Much bigger than a single tree | Napa Valley Register

Home » Opinion » Letters To The Editor

Much bigger than a single tree

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Comment

Dear editor,

The Register frequently publishes letters and articles about trees. Letters mourn the loss of street and park land trees. Articles discuss trees in the residential landscape or describe their imminent demise.

Meanwhile, industrial vineyard development in the hills above Napa proposes the removal of trees by the tens of thousands. Soon, approximately 1,200 acres of the former Walt and Circle S ranches will be converted to vines, roads, reservoirs and rock piles, with indirect and irreversible negative impact to an additional fragmented 2,600 acres. At Circle S, 13,849 trees are slated for removal. It isn’t quite that many at Walt (there are fewer trees to begin with) but the loss there will be equally significant. In the central Napa Range, many square miles of primitive chaparral and pine-oak woodland has been converted to vines in the past two decades. This proposed burst of vineyard development across the slopes of Atlas Peak represents an astonishing loss of our natural heritage.

The draft environmental impact report is complete for the Circle S proposal. The Napa County Conservation, Development and Planning Department, is accepting comment on the EIR through Jan. 9. The Walt Ranch EIR is in preparation. Call 253-4417 or visit www.co.napa.ca.us for complete information.

Murray Berner

Napa

2 comment(s)

napaoldguy wrote on Jan 6, 2009 7:25 PM:

" don't you know it's ok to destroy anything for the wine industry. They think the grape vines are as good as trees. That way we can import some more workers too. "

concerned1 wrote on Jan 6, 2009 11:33 PM:

" EDEN has been commenting on each vineyard conversion, asking the project to limit tree cutting, leaving sufficient wildlife corridors, and now to justify the loss of carbon sequestration with adequate mitigations. We have made progress by the best argument against denuding the hillsides is the conclusions by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change that no more forest be cut. Planting two seedlings as currently approved by the County do not offset the loss of a mature tree. "

Join the conversation

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login? (requires cookies)
	Forgot Your Password?

Create an account

Comment Guidelines

The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.

What gets your comment posted?

• Staying on topic

• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less

• Avoiding name-calling

• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger

What gets your comment deleted?

• Personal attacks

• Derogatory remarks

• Name-calling of any sort

• Going off-topic

• Hate speech

• Racially-insensitive comments

• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict

• Posting e-mail addresses

• Posting comments of a commercial nature

• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS

• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.

The fine print

- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.

- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.

- Comments may take several hours to be posted.

- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.

- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.

- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.

Search: