NVR Logo
Coming together to give change a chance
Friday, March 06, 2009
Save and Share Share
I have heard that Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal did not end the Great Depression, that it was really World War II. This is partly true. However, World War II was, in itself, a gigantic stimulus package.

The most important message FDR gave us was hope and confidence in our government. He showed that government does care for all its citizens — businesses, the unemployed, homeless, elderly and poor — and that he would do all he could to end their pain. I believe this is exactly what the Obama administration is trying to do today.
What really ended the Great Depression was a combination of fair taxes, government programs, World War II and a concerted effort by all citizens of this nation. Franklin Roosevelt gave us a unity of purpose and faith in our government that we could get the job done.

Obama has been in office just a few weeks and the obstructionists are already doing everything in their power to tear down the change that most Americans want. He has established a special bond between the presidency and the American people. Obama believes in democracy and the free market, and the capacity of Americans to address their ills affecting society. He refuses to accept that government invariably bungles whatever is attempted, and this refusal has inspired new ideas and government efforts that will have a positive effect on our country.
Will Obama get everything right? Nobody can, but most of what he does will be right. And if he makes mistakes he is presidential enough to admit it and take proper action.

He says he believes that old age need not be accompanied by poverty, and that receiving government help is not a brand of failure but a temporary step toward success. All of us may need help during our lifetime, even corporations and banks.
There are some, when their arguments fade, that resort to placing labels on everyone who disagrees with their ideology. Let’s forget the labels and examine the ideas of others on whether these ideas are right or wrong for our nation. Let’s start thinking more about what is best for our country, not what is best for our party or winning elections.

Let’s give our new leader a chance, and then if we are worse off at the end of his term, we can elect someone else. Let’s give change a chance. Isn’t that what most of us voted for?

How sad that FDR’s programs, and the millions that it helped and is still helping, have to be debated again, especially in these hard times.

I lived through the Depression and the hardships that we had to endure: the millions that were out of work, the unemployed who came to my mom and dad’s farm asking only to work for food. My parents never let anyone leave their farm hungry.

I was a youngster at that time and I used to get excited when someone who was unemployed (Pa would call them “gentlemen of the road”) would arrive. It was so interesting for me to hear their stories about how many of them once enjoyed prosperity, and now because of no fault of their own needed help.

Pa used to tell me a story that prior to getting married to my mother, he once baked delicious pancakes under a bridge near Santa Rosa, for his friends. He was loved by everyone in Sonoma, and I am not surprised that at one time he could have been a “gentleman of the road.”

Homeless victims of that era were educated individuals, farm workers, railroad workers, factory workers, all walks of life, who worked hard at anything that came along. They were not bums, as we all realized that it could just as easily have been us traveling that same route. It was an education that lasted all my life.

However, there is something very different now than in the 1930s, something that will help us through this terrible economic crisis:

1) Social Security, which has helped so many millions of Americans.

2) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which has protected the American citizen from losing their life savings.

3) Workers’ compensation, which has helped thousands of workers who have lost their jobs.

4) The Wagner Act and the Taft Hartley Act, which protect the rights of workers.

5) The GI Bill of Rights, which gave thousands of servicemen and women an opportunity for a college education and the ability to purchase a new home, which went far in establishing our middle class.

We now have our chance — Republicans, Democrats, Independents, all Americans — to unite in debate as a nation, not to settle old scores or enhance our pocketbook but to bring this nation forward so all may benefit.

Let’s have a unity of purpose, for ourselves, our nation and the world.

(Giorgi lives in Napa.)ꆱ
31 comment(s)

napablogger wrote on Mar 6, 2009 1:12 AM:

" great letter, thanks for writing it. "

another voice wrote on Mar 6, 2009 6:05 AM:

" Well the FDIC is out of money, our president has trash talked the economy and done everything possible to discourage business, his "brain trust" has succeeded in making choices that have decimated most people's retirement funds and he is just getting started "spreading the wealth around." He is getting rid of inequality. People who have saved for 30 years now have as much as people who went on vacations, bought new cars and generally lived "for the moment" instead of those of us who have been "stupidly" paying our mortgages, saving our 15% for retirement, and giving to charities. We certainly have change.
And I like the new change of just taking over solvent organizations, too. Like all the poor people who were in the private school loan business the president has just nationalized. Sorry to all those people who are now unemployed in an industry that was not broken. And his statesman like actions including giving the bust of Churchill back to the Brits, and in exchange for a pen holder made from the timbers of an anti-slave ship, our sophisticated president reciprocated with a DVD collection of American movies. Classy. Real Classy.
I think leveling the playing field in Mr Obama's book is really just bringing us all down to the lowest common denominator.
And with the FDIC now broke, are you taking your money out of the bank today, or tomorrow?
I am not an obstructionist. I am just scared silly. "

common sense wrote on Mar 6, 2009 6:56 AM:

" Since Obama's taken office, the stock market has dropped ~3000 points. Jimmy Carter had a similar response. There is now more money circulating in the economy than any other time in US history...by a very large amount. (Inflation is coming...get ready).

The big-government liberalism promoted by Obama is NOT change. It is the same old garbage that we've fought against before. It doesn't work, it never has, and it won't this time. The question I have is...how long will it take for America to wake up and recognize what is going on? "

rpcv wrote on Mar 6, 2009 7:14 AM:

" Wise words, Mr. Giorgi. If only, for a little while, we could put aside hatred, suspicion and ideology and work together to fix this mess. Maybe in another world, another life.... "

JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Mar 6, 2009 7:32 AM:

" Thank you, Mr. Giorgi, for your letter, it's an insightful look at the past, and brings hope for our future. "

antipc wrote on Mar 6, 2009 7:58 AM:

" Nice attempt to paint a rosy picture but the reality is SSI will soon be insolvent, the FDIC just had to borrow $500 billon from the treasury, & workmen’s comp has become a safe haven for people who don’t want to work.

Doing what’s best for the country is not the strong suit of the party in charge & working with republicans & independents is the last thing they are going to do. They see this as an opportunity to further the socialist agenda while punishing the responsible productive sector with higher taxation, not to mention generations of debt.

At the current rate of spending I don’t think we afford to wait four years to replace the President. "

Raven wrote on Mar 6, 2009 8:16 AM:

" and what are you suggesting antipc, if we can't wait four years? "

O/U now wrote on Mar 6, 2009 8:19 AM:

" We dont need Obama to fix anything, He can and will only make it worse. FDR prolonged the depression with the "new deal" Should we have another world war to fix this mess? People need to take responsibilty for their own life and quit depending on everybody else. If they loose their homes, whats wrong with living in a tent? Are americans that soft? If they starve its their own fault. Why stay in a place where you can't find work. What is wrong with eating off the land? BE STRONG not a whimp eat possem. "

Common Sense wrote on Mar 6, 2009 8:53 AM:

" Latest Bloomberg study: The Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen faster under President Obama than under any new president in at least 90 years. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Mar 6, 2009 8:54 AM:

" The government and the Fed will put in all the money needed to keep folks bank deposits up to the FDIC limit of $250,000 dollars available for withdrawal.

It's a pity to hear Republican voices 'talking down' the banking system at the same time they complain about the president supposedly doing so.

What's really sad is to hear the same old bunkum being pushed that "Tax Cuts Will Cure EVERYTHING!" when eight years of Bushite-Hoover policies is exactly what ruined the country.

~Ruff "

antipc wrote on Mar 6, 2009 9:11 AM:

" Nice try Raven but I'm not going to plagurize SkipM. "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Mar 6, 2009 9:56 AM:

" The junior high school I attended was built by WPA workers during the Great Depression. The WPA was a great program, and it worked for me!

I purchased a home in Napa through the FHA. That program worked for me!

Unemployment was at 23.5% when FDR took office. Unemployment was down to about 9% in 1940, well before the US entered World War II.

Wars are not good for the economy. World War II did not help the US economy. Indeed, the US invasion of Iraq has been an economic catastrophe for both the US and Iraq.

FDR's SEC helped to restore credibility to the financial markets during the Great Depression. I'd like to see the SEC begin doing its job again.

President Obama's recently proposed budget ought to be supported by both GOPers and Democrats. "

Bauhausfan wrote on Mar 6, 2009 9:59 AM:

" Common Sense - " Latest Bloomberg study: The Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen faster under President Obama than under any new president in at least 90 years. "

And you are suggesting it is Obama's fault, I presume, and nothing to do with Bush and the Republican policies that created this mess?

I am sure, in hardcore conservative minority of this country, roughly 20-25% of the population they will believe this, but most people, know what brought us to where we are. "

freeport56 wrote on Mar 6, 2009 10:33 AM:

" MJH-

ROOSEVELT PRE-WWII NEW DEAL

1932 Unemployment Rate: 23.6% (12.8 million total unemployed)

1940 Unemployment Rate: 14.6% (8.1 million total unemployed)

Unemployment Rate Change: -9.0
Total unemployment percentage change: -36.7%

Source-David Sirota


Your numberas are a liitle shy of the truth. WWII . From 1941 to 1944 the unemployment rate dropped to 1.2% as the the War Time production effort was under way. The WPA were employed by the Government and did not do any private sector work. The WPA was a public works construction arm of the federal government. Government jobs do not stimulate the economy, innovation and manufacturing in the private sector do. Money in the pockets of businesses and individuals do. Socialism depresses an economy. As do the Presidents fiscal-pull-it-out -of-hat policies. "

altered ego wrote on Mar 6, 2009 11:48 AM:

" " This letter is the epitome of Ideological reaction and has no bearing on the reality of the situation "


I like that, hear ye! "

Mr4 wrote on Mar 6, 2009 11:48 AM:

" Jerry,

Very sweet but tragically naive.

All those programs come from our big hearts and have served the Greatest Generation well. We'll just ignore all of future generations that have only begun to pay for it.

The utopian ideals have been tried and tried again - always with the same result.

But maybe this time if we all hold hands and sing Cumbaya with real love everything will come out rainbows and ice cream! "

Raven wrote on Mar 6, 2009 12:42 PM:

" again antipc, you are suggesting that something needs to happen to Obama? What do you think will happen? There is no need to lift anything from anyone....just tell us what you think will happen or we need to do? "

cab e-girl wrote on Mar 6, 2009 2:45 PM:

" Raven: Perhaps Obama can trade up to Valenzuela and join Chavez in fighting for socialism. He did invite Obama today! "

cab e-girl wrote on Mar 6, 2009 3:15 PM:

" Bauhausfan: No one is blaming Obama for what happened prior to his taking office.

Obama; however sold his Presidency on the economic downturn and his ability to turn the economy around. He VOLUNTEERED for the job and promised that his way was the best way. Certainly the DJI, which has dropped from 9500 when he took office, to it's current 6600 does not have much HOPE in his ability to turn things around. The market looks forward, not back and that should be a red flag all of us. His radical and out of control spending has not impressed investors, nor does it impress me. Instead of crying about not being responsible for the state of the economy, we would like to see some leadership owning up to the responsibility of the job Obama fought so hard to get elected to. "

kevin wrote on Mar 6, 2009 5:20 PM:

" Democrat financial adviser Jim Cramer has it right:

"Look at the incredible decline in the stock market, in all indices, since the inauguration of the president, with the drop accelerating when the budget plan came to light because of the massive fear and indecision the document sowed: Raising taxes on the eve of what could be a second Great Depression, destroying the profits in healthcare companies (one of the few areas still robust in the economy), tinkering with the mortgage deduction at a time when U.S. house price depreciation is behind much of the world's morass and certainly the devastation affecting our banks, and pushing an aggressive cap and trade program that could raise the price of energy for millions of people."

The only question I have is how someone so smart could have been fooled into voting for B.O. in the first place... "

PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Mar 6, 2009 5:52 PM:

" ruff, it was not tax cuts that ruined the economy. Tax cuts help the economy by putting the money where it can do the most good (hint: it's not the government).

It was ACORN, Schumer, Waters, and Frank pressuring mortgage lenders to give mortgages to people who could not make the payments.

It was greedy corporate/financial types who packaged up these mortages and sold them, then ran crying to the government for bailouts while writing themselves checks for fat bonuses (for cleverness?)

It was Congress (both parties) voting for irresponsible $pending, and for wars we didn't need to be in.

It was Congress (both parties) who can't get off the drug called earmarks. They know what they propose wouldn't pass a straight up and down vote so they slip it into another bill that has a better chance of passing.

It was a president elected only on the basis of his ability to charm a crowd while his followers shout down anyone who dares ask questions about his ability to lead or his real-world experience.

It was this president saying we must have a huge stimulus and the lemming-like rush of congressional leadership to pass ill-conceived legislation taking money from the citizens to chew up in the government dungeons and parcel back out to their friends. We will be a long time getting over this mess. No one in the presidential or congressional branches has a clue if any of this will work. They are only trying to make themselves look good.

Now the threat of higher taxes is causing millions of jobs to disappear, along with market value and millions of retirement accounts.

How is socialism going to fix this? More spending and taxes. Good luck with that. "

PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Mar 6, 2009 6:07 PM:

" Someone who believes in this stimulus, please explain how the government taking money from its citizens and passing it back out to their corporate buddies, and taking money from responsible people who pay their mortgages and giving it to those who shouldn't have had a mortgage in the first place - how does this help turn the economy around?

Specifically, where is the benefit? The only benefit is to government bureaucracy and executives who want bigger golden parachutes, and to those in Congress who gain power by having all this money under their control. The people on Main Street will get . . . higher taxes while they lose their jobs. I guess if you're not working at least you won't have to worry about paying those higher taxes. And those of you who chant that the tax increases are only on the rich and the corporations - Wake Up! It won't work like you think it will. Sounds great to tax the rich, and if it worked I would be right up there with you clamoring for it. But rich people pay my salary (for me, quite literally). If they pull back and don't pay me, then I will become a tax burden rather than a tax payer.

Even the apologists admit that we certainly won't get 3 or 4 or 5 million new jobs. Even the government budget office doesn't think that the stimulus will do any good at all.

Every day I read about more calls for government programs to do everything for us so we won't even have to blow our noses when we get the sniffles.

So what happens when taxes get to be more than 100% of the GDP? "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Mar 6, 2009 6:43 PM:

" Freeport56 is correct about the 1940 unemployment rate, and I stand corrected.

Public investment in infrastructure helps spur private enterprise. Silicon Valley boomed because of prior public investment in universities and defense industries. Roads, bridges, canals, schools and a regulated economy help private businesses. "

PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Mar 6, 2009 9:50 PM:

" Our crumbling infrastructure is an embarrassment to our nation. Deferred maintenance and construction of necessary structures should be a standard part of our government budget instead of the socialist schemes we are burdened with.

Notice the word "necessary" - we don't need the pork barrel kind of ego-driven pet project construction.

We also have a problem with specific taxes collected for things like road maintenance, which are then used for other purposes - then we get the calls for increased taxes. No, we don't want increased taxes. We want our road fund taxes used for road repairs, not other government silliness. "

dellasumbrella wrote on Mar 6, 2009 10:18 PM:

" Very nice piece, Mr. Giorgi, and despite the very vocal few who will do their best to taint truth and create contention where it need not exist, there are many who will join you in that unity of purpose.

So thank you reminding us of the possibilities. "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Mar 6, 2009 10:20 PM:

" By the way... The "real" unemployment rate is probably more than 14% right now! "

Raven wrote on Mar 7, 2009 9:32 AM:

" The official is now up to 8.1 percent nationwide, highest in 25 years ... and next month will prob be worse... but as MJH says, that rate doesn't include people who have exhausted their bennies, stopped looking or are working part time after losing their job because their isn't fill time work available. "

glenroy wrote on Mar 9, 2009 3:47 PM:

" WW2 war production began ramping up in late 1938 and increased through 1945.… the employment lib’s claim resulted from FDR’s make work had less than 1% impact on the unemployment percentage…the rest is all WW2 and had nothing to do with FDR’s make work programs.

Additionally, there were thousands of Americans who enlisted in foreign services….

This is pretty basic stuff….not surprising too complicated for some.... "

anticommie wrote on Mar 12, 2009 11:47 PM:

" I hope you are getting all the change you Leftests voted for, cause this country is headed down a path of socialism that will be very difficult to dig ourselves out of. All being done with feel good words like: "Change" "Hope" "Progressive" "Fair" and "Liberalism."

Norman Thomas was right this country will adapt socialist principals once the word "socialism" is replaced by "liberalism." And a majority of voters fell for it, if not full out embraced it. "

jwk wrote on Mar 15, 2009 4:36 AM:

" Now we've seen the Change the Knuckleheads, Lib's and Main Stream Media wanted I hate to see "The Hope".. Good Grief!! God Help us for the next 3 1/2 years and COUNTING Down... "

JimClark wrote on Mar 16, 2009 3:05 PM:

" Social Security? It may have been more advisable to invest one's money into a capitalist fund that would allow a better return on one's investment into it. Being taxed on retirementment funds is an infamnia. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy