What will climate change bring to Napa vineyards?
The types of grapes suitable for the Napa Valley may change if global warming continues as projected. The topic was the subject of a Napa Sustainable Winegrowing Group meeting on Tuesday. Register file photo |
Buy photos
Sustainable group meeting focuses on growing concern
By MIKE TRELEVEN
Register Staff Writer
Is the end near for pinot noir in Carneros?
Dozens of people crowded into a meeting Tuesday to discuss the possible effects of climate change on Napa Valley’s grape growing industry.
Featured speaker Kim Nicholas Cahill at the Napa Sustainable Winegrowing Group event suggested that if Carneros is no longer cooled by the bay breezes and marine layer as it is today, change may be in order in the vineyards.
Cahill is a viticulture associate at UC Davis whose family includes Sonoma county farmers. She has a Ph.D. from Stanford University and has extensively studied local effects of climate change.
She said she was “not aware of anyone in Carneros switching right now from pinot noir on a large scale. But it is something people are considering.”
At least 60 people crowded into a small conference room at Walsh Vineyards Management to get an update on local climate change impacts on the Napa Valley.
Nicholas Cahill told the audience that predictions are for a nearly 1 degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature by 2020. “We can expect to live in a climate we have never lived before,” she said.
Under that scenario, the best location for pinot noir is likely farther north, along the coast of Oregon and Washington.
Will it really happen? “I hesitate to say exactly what people will do, because it is easy to over simplify the issue. Growers might have some very innovative options they may take advantage of,” said Nicholas Cahill after the meeting.
For example, more cutting-edge growers may experiment with different trellising systems to provide more shade. “There’s a laundry list of possible things ... different irrigation techniques ... but to say how much benefit, that has not been completed,” Nicholas Cahill said.
Warmer temperatures will stress vines more than current conditions, she said.
Exactly how much warmer temperatures will get depends on greenhouse gas emissions humans continue putting into the atmosphere during the next 20 to 30 years, added Nicholas Cahill.
“The point is vine development is tied to temperature,” she said. The goal is to have a certain balance between tannins and acids at harvest time. With warmer temperatures, sugar levels also tend to go higher while acid levels drop. That is not desirable with pinot noir.
Nicholas Cahill said research reveals that the Napa and Sonoma valleys have seen more of an increase in night-time temperatures than daytime.
“The wine industry must overcome barriers and adapt to these changes. It will require an integration of researchers and growers in a balanced dialogue,” she said.
One person in the audience told Nicholas Cahill that he has heard that growers of gewurztraminer in Austria are switching to warmer weather varietals due to the early signs of climate change. He added that cooler varietals seem to be moving toward France, which is experiencing cooler weather patterns.
Another person in the crowd suggested local grapegrowers should begin talking with growers in Paso Robles, which is warmer than the Napa Valley. “They have that experience.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
calistoga_tony wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:28 AM:
The Polar ice caps were supposed to be melted and gone by now, yet the ice is thicker now it has been in recent years. What else will the global warming types ignore to push their imaginary agenda? Please enough of the global warming. "
areyouserious wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:55 AM:
psoren wrote on Jan 14, 2009 1:18 AM:
I have taken university level college courses on the Environment. I was also a firm believer in Global Warming - a theory that is pushed heavily in universities across this country. Until I read this book and researched his footnotes.
You just have to stand back and admire the power of the media... "
kevin wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:03 AM:
How well do grapes grow under snow and ice? "
Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:50 AM:
I agree.
Is climate change the new "PC" term for global warming since they don't know if the temps going up or down? LOL "
missmarvelous wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:13 AM:
antipc wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:46 AM:
neonapan wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:49 AM:
Call me crazy, but I think I'll take the scientific community's opinion over Calistoga Tony's. To believe otherwise means you have swallowed the oil business' minority opinion of the issues. It is them, and our lame duck president's administration, who have tried to obfuscate this issue. "
db76 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:04 AM:
jwk wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:05 AM:
krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:06 AM:
mikeb wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:12 AM:
localmama wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:29 AM:
Missmarvelous, it is apparent you don't enjoy the fruits of the wineries labor. Napa Valley is well known throughout the world for their wines, the supply and demand will always be there for a normal households staple whether it be for entertaining or everyday use.
This gloom and doom is just so boring and tiresom. "
krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:09 AM:
Not only does she visit with people who are out in the environment and have been conducting studies and taking samples, but she visits with scientists who have performed highly sophisticated climate models that show a direct increase between the amount of CO2 in the air and temperature rise. You can argue all you want about it, but are you going to listen to a government with it's hands in the oil companies pockets, or a large group of scientists who have seen the effects first hand? "
reason-ator wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:35 AM:
I'm of the opinion that we can't slow climate change. Our little country is not expanding its industry exponentially, like the countries on the other side of the world that have billions of people. The air we saw in China during the Olympics was AFTER they'd made a huge effort to clean it up by shutting down factories. Can you imagine what it's like when the world isn't watching ? And that air pollutiing blows over here, and we're not going to stop it by buying the Priuses over here that result in the pollution over there.
We can knock ourselves out and strangle ourselves economically and the other countries that will flourish will still pollute the world. We can't fix their problem. Let them do it. "
Native74 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:47 AM:
I started planting an orchard and each year I put in a new row. Just planning for the future. We used to have so many beautiful fruit orchards in Napa so why not begin again? "
Econut wrote on Jan 14, 2009 10:19 AM:
Human activities have a net INCREASE in global temperature, but whether it accounts for 0.2% or 20% or 100% of the current warming trend, nobody knows with certainty. Global warming is happening, it is not a hoax, and humans are contributing to it. However, I believe overconsumption of natural resources and habitat destruction are far more serious environmental issues than global warming.
I endorse Krusty's suggestion to read "Field Notes from a Catastrophe." It's an excellent book. "
freeport56 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 10:22 AM:
krusty- you better check more than on source for promulgating the warming hoax. global temperaures are falling buddy. It seems that GW will be the source of tax revenue for the new Democrat Empire. "
JimClark wrote on Jan 14, 2009 11:09 AM:
We have absolutely no control over our Earth and its future. We exist here and, while we ARE here, we must take our humanity to its highest level.
Please do not sell your future to a collection of simple-minded opportunists. "
reason-ator wrote on Jan 14, 2009 11:42 AM:
I could live with that. "
2056 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:04 PM:
mikeb wrote on Jan 14, 2009 1:40 PM:
Napagrrl wrote on Jan 14, 2009 1:52 PM:
JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:03 PM:
nogrooveinsolano wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:18 PM:
Excuse me whilst I enjoy my Pinot Noir. Good night. "
another voice wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:20 PM:
The way "Climate Change" rolls off most people's tongues, the campaign has clearly worked.
Sigh. "
steph wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:51 PM:
You forgot to tell people to buy a Prius. Oh, and continue to brag about your plane rides to various locations around the globe cause you're all eco-conscious like that. "
steph wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:55 PM:
...wait...
how do we bend the curve? Where's the data on that?
*yawn* Global Warming Schmobal Schmarming. "
Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:05 PM:
My mom would do exactly the same thing with me...However, when you have a stomach bug, you are pretty much "forced" to stay home if you know what I mean...my brain and fingertips are OK.
Thanks for your concern...btw, I am always up at 5:00 when my dad leaves for work.
Thanks for the concern though. :) "
Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:08 PM:
Wow. What a waste of money. Could have gone to the schools... "
krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:20 PM:
steph wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:25 PM:
Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:37 PM:
Thanks! As a matter of fact she's standing behind me telling me to quit blogging... (blushing smiley) "
imamonk wrote on Jan 14, 2009 6:11 PM:
3rdgenNapan wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:38 PM:
If it gets too cold, our vineyards can revert to hops -like they did in england when the climate got too cold for their grapes in the mid-ages. "
109823 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:01 PM:
krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:21 PM:
The computer models have predicted the changes we have already seen. The computer models were tested against the past in order to determine their accuracy.
Taking air samples from ice that is thousands of years old has given us the ability to measure the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere at that time. It has been shown that the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere has a direct impact on temperature. When you see that the amount fo CO2 in our atmosphere now is higher than it's ever been, that can't be a good thing. "
Is it 2012 yet? wrote on Jan 15, 2009 9:41 AM:
juls wrote on Jan 15, 2009 6:46 PM:
Rocco wrote on Jan 16, 2009 7:55 AM:
Bauhausfan wrote on Jan 16, 2009 7:59 AM:
Despite how much you want to think it is a hoax or a myth made up to make conservatives look like people who believe the earth is flat, the fact is it is not.
Also most scientists don't think the cause is unknown. Please stop lying. "
Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Jan 16, 2009 8:52 PM:
Rocco wrote on Jan 17, 2009 8:16 AM:
Raven wrote on Jan 17, 2009 9:38 AM:
skeptic wrote on Jan 17, 2009 10:37 PM:
kevin. did we ever agree on anything ?
at least this proves there is no conspiracy between the "right' and the 'left" on this issue. because we both just happen to agree that the last year obliterated by 2/3 rds of a degree centigrade , any warming the planet had in the last 100 years. i already cited the source in a previous post but check nasa and 3 others of your favorites , for last year. (i know, 1 year is not statistically significant , considering millions of years)
also ,watch the great global warming hoax while it's still on youtube , even , or especially if you are a proponent. why not know the arguments of the other side, if not to persuade them by your superior logic ?
neonapan. i take you seriously. you make a true point, i hate to conceed, but it's true. oil co.s have paid some of the top 48 websites to put things their way. but it's not so simple. b.p. and shell have also paid millions to promote global warming. sorry, cool, hip term is now climate change since record coolling is happening outside ca. right now.
b.p. gets carbon credits for building nuke plants.they are all for "climate change".
the ice caps on mars and moons of jupiter got smaller but are now bigger, like ours, because of fluctuations in the sun, the source of all our energy. "
wiseone wrote on Jan 18, 2009 6:04 PM:
You climate change deniers are about as intellectually honest and sophisticated as Holocaust deniers.
Yes, "climate change" has replaced "global warming" as a term used to describe what current science reflects about what is happening to our planet and how it affects weather globally. Because concepts evolve and terminology changes does not mean that theories are wrong or irrelevant, Einstein...
The argument is over, folks. Get with the program and read something besides Michael Creighton, for God's sake. "
steph wrote on Jan 18, 2009 6:46 PM:
What's 50 years?
It's nothing, that's what. It's anecdotal. Emotionally compelling, but not science.
I'm still waiting for anyone to claim that anything we do will affect the climate the way we want to.
Until I'm convinced that anything we do can stop all the hurricanes and freezing temps and melting glaciers, I'm bored with all the Chicken Little antics.
Reducing dependence on foreign oil? Reducing radioactive byproducts of coal mining and burning? Continuing to clean the environment? Creating good jobs for Americans without taxing the rest of us into oblivion? I'm all ears and eyes. But quit with the manipulation. I'm not interested.
And pick a different poster child, one who walks the walk, not one who flies all over the place, all pious in polluting airplanes, and living it up in giant homes.
Please. "