NVR Logo
What will climate change bring to Napa vineyards?
The types of grapes suitable for the Napa Valley may change if global warming continues as projected. The topic was the subject of a Napa Sustainable Winegrowing Group meeting on Tuesday. Register file photo | Buy photos
Sustainable group meeting focuses on growing concern
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Save and Share Share
Is the end near for pinot noir in Carneros?

Dozens of people crowded into a meeting Tuesday to discuss the possible effects of climate change on Napa Valley’s grape growing industry.
Featured speaker Kim Nicholas Cahill at the Napa Sustainable Winegrowing Group event suggested that if Carneros is no longer cooled by the bay breezes and marine layer as it is today, change may be in order in the vineyards.

Cahill is a viticulture associate at UC Davis whose family includes Sonoma county farmers. She has a Ph.D. from Stanford University and has extensively studied local effects of climate change.
She said she was “not aware of anyone in Carneros switching right now from pinot noir on a large scale. But it is something people are considering.”

At least 60 people crowded into a small conference room at Walsh Vineyards Management to get an update on local climate change impacts on the Napa Valley.
Nicholas Cahill told the audience that predictions are for a nearly 1 degree Fahrenheit increase in temperature by 2020. “We can expect to live in a climate we have never lived before,” she said.

Under that scenario, the best location for pinot noir is likely farther north, along the coast of Oregon and Washington.

Will it really happen? “I hesitate to say exactly what people will do, because it is easy to over simplify the issue. Growers might have some very innovative options they may take advantage of,” said Nicholas Cahill after the meeting.

For example, more cutting-edge growers may experiment with different trellising systems to provide more shade. “There’s a laundry list of possible things ... different irrigation techniques ... but to say how much benefit, that has not been completed,” Nicholas Cahill said.

Warmer temperatures will stress vines more than current conditions, she said.

Exactly how much warmer temperatures will get depends on greenhouse gas emissions humans continue putting into the atmosphere during the next 20 to 30 years, added Nicholas Cahill.

“The point is vine development is tied to temperature,” she said. The goal is to have a certain balance between tannins and acids at harvest time. With warmer temperatures, sugar levels also tend to go higher while acid levels drop. That is not desirable with pinot noir.

Nicholas Cahill said research reveals that the Napa and Sonoma valleys have seen more of an increase in night-time temperatures than daytime.

“The wine industry must overcome barriers and adapt to these changes. It will require an integration of researchers and growers in a balanced dialogue,” she said.

One person in the audience told Nicholas Cahill that he has heard that growers of gewurztraminer in Austria are switching to warmer weather varietals due to the early signs of climate change. He added that cooler varietals seem to be moving toward France, which is experiencing cooler weather patterns.

Another person in the crowd suggested local grapegrowers should begin talking with growers in Paso Robles, which is warmer than the Napa Valley. “They have that experience.”
47 comment(s)

calistoga_tony wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:28 AM:

" Record cold temps, and people are still pushing the global warming thing? The grapes that have been growing in wine country for decades will continue to grow for decades to come. Has anyone seen Al Gore since the record cold temps hit the US in recent months?

The Polar ice caps were supposed to be melted and gone by now, yet the ice is thicker now it has been in recent years. What else will the global warming types ignore to push their imaginary agenda? Please enough of the global warming. "

areyouserious wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:55 AM:

" But 81F in January is normal? Right Tony? "

psoren wrote on Jan 14, 2009 1:18 AM:

" For all of you who believe so strongly in the theory of global warming, read Michael Chrichton's, "State of Fear."

I have taken university level college courses on the Environment. I was also a firm believer in Global Warming - a theory that is pushed heavily in universities across this country. Until I read this book and researched his footnotes.

You just have to stand back and admire the power of the media... "

kevin wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:03 AM:

" There's a new report out warning about global COOLING.

How well do grapes grow under snow and ice? "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 5:50 AM:

" Tony-
I agree.

Is climate change the new "PC" term for global warming since they don't know if the temps going up or down? LOL "

missmarvelous wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:13 AM:

" Vitners shoud be worried about the "economic climate" as there are way too many wineries to survive. Wineries are going to take a big hit, as tourism slows down, and people make a choice of what they will spend their money on. We all know that everyone that builds a mcmansion needs a winery for the tax write off, but lets get real, how many wineries can the valley support? It's not a sustainable crop, it does not feed the masses and it depleats the table water and erodes the soil. Silt from the winery run-offs is filling up the Carquinez Straits, it's an "eco" nighmare, be glad that your neighbors in down valley Solano County havent raised a rukus yet, but they will, as Vallejo is a hot bed of the Left Wing liberal think-tank... "

antipc wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:46 AM:

" I'm envisioning scenes from Falcon Crest throughout the county. "

neonapan wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:49 AM:

" The overwhelming majority of scientists on the planet (that is, those not employed by oil companies) believe that our climate is changing as a result of human activity. Overall average global temperatures are inarguably rising, but this will have different impacts depending on location. Some argue that increased temperatures inland will draw more air off the ocean, cooling coastal areas of NorCal. To take a local heat wave or cold snap as evidence pro or con is very silly indeed. I know for a fact that local average temperatures have already significantly risen, largely as a result of increases in nighttime lows.

Call me crazy, but I think I'll take the scientific community's opinion over Calistoga Tony's. To believe otherwise means you have swallowed the oil business' minority opinion of the issues. It is them, and our lame duck president's administration, who have tried to obfuscate this issue. "

db76 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:04 AM:

" Tony, you just don't get it. They are talking about overall temperature, not specific temps on specific days. There are going to be more extreme temps too--winter will have colder days, summer will have warmer days, but overall, the global temp will rise one or two degrees, which will bring humans out of the narrow temperature band that has optimized human civilization growth for the last 10,000 years. I think it's funny that people read blogs and watch Fox news, and all of a sudden they're an expert on global climate change. "

jwk wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:05 AM:

" There is NO MAN made global warming. Anyone who believes that garbage also believes in Al "Hypocrit" Gore's fraud and Voted for Clintoon & BhusseinO. The climate is actually getting cooler again ANy major changes are due to the Sun and Volcanic eruptions. We couldn't affect Mother Nature's climate either way, EXCEPT for Massive Nuclear strikes, which could happen with the New Limpwristed Milktoast Socialistic Liberal Administration. There's MORE scientist who say there's NO Global Warming than those Lib ones who say there is. Besides China & India are far worse than the USA in emmissions. Why don't you EPA Nuts, Enviromental Whackos and Tree Huggers go over to those countries with your issues and try ruining their economy's. Fat Chance you'd get anywhere with them!!! "

krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:06 AM:

" Global temperatures have been rising for years. The polar ice caps have been receeding more and more every year. Climate change doesn't mean the end of cold weather. It means more extreme weather patterns and higher average global temperatures. "

mikeb wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:12 AM:

" Yes, neonapan, the portion of the "scientific community" that is supported by over $50 Billion annualy in grants to study "the effects of global warming" are all in agreement that they can not refute the basis for their funding. "

localmama wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:29 AM:

" I agree with CalistogaTony...

Missmarvelous, it is apparent you don't enjoy the fruits of the wineries labor. Napa Valley is well known throughout the world for their wines, the supply and demand will always be there for a normal households staple whether it be for entertaining or everyday use.

This gloom and doom is just so boring and tiresom. "

krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:09 AM:

" I suggest that anyone doubting global warming read "Field Notes from a Catastrophe." The author, Elizabeth Kolbert visits scientists around the world who have been studying these things for decades.

Not only does she visit with people who are out in the environment and have been conducting studies and taking samples, but she visits with scientists who have performed highly sophisticated climate models that show a direct increase between the amount of CO2 in the air and temperature rise. You can argue all you want about it, but are you going to listen to a government with it's hands in the oil companies pockets, or a large group of scientists who have seen the effects first hand? "

reason-ator wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:35 AM:

" Thank goodness for Global Warming. If not for Global Warming, we'd still be in the ice age. It's not all because Fred Flintsone's car got lousy gas mileage that we aren't living on a glacier.

I'm of the opinion that we can't slow climate change. Our little country is not expanding its industry exponentially, like the countries on the other side of the world that have billions of people. The air we saw in China during the Olympics was AFTER they'd made a huge effort to clean it up by shutting down factories. Can you imagine what it's like when the world isn't watching ? And that air pollutiing blows over here, and we're not going to stop it by buying the Priuses over here that result in the pollution over there.

We can knock ourselves out and strangle ourselves economically and the other countries that will flourish will still pollute the world. We can't fix their problem. Let them do it. "

Native74 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 9:47 AM:

" Oh no, not the pinot!

I started planting an orchard and each year I put in a new row. Just planning for the future. We used to have so many beautiful fruit orchards in Napa so why not begin again? "

Econut wrote on Jan 14, 2009 10:19 AM:

" For those of you who believe humans cannot change climate, have you never heard of an "urban heat island"? Temperatures in cities are often several degrees higher than the surrounding countryside, especially during night and during winter. It is a well known and well documented phenomenon, and the causes (heat-absorbing surfaces, heat-generating engines, greenhouse gas emissions, etc.) are well understood.

Human activities have a net INCREASE in global temperature, but whether it accounts for 0.2% or 20% or 100% of the current warming trend, nobody knows with certainty. Global warming is happening, it is not a hoax, and humans are contributing to it. However, I believe overconsumption of natural resources and habitat destruction are far more serious environmental issues than global warming.

I endorse Krusty's suggestion to read "Field Notes from a Catastrophe." It's an excellent book. "

freeport56 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 10:22 AM:

" Bsides frozen grapes......




krusty- you better check more than on source for promulgating the warming hoax. global temperaures are falling buddy. It seems that GW will be the source of tax revenue for the new Democrat Empire. "

JimClark wrote on Jan 14, 2009 11:09 AM:

" Global warming, evolution versus the current "thinking" denies us our ability to grow beyond what we, as humankind can become in our evolution. We might not give credence to those who seem to get some personal satisfaction by causing fear. If our world should flame out, it is no reason to continue pursuing a future for humankind.

We have absolutely no control over our Earth and its future. We exist here and, while we ARE here, we must take our humanity to its highest level.

Please do not sell your future to a collection of simple-minded opportunists. "

reason-ator wrote on Jan 14, 2009 11:42 AM:

" Napa Valley wasn't bad when it wasn't covered in vineyards, just not as famous. It had a lot fewer people, much less traffic, and fewer tourists.

I could live with that. "

2056 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 12:04 PM:

" Not only would I like to see some hard data (historical) but more important is how we have come to determine or model the 1 degree increase over the next 11 years. Kim if you have published anything recently I would like to read it. "

mikeb wrote on Jan 14, 2009 1:40 PM:

" reason-ator is on the right track here. Wine-snob-econ-nuts beware!!! The sky IS falling, the globe IS warming, rip out your grapes and flee NOW!!! Save Yourselves!!! Boogiewooogiewoogiie!!!! "

Napagrrl wrote on Jan 14, 2009 1:52 PM:

" Angelina, I have been reading comments all over the place from you today. In response to "shouldn't you be in school," you replied you were sick. If my child(ren) were up at 5:50 am (and for hours beyond) responding to comments to the editor or other newspaper articles, you can sure as heck bet they'd would be going to school. Sniffles or what have you be dam*ed! "

JustAnotherManicMonday wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:03 PM:

" Who wants Pinot anyways? Tastes awful! Drink some other red and stop complaining. Send those pinot grapes to Oregon or Washington. "

nogrooveinsolano wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:18 PM:

" If I can recall this book in my elementary school years about the Solar System, one graphic haunts me to this day: The huge fireball expanding within the next thousands or ten-thousands of years, will burn itself out. So take note kids, we've had our global cooling back in the "caveman" day--without the Brontosaurus ribs overturning a car--, look how our oceans and Nothern Canadian islands were formed: The warming of the earth, sans "greenhouse gases." This is nature, folks. Expanding Sun + warm climates = the "rising, bigger tides."
Excuse me whilst I enjoy my Pinot Noir. Good night. "

another voice wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:20 PM:

" An answer to Angelina.... Actually George Souros collaborated with Al Gore, funding Gore's $300 million for a PR campaign to change "Global Warming" to "Climate Change".
The way "Climate Change" rolls off most people's tongues, the campaign has clearly worked.
Sigh. "

steph wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:51 PM:

" mikeb--
You forgot to tell people to buy a Prius. Oh, and continue to brag about your plane rides to various locations around the globe cause you're all eco-conscious like that. "

steph wrote on Jan 14, 2009 2:55 PM:

" Buy a big house or two, rip out the ugly kitchen and replace it with an eco-friendly one and tell everyone they need to reduce their carbon footprint cause global warming is such a concern and the only way we can bend the curve is...

...wait...

how do we bend the curve? Where's the data on that?

*yawn* Global Warming Schmobal Schmarming. "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:05 PM:

" Napagrrl,
My mom would do exactly the same thing with me...However, when you have a stomach bug, you are pretty much "forced" to stay home if you know what I mean...my brain and fingertips are OK.
Thanks for your concern...btw, I am always up at 5:00 when my dad leaves for work.
Thanks for the concern though. :) "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:08 PM:

" anothervoice-
Wow. What a waste of money. Could have gone to the schools... "

krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:20 PM:

" I wonder what your sources are, freeport56. No legitimate scientist in their right mind would deny global warming. There are many sources in "Field Notes from a Catastrophe." The author interviews and observes scientists in many different locations throughout the world. I've read other books on it too. That book just happens to have some great insight into the problem, it's affects, and finding a solution. "

steph wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:25 PM:

" Angelina the 4.0 student already has a mother. "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Jan 14, 2009 4:37 PM:

" steph-
Thanks! As a matter of fact she's standing behind me telling me to quit blogging... (blushing smiley) "

imamonk wrote on Jan 14, 2009 6:11 PM:

" That would be Great ! Just think ! No more "Winos" coming to town,less deaths on the highways and we could get back to some resemblence of sanity. "

3rdgenNapan wrote on Jan 14, 2009 7:38 PM:

" krusty - I guess you are not aware of the canadian scientists who pushed their gov. to sign Kyoto and are now apologizing b/c they were wrong. Read State of Fear and check the footnotes. Check the English Court's judgment finding Gore's movie 'facts' were inaccurate and wrong. Read the senate minority report; check out all the scientists coming out against GW who also state they were warned not to b/c their funding and/or jobs would be eliminated. Follow the money - if GW was true, why did Gore buy property in SF that by his estimates will flood in the next couple of years? Look at all the $$ being made, all the new ways to indirectly tax us and regulate our lives. Why can't their computer models replicate the climate changes that have already occurred if they are so accurate? Ever wonder why they don't tell you what the temp. is supposed to be? vs. warm? b/c the climate is always in flux; the environment is in flux. Man's CO2 contribution is nothing compared to one volcano, or the CO2 from the oceans.. When you repeat a lie long enough and often enough, people come to believe it is the truth. ... after all why would they lie... now they are brainwashing our kids in school, no questions on GW are allowed - unless you like to be ridiculed. peachy.
If it gets too cold, our vineyards can revert to hops -like they did in england when the climate got too cold for their grapes in the mid-ages. "

109823 wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:01 PM:

" Who cares? Maybe they'll make raisins. "

krusty wrote on Jan 14, 2009 8:21 PM:

" State of Fear is fiction. Several scientists whose research had been referenced in the novel stated that Crichton had distorted it in the novel. Sixteen of 18 top U.S. climate scientists interviewed by Knight Ridder said the author was bending scientific data and distorting research.

The computer models have predicted the changes we have already seen. The computer models were tested against the past in order to determine their accuracy.

Taking air samples from ice that is thousands of years old has given us the ability to measure the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere at that time. It has been shown that the amount of CO2 in our atmosphere has a direct impact on temperature. When you see that the amount fo CO2 in our atmosphere now is higher than it's ever been, that can't be a good thing. "

Is it 2012 yet? wrote on Jan 15, 2009 9:41 AM:

" All of us who don't bite into the GW scam make waaaay too much sense for the ones who bit into it and are told to swallow it hot...now it's too late for them to accept it and back down, therefore the "new" term: Climate Change ('cause you'll never know if it will get too hot or too cold). LOL "

juls wrote on Jan 15, 2009 6:46 PM:

" A "large group" of Scientist belive in global warming. Great, wonderful, fantastic. What a great arguement you have. Unfortunately, if you were to count the actual number of scientist that believe the cause of global warming is unknown and that CO2 is not the culprit you would find an even bigger number of them agreeing that the cause is unknown. For now I'll go with the half-million or so scientist that say global warming's creation is from unknow causes. You can keep believing the politicians (backed by a few scientist) if you want. "

Rocco wrote on Jan 16, 2009 7:55 AM:

" Wow, let me see if I got this right…After reading a few of the NVR’s postings I’ve learned that: if the climate changes in any way, it must be man’s fault, the Palestinians just want peace, Palin will always deserve to be ridiculed, Obama’s agenda of National Socialism will eventually fix our country, and that Al Gore should be believed over a know-nothing like Michael Crichton. Umm… Well, if ignorance is bliss, we must be a very happy nation. "

Bauhausfan wrote on Jan 16, 2009 7:59 AM:

" Yeah, it's all just made up by liberals and scientists. Global warming doesn't exist because many on here have read distorted information from very questionable sources. And yes, climate change is the correct term, because that is what it is. Extreme weather patterns are what is happening and will keep happening and getting worse.

Despite how much you want to think it is a hoax or a myth made up to make conservatives look like people who believe the earth is flat, the fact is it is not.

Also most scientists don't think the cause is unknown. Please stop lying. "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Jan 16, 2009 8:52 PM:

" During the most recent fifty years, average temperatures in the Napa Valley have increased by three degrees. Haven't they? "

Rocco wrote on Jan 17, 2009 8:16 AM:

" Dear MJH, I don't know, have they? I would like to see the data. Could you please cite your source. "

Raven wrote on Jan 17, 2009 9:38 AM:

" go to the NOAA wen site and look up Napa then follow the historical climate data.. "

skeptic wrote on Jan 17, 2009 10:37 PM:

" psoren. i agree . people should at least look.
kevin. did we ever agree on anything ?
at least this proves there is no conspiracy between the "right' and the 'left" on this issue. because we both just happen to agree that the last year obliterated by 2/3 rds of a degree centigrade , any warming the planet had in the last 100 years. i already cited the source in a previous post but check nasa and 3 others of your favorites , for last year. (i know, 1 year is not statistically significant , considering millions of years)
also ,watch the great global warming hoax while it's still on youtube , even , or especially if you are a proponent. why not know the arguments of the other side, if not to persuade them by your superior logic ?
neonapan. i take you seriously. you make a true point, i hate to conceed, but it's true. oil co.s have paid some of the top 48 websites to put things their way. but it's not so simple. b.p. and shell have also paid millions to promote global warming. sorry, cool, hip term is now climate change since record coolling is happening outside ca. right now.
b.p. gets carbon credits for building nuke plants.they are all for "climate change".
the ice caps on mars and moons of jupiter got smaller but are now bigger, like ours, because of fluctuations in the sun, the source of all our energy. "

wiseone wrote on Jan 18, 2009 6:04 PM:

" Wow! Denial is not a river in Egypt, is it? It's the one that runs right through the Napa Valley!

You climate change deniers are about as intellectually honest and sophisticated as Holocaust deniers.

Yes, "climate change" has replaced "global warming" as a term used to describe what current science reflects about what is happening to our planet and how it affects weather globally. Because concepts evolve and terminology changes does not mean that theories are wrong or irrelevant, Einstein...

The argument is over, folks. Get with the program and read something besides Michael Creighton, for God's sake. "

steph wrote on Jan 18, 2009 6:46 PM:

" 50 years?

What's 50 years?

It's nothing, that's what. It's anecdotal. Emotionally compelling, but not science.

I'm still waiting for anyone to claim that anything we do will affect the climate the way we want to.

Until I'm convinced that anything we do can stop all the hurricanes and freezing temps and melting glaciers, I'm bored with all the Chicken Little antics.

Reducing dependence on foreign oil? Reducing radioactive byproducts of coal mining and burning? Continuing to clean the environment? Creating good jobs for Americans without taxing the rest of us into oblivion? I'm all ears and eyes. But quit with the manipulation. I'm not interested.

And pick a different poster child, one who walks the walk, not one who flies all over the place, all pious in polluting airplanes, and living it up in giant homes.

Please. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy