Reaction to Gavin Newsom in Napa
By MICHAEL HALEY
October 28th, 2009
September 23rd, 2009
August 31st, 2009
August 20th, 2009
Newsom drew an unexpectedly large crowd, and a very enthusiastic one at that. Being a Republican, I don't often go to what felt like an insider Democratic Party event, and this was a very progressive liberal crowd.
One sense that I get in those kind of events is a warm fuzzy feeling, a sense that we are the people who care. We care about the down trodden, we care about those without insurance, we care about minorities, etc, etc, and there is a very nice atmosphere that is created by that sense, and I enjoyed that feeling.
It is a very different sense than I get at Republican events, where the energy is much more aligned with the feeling that "we are the responsible people," the salt of the earth, the competent ones who are going to bail everyone else out when all else fails. And there is a pride in that.
I realized that providing health insurance to everyone, universal health care, is an article of faith for the Democrats, very much akin to the article of faith that the Republicans have in reducing taxes and reducing the size of government. I hadn't quite realized how committed they were to that until tonight, when I could see the reaction to Newsom talking about it, promising it. He touted the fact San Francisco had done it already, without raising taxes no less.
In fact he vaunted the fact San Francisco had a balanced budget, and used all the accomplishments of the city as evidence of his good leadership. A woman next to me was as surprised as I was to hear about the balanced San Francisco budget, and whispered "I heard they had millions in deficits," and I said "and they have hundreds of millions in unfunded liabilities." So there was some skepticism in the crowd on that score, he made San Francisco sound like heaven on earth, but the crowd seemed like they believed it.
So he is running on his record in San Francisco, and that is sure to be heavily scrutinized if he becomes a highly rated candidate. He is a very personable and very likable guy, and has tremendous self confidence and poise, all of which I liked.
He is also a very progressive liberal, hitting on every far left talking point, even saying that some conservative talk show hosts had come around to accepting that global warming is a major threat. I am not so sure about that one, he did disclude Sean Hannity, but with 41% of the American public still thinking that global warming is exaggerated, this still seems like mostly a political statement.
The only time he balked on a progressive view is mentioning that he is not sure about legalizing marijuana, which seemed to be another crowd favorite. He followed that with a gut wrenching story about a mother he knew who was ill sending her son out on the street to find some medical pot for her, and the agony she went through about that. It was more of a politician's trick to layer over the fact that he is against legalizing pot. By the time he was through, we were supposed to forget about that.
The biggest applause line and indeed a standing ovation came when a woman thanked him for standing up for gay marriage. This was a very emotional issue for the crowd.
I have a feeling that if you were to see him in a conservative setting you would hear a very different speech. That's OK at this point, but at some point he is actually going to have to come up with some plan to fix California's budget problems -- the biggest task of the next Governor -- if he wants to get my vote.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
altered ego wrote on Mar 13, 2009 1:31 PM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Mar 13, 2009 3:50 PM:
You sound torn, between your old ideology, your common sense, and your heart.
Obama has already taken the old Bush budget, eliminated the budget gimmicks like pretending that a multi-year war with no end in sight was an emergency and thus 'off-budget' for year after dreary year.
I honestly believe that we are going to see a turn around although I push the lefties to do more and the righties to let the balance be restored.
The last years of the Clinton administration can be used as a model for a government that runs 'in the black', pays it's bills, pays down the debt and still finds room to help it's citizens succeed. And as much as it galls many Republicans, it was President Bush who tipped over a very good apple cart just after Clinton had fixed it up.
Gavin Newsom is another pragmatic progressive who will make an excellent governor.
I wanted to see him, and though you and I have had more that a few 'at-bats' against each other... I want you to know that I appreciated your account of the event.
Maybe we'll have better luck next time!
~Ruff "
Ruff Limblog wrote on Mar 13, 2009 4:06 PM:
In this case the video seems pretty dark to me.
Was it an issue with the backlighting in an otherwise well-lit room for human eyes?
It would be nice to hear you (or the video person if it wasn't you) discuss the production environment.
Were you acknowledged, and given a place to set up? Was there a Q&A afterwards?
Stuff like that.
My experience taking video of events has been that politicians are getting smarter about 'new media' much faster now that the ground is starting to shake under broadcast and print, and citizen media has fatally wounded several what I will call 'press handler staged events' campaigns went south.
It's like an arms race, now that so many smart phones can shoot video.
~Ruff "
Bill wrote on Mar 13, 2009 4:47 PM:
Did you notice how easy it was to get in and see him? Its a pretty open deal compared to trying to hear the opposition party as either a stranger or a Democrat.
That oughta provoke some thing besides comments on this slick wanabe. "
napablogger wrote on Mar 13, 2009 5:22 PM:
PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Mar 13, 2009 6:17 PM:
Oh really? By the last year of Clinton's term the economy was already tanking and the prosperity had nothing - repeat "nothing" - to do with Bill Clinton. It was the tech bubble and it's burst was smaller than our recent financial collapse, yet was big enough to cause many people to lose a lot of money, so if you want to put the blame for that to Clinton, be my guest. But it was small in comparison to the mortgage bubble sponsored by Frank, Waters, Schumer, and Obama. We are well on our way to the Second Democrat Depression.
We might as well elect Newsom, he can turn out the lights when it's all over. "
napablogger wrote on Mar 13, 2009 7:22 PM:
If I viewed it from that angle he is far too liberal for me at this point based on this speech, but like I said I think he was playing to what he percieved to be the local left wing audience. And if he came up with a plan, if anyone came up with a plan to fix our budget mess they would get my vote, all else being equal.
I would have to find out a lot more about him before I make a decision if I can support him or not. I was there to simply observe and take in the event.
I also think it is unfair to judge him on his looks, which it appears some people are doing. Like Lynda Carter (Wonder Woman) used to say, don't hate me because I am beautiful.
He seems authentic to me. A politician, but not overly slick. But it takes time to get to know people.
And Ruff, thanks for your comments.
I am in the video btw, if any of you do not know what I look like. I am the guy in the white long sleeved shirt standing up against the wall in a white baseball hat. It was dark so you can barely see my face. "
Mr4 wrote on Mar 13, 2009 9:06 PM:
krusty wrote on Mar 13, 2009 9:07 PM:
People who don't like Newsom may have valid reasons for not agreeing with him. But does that mean you shouldn't at least hear him out? They base their assumptions on what they read in the press, not on what they see with their own eyes.
The governors race is so wide open at this point that I don't think anyone has decided who they're going to vote for. It's wise to get as much information as possible on each candidate in order to make a more informed decision.
I wish I could have gone to see Newsom. I would have liked to learn more about him. "
a teacher wrote on Mar 14, 2009 12:17 AM:
I would like to believe he is sincere, but I have my hesitations. I can't put my finger on why, though. "
Ruff Limblog wrote on Mar 14, 2009 3:32 AM:
The final Clinton budgets were balanced and the Clinton black ink was turned to sustained BRIGHT DAYGLO RED as soon as Bush could get his tax cuts for the 'haves and have mores' passed.
And all the budget gimmicks to pretend that things were not getting worse blew up in Republican's faces before Bush could dump his mess on his successor.
Bush and the Republican's major 'accomplishments' in office were three:
1) Bush and the Republicans destroyed the economy and made working class Americans yearn for the 'good old days' of Bill Clinton's second term when they had jobs.
2) Bush and the Republicans destroyed the Republican Party's 'fiscal responsibility' message and any lingering respect for Republican 'Supply Side' ideas.
3) Bush and the Republicans failure to deliver for working class Americans helped the Democratic Party win congressional majority in 2006. In 2008 Republicans enlarged the Democratic majority. And, Republicans can be fairly credited with helping elect the first black president of the USA as the economy 'cratered' (John McCain's own words to David Letterman).
Bush was a 'catastrophic success' for Republicans. He delivered on Republican ideology and destroyed his party.
The constant repetition of the standard Republican economic 'analysis' that 'Tax Cuts For the Rich Cure Everything' makes it no surprise Republicans 'ideas' are no longer respected.
You can bet that if Republicans like John Boehner are still talking more Bush-and-Hoover-nomics like: 'Spending freezes', it will be another banner year for Democrats.
Our country is in trouble, Republicans put it there, and so far they aren't helping at all.
~Ruff "
misfit wrote on Mar 14, 2009 8:37 AM:
napablogger wrote on Mar 15, 2009 12:57 AM:
The ones I do know like Jerry Brown or John Garamendi I don't like. "
Ruff Limblog wrote on Mar 15, 2009 4:59 AM:
The demonstrations concerning the school cuts along with Republican hypocrisy and grandstanding on the CA budget mess will be an rather 'Schwartzeneggar-esque' burden for the Republican candidate to carry, and there are LOTS of people unhappy with Republican 'solutions'.
Locally the 'same old song' is not going to carry a Napa county that registration drives pull in more Democrats by a 4 or 5 to 1 margin over Republicans.
Prop 8 lost in Napa County, "my friends" and the continuing rightwing hostility to equal rights for all is not making Republicans any new friends, but lots of enemies.
Please, Republicans, don't change a thing!
~Ruff "
kevin wrote on Mar 15, 2009 9:20 AM:
A candidate could be intelligent, resourceful and competent, but if he promotes those Party ideals, he is not viable and there is no point in wasting time listening to them... "
sickothis wrote on Mar 15, 2009 1:16 PM:
Keep it up, please. "
freeport56 wrote on Mar 16, 2009 8:25 AM:
cab e-girl wrote on Mar 16, 2009 5:33 PM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Mar 18, 2009 11:39 AM:
And if Mr4 is not chosen by his compadres, then it would be grand to have Mr4 be an official campaign spokesperson.
There are several local Republican voices that will hopefully speak up loud and clear about things like denying healthcare, cutting teachers, not paving our highways, and keeping taxes low for the well-to-do while the unemployed including Good People, are homeless.
Most Californians are pretty fed up with these kinds of Republican 'solutions' already, and even more voters will be by the time the Republican budget cuts really bite. We are already seeing letters on the opinion page about the Republican budget cuts in store for education.
The stew pot Republicans have landed themselves in should be merrily boiling by next year, you betcha!
Just like Bush was the albatross around the neck of John McCain, Arnold Schwartzeneggar and the Republican grandstanders in the state house will be tenderly and lovingly hung around the necks of Republican candidates in 2010.
It should make for a Republican donnybrook of epic proportions.
~Ruff "
C'mon reg get it right wrote on Mar 19, 2009 9:44 AM:
Thank you for your well reasoned comments. I am a democrat but look at politics with a questionable eye. I espicially appreciated your tone. No need to attack, acknowledge other groups views bravo. Thank you "
steph wrote on Mar 19, 2009 11:42 PM: