Caldwell won race on the cheap
Supervisor’s campaign spent $50,000 to Simpson’s $160,000, records show
By KERANA TODOROV
Register Staff Writer
Keith Caldwell spent $50,400 — less than a third as much as his opponent Gary Simpson — in his successful bid to become the member of the Napa County Board of Supervisors representing District 5, final campaign finance records show.
Simpson, the former Napa County sheriff, spent close to $160,000 between July 2007 and December 2008, according to campaign finance reports filed Feb. 2 with the Napa County Clerk’s office. He ended the campaign, which included a June primary and November runoff, debt-free.
Caldwell said he came up a little shy in his fundraising and paid $6,000 to cover outstanding bills.
The former American Canyon fire chief said this week that he tried to run a grassroots campaign that did not require big fundraising.
To put a cap on expenses, he limited the number of mailings of political fliers, each run of which can cost as much as $6,000. Instead, Caldwell said he walked as many neighborhoods as he could. In Coombsville, where houses are often far from the road and pedestrians can only make it as far as the gate, Caldwell scheduled coffee meetings and sent campaign post cards.
For his part, Simpson said he sent six or seven mailers and paid for radio spots and newspaper advertisements. “Obviously, that was not enough,” he said.
Running in a district where half the votes came from American Canyon was a tough go, he said. “A popular fireman from American Canyon is hard to beat,” he said.
In addition, Democrats turned out in force for Barack Obama in November and the Democratic Party in Napa came out for Caldwell.
“The Republicans didn’t do that for me,” Simpson said.
Mark Joseph, Caldwell’s campaign treasurer and former American Canyon city manager, on Friday said the campaign “didn’t really want to raise so much we would be beholden to anybody.”
Simpson, who ran successfully for sheriff five times, including four times unopposed, has not ruled out another future race. “You never know,” he said.
In the meantime, he has no regrets, he said. “You just take your best shot,” Simpson said. “I’m not bitter about a thing.”
Both Caldwell and Simpson raised little-to-no money in the waning days of the campaign, finance forms show.
Simpson received no money last quarter. Caldwell raised $150.
According to the campaign finance disclosure forms, Simpson raised about $162,000 in 2007 and 2008, including $4,000 in nonmonetary contributions.
Caldwell reported raising about $44,000 between July 2007 and December 2008, including $5,000 in nonmonetary contributions.
District 2
In the District 2 campaign for supervisor, incumbent Mark Luce won the election in a runoff campaign with 70 percent of the vote over Harry Martin, publisher of the Napa Sentinel and a former Napa City Councilman.
Luce raised about $172,000 and spent about $157,500 between July 2007 and December 2008, his campaign finance forms show. Luce finished the year with about $15,000 in cash on hand.
Martin reported raising about $9,000 and spending about $4,000 in newspaper advertisements in the Sentinel.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
boise1 wrote on Feb 12, 2009 8:26 AM:
When you have the majority for slow-growth it is the message not the dollar that wins.
Its all about grass-roots!!! "
Cadence wrote on Feb 12, 2009 2:18 PM:
delphi wrote on Feb 12, 2009 6:51 PM:
We are all for slow growth except for a few Napa Pipe suppoters. The forces of slow growth are a bit tarnished in the last year. Caldwell and the phoney diplomas( when is the Register going to give us an update on their lawsuit against AmCan to release the report that could of cost Caldwell the election?) and now former Planning Commissioner Jim King and his resignation. Again we all want slow growth but we also want good representives to advocate for us. "