NVR Logo
My favorite books of 2008
Sunday, January 04, 2009
Save and Share Share
These are my favorite books for this year, in no particular order. I have my own particular standards, which include the fact that I hardly read fiction any more so these are all non fiction. Also, they may not have original publishing dates of 2008 but are all recent and I read them myself this year.

Fiction books to me seem to be all the same any more, characters thin as paper and plots dominated by political correctness and silly gimmicks. Once in a while I pick one up and am reminded of why I don’t read them. "The Human Stain" by Phillip Roth is a good example, silly racial theme, over reliance on sexual titillation, why people think he is a good writer is beyond me.
In terms of non fiction, I am not just interested in getting facts but also in a good story and frankly, I like gossip. Maybe that replaces the need for fiction, but good gossip about real people and real events can’t be beaten. People just fascinate me, and I like to hear about them.

So, with that warning to my readers about my idiosyncrasies, here goes.
"The Prince of Darkness" by Robert Novak. Novak does go to the top of this list for a reason, if you like politics at all you will find this to be a fascinating read. The thing about Novak is that he is one of these kinds of people who just can’t lie even if they try. He reacts emotionally to everything and doesn’t care what he says about anyone. Those who try to categorize him as a partisan will be in for a big surprise, a pleasant surprise, if they read this book.

It’s a great read and if you want to get the inside scoop on every President, Barry Goldwater, the Kennedys, and the whole cast of political characters for the past 50 plus years, it is all there. You will read things here that you will not see anywhere else, and he has been there in person for all of it.
" The House of Mondavi" by Julia Flynn Siler, another book that I could not put down. It is also a must read for anyone living in the Valley, to understand how Mondavi shaped Napa history and was the key player in developing our wine industry, with all the greatness involved as well as the not so great. Silar is able to capture the human elements of the Mondavi family and the section about the selling of the winery to Constellation is simply fascinating.

"The Dark Side" by Jane Mayer, tells the inside story of the torture regime fostered by Dick Cheney along with Donald Rumsfeld and the Bush administration. This is a very well written and documented story told through the eyes of the other conservative loyalists within the Bush administration. Mayer obviously has tremendous contacts within the administration and it is clear that a lot of people with intimate knowledge of what went on wanted to talk. As such, it adds an authenticity that is impossible to ignore except by the most partisan hold outs for torture.

"What Does China Think" by Mark Leonard, is a brief overview of the attitude of the Chinese toward themselves that is a very revealing and enlightening bit of information for the American audience. Leonard traces Chinese history briefly while bringing it quickly up to present day attitudes that the Chinese have toward themselves, often feeling that they are just adopting cultures and attitudes other than their own. The latest is adopting American culture and points of view, and that will surprise many American readers to hear, yet it is clear that there is great truth in Leonard’s explanation. It is a great book if you want to understand what is happening socially in China right now.

"The Conservative Soul" by Andrew Sullivan, I mention quickly because if you want to understand how the fundamentalist Christian mind set affects conservative politics, this is your book. Before you dismiss it as an attack on conservative Christians, bear in mind that Sullivan is not only a conservative himself, he is also a devout Catholic.

I’m very interested to hear others picks, and if you can say why you liked the book that is of most interest to me.
35 comment(s)

Jenn wrote on Dec 23, 2008 9:52 PM:

" Ill have to try a couple of the ones you listed above, they sound interesting.

I think my favorite for this year is called Dreamseller by Brandon Novack. I dont know if the library carries it, but I have only found it at Barns and Noble or ebay. It is a very interesting story of the authors life from an up and coming child skateboard star, to his fight with addictions, to his new clean life. It gives very good insight into ones battle with drug addictions. I usually dont read books like this, but I was instantly hooked by it and finished it in one day! If anyone checks it out, I hope you enjoy! "

napablogger wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:09 AM:

" Jenn, thanks for the recommendation, I will have to check it out.

Sounds like that book Oprah promoted, a million little pieces or whatever exactly it was called but only true this time. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 24, 2008 5:21 AM:

" NB - I'll be looking for some of your titles at the Napa Library.

I have some for you.

"The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein. Ever wonder why the past eight years have been one disaster after another? Ever wonder why Republican 'solutions' have been mired in cronyism, 'mismanagement', 'no-bid contracts' with poor to no 'accountability' or 'oversight'? It was so that 'Disaster Capitalists' could make trillions and have cover to lower America's standard of living. The current economic flameout is their true 'Mission Accomplished'.

For the best expositions about how the 'left' used the internet to destroy the Republican 'permanent majority' in 2006 and 2008. Something every Republican will absolutely hate to read, but should.

"Crashing the Gate" and "Taking on the System" by Markos Moulitsas Zuniga.

Interestingly, NB, Markos recommends reading Robert Novak as well.

And, NB - while we are on the subject of reading, a few questions if I may?

1) How much reading of internet sites or email newsletters do you do as a percentage of reading stuff 'on paper'?

2) How much English language 'news' from foreign-based sites do you read? Which English language foreign sites do you find valuable?

3) What are your top 5 internet sites to visit? My top website in terms of visits is the NVR OnLine page but I suspect that is because I both read it and write to it as part of my personal 'Think Globally, Act Locally' efforts.

~Ruff "

napablogger wrote on Dec 24, 2008 11:52 AM:

" Ruff, maybe I will give Klein another look. Frankly I think her ideas are a bit off the wall, I started to read that book but I read through the customer comments on Amazon and thought she does what a lot of extremists do on both sides, take a bit of truth and push it too far. Kos strikes me the same way. I need more about why you liked his books before I will read them.

I am on the net way more than print copies, I get the NVR in print and most days don't even look at it. I read easily six hours a day on the net.

The Daily Dish is my mainstay, I also get a lot of news via email, Sac Bee, NY Times that I check every day. I check Drudge every day, Lucianne.com, and there are 4-5 economists sites I read every day. I also like Coyote Blog, a libertarian guy who is pretty smart, Megan McArdle.

Beyond that I check a number of other sites on a rotating basis depending on my mood. I was readng Huffington Post a lot for a while, now I go now and again. Power Line, Dan Drezner when he writes is good. Etc. I have about 100 blogs bookmarked then they lead you to other articles. "

glenroy wrote on Dec 24, 2008 12:17 PM:

" Well….reality is why would anyone want to read about private enterprise by someone who has never succeeded at it? Or even recommended by one who hasn’t? Our colleges are full of professors who are virtually unemployable outside their self proclaimed Temples of Intellectualism…LOL>…where what is said remains gospel despite the reality of the world around them.

As the world watches the economic wonders in South Korea, China, Brazil, among many others, the American left still clings to economic failures like Cuba, Nicaragua and North Korea….go figure. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 24, 2008 4:54 PM:

" glenroy - This is not nearly up to your usual standards in ranting.

I can't remember the last time that anybody anywhere on NVR came out saying North Korea was a model of good government.

Still scared of those commies under your bed?

;o)

Soooo... back on topic, glenroy, read any good books lately?

;o)

~Ruff "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 24, 2008 5:08 PM:

" Well, NB, I am suggesting those titles because they are interesting reading, not because I unquestioningly agree with everything they say.

However, there is an amazing congruence between the way the government has been mismanaged over the last eight years, if you are trying to make the case that people who hate government are trying to do a good job of running it. Now once you move away to wondering what other reason Wall Street looters would have for wanting to gain control of the US Treasury... recent history makes more sense.

On Markos books, you may not agree with his politics, but he does a good exposition on just how the Democrats were taken from near total collapse in the 'Contract With America' days to beating the Republican election machine in 2006 and 2008 along with excellent prospects for 2010 and 2012.

I should think you'd enjoy reading how little respect Markos et all have for Washington,DC Republicans or Democrats.

Finally, NB, Patton said of Rommel when he beat him as Kassarine Pass -- "I read your book, you b*st*rd!"

This is one bull-goose looney lefty commie pinko marxist amoral secular progressive 'Blame America First' traitor who wishes you...

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, NB!

~Ruff "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Dec 24, 2008 5:44 PM:

" Haley writes, "The thing about Novak is that he is one of these kinds of people who just can’t lie even if they try."

He must be kidding. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 24, 2008 9:58 PM:

" Madison Jay, that line was written for people like you. Have you read his book?

And did you hear today's news? Cheney put Libby up to it. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 24, 2008 10:02 PM:

" Ruff, fair enough, as long at is a good read I don't always agree with what I am reading either.

I ordered one of the books glenroy recommended, Interrogators. Reading the Amazon comments it looked like a very well liked book but I am not so sure it will prove his point. We'll see. "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Dec 25, 2008 1:20 AM:

" I read Murray Waas's article about the recent Cheney/Libby link on December 23. (I did not read about it in the NVR.) I have not read Novak's book. Who has read Joseph C. Wilson's memoir titled "The Politics of Truth: Inside the Lies that Led to War and Betrayed My Wife's CIA Identity: A Diplomat's Memoir"? Wilson's characterization of Novak differs greatly from the view you've expressed in the comment found above. "

Bill wrote on Dec 25, 2008 10:37 AM:

" Naomi Klien plays fast and loose with the truth. I don not trust her as an author about anything and find her close to outright lying. Like so many would be commentators on both sides it is more about career aggrandizement. She is no different, perhaps worse, than Ann Coulter. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 25, 2008 10:58 AM:

" MJH,I don't think there is any doubt that Wilson is the liar. I actually looked through his book and read parts of it. He and his wife are two of the biggest pubilcity hounds around. They are the opposite of Novak, they exaggerate and hype up everything.

They just used the situation with Novak to promote their own cause. Novak addresses it in the book and events have borne out his story. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 25, 2008 11:01 AM:

" Bill, she strikes me the same way. I think her first book, The Beauty Myth was a good book. But once she got into politics she is so partisan that you get the feeling that she would come up with anything to promote an agenda.

After the Beauty Myth she became a darling to the left wing political upper classes and aspires to serve them now to keep her celebrity status. That is how she strikes me. I have seen her on tv just spewing nonsense. I can't remember anything now except her advice to Al Gore to wear brown clothes. "

Bill wrote on Dec 25, 2008 11:04 AM:

" I got "Boom" for Christmas. I have to wait for the paperback as I asked for it last year.

Brokaw is an easy and entertaining read but his previous books title was really lifted from the generation that founded America and slapped on to the parents of so called boomers.

He may be one reason for much of the recent generational hate or envy that one sees. I have only just passed the introduction but already he presents an overly quaint and not very original view of what many of us have the experienced and lived in reality.

With more eloquence than Gilroy above he echos a vastly accepted notion with simplistic trivializations of a whole generation with statements such as "..., boomers took college for granted and converted campuses into staging grounds for their campaigns against anything that smacked of the establishment." Horse pucky.

I hope the rest of his book provides better insight rather than an almost transparent effort to classify history through the prism of accepted mass media sloganeering he was so much a part of. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 25, 2008 1:51 PM:

" Bill, I am tired of the constant talking about the sixties, you see it around here (Bay Area) a lot more than you do elsewhere in the country. It was the big glory days for most of the older people around northern California and they just can't seem to get enough of reminding us how great they are and how they changed the world.

If I were younger I would hate the sixties and all that claptrap.

One thing these sixties recappers seem to forget is that is when the conservative movement became energized too. They just don't get the same press.

I say this in response to your post about BOOM, I am sure Brokaw's book was entertaining, it sounds a big shallow from what you are saying. "

Bill wrote on Dec 25, 2008 5:03 PM:

" NB. I am from here (SF Bay area) and the myth of what happened here is larger in the minds of those that did not live the history. It was an immediate commercial success and marketed to the curious rest of the country.

There was a greater altruism all around in the sixties as well as a healthy mix of "don't kid yourself." Everyone should be tired of reliving the sixties as they never really get it right.

oh and happy holidays "

napablogger wrote on Dec 25, 2008 10:01 PM:

" Bill, agreed. And Merry Christmas to you as well! "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Dec 26, 2008 12:51 AM:

" It takes a jujitsu of logic to conclude that a CIA agent working undercover for years is a publicity hound. Who are the patriots, the Wilsons or Novak? Novak claims he wasn't warned about the dangers associated with outing a CIA agent. It is now accepted as fact that he, indeed, was warned. Publicity hounds? During a Bush years, up is down and truth is lie. I hope that the reality-based community accepts facts rather than truthiness during the Obama years. "

a teacher wrote on Dec 26, 2008 10:52 AM:

" I haven't read many books this year I found worth recommending, but here is one that I liked:

Physics for Future Presidents by Richard Muller

It's a good summary of the science issues that impact Americans (and the world in general). From global warming to Terrorism to over population. It's not particularly ideological, although I'm sure that those who disagree with some of Muller's points will claim some sort of bias. At any rate, he has clear explanations and plenty of foot notes to explore further. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 27, 2008 10:29 AM:

" MJH, Novak wasn't warned that mentioning that Plame was working for the CIA was a problem, not that mentioning an under cover officer was a problem. Her name was given to him and he did not know she was supposedly under cover--which in fact she wasn't at the time.

Joe Wilson has repeatedly lied, even in his book he lied about this story. Yes, they became publicity hounds, martyrs for a cause of bashing Bush due to their extremely left wing politics.

Wilson in public always claimed that there was no yellow cake uranium there, he never mentioned that he took that information on his trip to Africa solely from one person, the Iraqi P.R. minister, not the Nigerians. Turns out the Iraqi he took that info from was none other than Baghdad Bob who turned out to be a laughable liar.

The Wilson's did not know what they were talking about, they were just out to bash Bush and when they got caught they tried to blame everyone in sight. They are still pushing that crap.

Novak didn't do anything wrong, this is one of those phoney liberal stories that just get made up and refuse to be let go.

Read Novak's book and get his side of it at least. His reputation has been unfairly smeared.

Its funny, the liberals think the Republicans are the only ones that do this. Not so, both sides do it and Plame is a prime example. "

napablogger wrote on Dec 27, 2008 11:05 AM:

" teacher, Thanks for the suggestion, I will check it out. For some reason I don't like science all that much. I can't hang with it usually. "

Bill wrote on Dec 27, 2008 8:27 PM:

" Dogone it NB, I'm wondering how you can have an informed opinion on the major topics of the day if you can not hang with science?

How can you express an informed opinion on energy, air and water quality, diet or even economic theory? I'm going to let it go and perhaps remind you the next time you go off aginst some one concerned with conservation as being an eco- fascist or enviro-freak. It must ber one of those throwaway sentences you use to invite ire.

The Mayer book should be good but U.S. involvement in torture has long been ignored by all sides and over a number of years not just this administration. It is well documented in many books (I have a long list), reputable reporting and investigations. Central America is full of tortured corpses where the U.S. had direct supervisory involvement and quite possibly hands on experimentation.

Administrations have managed to maintain "plausible deny-ability" untill now. The overt advocacy by the Bush administration is what is so astounding. That there are so many deniers and that there has not been a true outrage by either party or the public exemplifies the complacency we accept as a nation.

Abu Grahib was not a few school boys playing pranks. It is a massive cover up to only prosecute the perpetrators in the enlisted ranks and not hold the officers corps responsible. the practice of torture exists and is tacitly condoned in many of our so called intelligence gathering and foreign policy operations. The Schools of the Americas routinely trained foreign military officers in in the use of torture and many other highly questionable techniques.

I have not been surprised by the reaction to its use but have been disgusted by its acceptance. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 28, 2008 7:50 AM:

" NB- In addition to not hanging with science' you aren't hanging with the truth about what Wilson wrote or the dispicable actions the Bush White House to against his wife.

Joe Wilson's OPED turned out to be exactly true there was NO new Iraqi acquisition of yellowcake uranium from Niger. When Joe Wilson called Bush a liar he was correct - Bush was lying.

As it has turned out in trial, one member of the Bush White House cabal was convicted in a court of law concerning outing Valerie Plame.

Anybody would would sit in the White House and authorize torture be applied to individual prisoners would not have much trouble with violating more laws.

NB, I had more respect for you before you wrote you factually-challenged screed about Wilson-Plame.

Did you ever serve in the military, NB? Were you ever a foreign ambassador, NB? Did Saddam Hussein ever threaten to hang you, NB? Was your wife ever under-cover in a foreign land and subject to death if caught?

NB, I was hoping you had actually figured out that the vast majority of the accusations made against the Bush administration have turned out... sadly true.

But, no... you and the NVR editorial board continue to disappoint.

~Ruff "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Dec 28, 2008 9:08 AM:

" How does one account for the grand jury testimony of CIA spokesman Bill Harlow? "

napablogger wrote on Dec 28, 2008 11:19 AM:

" Bill, well I do read science and I never call anyone an eco fascist or anything like that. I try to stay away from too much hyperbole like that, as you must have noticed. My goal is to communicate with people.

On the science, I can read it if I am interested in the subject, like global warming or cold fusion. It is hard for me to sit down and read some just for fun. But you can't know everything.

I agree with you on the torture thing, the thing that is different now is that they have tried to make it legal and institutionalize it as policy, which is raising it to a whole nother level.

There was also the Pheonix program in Vietnam, although I think many of these programs have been exaggerated in the writings of the mostly liberal critics who write about them.

One thing that I read about the Islamic terrorists is that they were surprised that American soldiers engaged in torture--we have used it so little in the past that enemies don't think we will. I would like to get back to that status.

It is one thing that makes America better. "

a teacher wrote on Dec 28, 2008 1:12 PM:

" NB:Muller's book is very readable. :) "

freeport56 wrote on Dec 29, 2008 7:21 PM:

" "The Black Book of Communisim" doicuments how the commies have murdered 100 million world wide. seven authors from different countries. very enlightening.

"The Qu'ran". It is nice to know how and why the jihadists think what they do and why.

As for internet sites for news, Israeli Insider, Sky News, Al Jazzera,MEMRI-Middle East media Research Institute; they gather news from all over the Middle east. even look at the childrens programs and the propaganda they dispense. Arab American News, and WorldNetdaily just to name a few. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 31, 2008 7:31 AM:

" fp56 - Are you pretending that your list of news sources is something besides very one-sided?

I look at many, but not all, of those sources and a lot that you don't mention as well.

That's how I keep up with the latest in 'wingnut thought'.

What I don't find on your list is any sign of reading anything besides right-wing news, most of which, no surprise, I find terribly slanted.

Not that slanted is bad, but ONLY reading slanted news kind of ends up making the reader a chump.

I'm surprised you left out FAUX News, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, Rush Limbaugh, and Glen Beck.

And NO science? Puhleese!

Widen your horizons a bit, it can be scarey, but you CAN learn new tricks you old dog!

You'd definitely improve your ability to be a decent sparring partner. I'm bored with the "same-old, same-old"! It's like shooting... no... dynamiting fish in a barrel.

Happy New Year!

~Ruff "

Jane Eyrehead wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:43 AM:

" NB, I believe you are confusing Naomi WOLF (author and political consultant who told Al Gore to wear "earth tones") with Naomi KLEIN, author of "The Shock Doctrine", which I read, and liked very much. She is less hyperbolic than the kids on Fox News, by the way. I also enjoyed Frank Rich's "The Greatest Story Ever Sold" (about the run-up to the war in Iraq) and Bob Woodward's "State of Denial", which was an amusing work he produced after he spent several years on bended knee before the Bush White House.

For those of you who are getting sick of the memoir genre, let me recommend the hilarious "Arsonist's Guide to the Writers' Homes of New England." It is a wonderful satirical novel.

I am currently reading "A Traitor to His Class"--about FDR--and I look forward to "The Republic of Suffering." This is a history of America, esp. the south, after the Civil War, written by the president of Harvard.

It wouldn't kill people to pick up a piece of classic fiction once in a while. I find it very enjoyable to reread books I didn't care for in high school. Maybe I had a problem with the teacher then, because I like "Moby D-word" now.

(I had to edit the title of Melville's classic tome because the obscenity detective would not allow it as originally written.
The higher technology is protecting us all!) "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:32 PM:

" Jane Eyrehead - I assume you were referring to 'Moby D*ck' which will get past the 'bad word' detector.

It gets past the 'bad word' detector when you write 'D*ck Cheney' as well... a human being who defines the word obsenity.

~Ruff "

pharper wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:23 PM:

" "Why We S**k" by Denis Leary was a really good book. The writing wasn't quite as heavy as that in some of the books mentioned above, but I thought it was a great read. "

Bill wrote on Jan 2, 2009 4:58 PM:

" Holy jumpin' books people who read beyond the Google this enlightenment. What great suggestions an observations.

Jane Eyerehead is correct and now I have doubts about who I may have confused.

Pick up an old classic!! wonderful! My name is not Ishmael.

My current favorite although over a year old from last years read has to be "Supercapatalism" by Robert Reich (I'm cheap and wait for the paperbacks). It is not as dull aread as many books written by economists tend to be but as it confirmed my theory that wages went flat over thirty years ago I tend to be a little self important in recommending it.

No apologies for his political lineage, he was a Clinton appointee and an advocate of free trade with a more limited aspect than the fevered freemarketeers ans was Secretary of Labor.

This may make him anathema to those with a hide bound attitude to anyone adding to the cannon of political economics this side of Adam Smith but it is a level headed assessment of the U.S. economy from WWII to the present, whether or not you agree with all his observations. "

steph wrote on Jan 8, 2009 8:29 AM:

" I challenge all of you to read a book from the "other side" instead of only picking out books that you believe will reinforce your narrow views of the world. "

Bill wrote on Jan 8, 2009 6:41 PM:

" What would you recommend Steph? "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy