the some of the indulged and spoiled millenium generation, but white folks have traditonally been the farm laborers as they were once the new immigrants to this great country. I know plenty of (white) people with vineyards and farms whose children were raised working those vineyards and farms. "
kbf wrote on Mar 22, 2009 11:15 AM:
LMW wrote on Mar 22, 2009 12:30 PM:
Where's the contribution to your ROADS!!That has all to do with Health, future of Napa Valley's Health! "
Maya wrote on Mar 22, 2009 12:42 PM:
My understanding is that immigrants of all races have generally done the farm labor jobs, not the later generations. Back a century ago it was Chinese immigrants doing the farm work. I don't deny that a few people who aren't immigrants have done difficult farm labor jobs, but the vast majority of them have been done by immigrants. "
Maya wrote on Mar 22, 2009 12:50 PM:
I have no idea what myth you are referring to, but my lifestyle is modest. I don't own a home, I live in a tiny 2 bedroom house with a family of four, and we make ends meet through my spouse's salary alone. I am curious to hear what myth you think I want to keep up. "
Maya wrote on Mar 22, 2009 12:55 PM:
snakes-even rattlers
mountain lions
weeds-blackberry bushes, and sometimes weeds that cause allergies
insects
chemicals sprayed-even past the REI I don't feel comfortable being out there
weather-both heat and cold-I can stand the heat a little better than the cold or wind
portable toilets-often the closest available toilet each workday "
Maya wrote on Mar 22, 2009 12:58 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 22, 2009 1:43 PM:
Here's the problem I see, and it involves immigrants from 'Anywhere' on the planet. I was visiting a relative at a UCSF hospital recently. UCSF actually hand selects their immigrant nurses from the Philippines (I spoke to an immigrant about this). She said that UCSF told the Phillipine nurses (making $3 an hour) that people in the U.S. didn't want to get their hands dirty and didn't like being nurses because of it.
Is that really true or does UCSF want to hire cheap labor which lasts ten years (it takes that long for immigrants to begin making the same demands as natives). When they cycle through the older level of immigrants, they continuously bring new ones in. It has less to do with getting hands dirty and more to do with saving money.
There are a lot of unemployed, aimless young men in Vallejo. I can assure you that if they were trained and paid property, and a train transported them Upvalley, they would come. They might not speak Spanish though.
We need to begin thinking about putting our Native workers into positions which they've been brainwashed into thinking is too hard for them. It will require public relations efforts.
Instead of bringing one generation after another into this country (we're overpopulated because of it), who are only willing to get their hands dirty for ten years, necessitating a new influx of immigrants, why not use PR to get natives out there? I think it can be done, especially now. It might be more costly, but we cannot go on forever over populating the country with new immigrants willing to get their hands dirty for less than one generation. "
winewoman wrote on Mar 22, 2009 2:08 PM:
kbf wrote on Mar 22, 2009 2:53 PM:
109823 wrote on Mar 22, 2009 3:09 PM:
MarkMiwords wrote on Mar 22, 2009 3:30 PM:
kbc wrote on Mar 22, 2009 3:48 PM:
justmeandyou wrote on Mar 22, 2009 6:48 PM:
sickothis wrote on Mar 22, 2009 8:00 PM:
They didn't last a month. "
steph wrote on Mar 22, 2009 8:12 PM:
I would be very shocked if the nurses you refer to aren't members of a union and each nurse is paid the same union-negotiated salary.
Anything else would be illegal. "
Maya wrote on Mar 22, 2009 8:24 PM:
People here won't understand how difficult the work is unless they get out there and try it themselves, which they won't. It is kind of like camping, and nobody would do that 40 hours a week 11 months a year. Camping is something we do for short periods of time so it is more bearable. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 22, 2009 11:08 PM:
sickothis, 3 people from Vallejo is not a significantly high enough number to be statistically relevant. Besides, do you know the real reasons they left? Perhaps there were transportation issues when gas prices hit $4 a gallon. Maybe they felt awkward being amongst co-workers who did not speak their language. What I'm saying is that we should figure out why they did not last. Did they get paid $20 an hr? Did they receive proper training? Also, it's not as though migrant workers haven't ever abandon fieldwork for construction work. I'll bet you can find three migrant workers who only lasted a month in the field as well.
And Maya, you are a perfect example of second generation migrant workers unwilling to work the fields. Are we supposed to indefinitely bring in generation after generation of migrant workers who only last in the field for ten years? Can we really support it, population wise? it would be an interesting study to find out what happens to second generation descendants of migrant workers, not an isolated case, but an overall evaluation of how it impacts the fabric of our society. You might argue that our country was built on immgration. it was. But we have a different world today. There are already too many people here. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Mar 23, 2009 8:59 PM:
More importantly is my concern that we've lost a piece of our dignity in the process, the part that involves self sufficiency. Soon, our country will, in many respects, be owned by China and politically influenced by the uncontrolled influx of a migrant population.
We should also be concerned about our image. Do we really want the rest of the world believing we are not self sufficient or motivated enough to become nurses, farm workers and construction workers etc? "
napan007 wrote on Mar 26, 2009 2:20 PM:
savenapa wrote on Mar 29, 2009 7:53 PM:
I'd rather pick grapes than be on the end of a shovel trenching for conduit out in the sun for 8-10 hour days. That's what most of the apprentice carpenters did when the stepped onto a job site fairly green. Try building a housing tract for a greedy developer. You get bird-dogged all day, and in the 80's it was all piece work. Hard work is hard work. It's all relative. If you aren't used to the sun you get acclimated in a couple weeks. You learn not to stroke out. It's no big deal...it's just work like anything else. "
Paddy wrote on Apr 5, 2009 9:50 AM:
Have you ever mucked out a hard rock gold mine (lots of rattlers)?... laid pipe in sub-Sahara Africa (Cobras, gators, leapords, etc)? Have you ever dug a well using hand tools, shovels and buckets? How about erradicating forests of bamboo?
My personal list goes on and on. It's insulting and racist to think 'we' haven't worked hard all our lives. I'm angry Americans who don't speak Spanish are not considered for ANY job in this country. "