The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
jeeper16 wrote on Jan 18, 2009 6:34 PM:
They are nothing more than a bunch of urban terrortists. "
Dwayne wrote on Jan 18, 2009 6:45 PM:
mytwocents wrote on Jan 18, 2009 7:40 PM:
VERUM wrote on Jan 18, 2009 7:41 PM:
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Jan 18, 2009 9:11 PM:
From your comments on this and other articles, you seem to be implying we are inventing these stories. We report the events that take place in this community, and this took place here. "
db76 wrote on Jan 18, 2009 9:25 PM:
yoyo wrote on Jan 18, 2009 9:43 PM:
I am glad this is reported. This is what a local paper needs to be reporting on. Thanks Dan Ross and keep it up! "
VERUM wrote on Jan 18, 2009 10:28 PM:
But again, no bomb. Just bogus. And the police had no idea that this relative existed and could be a target? "
napaoldguy wrote on Jan 18, 2009 11:36 PM:
I would much rather hear about the fake bomb scare then what's happening on Monday which I believe is a fake holiday or Tuesday. "
reason-ator wrote on Jan 19, 2009 12:26 AM:
I understand the anger of the people of Oakland. It's been festering since before the Riders, and simmering with the illegal warrants that got some of their favourite drug dealers arrested. But after seeing a young man destroying someone else's property in the recent riots while saying "Someone gotta pay", I can't help but feel that they are losing sympathy from some people who can't logically understand this misguided theory of justice.
They are protesting the punishment of innocent people by punishing innocent people. Not too smart. "
lousy naive ignorant napan wrote on Jan 19, 2009 7:07 AM:
Maybe we should just ignore it and pretend we don't have a serious problem... "
Maya wrote on Jan 19, 2009 7:47 AM:
gladtobegone wrote on Jan 19, 2009 8:52 AM:
notshocked wrote on Jan 19, 2009 9:20 AM:
I think the report of a bomb scare is important; it is nothing short of terrorism to the family and neighborhood and the perpetrators, if found, should be punished to that full extent! "
lousy naive ignorant napan wrote on Jan 19, 2009 10:12 AM:
I completely agree. If a bomb scare (or 2) inside city limits isn't front page news, I don't know what is... "
Dwayne wrote on Jan 19, 2009 11:10 AM:
The cops destroyed them because they couldn't figure out whether it was cookies for the family, or something ordered from E-Bay... That's standard procedure if X-Rays cannot determine the contents, but it doean't mean it was a bomb, or even that it was intended as a fake scare... In fact, the cops refused to disclose what the contents were, but did say there were no explosives...
Both could have been quite innocent, and this is being blown way out of proportion because the police don't want to admit that they just blow things up when they don't know what else to do... The results are the paranoid comments here...
Besides, handling it this way insures that Napa has a bomb squad, and that they get some procedural practice... Not releasing information is the same mentality as in the Bart shooting...
Get a grip..... "
lousy naive ignorant napan wrote on Jan 19, 2009 1:52 PM:
Yes, it was probably just some nice person bringing cookies... And those nice people in Oakland didn't mean to cause any damage... "
notshocked wrote on Jan 19, 2009 4:25 PM:
Get a grip. "
Dwayne wrote on Jan 19, 2009 5:24 PM:
Paranoia is much more exciting than reality... Have fun..... "
mytwocents wrote on Jan 19, 2009 6:29 PM:
" Please note that neither was a "bomb"...
The cops destroyed them because they couldn't figure out whether it was cookies for the family, or something ordered from E-Bay... That's standard procedure if X-Rays cannot determine the contents, but it doean't mean it was a bomb, or even that it was intended as a fake scare... In fact, the cops refused to disclose what the contents were, but did say there were no explosives...
Both could have been quite innocent, and this is being blown way out of proportion because the police don't want to admit that they just blow things up when they don't know what else to do... The results are the paranoid comments here...
Besides, handling it this way insures that Napa has a bomb squad, and that they get some procedural practice... Not releasing information is the same mentality as in the Bart shooting...
Get a grip..... "
I'm willing to bet Dwayne lives no where near So East Napa. If you were closer you may think more clearly and take it more seriously. "